WestCanMan

Nothing to say about the CNN pedos? I brought them up first, got called a batshit crazy conspiracy theorist even though I was 100% correct, and then Beave just cited one of his ridiculous sources to draw attention away from the fact that CNN had high-ranking employees who were long-time, serious pedos. One of them was training children to perform sexually. The only thing worse is a guy like Olson who had sex with them and then killed them. But honestly, what even happens to kids who get trained to perform sexually? Do they allow them t become adults and maybe testify against them, or do they kill them? Beave's sources to this point have always been bogus, and even if some of it is true there are people accused of things like "having sex with a 17 yr old", which is legal in Canada. In fact, pre-Harper the age of consent here was 14 if you can believe it. Another one of those guys was charged with having a small amount of child porn. When you consider the lengths that the Dems went to when they were trying to frame Trump for Russian collusion (Hillary's lawyer - Sussman - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, an FBI lawyer - Clinesmith - was charged criminally for providing false evidence, and other top members of the FBI like McCabe, Orr and Strzok were fired or demoted for their own malfeasance) I think that it's normal to assume that some of these charges are bogus.

I didn't say that CNN never reported on pedophiles, I said that they never outed their own pedophiles. They had two. I think it was project veritas that busted them. You can read all about it if you want. https://nypost.com/2021/12/15/cnn-fires-pedophile-chris-cuomo-producer/ https://nypost.com/2021/12/30/second-ex-cnn-staffer-under-investigation-for-alleged-crimes-involving-minors/ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/second-former-cnn-reporter-police-investigation-rcna10457 So yeah, 2 CNN pedos. Not bad, I thought that there'd be more.

Groomers. Most leftists are either groomers or they support it. Did you notice that in the week when Ghislaine was expected to start naming names CNN outed TWO PEDOPHILES? CNN has been on the air since 1980. That's 40 years. Over 2,100 weeks. How many other pedophiles did CNN out in 2,100 weeks? What are the chances of something happening twice in one week and zero times in 2,099 other weeks? It's so close to zero that mathematicians would call it zero. In short, CNN had to have been ignoring the pedos in their company for years. Why is that? Try to answer that hnestly without using the word "groomer" lol. I know the definition of fascism, and I gave you a perfect example of it. And FYI, me trying patiently to man-splain something basic to you isn't fascism. Democracies elect governments, governments create legislation when they get majority approval. That's democracy. Florida democratically created legislation. Now ya should know. Don't get this one wrong again. The emergencies act was unilaterally enacted by the PM. The implementation of that act is basically fascist in nature, no matter who invokes it , or when, but that level of power is actually necessary in times of emergency, so it's possible to use that level of power responsibly. When that happens, Canadians will likely appreciate that it was worth it. He didn't use it responsibly, he used it to reinforce his bogus pseudovax mandates and to end the humiliating protests with a combination of undemocratic measures which brought shame to our country. The Senate, long thought to be completely useless, was speaking out against his overreach and his fascism, and they were actually voting to put an end to the fascist overreach. I don't know if they're even done anything before. They lost the rubber stamp that says "nay" in 1938 and they just got it replaced this year. They did it because apparently the Sente can put an end to fascism. Who knew? That was hardly an answer to anything, let alone to the legitimate points that just went over your head there. And that's not what Disney did - they swore that they'd put an end to DeSantis's anti-grooming law. They got their hand slapped. Boo-hoo. If they would have stuck to entertainment instead of fighting the anti-grooming law they'd be just fine. It's important now for other companies to be able to out-compete Disney. It's not fascist for me to tell the truth. It's fascist for a small group of groomers to change laws which are duly created by the will of the majority. Liars do have the right to free speech, but Disney paid a steep price for their lies. Live and learn. Disney isn't guilty because I say so they're guilty because they're guilty, I just pointed it out to you. I can't make you understand it though, any more than I could get a bug to understand pedophilia. It doesn't really exist outside of humans (mostly leftists). Yay for you! You got to invoke the name of one of your heroes today. I don't "believe" they're lying. I know they're lying, just like you do. Their lie is fun though, it adds to the virtue signalling nonsense that keeps their party afloat. You actually need it. I'm not gonna stop pointing out the fact to you that the bill doesn't prevent "gay speak", it prevents "hetero-speak" to the exact same extent. It's a "don't be a groomer" law - leftists HATE it for that reason. ? cry me a river Beave. I don't really care what you think about the Russia/Ukraine war or anything else for that matter. FYI supporting Putin would sound like: "Putin is a great guy and I hope he gets re-elected." I don't really care about Putin, but I'm not supporting Biden/Zelenski's idiocy. Ukraine can burn for all I care. It's how the world works Beave. Get used to it. If you provide an extremely valuable service to your country which no one else is providing, you get some perks. When you turn into a vulgar, lying piece of crap you can lose those perks. If Raytheon keeps making the best shiny toys the gov't will keep giving them perks. If Raytheon starts providing modern weapons to Russia they'' lose those perks. Makes sense, right? Raytheon is a private company, they could make weapons for Russia if they really wanted to, they just know how bad of an idea it is, and what kind of crackdowns they'd face. Yes, they'd appear quite fascist in nature. This law is a response to what Floridians have seen on the "Libs of TikTok" page. Liberal teachers talked about the things that they were teaching kids. The gov't responded appropriately and democratically. It is grooming. Teachers are in a vast position of power over the most vulnerable and impressionable people in the country. Kids are "entrusted to their proper instruction & care", not "given to them as blank instruments to be indoctrinated in any manner they see fit". Talking to kids about sexuality opens them up to being sexually exploited. OMG where are you from? Of course I've met trannys. I live in the lower mainland of BC. Being a tranny is perfectly fine in it's time and place, but talking about trans-sexuality to other people's kids in no more of an option than talking to them about heterosexuality. Period. It's a family matter in our society. Up 'til now we didn't even have to question that. If you think that it's fine for me or any other random poster here to strike up a conversation with your small children or grandchildren about my sexual preferences that's weird, and fwiw I'm not interested, but trust me, you don't have my permission and I'll leave it at that.

