WestCanMan

Hillary is absolutely known to have colluded with Russians. She gave money to a law firm which surreptitiously funneled money to a British ex-spy, who used some of it to get intel from Russians. Does it somehow make a difference if they're hackers or if they're computer-illiterate? If you found out tomorrow that Trump gave money to a law firm that secretly gave some of it to a British ex-spy who sent it to Russians for intel on the Demonrats would you call that collusion? Of course you would, but when Hillary did it you call it "a proper investigation into an election opponent's sordid past" lol.

Grow up. You're just harping on a leftist talking point that is known to be idiotic. He didn't say that HCQ worked the first day he heard about it, but of course he was going to talk about it. It would be ridiculous for him to ignore it. Also, the study that discredited HCQ turned out to another example of bought-and-paid-for leftist 'science'. Did you forget that it was leftist politicians that said that blocking flights from China was racist? That was completely stupid and it cost people's lives. Leftist politicians are always chiming in about masks and the science on fake masks is ambivalent at best. Leftist politicians are always chiming in on vaccines, and they're even lying about them (as usual). What's the difference? Should Pelosi and Trudeau STFU? Do these stats scream "sign the waiver, take a chance on some serious side-effects, or you're a murderer"? Do these stats scream 'honesty' to you? WTF does "unknown vax status mean"? Does it include people who took Astrazenica? Is it people who got a dose of two different vaccines? Are people who go two doses of thee same vax, well outside of the prescribed time-frame, included in that stat? Why isn't there a stat for fully unvaccinated? Is it zero? These aren't "stats". It's a bunch of numbers which are basically meaningless.

That's disgusting. There are going to be a lot of super pissed off soldiers coming home. My dog has never saved my life or fought beside me but if someone did this to my dog, there'd be trouble.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/united-nations-afghanistan-humanitarian-catastrophe The US is going to provide aid to the Taliban (Afghans). For sure Canada will.

You're pretending to not know what cheated means? You're pretending that Hillary didn't collude with Russians, or you don't think that's illegal? You're pretending that character flaws a mile wide and a passion for creating fraud-friendly election reforms is no big deal? You don't think it's weird that CNN was already pimping the 2020 election as "fraud-free" on election night after they spent 4 years chasing 2016 windmills? A fragment? It's literally the part where he says "what we have is inconclusive". IE, we have no proof of what you want us to pretend we have proof of. We can say almost though. Is that good enough? And like I said before, many times, whether or not Russians hacked the server at some point doesn't prove how data was taken from it, how they knew that there was anything there worth retrieving, or how they got into it in the first place. It's also odd that the DNC server was hacked after Bernie was cheated, when at least 50% of the nerds in the DNC are Bernie supporters. The DNC server, which was never actually turned over to the FBI - they just copied it, is just a fart in the wind anyways. The FBI have never come within a country mile of ever proving that Trump made any kind of deal with the Russians. You were sucked in. Stooged. For the 100th time in a row. Oh yeah, all those other cyber-security agencies that never had access to the server somehow confirmed it. They had a big high-tech seance. Literally every one. It's on tinfoilhat.com There's AMPLE evidence that no one ever checked into whether or not the files were leaked (and they were). That's because the FBI and the Dems were busy breaking laws to try and frame Trump with collusion. They weren't breaking laws in a crimely way though, just in a perfectly legal colluding-with-Russians way and then a lying-to-judges way. (Dang, I'm getting good at libspeak)

