WestCanMan

We have 1/8th the pop density of the US. If the US was 8x as big as it is now, and had the same population, to level the playing field with Canada, they'd cover all of NA, all of SA and all of Europe and then some. We have less gangs here too, because we only have 3 city centers with over 2M people. The US has 10 or so over 4M. We have less poverty. Less illegal immigration, because we don't border a 3rd world counrty

Knives and guns are neck and neck over the past 5 years or so for number of kills. If we lived in a place where no one had guns, would violent criminals be emboldened? If you were 6'6 and weighed 275 lbs you'd feel like you could break and enter homes with impunity? Especially those of seniors. No one who lives in the country, 30 mins away from a police station, will ever give up their guns. A lot of times they have livestock to protect, live around bear or big cats, etc. If you ever think about breaking into the home of a senior citizen who lives in the country just drop by a shooting range and watch some of those geezers blast clay pigeons. You'd have a better chance against Rambo. I'm not sure why our PM is targeting assault-style rifles because handguns are actually far more popular for murder. Apprx 3x as much. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=3510007201 The number of people killed by rifles and shotguns combines is 1/3 that of knives. How many of those are shotguns? How many are bolt-action rifles? By a rough estimation, assault-style rifles are not a great concern to the general public. 5th or 6th on the list. It could be very close to fire, which is a worse way to go imo.

I actually posted a link in this forum showing Pelosi hugging people in SF. I guess I'll have to find it here. Pretty crazy that they're blatantly erasing history here while it's still in people's recent memories. Just imagine what's gone from 3 years ago. You'd look like you were the liar if you were talking to a Demmie, telling them that there's video of a Pelosi hug-a-thin and it just end up being endless video of her being somehwat less retarded. Can you imagine if you were ever wrong when you were talking to one of them? They always act like they're right even when they're being eviscerated by facts. "Look at this picture of a map with strings on it".

MSM coverage. CTV is actually more of a Trudeau-booster than CBC.

Point is that CBC's coverage of SNC was a nerfed-down joke. "Nothing to see here."

Suddenly your replies aren't coming so quick, are they NWD? Seems like video of CBC mentioning the most pertinent info re: LavScam is really hard to find.

You just proved how much of an idiot you are lol. I asked for video of CBC talking about Fournier and the bribe, during coverage of Trudeau's SNC scandal. You provided evidence that CBC knew about it back before the scandal, with their own article. You did not find video, and you did not post a link to CBC referencing Fournier after Trudeau's scandal surfaced. Go forth now young man and FIND VIDEO OF CBC REFERENCING FOURNIER'S BRIBE SCANDAL, DURING COVERAGE OF TRUDEAU"S SCANDAL. Find somewhere where they said that Trudeau helped out the guys who have a history of bribery. You just acknowledged how easy it is to find evidence of Michel Fournier. Now find video of that skeleton coming out of the closet.

https://www.sacbee.com/news/california/article242171026.html This is one of the top results that comes up if you search for "did pelosi hug people on the street in chinatown on feb 24 2020" LOL.

I think that people should try to find video of Pelosi in Chinatown on Feb 24 2020 walking around in Chinatown, which shows her hugging people. I looked on google and youtube for ten minutes, couldn't find any video where she's hugging people. Seems like someone is trying to erase history.

@New Wold Order: I asked: "Can you find video on CBC where they talk about Michel Fournier and SNC’s history of bribing Canadian politicians, while they were talking about Trudeau’s SNC scandal? It’s pretty relevant, there should be some but I couldn’t find it." You posted two links from way before Trudeau's scandal, neither of them containing video. This was the 2nd one, it didn't show up in my reply, above. This is not a video,and it didn't happen during coverage of Trudeau's scandal: SNC-Lavalin bridge contract linked to $1.5M in suspected kickbacks

Who's playing "The ostrich game"?

It's actually hard to find the video footage of Pelosi hugging people in the Chinatown video now. Even on youtube, if you do a search for "pelosi hugging people in chinatown during covid" you get videos of her talking positively and looking like a cute granny but the hugging is scrubbed.

Schiff is talking about a 9/11-style investigation into America's covid response. This video is actually a clear indication of what actually went on in America, and what kinds of things the Dems and their media were doing when the alarm bells started going off. It's actually a Boy Who Called Reverse-Wolf story. Trump was taking action against covid while CNN and the Demmies were actively saying "it's not really a wolf", and they didn't stop until the wolf was in the middle of the town standing over a pile of bodies. "Don't ban travellers from covid hotspots! Go around in public hugging people!" Honestly, this video will haunt Pelosi if there's really an investigation. It's the exact opposite of what politicians in Taiwan and SoKo were doing to fight covid: https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/nancy-pelosi-visits-san-franciscos-chinatown/2240247/

Killing is easy, there's no way around that. You could just throw gas on people if you didn't have a rifle, or use a truck, or make a bomb like the one in Oklahoma that killed over 150 people and wounded 700. People use knives which are quieter, don't need to be reloaded, and can't be legislated. People throw acid in other people's faces now so that they live a painful, tortured life. There are far worse things than being shot. Be sensible, changing this one law has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NS SHOOTING CASE! Be sensible, changing this one law WILL NOT STOP ANYONE FROM FINDING A WAY TO GO ON A KILLING SPREE.

