Boges

Potato, Po-tat-Tow. But sure. ?

No one is valuing one over the other. It's just a natural evolutionary outcome to a multicultural society. Interestingly this "Browning" is happening mostly in Western Democracies (Canada, US, UK, France etc)

A Genocide would indicate a systemic approach. Allowing for abortions simply gives a person the ability to end an unwanted pregnancy. Massive thread drift though.

That's a heck of a conflation. You still haven't vocalized why the browning of society by the intermingling of races is a bad thing. Since you're essentially calling it a genocide.

Who's advocating for Genocide?!?!?!?!

Well Jews are a religious group. AFIK the colour of ones skin doesn't determine if someone is Jewish. Jesus was not White.

Only FPTP can produce a Conservative Majority. Win enough seats by narrow margins, you can obtain a majority with only 1/3rd the population's support.

So how are White people being systematically exterminated? I'll hang up and listen.

It would be nice for a citation where "the woke" are claiming the white are inferior. Speaking as a White person, I can certainly say that people who spout shit about "preserver their race" are trash. Their skin colour has nothing to do with it, however.

And we can call them out for their racism as well. Perhaps you could provide a few relevant Canadian citations.

Your BFF Pat King is saying that the "White Race" is being depopulated. Not by a Holocaust but by the introduction of other races to slowly brown the population. And I ask again, WTF is wrong with that?

Who's saying that?

Words matter https://www.britannica.com/topic/genocide No one is systematically eliminating white people. But the longer we live in a country with a variety races and culture the more a race evolves into something else. It's evolution.

No they don't. The colour of your skin isn't sacrosanct. Do people of mixed races have less value? If we're speaking purely from a genetic perspective, we grow stronger as a people when we mix different racial backgrounds. In-breeding is a bad thing for a reason. Back when I went to purchase a dog, I purposely choose a hybrid breed because I knew it would be less likely to have genetic issues.

Still can't rationalize why the "White Race" should be protected can you?

And I don't. But talking about "The White Race" and "Blood Lines" sounds about as Racist as I can imagine. We're chasing our tails now. Seems like you pulled the ripcord on trying to defend why the White Race needs to be preserved. Evolving to have lighter skin because you live in a Northern Climate isn't something special that needs preserving.

Even the PCs in Alberta eventually lost. The NDP to boot. Political winds are always changing. Doug Ford is set to received a second mandate after 15 years of Liberal rule.

Sounds like the Right are onboard with Proportional Representation now. What a weird world.

I think he's making his view pretty clear in the video I posted earlier.

What protections are Mr King looking for?

It's racist if "someone" suggests that any racial Group should be protected as if they're a breed pedigree dogs.

I would also call it racist.

Poor Ezra Levant. ?

No one is calling for executions of white people. If the "White Race" slowly gets browned through intermarrying, what exactly is wrong with that? I also would oppose an ethnic minority doing the same thing. And I concede it happens all the time with other racial groups, doesn't make it right.

So what does that have to do with the "White Race". Does a White person coming from Poland present "Canadian Culture" more than someone coming from Vietnam or Mexico, or Nigeria? They all hail from different "cultures" but only one is white.