WestCanMan

Yes, Trump made billions. So what? He has billion-dollar businesses that existed long before he became POTUS. It's not just the Presidency that grew his brand. The Apprentice did that too. It's far more questionable when guys like 3-House Bernie and B Obama have become wealthy from...... what exactly? FYI $1.2M isn't a lot. The gov't received services equal to that amount, and Trump would have made $1.6M by now just from his salary as POTUS, and he has never taken any of that money. Seems like the Gov't owes him bigtime. That's not CBC or CTV, the article I posted was from the National Post, and CBC and CTV let Trudeau say that "all that happened is that I failed to recuse myself from the decision-making process to hire We" for the $900M program, and they knew he was lying but they didn't mention that. This is like when Biden says "It's not important that my son got an $83K/mo job at Burisma, just because he set up meetings between myself and oligarchs. The fact that Hunter did $1,500,000,000.00 of business with the Chinese government is no big deal as well" and the media collectively nod their heads and rush off to cover the story about anonymous sources claiming that Trump said [insert random BS here]"THIS IS HUGE!!!!".

1) FYI not a single person from Trump's team has been convicted of collusion. Zeeeeroooo. 2) Every top-level American gov't official has Russian contacts. The US and Russia have normal diplomatic relations. 3) If you have names of someone in jail for collusion then name them. You're still at a big fat zero for all your posts here combined.

Pity you can't read. Even the title says "may have" but it's all downhill from there. They're all just idiocy. It's Trump's right to fire Comey, and Comey was a proven slimeball by the time he was fired. Telling people not to make emails public is normal, unless you're as dumb as Hillary or Hunter. Telling Sessions not to recuse himself was just fine. There was no crime, there was no need for recusal. Etc. Your list is just pure partisan BS. No surprises there.

Trump has publicly talked about labelling the KKK and Antifa as terrorist groups, but that might just be because of their DNC roots.

They're mostly insinuating that she's part of a sect that's contrary to the whole 'women's equality' movement, but I don't know what's more 'equal rights' than a woman completely dominating dozens of Senators on her way to a SCJ appointment.

Bullshit. You're just a divisive racist if you think that "black people live in fear of the police killing them for no reason". My claim is that "Floyd was resisting arrest, so force actually was necessary, and Floyd was making the claim that he couldn't breathe when no one even had their hands on him, so police had reason to believe he was lying when he said he couldn't breathe." If you watch the bodycam footage it literally takes most of the wind out of the sails of the G F saga.

It was a situation where a slow pull-out was necessary. Truncating the military's oversight there created an enormous power vacuum. That was Obama's 'strategy', I think he called it "Operation Custer". You've just taken TDS to a whole new level. That's literally the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life. I know I say that a lot here, especially in the last week for some reason, but this time is for real.

How ironic.

"Good for her" was referring to the woman who wrote the article that Argus cited. Speak English much?

I never laid claim to any great military victories, and I've never said that I was a veteran of a military conflict. I said that I served in the military and that's a simple fact. Whether you believe me or not, I don't really give a crap.

Again you came up with a hollow, worthless post that's nothing more than a baseless accusation. If you want the litany of lies CNN has told look at their stories re: the Dr Ford allegations, Russian collusion, Ukrainian collusion, Manafort's sentencing, Pulse nightclub, Biden in Ukraine, Biden China, Michael Brown, FBI malfeasance, Sandman, Smollett, just for starters. There's literally nothing accurate or honest about any of those stories. You can ask me about any of those stries and I can easily show you how CNN lied about them. I'd love for you to find a story that Fox lied about camper.

Dude, he didn't have to lie about Russian collusion. It was a farce. He knew that along because in order for it to be real he would have had to have participated in it. If Hillary accuses you of pooping on the Whitehouse lawn do your associates have to lie for you to say that you didn't do it? If you say that you didn't do it does that make you a liar? If you don't magically find some evidence that proves that you pooped on the lawn does that mean that you obstructed justice? LMAO. Your circular reasoning is impossible to deal with.

