WestCanMan

How do they come by the standard of 30% less severe? If it actually means 30% weaker then your straight-line math doesn't work here. Just imagine if you gave 100 regularly drinking males 3 drinks each, in 1 hour during/after dinner, and when you performed that exact same experiment 1,000 times, you found that on average about 15 of them would be drunk. If you gave 400 regularly drinking males 2 drinks each, in 1 hour during/after dinner, would you expect there to be [.7 x 4 = 2.8 times as many] 42 people drunk? Not at all. There might be 20, 15, 1, or maybe even 0. The point is that there's a threshold that you need to cross to push people over the line and that's exactly how covid works. The analogy that I give is that if you're walking on the edge of your grave, covid gives you a nudge. Healthy people aren't picked up and carried to their graves like they would be with Ebola or something like that. Here's the deal: almost 66% of the people who died in Canada were among the 4% of us who are over 80 years old (18,239 deaths). There were less than 800 deaths among the ~23,000,000 Canadians under 50. That's 2.7% of the deaths in 60% of the population. Another way of looking at it is 23 times as many deaths in 1/14th the number of people. The correlation is in granite. If covid pushes with 30% less force it's not likely to push many people into their graves at all. Even with the original, stronger versions of covid, 94% of the Americans who died needed to have other co-morbidities in order for covid to be able to finish them. Take away 30% of the severity, what's left? People on palliative plus a handful of really unlucky outliers?

If it wasn't for Fox News we wouldn't know that members of the FBI were charged with crimes for their illegal activity during the Russian collusion witch hunt. We wouldn't know that it was actually Hillary who colluded with Russians to influence the 2016 election. We wouldn't know that Dr Ford didn't name a location or a year that the alleged attack supposedly occurred, we'd all believe that Brionna was just an innocent girl laying in her bed when she got shot, we'd all think that Rayshard was just a bit tipsy and had a nap then got killed for no apparent reason, almost no Americans would have seen any of the G Floyd bodycam footage on TV, we'd think that K Rittenhouse carried a gun across state lines to hunt down protestors, we'd think that all of the BLM protests were peaceful, we wouldn't know that the Chazis killed a kid, we wouldn't know that the people at the Jan 6th mostly peaceful protest who were the guiltiest of all of committing the crime of sedition have never been charged because they were federal agents, we wouldn't know that people who handed out weapons at the Jan 6th mostly peaceful protest weren't charged because they were agents, etc. There are a lot of things that we wouldn't know, but to make a long story short, Americans would be just as stupid as Canadians are, politically. As Canadians we have some weird feeling of intellectual superiority over Americans but in truth it's the exact opposite. Leftist Canadians are, by far, the dumbest group of people on earth.

You're trying to one-up yourself in the battle of idioter vs ideotist again. Shocker. What stick did Obama hit Russia with? LMAO. Russia has Crimea and not so much as a splinter. Trump forced NATO members to ante up. It was necessary, and he's not weak. Leftists are actually devoted to being the useful idiots of communism, just ask the BLM leader who puts words in your mouth Beave. Are you even allowed to talk about Russia like this? You should ask.

Everything that I said was factual & important, your biased little brain just doesn't deal with 'facts': you only want opinions that damage politicians that you don't like. I don't care if Putin 'rebuffed Obama's friendly overtures'. Putin saw weakness and exploited it, just like I mentioned in the thread title. Lol, so dumb. FACT: Biden got dummied by the Taliban after they spent 18 months following Trump's plan to safely evacuate American soldiers and civilians. As of yesterday there were still Americans abandoned in Afghanistan (less than 12 now). FACT: Putin is a much smarter and stronger adversary than the Taliban, and this is all on his doorstep so it will be easy for Putin to ramp up the resolve of his people. FACT: Putin has already outmanoeuvred Biden. Russia is dealing from a position of strength now and the US is fragile under Biden. FACT: Biden has some of the lowest approval ratings of any president ever. Americans don't want war with Russia and after Biden already screwed up the border, covid mandates, crime, schooling, opioids, the economy, racial division and everything else that he has touched, they definitely don't want to see how bad he can screw up a confrontation with Russia. Dolted vs Goliath with tens of thousands of American lives at stake is not a highly anticipated drama from an American POV. FACT: Trying to shove NATO up Putin's ass isn't smart, and it's obviously very easy for Putin to win this PR war, especially given that the Dems told so many lies about Russia over the past 4 years. I get that you'd love for Biden to ram this one through and get off Scot-free like Trump did when he moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, but Trump was a strong president and people didn't fuck with him, or when they did they paid a heavy price. Biden is a weak, doddering fool and the only ones paying a price right now are Americans. Putin will eat his lunch. That's just a fact. And just remember, you're hearing this from someone who is better at predicting the future than you are at understanding the past.