Stop crying and making idiotic, baseless accusations and start trying to make some counterpoints if you think I'm just brainwashed. All you do is rant like a psycho and cry about Trump but you never point to the spot on the doll where he hurt you. Do you think this site is just here for your snotty insults? Speak, man. I'm rubber, you're glue blah blah blah. Grow up. But 1) you don't know that, 2) no one had any reason to believe that HCQ didn't work back when the leftists started shrieking that HCQ kills people and turns them blind and 3) the Lancet's study that came out after all shrieking started turned out to be false. Literally the day that Trump commented on the HCQ study leftists just bombarded the planet with lies, as if they were working for Big Pharma. Grow up and stop being such a hypocrite. 1) Trump just mentioned the study when the leftists started lying about it, he never claimed that it was already proven to be the solution and 2) the politicians that you so dearly love promote the vaccines all the time, and they lie about those too. Shocker. The gov't of Ontario even published a vaxx 'study' claiming that 92% of cases were coming from unvaxxed people. Problem is that the study started on Dec 14th - the day that the very first Canadians received their first shot - so not even one Canadian was dbl-vaxxed and went through their 14-day waiting period until at least two months into the study. By the time that there were a significant number of people 'dbl-vaxxed' the flu season had passed. The whole study was like comparing the number of home runs by Babe Ruth and Barry Bonds before 1980. Whatever has been proven as of Aug 31 2021 has nothing to do with the fact that leftist politicians were lying about covid last summer. I can't say for sure that the bogus study that The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine were pimping were done for leftist politicians or Big Pharma, but this is what your "science" looks like: https://www.science.org/news/2020/06/two-elite-medical-journals-retract-coronavirus-papers-over-data-integrity-questions https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/06/04/researchers-retract-study-that-found-big-risks-using-hydroxychloroquine-treat-covid-19/ The leftists and their hacks just keep getting busted cheating on elections and lying about 'science' but you remain their leal stooge to the very end. Your videos about Trump were long and useless. Just the fact that Trump could speak, and hurt leftists feeling for 53 minutes straight, is proof that he's several levels above Joe "porridge" Biden. He can't even talk for two minutes without losing his words in dramatic and painful fashion. It's cruel and unusual punishment to let that old fart twist in the wind.

OMG dude, she cheated, period. It's not even up for debate. I said she cheated and I proved that she cheated - she cheated. Then the Dems spent 4 years pimping fraud-friendly election policies. That's not up for debate either. They even took measures to make mail-in votes more susceptible to fraud. Again, ever single part of what I said is easily verifiable, none of it us even the topic of debate. There's no straw-clutching, what I posted was the sworn testimony of the one person on planet earth with the most knowledge of the topic. Regardless of whether or not Hillary was involved in the election, Russians hack. It's what they do. The fact remains that wikileaks got some leaked information about the DNC and Trump used it. Good for him. It was really important to have a decent president for a while. That's a terrible analogy. Here's a better one: "You're the leader of an unscrupulous political group who conspired against the most popular politician within the nerd demographic of your own group. Then the information on your server regarding that plot gets leaked.... by some nerds. So naturally you "BLAME THE RUSSIANS!"

You could have stopped right there BeaverFever. You actually don't think about things like this with an open mind, whenever you see that Trump 'did something' you clutch at the first bias-confirming opinion that you hear like a drowning man clutching at a straw. Sorry to be a downer, but this isn't an example of you being cute or smart, you're just showing that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. FYI Trump never lost credibility on HCQ. Trump talked about a promising new study on an off-patent drug which was proven to be 1) effective against viruses and 2) safe - over 7 decades & billions of doses administered to hundreds of millions of people. An example of losing credibility on the topic of HCQ is the Dems, the Liberals and the Lancet. You can look that up if you want, I'm not your covid sherpa. OMG dude, just think about the fact that you had to go completely off the topic of foreign policy to rant incoherently about things that you were just incorrect about, and then you topped it off with enough irony to protect an entire battleship from 16" shells by alluding to Trump's 'fragmented word salad'. FYI Trump can answer questions on the spot, at length, without 'losing his words', unlike Biden and Trudeau, who are literally two of the worst politicians ever in NA in that regard. https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/justin-trudeau-tongue-tied-cutting-plastic-waste-video Not only is he stupid, and blatantly lying (no one sells water in tetra packs), he's just a stammering imbecile. Beaverfever - the topic of the post that you quoted was Trump's ME/far east effectiveness. Do you have any damning evidence to chime in with on that topic or can I consider your weak attempts at discrediting him on other topics as an admission that his record in dealing with the ME/far east is beyond reproach?

One clarification Re: the $83B in weapons - that's not all on Biden. Almost all of that is weapons that the Americans gave the Afghanis over the past 20 years.

Understand - Trump doesn't want foreign wars, and he drops the hammer when he has to. He was extremely effective at making enemies pay and keeping Americans safe. I wouldn't say that Obama was a warmonger, he just wasn't very good at dealing with foreign conflict. I don't know if Biden is a warmonger or a pacifist, because he's such a complete idiot, and America's enemies instantly became stronger by orders of magnitude when he was elected.

