WestCanMan

The thread was just started to draw attention to the fact that Schiff got caught lying again (i.e., there was a camera rolling while he was talking - happens every time). Beave dropped in the get skooled. That's about it.

I'm not second guessing, eyeball. I know the pattern well enough. You can't address the comments at the heart of our debate about Reid, Cannon, Smollett, collusion and v2, Farrakhan, BLM, Dr Ford, Waukesha, defund police, Brionna, Rayshard, Floyd, M Brown, COVID politics, Maddow, accusations of white supremacist terrorists at PTA meetings, Dem election cheating, etc, etc, etc because you know that you and your leftist buds were ultimately busted for being total liars on every story. I'm not really 'debating with you' as much as I'm just making the case about how stupid and divisive Dems are. I'm not drifting at all. You're ignoring the heart of the matter and trying to chip away on the fringes. Go ahead and tell me how Dems weren't busted for lying/stupidity on even one of their wedge issues cited above.

You act like those 'FACTS' are somehow damning but it's quite the opposite. Also, they weren't "traitors" they were "rioters". Also, by leftist standards it was a mostly peaceful protest because only a couple hundred people did anything illegal on that day. Thousands of people didn't break the law at all. The FACT is that there weren't a lot of people who did things that were serious enough to warrant criminal charges being laid. Oooh SNAP! There are people who stormed barricades and assaulted police and unlike you, I hope that everyone who assaulted officers in the US goes to jail for at least a year. I'll say it without ambiguity: I hope that everyone who broke a barricade or assaulted a cop on Jan 6 goes to jail. I hope that it's for at least a year. FACT: 6 months is a lot of time for a non-violent offence. If BLM rioters were getting 6 mos for non-violent offences there would be THOUSANDS of them in jail. There were less than 120, total, for all of the assaults and the looting & arson (which caused billions of dollars in damages and ruined communities). FACT: 5 years is a long time in jail. People get less than that for murder. Ashli Babbit was a 110lb, unarmed girl who was shot by a cop who was protected by barricades and other cops. If people who stormed police precincts or attacked federal gov't buildings during the BLM riots received the same treatment then there would be dozens of dead BLMers. Spare me the drama, Nancy. I get that there were 20,000 national guardsmen there on Jan 7th, that doesn't mean that they even needed 1.

Childish insult? Check. I've done the dance with you 100 times eyeball. You gobble up every single leftist narrative on the news without fail. Can you even name a time when you questioned something that you saw on CNN or CTV? And don't pretend like you have a source that's somehow better then them because wherever you get your news, it's just a carbon copy of their propaganda. Bottom line: if CTV or CNN said it, you followed their narrative verbatim and you just insulted everyone who presented actual facts which conflicted with your views. I get it. In a perfect world you'd be able to rely on major news networks in developed western nations but that's not usually the case at all here. Everything under the sun is twisted into a political narrative now - even viruses and the weather.