Can you find video on CBC where they talk about Michel Fournier and SNC’s history of bribing Canadian politicians, while they were talking about Trudeau’s SNC scandal? It’s pretty relevant, there should be some but I couldn’t find it. Ive seen SNC describes a company that did bad things abroad. Their criminal activity within the country was never mentioned on any news coverage that I saw.

Self-determination, Canadian-style: ”We’re going to ummm welcome islamic state, excuse me ‘daesh’ uh terrorists, er I mean uhhhhhh fighters, back to ummm Canada. We will uhhhh not umm allow the ummm fact that uh people are uh carrying a ummm deadly virus to uhhh stop them from um flying to Canada uhhhhh and uh spreading it. A uh person with um a violent past who was ahhh not allowed to um buy guns legally in uhhh Canada got some uh illegal guns um from the United uhhhh States and uh went on om a shooting spree. This is somehow uhhh proof that the uhh gun laws don’t um work. If, for example, we uh made mustard illegal it would uh stop even uh more guns from um killing people.”

He’ll just put his head in the sand, like all good Demmies do, when actual facts are coming out. “That’s PROPAGANDA! Everything that’s true is considered GOP PROPAGANDA!!!”

Your cute insult of the day would be applicable to a comment like “the WHO gave all the worst advice because they are....”. You see, assigning my reasons to their actions makes it a conspiracy theory. Just saying what they did has nothing to do with string, maps, etc. Get it? Just facts.

You do know that Adam Schiff [Demmie] is the Chair of the House Intel Comittee, right? Do you think that the Dems lack access to intel?

Which part are you questioning eyeball? Are you forgetful? It's all been here before. Trudeau did zero before March 16th - FACT. I've posted video of Pelosi's Feb 24 hug-a-thon, you can google it if you don't believe me. After the first week of March America was shutting down. The WHO was saying that there was no H2H, masks were bad, and they bashed Trump's travel ban after he did it. Book it. So what part are you at odds with eyeball? How can you not know this by now? You're following the topic. If you have some facts, bring them on in. Don't just make childish accusations without supporting facts. This isn't CNN.

Did he? Was Trump the one telling Americans to go on a hug-a-thon in late February, or was that Nancy Pelosi? Was he the one telling New Yorkers to ride the subway and eat in restaurants like everything was a-ok like DeBlasio and his top Public Health official? Trump was wa ahead of every Dem in the country on recognizing that there was a pandemic coming. He was ahead of Pelosi and the Demmies, 45 days ahead of Trudeau. Trump rocked it compared to Pelosi, the WHO, and Trudeau. You should at least acknowledge that before you plow ahead with criticisms.

Another moronic premise for a thread. Trump has been THE TOUGHEST President vs China in US history. Just because he stroked Xi's ego to try and get access for his scientists to get into China doesn't mean that he was fooled by them, unlike the MSM and Canada. Trump's anti-covid strategy was far better than Canada's anti-covid strategy, which included such things as "don't wear masks" and "we're not doing anything until March 16th". Where's your thread about how bad Trudeau was? He was far worse by and standards. But you give your own PM a pass. Why? Are you just a media stooge?

Self-determination for Canada doesn't seem like such a great idea lately.

Trump wasn't the lead on fighting the virus. I acknowledged that Taiwan and SoKo did a far better job from a worse predicament. Trump was definitely ahead of the WHO and Trudeau, I have multiple videos to prove it. When the WHO was saying that there was no H2H, travel didn't need to be restricted and masks shouldn't be worn, Trump was at least smart enough to block travel. Trudeau didn't even do that. WRONG. The WHO gave out THE WORST ADVICE POSSIBLE. Like I said before, if they were actually trying to start a pandemic they wouldn't have done anything differently. "H2H transmission isn't happening, don't wear masks, don't ban travellers from the covid-rich environment." Taiwan and SoKo did the exact opposite of what the WHO said and they turned out to be the rock stars of fighting covid. Why is it that you think that Trump did so poorly when he was smarter than the WHO? Why is it that you prefer Trudeau's stye of doing absolutely nothing until we had to shut the whole country down? Why are you judging Trump, a politician, more harshly than the WHO, the world's "defence" against pandemics?" The WHO doesn't even get a 0/10. The WHO gets a negative 3 out of ten. They sucked in our PM and our top public heath officials. Our PM did so poorly that Xi patted him on the head.

Delaying something and then signing it later is always a great strategy - it makes it seem like you're really important and powerful. If you've recently bought off the media they will play it up just the way you like it. I'm sure that Trudeau really stuck it to the US just like he did to returning islamic state terrorists, just like he carried the fight against islamic state when he took over being PM in 2015, just like he fought for Alberta jobs, just like he fought to get drinking water to our indigenous population, just like he fought the indigenous suicide epidemic, just like he helped the veterans who were asking for more than our government can give, just like he fought covid by waiting until March 16th and lulling the virus into believing that we would never do anything at all, just like's fighting to get to the bottom of the WHO's devastating advice. He's a [paper] tiger.