Yzermandius19

You must not see any racism then, if the only examples you can think of don't prove racism at all. He told Ilhan Omar to go back where she came from because of her anti-American values, not her race or nationality. You simply view any support of people you don't agree with as racist, and any criticism of those who have intersectional appeal as racist. You will just move the goalposts endlessly, no matter how many times your interpretation of Trump being racist is proved incorrect, there is no reasoning with you, no amount of evidence will sway you. You'll just hang your hat on an endless string of obvious hoaxes instead to fool yourself into thinking you're right.

He denounced racists throughout that speech, you watched an edited video and jumped to the conclusion that Trump was supporting racists, because you are a rube easily lied to by the media. He specifically said he wasn't talking about Nazi's when he said fine people on both sides, not even a minute later, "and I'm not talking about the neo-nazi's and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally", yet you ignore that part to take a quote out of context and tar him as a racist. Nice try with the Charlottesville "Fine People" Hoax, that has been debunked long ago, and you still believe it. There it is: Repeated denouncing of racists, and the supposed "fine people" remark you hang your hat on was an edited video media hoax you fell for. You'll never give it up though, you are still going to pretend Trump openly supports racists based on nothing but baseless media interpretations of his words, while ignoring what he actually said even when it completely refutes the media narrative.

He never did that. He has in fact denounced racists on many occasions, and you can't even name one instance in which he openly appealed to them. Stop listening to the anti-Trump media, they are rotting your brain with obvious lies.

Not getting impeached with no proof of a crime is the just outcome. You are the one giving Democrats a pass for actual crimes as not being impeachable conduct while pretending the those who didn't commit any crimes was somehow impeachable conduct if they are a Republican. You have no credibility when you're that big of a partisan hack, and when you call everyone who sees through such hackery a Trumpist as an excuse to write off their entire argument without addressing it, that just makes you look like an even bigger hack. Clinton tried to cover up his non-impeachable conduct by committing an actual crime which got him impeached, Trump tried to cover up his non-impeachable conduct without committing an actual crime to do so and still got impeached anyway. Despite that, impeaching Clinton backfired on Republicans, just as impeaching Trump is backfiring on Democrats. Pretending Trump is worse is obvious TDS, and acting incredulous that Trump would be acquitted when the Dems don't have him committing an actual crime, and Clinton got off even though he did commit an actual crime, just goes to show your expectations were based on being a political noob who hates The Bad Orange Man too much to see straight and thus fills in the many blanks with wishful thinking.

Clinton was impeached for perjury, not getting a blowjob. Trump committed no crime, asking for an investigation is not a crime. The only reason you find such reasoning hard to swallow is because you're a pro-Democrat partisan hack who wants to pretend what Trump did is far worse. Democrats get a pass for committing actual crimes with you and mere accusations are proof of guilt when it's a Republican.

Trump is so in your head you attack his supporters as racists. This is how Trump wins elections, people like you with your basket of deplorables schtick.

Bill Clinton actually committed a crime, Donald Trump did not. They have less on Trump than they had on Clinton, expecting impeachment to go any other way is called being a political noob indulging in wishful thinking.

Who could have possibly seen this coming? Those who didn't just start following US politics when Trump was elected, that's who.

Wrong, those witnesses are available to the House, they could call them right now if they wanted to, they simply do not have the balls to call them. The House is refusing to hear them, the Senate is saying, "if you want to call those witnesses, then call them yourselves and get back to us". This narrative that the House couldn't call the witnesses they wanted to is a lie, they simply wanted to rush impeachment and said they had enough evidence they didn't need to call any more witnesses, but then the second it's in the Senate's hands, they demand more witnesses and evidence, and try to pretend like if the Senate doesn't go along with them that it's all their fault the witnesses didn't get called, and you fell for it. This is on House Democrats, but you hate Trump so much that you automatically side with anyone who is against him and blame his supporters, hence blaming Senate Republicans for a lack of witnesses and evidence instead of the House Democrats, when it's clearly the latter's fault. It's the House's job to investigate, and the Senate's job to hold the trial, doing the House's job for the House on top of their own job, that is not on the Senate, the House Dems just want to pretend it is to cover for their own incompetence.

