blackbird

With the failing health care system, the failing parole boards, the failing bail system, and the obsession of the PM with his own personal interests instead of taking care of Canada, is the federal system really viable anymore? I am wondering if federalism is really a viable system any longer. Would provinces be better off as sovereign jurisdictions so they could look after the justice system, health care system and everything else properly? The federal system is becoming more of a disaster every day. It is clear cooperative federalism is not working the way it should. There is constant tension and differences between what the federal government is doing or not doing and what the provinces are doing or think should be done. The provinces do not have control or jurisdiction in some critical areas that are failing Canadians.

All 13 Premiers are bucking Trudeau's plan to keep releasing dangerous offenders and demanding he amend the bail system for dangerous offenders. Premiers demand bail reform in letter to Trudeau after killing of OPP officer (msn.com) I really don't think Trudeau cares about the well-being of the police or Canadian people or he would not have let the bail system go this way long ago. Same with the parole board. What did Trudeau say or do about it after 12 people were stabbed to death in Saskatchewan Cree Nation last September by a guy released by the parole board? I am skeptical that he will do anything. He is busy fighting climate change and forcing his woke ideology on Canadians. LILLEY: Japan asks for natural gas, Trudeau offers lectures on decarbonizing (msn.com) Trudeau lives in some kind of alt reality. With all these kind of things going on between Trudeau and Premiers, not to mention the failing health care system, I am wondering if federalism is really a viable system any longer. Would provinces be better off as sovereign jurisdictions so they could look after the justice system, health care system and everything else properly? The federal system is becoming more of a disaster every day. It is clear cooperative federalism is not working the way it should. There is constant tension and differences between what the federal government is doing or not doing and what the provinces are doing or think should be done. The provinces do not have control or jurisdiction in some critical areas that are failing Canadians.

This document or rather red power manifesto has a long list of extreme instructions that should alarm every Canadian. This was never brought before Parliament and each item never discussed and ratified by any kind of vote of our elected members of Parliament. This is a decree. I have only heard bits and pieces of these things in the media from time to time which of course would not set off any alarm bells. But if you read this whole document in one piece and realize he is serious, it should shock a lot of people. This is coming from one man, the Prime Minister, and is essentially his marching orders. This has nothing at all to do with democracy but is a clear demonstration of his plan to implement some kind of utopian liberal state. It is truly shocking. Why do we even have a House of Commons? What purpose do they serve? One small part is an example: "Continue efforts with the Minister of Canadian Heritage to develop and introduce legislation as soon as possible to combat serious forms of harmful online content to protect Canadians and hold social media platforms and other online services accountable for the content they host, including by strengthening the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code to more effectively combat online hate and reintroduce measures to strengthen hate speech provisions, including the re-enactment of the former Section 13 provision. This legislation should be reflective of the feedback received during the recent consultations." This is a clear example of how Orwellian Trudeau thinks. He intends to implement his new social order of control on every person in this country in accordance with his way of thinking. This mandate list of instructions is not a list of suggestions, but it is a order or requirement for his minister(s) to follow. Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Mandate Letter (pm.gc.ca)

This is a serious mistake. They said the idea is to focus on rehabilitation over punishment. So far that ideology has resulted in a number of police officers and many ordinary Canadians being murdered. Canadians need to wake up. This has already proven a disaster. It also has resulted in repeat offenders being constantly arrested and released in B.C. Ottawa laying groundwork for Indigenous justice systems, says Lametti (msn.com) Some citizens in Dawson Creek have formed a self defence group because the RCMP have been unable to stop the crime by repeat offenders in that town. Some are arming themselves with whatever they can in their homes. Fed up B.C. Peace residents take action against property crime | Watch (msn.com)

The House of Commons also needs to investigate the huge increase in the size of the federal public service since Trudeau was elected in 2015. It has increased by about 75,000 employees or roughly 25%. This is a huge increase in the cost to Canadian taxpayers. This in addition to the tens of millions of dollars in contracts to private firms. What exactly have they accomplished with all this spending?

No, this subject is not in the first three pages of Federal Politics. I checked. What does "front page" mean? Give us the title and location. There is no such thing as "front page".

LILLEY: Commons needs to fully investigate Trudeau's huge contracts for McKinsey (msn.com) This is just another reason we need people like the RCMP officer to be able to exercise his freedom of expression on his own time and the many other people who protest Trudeau. It is the only thing that might help put the brakes on the abuse of taxpayers. What other means do Canadians have to prevent the ripping off of taxpayers? The House of Commons seems almost powerless. Speaking out and the fear of the voters is all there really is.

How is he biting the hand that feeds him? He would have to be talking about the RCMP which he isn't. He is talking about politicians just like everyone else does. That's his right under the basic fundamental freedom of expression, which you scoff at and reject. How about Trudeau and the liberals show some respect for the police by not letting dangerous criminals out onto the streets repeatedly to take the lives of innocent policemen?