1- Of course Hillary cheated 3 times. She cheated at the debate - that's cheating. She conspired with the head of the DNC to win the Primary - that's cheating. She colluded with Russians to get the fake collusion investigation started - that's cheating. It may seem like all of those things are on the up & up to you, but you have no relationship with the truth. Crowdstrike: https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html That's what he said under oath, but let's pretend that what he says when he's shooting the shit and what he says when he's under oath are equally accurate - we'll call it a draw lol.

As long as our MSM is so far left there's not much the conservatives can do. If O'Toole said: "I will not recognize more than 22 genders" the hounds at CTV and CBC would compare him to Hitler, and all that we'd see in the news for the next month is glam-shots of Trudeau snot-bubble-crying and giving teddy bears to heroic 6 year olds after their sex-change surgeries. The media is the real enemy here, Trudeau is just capitalizing.

LMAO, you don't even have a basic understanding of human nature. Most of us can look at the past and predict things in the future, but all that you can possibly 'know' is what CNN tells you. Here are a few things for you to ponder: There were almost zero US military deaths under Trump's Presidency When a single military contractor in Iraq was killed, and Iran thought that they got away with it by hiding behind the "it was a militia group" story, Trump killed Iran's top two generals. From Iran's POV, if that was a chess match, you couldn't even say that they got "a pawn", because in the US military arsenal one contractor is about 1/1000th of a pawn. The US took Iran's queen and a knight in dramatic fashion. When's the last time in history that the cost for killing a single soldier resulted directly in the deaths of two generals? I'm pretty sure that never happened. Trump's baseline for protecting Americans was astronomically high. He even protected Syrians with a very warlike attack when they killed their own people. Russia and Syria rattled their sabres after that, then Assad screwed up again, got hammered again, and the Russians and Syria didn't even do so much as snivel that time. They just learned a valuable lesson: Trump doesn't put up with attacks causing death. Biden can't pretend that his baseline for protecting Americans is anywhere near as high because he's already weaselling and snivelling under the Taliban's boot. This time the Talis are Corn Pop and Biden is just a child-sniffing perv with hairy legs. Americans keep getting killed and detained by terrorists and Biden is just...... ugh. The ME/far east terrorist groups have just gone from zero to hero in 7 months.

He killed the leader of Al Shabaab - Ali Hussein, Al-Baghdadi from islamic state (pancaked that terrorist group), Qaassam Al-Rimi from Al Qaeda (by the time Trump left office, Al Qaeda was considered to be history) and the top two generals from Iran's Quds force. I don't blame you for being completely clueless about this - you only watch fake news. So? Trump just wanted troops out of Afghanistan. His way of dealing with terrorists is to bite off the head of the snake, not to leave kids in shithole countries to die or lose limbs to IEDs. He uses missiles and drones, not kids, to fight his wars. I know that you either can't understand this, or that you'll deny it because lying is no big deal to you, but Trump's way of dealing with terrorists was wildly effective. Fear of terrorists wasn't a thing anymore in 2019. Cite? Of course I don't believe you, but if there's even a shred of truth to what you're saying it's guaranteed to be beliberatly misleading. News flash. Biden has bungled everything. The US is a dumpster fire now on every level. When I made the thread about "When the GOP's away the terrorists will play" I wasn't just guessing. I was able to predict in advance what you still haven't come to terms with yet. Trump's leadership was killing terrorism (in 2 ways), and Biden's blatant weakness was like an ad for Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Momentum for terrorist organizations right now is through the roof. Leaders can brag now, instead of turning the job down for some lame reason or another. The 2nd way that Trump was killing terrorism, which I didn't mention here, is that he wasn't stirring shit up. He didn't kill whole bunches of young muslims, paving the way for a new generation of anti-American fanatics. He got rid of islamic state, which even the Saudis and Iran hated, he killed some terrorist leaders, which no one can gripe about, and the body count against women and children was extremely low. He even got to play the hero when he convincingly bombed Al-Assad's targets, twice, for killing civilians. Trump was anything but weak. His long-term strategies were solid, and they were working well. If you can't admit that Trump's ME/Far East game was light years above Biden's, that's pathetic.