The reason why the people in that poll are prejudiced against Republicans (when they say Republicans most of them mean 'white people', because they just view black/asian/hispanic Republicans as 'uncle Toms') is because they watch too much of the same lying news that you do - and they're the most naive and stupid people in that group. Leftists are racists in general. They view every topic through the lens of race. FYI that's racist. An example is the G Floyd incident. It was viewed as being 100% racist for no other reason than the cop was white and the deceased was black. Tony Timpa was killed the exct same way, it just took longer in his case and the police were able to cover it up for months before the truth came out. There were black officers involved in that but no one said that was racist and that's good because, just like in the Floyd case, there was no evidence of racism at all. Those cops are all still cops btw. None of them went to jail even though they lied about the incident and covered it up. Leftists lie about current events [Rayshard, Brionna, Timpa, Floyd, Smollett, Sandman, Rittenhouse, M Brown] and history [slavery in the US, slavery in the rest of the world] to try to make white people look evil. That's racist. They even accept serious crimes by people who are out chasing windmills. E.g. Jussie Smollett's serious hate crime, the BLM riots, BLM assaults, BLM looting, BLM murdering police officers, the hijab hoax in Toronto, the Waukesha car murders, etc. They accept insane racism like that of Joy Reid, Louis Farrakhan and Nick Cannon. "They're still really good people, they just say some things that are racist because there was slavery in the US 150 years ago." Leftists inundate the MSM with the stupidest lies imaginable and then pretend that if anyone doesn't agree with them it's just because they're racist. "We need to defund police because they're committing genocide against blacks." Honesty that's not from an awful stand-up comedy skit, it's a real sentiment echoed by leftists all over NA. "The riots were mostly peaceful, with just a few murders, hundreds of assaults, some murdered cops, and billions of dollars in losses from looting [aka 'reparations'] and arson. They ignore serious threats like the severed head 'joke', calls for another actor to assassinate a president, grand visions of blowing up the whitehouse, etc are all ok. The lying about Russian collusion, Ukrainian collusion, Kavanaugh, SNC, WE, covid, etc is at a scale that was unimaginable just ten years ago. The fact is that in the vast majority of instances, leftists are 'less than' in every way. I'm not going to pretend to respect or like people like that. Math is life. Everything is on a bell curve. Of course there are people on one end of the curve that I outright hate in that group (AOC, Trudeau, Schiff, LaFlamme, Cuomos, Lemon, Maddow), some on the other end that I respect more than most conservatives (Philpot, JWR, Gabbard, Geraldo, Manchin), but in the middle there are a bunch of people who are helping to do a lot of damage to this country. I don't hate them, I just think that they're stupid and that they've allowed themselves to be brainwashed. Warning labels are mostly to blame. You're not a smart guy eyeball. When you watch CBC say that "blocking flights from China is racist" you nod your head and make that your mantra, then when CBC says "Trudeau is a hero for blocking flights from India" you nod your head and make that your new mantra. I never have to wait to see what your opinion will be, it was on CNN or CTV yesterday. Anything that they didn't cover, didn't happen, period. Don't you find it weird that your facts never stand the test of time, and that your best defence is always a childish insult?

OMG, you're stretching that crap thinner than graphene now. Imagine a society where kids who are a bit ahead of the curve ask their teacher some math questions from a bit over the horizon and they just draw a blank stare. "That's not really important, Timmy. Just learn your gender pronouns and memorize all of the reasons why we don't need any actual evidence to convict people like Trump & Kavanuagh'."

I don't hate rank and file dummies, I hate the people who know that they're lying but keep on plugging their propaganda anyways. TBH I did say that it's 'racist leftists' that I hate, and it's pretty well established that people in NA are allowed to hate racists.

? OK MH, let's force all of our football teams to consist of 5% black players, 17% asian, etc. Sound good? And then we can just squeeze people into teaching jobs even though they're unqualified. While we're at it, let's abolish the word "merit" and just use "diversity hire" in it's place from now on. On the bright side, making a resume will be easy. Q1: Identify your skin colour on the chart to the right. Q2: Identify your gender from one of the 53 options on the right, OR SELECT OTHER! Honest to god Trudeau, we didn't mean to slight you by not including your gender on this form. I was told that there were only 53 but I was like, "yeah right", but they insisted, so I only put 53 there. IMO there should be like, 60. Or 70. All of the cool ones are like, 45 and over. Q3: Identify the spots on the doll where conservatives hurt you.

Nope. The average Dem is a young adult who gets most of their political opinions handed to them from SNL, and then backs that up with a smattering of CNN/NYT/MSNBC/CBC headlines. There are also a lot of kids that get indoctrinated in college by profs who never really lived in the real world, who had most of their lives handed to them by their parents, and who therefor see adults and governments as a never-ending source of handouts. Then there are some losers who feel like they need to find a scapegoat for their problems, and CNN/MSNBC provide them with that on a daily basis. In all 3 cases you have children/young adults looking up to members of society who they feel like they should be able to trust, but who are actually just inculcating them with leftist propaganda constantly. Pelosi: "Give me a child until they're 21 and they'll never think for themselves unless they end up getting a job." I don't want to kill people just because they were exposed to too much propaganda when they were young, most people figure it out after they've worked full time for a few years.

