QuebecOverCanada

OH! So this information was actually omitted by MSM? But weren't you saying it wasn't? Come on Bubber.

Peace be with your family members, they are normal and were doing their part they thought, same as me. We were conned, as we were told the vaccines would basically give us a passport to freedom. The establishment, be it figures of authority in Pharmaceuticals, the Press and Politicians all lied. They lied to much they don't know what's coming for them. Eventually, every population subject to too many restrictions rebel and it gets very nasty at that point. It is always tasteless to have death threats and bombs directed towards the politicians, and it is unforgivable. But it happens. Look at what happened in... France. Today. A country that likes to take action toward its political class; OISE: A LREM MEP DECLARES A VOLUNTARY FIRE IN HIS HOME The garage of LREM deputy for Oise Pascal Bois was set on fire on the night of Wednesday, December 29 in Chambly (Oise). Targeted ahead of the immunization pass vote on Monday, the 62-year-old saw hostile tags about it on the wall of his home. Alerted during the night, the firefighters managed to bring the flames under control around 2:30 a.m. this Wednesday in the politician's personal garage, according to the Oise SDIS. The deputy lodged a complaint and an investigation was opened on the grounds of "destruction by dangerous means" and then entrusted to the Senlis Research Brigade, according to information provided by Jean-Baptiste Bladier, the Senlis prosecutor. After having noticed on the wall near the garage inscriptions indicating “Vote no” and “It’s going to fart!” in reference to the vote on the vaccine pass on Monday, Pascal Bois saw his vehicle be partially burned in his garage. "The most shocking thing is to attack the personal home," the LREM man insisted. In fact, as a general rule, it is the elected offices that are targeted by opponents of the health pass and not the personal homes of politicians. https://www.cnews.fr/france/2021-12-29/oise-un-depute-lrem-denonce-un-incendie-volontaire-son-domicile-1165471 ---- I'm all for peaceful demonstrations and am disapproving the fact a citizen does that. But I'm also very much against tyranny. Bring more tyranny and see what happens.

You call bullshit the ANSM? What are your credentials, apart from being the principal arguer to Shady's daily posts? But let's come back to the object of the conversation; is it censored, or is it not? Are you able to find an article about that in mainstream press, or you were simply articulating a viewpoint based on your baseless assumptions and lack of scientific knowledge?

Show me the piece of information somewhere else then. It will be easy for you!

You have no idea about what you're talking about. The ANSM in France (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé) reported more than 110K cases of serious side-effects from COVID-19 vaccines in a year. For ALL drugs and medicine, they register only 40K cases yearly on a normal given year.

It's because you have ping set to number 20000000 in your brain. You are quite fast to say for example that Goddess made an argument that is contradictory. You say she is indoctrinated and a hypocrite because she says she is against the forced administration of COVID Vaccines and simultaneously to stop worrying against the unvax and to stop also people scaremongering too much towards vaccines being administered. So I take your political leaning for the past 2 years I've been here, even more, and I apply it to COVID restrictions. Oh, so you recognize IDs are important?

His point is the following. He is very much generally against verification of IDs during elections or to pass a border. Because poor people and people who don't have White skin, according to the herd he belongs to, don't have IDs. It is discriminatory to ask for an ID to verify your identity when you vote. But he is full for the vax passport, and verifying and ID if you go to have a Mc Donald's with your child on the road though. Because THAT kills people, you weirdo.

We had the best riots all across Canada last May at least.