You're such a sucker for leftist bullshit. For starters, I said that Hillary/the Dems cheated on the election 3 times and I was 100% correct. That's actually just the number of times that she got caught. Trump never colluded with the Russians and no one has ever found any evidence of that. Zero. The CEO of crowdstrike already said that he has doesn't know for certain about the hacking theory, and even if that idiot did get hacked when she was storing data illegally, no one knows that wikileaks got their info from hackers. The data breach happened right after the whole planet found out that the Dmes screwed Bernie, it's pretty obvious that 50% of Dem supporters and 100% of GOP supporters would have been happy to leak her skeezy details. Assange himself said that he got his info from leakers, and unlike the Dems, the FBI, CNN and every other discredited source that you choose to follow, Assange has a flawless record of protecting his sources and telling the truth about where he got his info from. I'm not saying that his word is gold, but it counts for more than all those others. Mail-in ballots are by far the most fraud friendly way of holding elections. Since the beginning of elections, it's just been a big, fat, juicy target, made even easier by Dem policies like "signature matching is racist" and "unsolicited ballots should be mailed out to everyone". Just because the Dems didn't get caught doesn't mean that they didn't cheat, and the likelihood of them not cheating is less than zero.

Do I need to provide you the list of terrorist leaders killed by Trump? HE MOST CERTAINLY WAS HUNTING THEM LIKE DOGS, AND KILLING THEM. Who cares? Trump has always been about getting Americans out of middle east wars. His approach has always been to kill the leaders. "Let's have a war of attrition amongst the peons" is pre-Trump and post-Trump logic. Trump's deal with the Taliban never would have been "We'll pull our troops out and rely on you guys to send all of our weapons home and get our civilians to the airport." That is all Biden's doing. Trump's deal would be: "If this doesn't go smoothly, you'll be the first motherfucker to die. I killed the top general in a country with one of the largest militaries in the world, and with the planet's most extensive terrorist network, I'll kill you if you make a nasty tweet about the colour of our uniforms." What's the problem with that? The whole point of the war in Afghanistan was to put an end to the training of terrorists there. Huh? Pull out the soldiers, leave the weapons there, bring the soldiers back, and do it all during the Taliban's military campaigning season... "Doh! It's too late. Let's ask the Talis to guard our civilians and the other Afghanis who helped us fight them...." Biden code-named his operation: "Freeze! I have a gun pointed at my head and I'm not afraid to use it!"

What "Big Lie"? When did I say "everyone does it"? Of course the Dems cheated in 2020. It's impossible for them to have gone from "cheating 24/7, 365 days a year for over 4 years" to "not cheating at all" in one day, and if they did, why would CNN expect that, and how could they know it to be true in advance on election night? You'd have to be a complete retard to suspect that the Dems weren't going to cheat on the 2020 election. That's like: CNN "Look how fast that shark is swimming towards that wounded seal. It's definitely going to administer first aid to that seal." Leftards: "That lucky seal is in going to be saved!" It's a 100% established fact that the Dems lied and cheated from before the 2016 election right up 'til the 2020 election. That's not up for debate. They also spent that whole time creating voter-fraud-friendly election reforms like "no one needs ID to vote", "ballot signatures don't need to match the voter's signatures that are on file", and "ballots can be mass-mailed to the entire electorate, unsolicited", etc. If Bernie Madoff gets out of jail and comes to you with some great investment opportunities do you start telling all your friends that you've got the inside track to a huge financial windfall? Would you let Ghislaine Maxwell take your daughter or niece away on vacation? Your answer to either of those questions should be no (for gawd's sake please say no to the second one, at the very least) and you shouldn't trust the Dems.

Here's the breakdown: FYI Hillary cheated on the 2016 election 3 times. She conspired with the DNC to win the nomination, she cheated in the debates, then she colluded with foreign agents (including Russians) to influence the election. That is 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. Newsflash - she lost. That is 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. She is known to have given money to a law firm, Perkins Coie, who gave it to a former British spy, Christopher Steele, who paid Russians for 'intel'. That is 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. At no point was the status of the 'intel' from the Russians/Steele any better than "unverified". It's true that the FBI presented it to the FISA court as 'partially verified' but that was a lie. Absolutely nothing of substance that was ever provided to the FBI by Steele was ever verified. That is 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. The FBI absolutely broke laws and it's not a secret. They withheld exculpatory evidence, they lied to the FISA court about the validity of Steele's intel (and they did that multiple times to get the FISA warrant renewed) they unmasked people illegally, they continued working with Steele after they were told not to, and the whole operation was conducted in a thoroughly biased and dishonest manner. They even lied about the extent of their knowledge to the public to damage the reputation of a sitting president. The top 2 FBI agents on the case were fired for their various corrupt activities and an FBI lawyer pled guilty to lying to the FISA court. That is 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. The FBI never found any evidence of collusion. IE - they never advanced their case. At no point in the history of mankind has anyone ever provided a single piece of evidence that showed that the Trump campaign colluded with Russians. The Russians were known to have used a FB account to put out attack ads against both candidates in order to sow discord, and it's a fact that the Dems took the bait hook, line and sinker, and it's a fact that the Dems remain their useful idiots to this day, but that's not proof that Trump colluded. That is all 100% true, and not exaggerated in any way shape or form. Stop lying and making baseless insults just because you don't have a single tidbit to add to the discussion.