Congratulations! Did you finally figure out political preferences is matter of choosing the least evil? Seems to me Trudeau doesn't like his opposition. He often smears them. So how is that any different? Sounds hypocritical to say he doesn't like a politician. That's how most politicians operate. Exactly the same. That's politics in the real world. Pretty clever buffoon. He is brilliant. That's why the liberals won't like him. He knows how to be most effective. Whatever occupation he is in, he is a brilliant asset. Very clever. He likely has a lot of respect for his occupation or profession. Would you rather have a dumb puppet who can't think for himself and won't say a word about what is going on in the world or a brilliant thinker like him? I would pick him. He gets five stars for his originality.

If this fella started a Go-Fund Me campaign for his legal defence, I'm sure a fortune would be contributed across Canada.

Trudeau's progressive multiculturalism no one may question.

Everyone has the right to speak against the government on social media in whatever way they choose. Policemen have been murdered by the catch and release court system controlled by the Liberal government. Anyone should be able to understand why a policeman would be interested in opposing Trudeau in his spare time and that is a fundamental right in a free and democratic society.

False again.

You are grasping for straws now, making up nonsense. Nothing he said or did was illegal. He simply exercised his freedom of expression. I have news for you. All your excuses for opposing his freedom of expression simply confirm what I believe about it. He is in the right.

The Canadian Anti-Racism and Research Society is getting in the action now. Still haven't heard what he said that is "racist". The news reported him as saying "... plays the role of a character he calls Father B, and professes to be 'the High Prophet of the Church of Trudeau' as he explains what the website is about, stating, 'our religion teaches the importance of socialism, of cancelling everyone that offends anyone, of being woke and highly emotional.'" Absolutely nothing racist in that.

The Liberal government is now going after members of the Armed Forces who hold any unacceptable views as well. they appointed a professional investigator to investigate the armed forces and come up with recommendations.

You missed the main point entirely. He was not using his position on the job to talk about politics on the internet. He was on his own time, not in uniform, and not even identifying his occupation. Therefore in those circumstances he should have the same freedom of expression as everyone else. If some liberal, NDP, or CBC revealed his identity, that is not his fault and he should not suffer any consequences for the media's action. Liberals, NDP and CBC, CTV have an agenda of their own.

Teachers are required by the government to teach progressive ideology to the students. They don't have to try to indoctrinate it online. They are required to indoctrinate them in the education system using taxpayer dollars.

Anti-Christian ideology is the default dogma taught to kids in schools with Darwinism, sexual orientation and gender identity teaching.

No, they are not. They are elected to provide good government, not use their position to push progressive ideology. They are supposed to be governing for all Canadians, not just liberals or progressives. So in your way of thinking a police officer, teacher, or nurse does not have freedom of speech. Obviously your claim is against the Charter of Rights which guarantees freedom of expression to everyone. It doesn't exclude some people. Anti-Christian speeches or commentary are common in every level of society. How often are Liberals losing their freedom of speech? Never or very rare. Their liberal/progressive ideology is the common speech among most politicians, and media. You are so badly brainwashed with progressive ideology that you can't see the problem. You want to silence everyone who opposes it.

What is funny is Trudeau uses his highest office in the land as PM to pontificate to millions of Canadians about his view of the world and his progressive ideology and he does it in his position as PM on mainstream media using taxpayer money. Yet some policeman in his off hours and without identifying his occupation makes up a mime or drama thing on his website with a likely very small audience. The CBC finds out his ID and makes it public and all the liberal followers and lefties go nuts and demand he be silenced. No doubt some local liberal in his town was told and reported him to the CBC so they can use their national coverage to trash him. Even the local mayor gets involved and condemns him speaking on social media. Must be a Liberal or NDP. The whole thing about silencing him is obviously political. Perhaps he should consider fighting for his freedom of expression under the Charter of Rights in court.

The problem I see in all this is once government or authority starts controlling what individuals say on their own time on the internet, then it becomes a slippery slope. Who is next to fall under Big Brothers control? The Liberal's Heritage Minister has been working on legislation to control social media, etc. If government had its way there would be no free speech. They consider anything said against the Liberals as offensive and unacceptable. So do the NDP. Lefty politicians have no concept of freedom of speech and they believe it should be heavily controlled. The next goal on the road to becoming a totalitarian state and creating the leftist idea of a utopia is to take away everyone's freedom of speech. But this could be done in steps by targeting certain professions first, then expanding it to include others and finally include everyone.

The simple truth is euthanasia or doctor-assisted dying is strictly based on the world system or secular humanism. The world system is portrayed in the Bible in the book of Ecclesiastes. It describes life as despair, hopelessness, and without any meaning. Euthanasia is the natural outcome of that kind of life. The term "under the sun" used in Ecclesiastes reflects that world view or thinking. The secular humanist way of thinking is confined to nature and human reasoning. In contrast with that, the rest of Bible gives hope, comfort, and belief in a future salvation in paradise.

Apparently it was the CBC who discovered his identity and revealed it. B.C. RCMP officer's anti-Trudeau website raises concerns about discriminatory views within the RCMP (yahoo.com)

I don't think I ever said the Christmas tree was invented by Christianity. Just pointed out recently that some woke library in the U.S. tried to not use it and was forced by an uproar to allow it again.