The FBI comes up empty-handed in its search for a Jan. 6 plot It may be true, as Confucius said, that “the beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name,” but it can also be the end of politics. For politicians, labeling controversies is often more important than addressing the controversies themselves. Even well-defined terms used in legislation must change to fit political needs, such as like “infrastructure.” When its real meaning proved too restrictive, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) simply tweeted, “Paid leave is infrastructure. Child care is infrastructure. Caregiving is infrastructure.” Done. The same is true with labeling political violence. When protests by Black Lives Matter and other groups turned violent last summer, some media employees were expressly told not to refer to “rioters” but rather “protesters.” Riots causing massive property damage were described by CNN as “fiery but mostly peaceful protests.” Conversely, the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol could not be just a riot, let alone a “fiery” protest, but only an “insurrection.” Many in the media continue referring to “the insurrectionists” rather than the rioters. National Public Radio even ran a running account of the “Capitol insurrection.” The term was further driven home by House Democrats by impeaching former President Trump for “incitement to insurrection” despite undermining any chance for an actual conviction. Members of Congress such as Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) are still in federal court claiming a conspiracy of “armed and organized insurrectionists.” Many of us remain disgusted and angered by the Jan. 6 riot — but it was a riot. It also was a desecration. These people deserve to be punished, particularly those who went with an intent to try to enter the Congress. The question is whether you can have an insurrection without anyone actually insurrecting. That Zen-like question may find its way into the hearings of some pending cases. Calling these people “rioters" does not minimize what they did — or undermine the legitimacy of their punishment. However, there is wisdom and even the chance for resolution when we “call things by their proper name.” https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/568842-the-fbi-comes-up-empty-handed-in-its-search-for-a-jan-6-plot

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated - sources WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - The FBI has found scant evidence that the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was the result of an organized plot to overturn the presidential election result, according to four current and former law enforcement officials. Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations. "Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases," said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation. "Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized. But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages." FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol. But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said. More than 170 people have been charged so far with assaulting or impeding a police officer, according to the Justice Department. That carries a maximum sentence of 20 years. But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as "seditious conspiracy" to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs. Senior officials had discussed filing such charges in the weeks after the attack, the sources said. Prosecutors have also not brought any charges alleging that any individual or group played a central role in organizing or leading the riot. Law-enforcement sources told Reuters no such charges appeared to be pending. Conspiracy charges that have been filed allege that defendants discussed their plans in the weeks before the attack and worked together on the day itself. But prosecutors have not alleged that this activity was part of a broader plot. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/

Not only are they anxious, but they zealously demand, by insulting the ones in society who they deem inferior to them, what they should or not do to prevent themselves from getting an illness which has a very high survival rate among healthy individuals. If they cared about the unvax, they would tell them the pros (and cons!) of vaccination, and they would go on with their day. No. Not sufficient for those psychopaths who will be taught a lesson eventually. They insult them by calling them names, they say they don't deserve any rights, and say they are the ones who should impose restrictions on others based on... their own fear! I won't be taking any other COVID shot. In Israel, they now have halted the administration of the 4th dose. --- Israel: the fourth dose of the anti-Covid vaccine suspended Announced last week, the fourth dose is on hold until further notice. The director general of the Ministry of Health, Nahman Ash, awaits the results of the studies. If Omicron is less severe than the previous strains, it could promote herd immunity. https://www.lesechos.fr/monde/afrique-moyen-orient/israel-la-quatrieme-dose-du-vaccin-anti-covid-suspendue-1375396

Your worries about your family/friends don't concern anyone but yourself. They are not important to us. The fact is, you could not worry about them, and we wouldn't care. The fact you are scared for them isn't a prerogative on our rights. We should tell you, as a collectivity consisting of grown adults, to simply f*** off and get diapers/kleenexes for your tamtrum. If you want to live in a hole, do. I was vaccinated. You are vaccinated. Your family and friends are probably vaccinated. If the vaccine works, you don't impose it on other people, and you don't care if others don't have it. Don't pretend like you care about other people. You don't. You think your emotions and your scaredness are sufficient to limit other peoples rights. No they don't, you child.

They are.

1. I posted you the graph given by the study presented to the court, accessible in the OP Here is the table showing every given N per variable, and its results. The graph is accessible on this pdf of the Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court on the Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council website Link to the pdf; https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/2021-12-16-OTCC-v-Ontario-FINAL-signed-by-all.pdf Link to the story; https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/news/ontario-court-declares-that-the-ontario-math-proficiency-test-is-unconstitutional/ 2. Do you think equality of outcome is desirable in society, even in an unpragmatic mindset?

This is not just the point of teaching quality. It is jurisprudence for future downgrades of standards across society in Ontario.