@BubberMiley But, but, but Betsy..... Can you show me on the doll where Betsy hurt you? If you don't understand what she meant, that's your problem. She was obviously paraphrasing, and she didn't mischaracterize the article beyond what would be considered an appropriate level of sarcasm. The article 'recommends that white people should apologize for blah blah blah', all she's saying is that it's completely stupid to ask 'white people' to apologize for things that they didn't do, to people who are guilty of the aforementioned things but aren't asked to apologize in return. It's pretty much saying that whiteness means you're just guilty and you have to apologize to everyone. Ergo, she said 'apologize for being white'. Sarcasm is a form of humour, and understanding humour requires a high-functioning brain. Just know that she's capable of creating humour that you don't understand.

I didn't edit either then. I just copied and pasted your post the same way that you copied the MSN article. Thank you for admitting that you lied. Was that so hard?

The way I see it there are 3 kinds of Dems: 1) Naive people who are sucked in and mind their own business 2) Naive people who are sucked in and try to spread all the bullshit that they hear from the top 3) Scumbags who profit from the lying and who have to constantly double-down or shift attention away.

Those are just all the naive unfortunates at the bottom of the heap. At the top is a bunch of twisted, evil people like Nancy Pelosi and OC who just lie ll of the time and advocate for things like "defund police", and "let violent criminals out of jail".

Most people are aware of exactly what's up. Normally 850 people would be enough of a sample size to draw some sort of a conclusion from, but the results from that poll were quite extreme. I'm not ready to accept such an extreme and far-reaching conclusion from a poll that only included 850 people. That's probably less than 1 person per college. I probably get a bit too much joy out of proving how stupid leftists are, that doesn't mean that I want to physically harm anyone. Especially not the useful idiots: most people who identify as leftists actually do it because they consider kindness and inclusiveness to be of the utmost importance.

You got caught editing a quote to such a misleading extent that what you posted was a full-on lie, Bub. It's in black and white and everyone but you understands that. The gist of Betsy's quote was 100% accurate. Obviously the apology wouldn't be worded "Sorry for being white", but if what MSN said was accurate [I still can't access the site] then the Sally Anne recommended that their white people should apologize for "biases or racist ideologies held and actions committed.” If you don't understand that I'm not the least bit surprised, but it's all 100% true.

1) The fact that you think that something is discredited is the ultimate proof of it's accuracy, and 2) 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and the first 11 months of 2021 just called, they want to tell you something about the Russian collusion investigation. I hope you're sitting down, nice and comfy in your mom's basement. I never said that all 23,000 were illegal, and it's a certainty that many of those were fraudulent.

Check out Urban Dictionary dude, you just got pwned, again. Don't get your hopes up, #5 is just an idiom. FYI pwned isn't misspelled either. Hint: when you've just been skooled and your only comeback is to attack someone for their spelling of a single word, 1) make sure that you're not just being wrong again and 2) try not to completely botch your grammar.

Dismantled lol. All you do is get skooled here Beave, by everyone. You have AOC's shamelessness, I'll give you that much. Schiff got caught lying for the 100th time, for editing Jordan's message and then characterizing it as "his text". It was not "his text", it was just what Schiff wanted to pretend his text was. Do you remember all of the times that he said "New bombshell evidence is coming out this weekend that will prove that Trump colluded with Russia"? FYI, in all that time there was zero evidence proving Trump colluded with Russia. What do you care if he lied publicly 100 times or 99 times? Does it make that much of a difference to you?