Good for her. There are Dems who have come out in support of Trump as well.

I said that to camper, not you. If you disliked Obama, good on ya. I don't think Trump is as bad as Obama at all, and I don't think that Trump has been a total blessing either. I'm just stuck in the position of continually having to correct people who are lying about him. I do think that it's quite possible, even easy, for a person to be quite a bit more 'Presidential' than Trump is on a lot of occasions. But I also think that he came out of the ME looking quite brilliant. There hasn't been a President in my lifetime who could with honesty look back on a 4 yr term and say "I rocked foreign policy over in the ME."

I know. It's far beyond your capability to think for yourself, and CNN didn't tell you that, so there's no way that it could possibly be true from your POV. Still, you can't refute it, so you're left in a position where all you can do is throw down a sandbox insult and try to keep a stiff upper lip. The sad thing is that if someone said what I just said about Trump you'd instantly believe it regardless of what it said. The fact that something is negative/positive about someone you dislike/like is enough for you, facts be damned. I served during the cold war, there were no 'missions'. I was already out 5 years before desert storm.

OK, so you completely edited your post after I responded to it, kudos for realizing how pitiful it was. Sadly, this is just another shallow, empty accusation where you failed to have good reason to disagree with what I said. FYI Barack Obama FULLY supported protests against the police, he FULLY supported anthem-kneeling, and even during the worst periods of violence during his Presidency he never spoke out against rioting, looting, arson, violence and racial division. He never commented on the criminal nature of BLM or how they were selectively editing video to drum up hatred and fear of police. He even fanned the flames of racism with comments like: "I can't help but notice that Trayvon looks like me.... etc" Just in case you don't know how the English language works, let me explain to you the entire meaning of the above sentence. "If that was me when I was younger, and I was obeying the law and being respectful, I never could have survived a walk down that street because Zimmerman was a white-supremacist Mexican-American and he was looking for a black kid to kill, like a lot of other cops. Trayvon was black, and that's the only reason he was killed." The notion that Trayvon's skin colour was the only or the main reason for his death was completely farcical conjecture and Barack Obama's comment was entirely divisive and shameful. Period. Given the amount of thought that Obama puts into being clear and concise, there's no reason to believe that he wasn't actually trying to fear monger when he said that. Do you like stats camper? Did you know that BLM actually had a chance to patrol American streets for 3 weeks, thereby ensuring the safety of African-Americans in a 7-block area of Seattle, referred to as CHAZ? Yep. BLM police controlled 7 blocks of sovereign US soil for 3 weeks and they only killed one black child. Think for a second about the fact that there are about 30,000 times as many police officers working across America as there were Chazis, and in just 3 weeks they managed to kill a kid and then clear the crime scene of evidence. In order for the "regular, racist American cops" to keep pace with the Chazis, they'd have to kill 30,000 black kids every 3 weeks. Lets pretend that there are only 10,000 times as many "normal, racist cops" as Chazis. They'd still have to kill 10,000 black kids every 3 weeks to keep pace with the Chazis. That would be 170,000 black kids that they'd have to kill. And don't forget that they'd also be destroying all the evidence on those scenes as well, just to be on par with the Chazis. Quick Camper, what's the name of the 16 yr old black kid that was killed by the CHOP Gestapo? What was the name of his 14 year old friend who was critically injured? Can you find some video of Anderson Cooper saying those names? Or Don Lemon? Or anyone on CNN? Just find me one video where CNN showed their faces and named their names Camper. One video. Honestly, they were children, killed by police, and the evidence of what happened was removed from the crime scene. If cops in Tulsa or Podunk did that, you'd know their names little man. You'd still be seeing them every day. Toodle off now.