I trust the CTV's ability to steer the debates away from Trudeau's scandals, to make sure that he's never interrupted, he can interrupt whomever he wants, and he can just make accusations instead of answering questions. The debate will be all about the amazing things that he plans to do for Canadians, and his record will not be up for debate.

According to Politico: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/26/us-officials-provided-taliban-with-names-of-americans-afghan-allies-to-evacuate-506957 Those Afghan allies must be ecstatic that US officials have 'helped them get into the airport'.

You have been cowed. Your humanity is non-existent - your head and heart are ruled by the religious rantings of men who marry young girls. Maybe one day there will be a microchip that can be put in a human's head to control their every action and emotion, forcing them to do unspeakable things, but until then, religion is doing just fine.

Aug 26th, 11 days after the thread was opened, the Libs are already behind: I think that Afghanistan is influencing our election bigtime. Virtue-signalling was all that the leftists really had going for them, and now the left in the US is imploding as a result of disastrous leftist policies. Policing is down, violence is getting insane, the border is a debacle in every way imaginable, people won't go to work because they're sucking the covid teat dry, the homelessness and Fentanyl issues are getting worse every day, and anti-America sentiment from the squad is really unpopular now that the military is being humiliated by a bunch of wife-beaters. Leftist politicians and the dishonest MSM have been exposed as frauds for backing Biden. They've left the USA completely rudderless, and Trudeau is the exact same kind of patsy.

I think that the situation in the US is helping the Conservatives quite a bit. Canadians are seeing Biden's weakness play out in Afghanistan with very real consequences, and Trudeau is the exact same patsy. Wokeness isn't dead, but it's getting people massacred now, so the Libs have dropped 2% in the polls.

When it became apparent that it was time to leave they should have been: 1) evacuating civilians, 2) getting expensive military hardware out of the country, 3) retreating tactically towards Bagram, 4) airstriking advancing Talis 5) destroying whatever military hardware they couldn't get out 6) holding Kabul until all of the Afghani allies were out 7) withdrawing the last of the US/allied forces. Biden: 1) evacuate the military 2) give the Talis bagram and keep the indefensible airport ? vacay 7) double down on whatever it was that I said yesterday. 50. I mean fiddy. I'm Joey B.) Answer tough questions with: "THAT WAS 4 or 5 DAYS AGO! C'MON MAN!" 6) get CNN to show concerts instead of covering the news, because the news is bad. 4) giftwrap $83B worth of military equipment uhhhh 2?) Afghanis something or other 7) send the military somewhere to seem important. Oh wait, bring them back next. prolly 5?) Leave everything in the hands of his most capable general. His name is uh, he's uh... uh... 9) Hide Kamala, she's even more embarrassing than he is 7) Talk about covid instead of the thing. 7) get my orders from the dark guy with the beard, and don't piss him off. Wait, why isn't he in jail? Can't someone plant some weed on him? oops, it's not 1995 anymore. Damn, those were good times. Isn't it naptime yet? C'mon man. 10) say it's all going swymmenglee, swingimly, swimmingly, somethingly 19) blame Trump. DOH! THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN #1! 7) Quote something from critical race thingy 3) just say that anyone would have fucked up this badly, everything was done with perfect military persiss... Perrrr. Uhh.. You know.... the thing! 12) Finally. [exit stage right. oops. other right] I mean, honestly, did I get it right? Was that his master plan? They had 7 months to do this. They wrote their plan on the shortbus to school on the due date.

Do you mean like, "Cheating on an election multiple times, still losing, and then colluding with Russians for fake intel to use for a fake investigation into whether or not their opponent colluded with Russians, where their FBI sycophants breaks laws but still can't manage to fabricate enough evidence to advance their fake collusion?" That almost never happens.