1. Anyone completing a math exam who has competence and merit will pass. It is the same question for everyone, the same equations, same formulas. Students, teachers, what makes you think that the identity of the person makes it more difficult? 2. A sample size that is too small reduces the power of the study and increases the margin of error, which renders the study meaningless. Statistics are made on the model of a Normal Curve, and the smaller the sample size, the smaller the Statistical Power. More about the effects of a small sample size, and its limitations may be found out here; https://sciencing.com/effects-small-sample-size-limitation-8545371.html 3. You may disagree with the opinion of many. We are many to disagree here with you, and it's alright. We're not dogpiling on you, we're just exchanging.

I believe many spheres of academia and in our institutions that revolve around control of human behavior is absolutely turning demented. We let so much power to corporations, governments and authority figures. You see it with COVID too, with the restrictions on behaviors and the imposition of new social norms but also fights toward intellectual elements of our society such as the equality of opportunity to be replaced with equality of outcome.

Exactly the differences between wokes versus the Civil Rights Movement and the mainstream Left as a larger spectrum in general. The wokes look for equality of outcome, and a difference of outcome is always synonymous with unfairness while it doesn't have to be proven. It is guaranteed that any discrepancy, is unfairness, unjust. The Civil Rights Movement and the mainstream Left want equality of opportunity, which is desirable and actually is a levelled playing ground for everyone to be included.

The major question is; why do we allow Chinese media when Chinese media censors our media? Why is it only one way, just like why do we accept all of their imports and accept their jobs theft, but they do not accept our exports? The answer might me that there is an interest from the higher ups in our own country to serve CCP. We must not confuse ourselves by pointing the finger toward people 10000km away for the real foe. It is not China, it is not the CCP. It is the Conservative Party, the Liberals and the NDP, alongside the financial elites in Toronto and in Montreal who are the ones we should blame.

And it's also that a math test result discrepancy isn't a proof of racism, at all. Certainly not when you compare the scores of races without controlling any other variable and having such unequal sample sizes across races. This is a farce masqueraded as a study. They reached their conclusion that racism is overwhelming when it comes to math exams before proving it.

Human Sciences are perverted by bad methodology, and badly interpreted by persons of authority who think a botched study is proof of bias. They have the opposite logical reasoning as the Enlightenment movement a few centuries ago. They do not believe in Empiricism; they have their minds already made and design pseudo-studies to prove their point rather than finding the truth.

1. Please, enlighten me. Is there another reason to why there are discrepancies in math results across races to explain the gaps in between them? Because I really thought a math exam was related to whether or not you may answer a mathematical problem. For me, the gaps between successfullness between races is easily explainable; in statistics, in order to have valid data, you need sample size which are to the least proportional between comparison groups. There are much fewer applicants in the study shown to the courts pertaining to certain ethnicities than others, thus making the sample size for the Black applicants 10 times less than the number of whites. For certain ethnicities, such as 'Latinos' and 'middle Eastern', they account for a tenth of the number of White applicants. Look at this, the data from a study presented to the trial; This is not a tangible proof of discrimination. The data is just bivariate, and doesn't control for outside factors such as the level of instruction of the applicants and many other variables we could discuss gladly. 2 Having mathematically literate teacher is a plus for the students. Having a teacher with browner skin isn't a plus, it's neutral. At least in my view as a non-racist person.

It is merit and competence in math that explains the success of the people succeeding a math exam. It is not discriminatory or should not be deemed anticonstitutional by a court because there are discrepancies in math tests results across ethnicities.

The anti-intellectual era, but the angry era. The era where racism has to be found in a math test. The era in which a woke professor published a book defending pedophilia, and the press rebranding the term as "adults attracted to minors". https://apnews.com/article/media-crime-education-virginia-norfolk-2adff01de54205e6513d5071f29e772a https://torontosun.com/news/world/woke-watch-prof-says-lets-ditch-the-term-pedophile-for-minor-attracted-person

Let me correct you on that one. https://www.otffeo.on.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/12/2021-12-16-OTCC-v-Ontario-FINAL-signed-by-all.pdf