Impeachment isn't popular, the Republicans will gain from Democrats bringing it back up, if the Dems do so, they do so at their own peril. The Dems can't successfully blame Senate Republicans for not doing the House Dems job for them. House Dems will suffer far more than Senate Republicans, the electorate will blame Democrats for not getting enough witnesses, not Republicans. You are engaging in wishful thinking that this hurt Republicans and helps Democrats. Projecting your own views on the American electorate will lead to faulty analysis, and most swing voters in swing states in particular do not see impeachment the way you do. Impeachment is a loser for the Democrats.

Lack of funding is not the issue with the government, how they use the funding is the issue with government. Doesn't matter how much you give them, they will waste it and demand more money to waste, claiming the only reason things didn't get solved is they are still underfunded. If you don't give in to their demands, they pretend it's because you don't care about the problem, rather than not wanting to throw more money away just so they can keep wasting it. More funding is not the solution, less waste is the solution. Looking for answers in more government funding will simply result in disappointing results, even if you get the desired funding levels. Those funds will be wasted to justify the existence of the bureaucracy, if the problem could be solved with proper funding, then they'll be putting themselves out of work by spending it that way, so they never do. The bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.

You want to hear more witnesses? That's on House Democrats, they can do so at anytime.

They heard all the witnesses that House Democrats called and all the evidence that was presented in those hearings. If the House wants to gather more evidence they are free to do so, it is not the Senate's job to do the House's job for them, especially if they don't want to.

The evidence has been assessed and found wanting, Democrats claiming that coming to that conclusion is inherently partisan, when their attempt to impeach on that evidence was vastly more partisan is comical.

If impeachment is purely partisan, it is designed to be blocked, hence it requiring a two thirds senate majority to remove a President from office. The Democrats thinking he should be removed is not grounds for removal, if they can't get a bunch of Republicans on board, it is dead in the water for a reason.

The Trump Haters are Wile E Coyote and Donald Trump is The Roadrunner.

The House Democrats are indeed acting like Communists.

If y'all wanted Bolton called, blame the House Democrats, they could have done it, and instead chose not to because they wanted to rush impeachment. They said the evidence was so overwhelming that they didn't need anymore, hence the rushing, but now they are demanding more evidence, clown show.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug.

Yes they do. Interviews do not stop all terrorist attacks fool.

Israel used to not exist, and there was no peace in the middle east when that was the case. Nice try.

Kadhr has been punished enough, further punishing him would be an even worse look for a PM.

It's real easy for those who grew up and raised in decent families who become terrorists to tell foreign terrorists how to pass these interviews and sound like they are the more Canadian than most Canadians. Not saying interviews are useless, just pointing out that many people posting in this thread seem to have far more faith in them than is warranted. It's really not that hard to game the process as people seem to think, the Army Guy theory that these problems are easy to fix, the government just needs to care, is a drastic overestimation of the governments abilities.

I support free speech. You seem to think the anti-free speech stuff only happened after Trump came along, you seem to think all of political history started with him. Trump has actually been better with regards to free speech than many other recent Presidents, you have no sense of perspective. Obama was far more anti-free speech than Trump will ever be, by several orders of magnitude, you just want to believe that Trump has made everything worse and you can delude yourself into thinking that is the case because you don't how things were before Trump, and only started to notice all the bad things happening in politics after he was elected. The reason you only started noticing post-Trump, is that the media would ignore when Democrat presidents did the bad shit, and they freak out when Trump does anything that could be spun to be bad as if it's the End of America. The media is distorting reality, and you buy into that distortion.

You're such a political noob. All administrations don't like criticism, doesn't make them cross the line into dictatorships. Simmer down chicken little.