Beave, I just saw where a guy introduced Biden to a 2-month-old baby. THIS IS BIGGER THAN WATERGATE!

What an idiot. You cited articles that just vaguely spanned 1991-2019 and a guy said that he flew "Trump and Clinton, more than once." Epstein "took a 14 yr old girl to meet Trump" in the '90s at Mar A Lago. Geez, then Epstein was banned from Mar A Lago. Again you've got nothing that links Trump to Epstein from later than the '90s, nothing that says he was a frequent flyer early on, nothing that says that he did anything with any underage girls, just a few innocuous things from the '90s farmed to look as bad as possible. You're either incredibly gullible and stupid or you're a determined liar but either way you still have nothing. Do you understand that Beave? And in either case you're just pathetic and sad.

How long did the posts stay up?

Again you're just lying. You keep on making the same stupid claim but you have never posted a link showing Trump had anything to do with Epstein since he got barred from Mar A Lago twenty years ago. I've never seen anyone with such an inability to feel shame aside from AOC. Are you guys toylit drinkin' buddies?

Wow, you sure wasted a lot of time posting all of that horseshit. Most of those topics are just things that you don't understand, as usual, even when they're as simple as saying nice things about someone so that you can have a relationship with them. Did you forget about Hillary's "RESET" button? Did you forget about Obama on the hot mic saying "I have a lot more freedom to shmooze with Vlad after the election ? "

I'm saying that Ukraine joining NATO is at least the same, probably even worse, and that's what's at stake here. You don't need to explain anything, but you should try to understand things instead of just using them as political talking points. Russia's geopolitical situation is nothing like America's, at all. They share a border with 11 or 12 countries including NoKo & China, they're across the Black Sea from Turkey and across the Caspian Sea from Iran, and they have the largest muslim population in Europe & they're physically close to all the nutjob muslim terrorist orgs. In short, they're either physically linked or in close proximity to all of the people & places that the US is in turmoil with. Being strong is a hobby for the US, but for Russia it's life & death. Allowing NATO to camp out right on their western border isn't just political intrigue for them. It's a massive threat to their security. Even China doesn't want NATO there. Your assertion that the US should just bully their way into a NATO partnership with Ukraine is not necessarily good foreign policy, and making a big move like that with the worst president in US history would be catastrophically stupid. One other thing, when did Russia suddenly become public enemy #1 for the Dmmies? Didn't your hero, Barack Obama, not famously quip "The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back" when asked about Russia as a geopolitical adversary? Didn't he slough off the whole concept of Russian interference in the 2016 election when Republicans like Matt Gaetz were sounding the alarms? It's dangerously stupid for Dems to lose track of who their adversaries are so easily, and then to provoke them unnecessarily without a full understanding of the extent of their provocation. It's like they're set to "FULL RETARD" all the time. "Let's defund the police!" "Oh we don't really mean defund the police" *proceed to defunding the police* "We actually mean defund the police but we need to use alternate slogans for it because we think that no one will notice that way. I hope no one sees this." - Obama Dem politicians in NY: "Let's get rid of the undercover division in NYC because we don't need them." Dem voters: "YAY!!!! YOU'RE SO PROGRESSIVE!" New NYC Mayor: "I have a great idea, let's start an undercover division to help fight crime and reduce the murder rate!" Dem Voters: "YAY!!!! YOU'RE SO SMART!" Dem politicians: "Let's let the prisoners out of jail because of covid. We'll get rid of cash bail too, so that anyone who commits a crime - like for example running over your baby momma with a car - can get out of jail within a few days." Dem News Media: "A car crash killed 6 people and injured 40 more at a Christmas parade in Waukesha." No wonder you're too ashamed to admt where you get your "news" from lol.

I said that your talking points are a mix of MSNBC and CTV, and that you don't want to admit what sites you get your 'news' ? from because you don't want me to prove how idiotic they are. I never said anything about Soros or Gates, you can talk to yourself about them. You still can't answer my question about the Cuban Missile Crisis, that's no shocker. I'd be surprised if you knew what it was and even if you did, you'd just make a fool of yourself again if you tried talking about it. Russia has already won this round. It's just time to start talking about Russia-Ukraine as "a win for peace if the US keeps their nose out". Do you really want the guy who botched a military withdrawal against a 3rd world country to get involved in military action vs Russia? ? You crack me up Beave.