You go caught red-handed lying again Bub. You actually EDITED the MSN quote 100%. I don't have access to the "Let's Talk Racism Guide" because my browser says "access denied" when I follow the link, so I don't know if MSN misquoted them, but you 100% misquoted MSN. Edit: Verb You took their words and modified them in a way which completely changed their meaning. The original: Your version: By removing the part at the beginning of the sentence that specifically referenced 'white people' you changed the meaning to be generic, instead of racist. The part that we're quoting is from MSN, so if you want to go through the guide

You edited the quote to change it's meaning. What a slimy, disgusting thing to do. The part of the quote that you cited went like this: The OP was 100% correct, you just edited the Salvation Army's quote, Schumer-style, to create your own lying narrative. They 100% did insinuate that all white people people need to apologize for racism and that no one else does. It's as plain as day. FWIW, MSN also had the exact same take on it. Only you and @Michael Hardner are into your little lie. #tenthousandreasonstohateleftists

I also wish everyone the best for the holiday season. For conservatives, the best of health and good times with family and friends, and for liberals, the best emotional support animals and conversion therapy experts possible. ❤️ That's the actual size of my heart.

You know for an absolute fact that there are people who think that voting for Trump makes you a racist, or at least they say it even though they know that they're lying. Republicans wouldn't have so much contempt for Dems if they weren't such hypocrites and liars. Dems like to say that they're the 'defenders of the peons' but nothing could be further from the truth. When rich people like Pelosi and Schumer advocate for 2M illegal border crossers, that doesn't help poor people in America. It helps wealthy people and suburban moms who want nannies and gardeners, but it actually hurts the poorest Americans. Those people compete for all the same unskilled jobs, they work under the table for less money, they compete for the same housing, etc. When illegal immigrants come in they compete directly with minimum wage earners, people on social security & pensions, young adults entering the work force, etc. Ironically the Dems somehow sucked all of those people into being their voting base. It's like an evil genius level of politicking. It's ridiculous that you can't see the similarities between how leftists here control the media, social media, judiciary and law enforcement, and the way that it's done in China. Can you honestly say that our media [CTV, CBC, Global] is any better than Xinhua or TASS? Trudeau made a law and then controlled the judiciary to help SNC "We bribe Canadian politicians" Lavalin, and then he looked down his nose at China and said that "the government here couldn't help Meng Wanzhou because the gov't here doesn't exercise control over the judiciary." It was Xinhua that had to point out the blatant, lying hypocrisy of that statement. No one in our media mentioned it. How much of a slap in the face is it when a hard-core communist propaganda outlet exposes the Canadian media and gov't for their anti-democratic MO? We used to think that we were better than them, but we're far closer now than you'll admit. I can't tell you how sick I am of racist leftists. I hate leftists with a passion.

For sure, but it's still not really an accurate reflection of anything. A lot of people are a mix of 'descended from slaves & slavers', and a lot of the people who weren't slaves or slavers in America descended from those people in other countries. The classic assumption is that almost everyone who is black is descended from slaves but it couldn't be further from the truth. Black slave-owners existed even in the US, but they were common all over the world and at various points in history they were the world's biggest slavers. There are also a lot of people who weren't 'slaves', per se, but their lives were no better. People were drafted to fight in wars in their teens, people worked in coal mines for not much money back before unions became a thing, etc. What's worse? Being a slave until you're 50 and having grandchildren, or getting drafted and then dying in the mud of Viet Nam at 18 yrs old? Not everyone can be compensated. It's just all a joke.

Kamala put Charlamagne tha toad in his place for a moment the other day and apparently the Dems are doing "damage control" for her. I didn't see the whole thing, maybe some of it really sucked, but when he quipped "Who's the president: Joe Manchin or Joe Biden?" I thought that it was appropriate for Kamala to step on him. She stuck up for Joe and then she said "...and my name is Kamala Harris and I'm the Vice President". At least one of America's top 2 people has a descended testicle. The actual problem is that she went on his show in the first place. It's far beneath the office of the VPOTUS to give an interview to a lowlife like that. Lay down with dogs, get fleas.

That qualifies as a "brilyunt sumry" by leftist standards but this is an adult forum, so it just counts as a lie. Go fish, son.