So you disagree with this? You don't think that Obama fully supported anthem-kneeling, and you don't think that Obama played devil's advocate for people who murdered police? There was literally no place for this attempt to rationalize the murder of these cops, at their funerals, period. The whole tone of his speech should have been "a heinous lowlife murdered 5 people who dedicated their lives to standing in harm's way to protect and serve Americans." Full stop. If you are killed, do you want Barack Obama bringing up some past history from your race or religion that you despised, and using it as partial justification for your murder? "Well, camper was a ________ and you know that some people still really resent the ________s for what their ancestors did. These kinds of murders are just going to happen from time. It's partly justified."

Wrong. Again, you're just spewing a CNN narrative as if there's some factual basis for it. The American members of the US military actually have no reason to dislike Trump, and the vast majority actually do support him. I'll give you credit, you probably know more about feeling shame than most, but there's nothing to be ashamed of with Trump's record as POTUS. Shameful would be supporting a disgrace of a President like Obama, who literally turned his back on the police and made it cool to disrespect of the American flag.

LMAO. This is the first time that I've ever heard that reason for Americans travelling with a US flag. America has a bad rep for being foreign policy bullies and that's all. As a former member of Canada's military I can assure you that members of our military share an extreme trust and respect for America's military, period. Your sentiments are childish and divisive.

OK campy, let's go then. You cite some lies/fake news reported by Fox and I'll recite the laundry list of CNN lies. SNC Lavalin is actually pertinent here, because you brought up Canada's opinion of Trump and I correctly stated how completely biased and worthless our MSM is. If CBC and CTV are worthwhile news channels then you should be aware of "crimes that SNC Lavalin committed which would be of great interest to Canadians, from before the DPA law was passed?" It should be a really easy answer for you. The reason that you don't know is because they have Trudeau's back, through all of his crimes agains Canadians.

All of your stories are twisted and idiotic. America's traditional friends are still allies, and the whole world has benefitted from Trump's Presidency. People like Trudeau, who are traitors to their own country might not like Trump, that's actually a proof that he's a decent person. Like it or not, the Kurds do have an actual history of terrorist attacks in Turkey, and Trump opted to let Turkey reclaim a buffer zone. The window of opportunity for Turkey to take actions against the Kurds ended a long time ago and there's no genocide pending, at least until the Dems get back in and world leaders are no longer afraid to act out their most evil intentions. FYI China's violations against human rights within their country didn't start in 2016. LMAO Camper, you're just woefully ignorant of world history. America is anything but weak right now, Obama was weak. Russian invaded a European country while Obama was POTUS and all he did was pee his pants a little. Russia has ALWAYS interfered in foreign elections, and they've always had extremely high-handed involvement in politics in that region. How many US soldiers died under Trump's presidency Camper? Compare that number to that of any other POTUS of the last 100 years and you'll understand why Trump is beloved by members of his military. Look at the recent successes of terrorist groups, and the longevity of their leaders, and tell me how Trump's Presidency was weak....... You're spewing CNN idiocy dude. Think for yourself, or look for some news sources with a history of accuracy. CNN has lied about everything over the past 4 years. Book it. All of their little toadies here scatter like flies when they're asked to vouch for CNN's record. It's a joke.

CTV and CBC are pure alt-left garbage. Canadians don't have access to the truth, at all, unless they bother to look for it themselves. Are you Canadian Massad? Can you tell me about any crimes that SNC Lavalin committed which would be of great interest to Canadians, from before the DPA law was passed?

Jim MacDougall was convicted on 18 counts of felony fraud and conspiracy charges. His wife went to prison for refusing to testify against the Clintons. The Clintons were their business partners. The Clintons "lost all their emails", I mean, "papers". Weird how that always happens. Hillary has also suffered two bouts of amnesia in her lifetime, both times when she was testifying in court. You're comparing the investigation of actual and very serious crimes with the Loch Ness Monster investigation.

Boohoo. That's not actually the story of a Republican who turned Democrat, it's a rehash of all CNN's fake news. More accurately, it's the story of a complete moron who doesn't know when they're being lied to.

You couldn't have made a more hollow post if you tried.