I get that you hate Trump but literally every single thing that you say is just your own idiotic opinion. Putin went to war against Ukraine and seized Crimea when Obama was president and what did Obama do Beave? That's a question that you need to answer if you want to have any credibility here Beave. Then Putin's militias pretended to be Ukrainian revolutionaries, and they were used to take over part of Eastern Ukraine. What did Obama do? Again, nothing. He didn't even give them any good weapons to help them fight for themselves. Do you understand that Russia was more aggressive while Obama was president than they were at any time since before the Berlin Wall came down? If Trump was so soft on Russia then what did they manage to do when Trump was president? Nothing. Russian troops advanced on some of Trump's soldiers and all 200 of them got wasted for their trouble. Then Trump shut down their pipeline, even though Germany also wanted it built. Putin and Merkel together couldn't do anything but pout until another president was elected. Enter Sandman. As soon as Sleepy Joe was elected he gave Putin's pipeline the green light, but Russia still went right back on offence. Tens of thousands of troops went to the Ukrainian border that spring. Less than 6 months later there was an invasion force of nearly 200,000 Russians there and now Putin is giving the US ultimatums. I know that you want the Dems want to engage in brinkmanship here but they can't project power right on Russia's border. The cost would be astronomical, both in dollars and in money, and Russia would certainly win there. The US will just have to eat their own words if they talk too tough. Putin outmanoeuvred another Demmie and now he's one of the two most powerful men on earth, neither one of them being Joe Biden. If you understand all of these things, that's great. If you want to make an argument against any one of those points then that's great too, but don't talk about fondling people's balls here. You're conflating your chat forums. Cole's notes: Russia dummied Demmie 1 by conquering America's 'ally', Trump brought Russia to heel, then Russia almost instantly dummied Demmie 2. Now the US is in concession mode (or stupid mode).

Of course not, you steer clear of sources with actual facts. Let's see your sources Beave. You got busted here for lying about this already, so post a link if you think that's true. Crystal ball says..... Beave just keeps on lying and pretends that he doesn't proof of anything.

Every time that you post it's like you're trying to out-iddjit every other post you ever barfed up. Fact - when Obama was prez, Putin ate his lunch. Russia took what they wanted. When Trump was prez Russia didn't advance an inch. The second that Trump was gone Russia was suddenly the BMOC again. This is just another instance where I can predict things in advance that you can't understand with the benefit of hindsight. Deal with it.

You have leaders, you just don't know who they are. Pretty much everything that you say trickles down from MSNBC or CTV, regardless of where you think that you're getting it from. I understand why you're afraid to name your actual sources: you don't want me to destroy them point by point like I did to Globe & Mail a couple days ago. You can personally jump back and forth between lies but your sources are a sitting duck. Did you mention how you felt about the Cuban missile crisis? No? Why not? Because if you say that the Cuban Missile Crisis had a decent conclusion then it's hard for you to argue that Putin is wrong for not wanting NATO right on his western border. Am I right? Of course I'm right, that was a rhetorical question. If you are too afraid to name your sources then just run away like the brainwashed leftist snowflake you are. Talk about cliche lol.

Jussie Smollett is the worst kind of person that there is. He's a bigot and a race-baiter and he throws his friends under the bus to get out of trouble. He has the least amount of character of any human being in history. One last thing about Jussie - the way that he lied in court was just ludicrous. There's video evidence of him rehearsing the crime, his cohorts admitted that they did it with him, and yet he still insists that by some miracle of coincidence, the exact hate crime that he rehearsed just sorta happened the very next day in the exact place where they planned it. It's just bizarre that he thought that he could lie his way to innocence in the face of such overwhelming evidence. If he's not charged with perjury then there's no room for a judge in Chicago or anywhere else in the sate of Illinois to ever charge anyone else with that crime - they need to just remove it from the books.

This is obviously a weak, bullshit narrative that's being used to protect Jussie Smollett, and it came from the DA in Chicago who knew that Jussie was guilty to begin with but didn't even want him prosecuted. When the story wouldn't go away, and knew that she couldn't stop him from being charged because there was so much evidence, she used the trial to downplay the seriousness of what he did and most importantly, why he did it. It's well-known that Jussie was a Dem puppet and a Trump hater, and when he got on the national stage he didn't use it to play the victim role, he used it to cast white people and Trump supporters as racists and homophobes. What he did was outrageously bigoted and evil but he's being accused of just being a selfish moron. It was actually really important for Smollett to get called out for what he actually did, the trial was a sham.

This is all just too complicated for you Beave. My advice to you is to just stop watching the news because you're not really being informed, just controlled. Did it ever occur to you that if the information that Tucker was passing along was correct, and the 2018 chemical attack in Syria was fake news, it means that Trump attacked a nation under false pretences? It's odd that when Tucker discloses that he's friends with Hunter Biden, or when he questions intel that Trump acted on with direct military force, you think less of him for it. Don't you think that Tucker should report on things which make him or the people whom he supports look bad? Beave: "My news sources would never report on any information that damages the narrative of their political leaders! What is wrong with Tucker Carlson?" FYI Trump wasn't in favour of always spending money to intervene in the ME/far east. He struck a deal with the Taliban whereby if they agreed not to kill any Americans, Trump wouldn't kill their leaders, and that's why no Americans were killed in the last 18 months under Trump. Almost no US soldiers died anywhere while he was President. He had the withdrawal scheduled and there's no reason to believe that there would have been any casualties or deaths during the withdrawal if he was still the POTUS. Tucker doesn't want the US to intervene in Ukraine. That's a legitimate position to take. The fact is that the US is just so weak under Biden that it's inevitable that Russia will run the board for a while. Elect an idiot, take the losses, don't throw good money after bad.

That's just stupidity talking. You've had months to learn about the pseudovaxes' shortcomings & side-effects and yet you're still just spewing idiotic propaganda. There are a lot of very good reasons for not vaxing but until one of your favourite propaganda outlets finally acknowledges it you'll just keep your head in the sand. It's Russian collusion all over again for you. Will you ever start to question what you see on TV? It's just weird that you don't yet.

You guy is makes up language your own now? It's sad if you can't watch Tucker's show and just indulge in a bit of common sense once in a while. His show is nothing like you've been told to believe by the same propagandists who told you to believe Dr Ford, Rayshard, Jussie, Russian collusion, Ukrainian collusion, the laptop is Russian disinformation, Jussie is still innocent, Brionna Taylor, G Floyd, M Brown, etc, etc, etc. At what point are you going to realize that you've been stooged every minute that you spent watching MSNBC and CNN? That's all 100% stupidity and horseshit, but at least you're consistent. 1) If Putin's actions are completely crazy then what do you think of the Cuban missile crisis? Should Kennedy have just let Russia dot Cuba with missile silos? Of course Putin is not going to let NATO park on his western border if he can stop it, and Biden is even weaker than Obama was, back when Obama took over Crimea and part of Eastern Ukraine. 2) There are war mongers in NATO. Here's what a Republican said about the Ukraine situation (you'd already know about this crackhead if you watched Tucker Carlson) https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/roger-wicker-ukraine-russia-nuclear-b1971691.html. 3) My take on this situation is that Biden's abject weakness is a danger to the planet and to all of America's allies. He's feckless, stupid, unable to admit to his failures which prevents him from taking suitable action to remedy them, mercurial, slow, lazy and he's completely lost most of the time. In his most lucid moments of the day they put him in front of the teleprompter and he's still out to lunch. His presidency is a black eye on democracy.

I love dragon art.

Anecdotes that support a leftist narrative are always viewed as significant stats, but when something happens like the ivermectin-vs-covid stats coming in from India we're supposed to believe that a sample size of 5M people is too small. TBH I really don't want to see vaccinated people end up having reduced immunity to new or old covid variants or anything else. That would be a near-apocalyptic scenario. Best case scenario is that the omciron variant is weak and it ushers in the end of all the covid bullshit, and then the purebloods and vax nazis can all just live on with a simmering resentment of one another.

That sucks. I feel horrible for people in that position. That video is as bad as Iverson's practice video lol:

Pardon? You've said that we should leave the unvaxed behind and that they shouldn't receive treatment in the hospital if they get covid. You've also advocated for them to be removed from their jobs and you supported the NB gov't's plan to allow grocery stores to deny service to unvaccinated people. What's the difference between saying that unvaxxed people should be excluded from society and saying that everyone should be vaxed? Are you fuckin' kidding me right now? I don't want to say the same things that you do because I don't like to look foolish. There are definitely people that shouldn't vax right now, BASED ON THE FACTS, SCIENCE AND STATS THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE. Absolutely, 100%, healthy young children shouldn't vax. There hasn't been a single variant yet that has been as harmful to healthy children as the pseudovaxes are. Of course you shouldn't talk to the grandkids about it, that would be overstepping your boundaries by quite a bit, but it's natural for the adults in a family to talk about things like covid and the pseudovaxes which affect every aspect of our lives to great extent. If your children didn't want to talk to you about covid or the vaccines that's a sad commentary on how much they value your opinion. Maybe you should start regurgitating my talking points so that they start to respect you more ?

If Tucker said that there is kiddie porn on there then there's kiddie porn on there. His record for accuracy completely dwarfs that of the NYT, WashPo, CNN, MSNBC, CBC, CTV, Global and NBC.