OMG. I'd be speechless if I didn't already have so much experience dealing with leftist stupidity. They characterized it as a "crash". Do you know what a crash is? Do you know the difference between "crashing" into 46 people and "intentionally running 46 people over"? FYI they are not the same thing at all. It's like the difference between "he shot 10 people in a racist rampage" and "some of his stray bullets hit 10 people when he was out shootin' around". It was a terrorist attack: 1) Witnesses said that "he swerved to hit people". 2) He was incredibly motivated as an avowed racist and as a BLM activist to attack people, 3) he has a history of using that vehicle as a weapon, 4) he rapped about killing people, 5) then he specifically killed a whole bunch of the exact people that he professed hatred towards. Then CTV gave him a headline to play his victim card. Did CTV say that "A man was walking through a Buffalo store with a gun and accidentally shot some people"? Because that's what "his car crashed into 46 people" means. They do not 'have faces' if they're killed by 'our guys' (in this case BLMers are 'CTV's guys'). The victims remain nameless and faceless so that their story doesn't generate a lot of emotion, which means that they will quickly be forgotten and the killer's cause will evade scrutiny. "A 6 yr old succumbed to his injuries in a Waukesha hospital, becoming the 6th fatality of that awful car crash" doesn't generate as much emotion as "Little Timothy Johnson was proudly walking with his sister behind his grandpa's float at the Waukesha Christmas parade when his ribs and neck were broken by Darrel Dbag's SUV as he plowed the crowd during his terrorist attack in Waukesha. Timmy was widely known for his kindness, and his teachers and classmates are distraught. Look at this massive crowd of sobbing people at his funeral." The people killed in Buffalo get that name/face recognition. Their lives mattered. Their deaths mattered. Their killer was evil. The people killed in Waukesha get buried. Their lives were meaningless. Their deaths were partly a function of their own guilt. Their killer was just a dude running away from a domestic disturbance, who now feels demonized by right-wing nutjobs. That's CTV for ya. That's why CV is filth.

No, I'm saying that it's a perfect example of CTV pushing their narratives. Waukesha was a "crash", according to CTV. The killer was out of jail on $1K bail, he was actually in jail because he used his vehicle as a weapon against his baby momma, he wrote and created a rap video about the Rittenhouse verdict in that time, then he used that same vehicle as a weapon for the second time in a month to kill 6 people and injure 40 others in what CTV calls "a crash". Here are their own words: It's not really an 'allegation' per se, he punched her and then ran her over and there were tire marks on her clothes. CTV's article says that the killer feels like he's being demonized. They also referred to it as a tragedy, etc, but there was no mention about whether or not people should feel safe at Christmas parades, although there have been several high-profile attacks against Christmas parades and Christmas villages or whatever you call them. At the Christmas village in Vcr there were truck barricades and armed security all around, but CTV never really mentioned that people don't feel safe at Christmas events. In any event, CTV ignored the killer's racism and BLM support, portrayed him as a victim, described the event as a crash instead of a mass murder, ignored the effect that the attack had as a terrorism event, and ignored the victims (I couldn't find a CTV article about the victims, or any videos of people crying at their funerals). Their coverage of the Buffalo attack was the exact opposite: the attacker was [correctly] identified as a racist, they ignored his mental health issues (he threatened his classmates with murder as well and went into a psych ward for it), they played up the incident as a terrorism event, and they gave the victims faces and backstories, covered their funerals. I know that you're completely unaware of the significance of giving the victims of tragedy "a face", but it increases the emotion of the events massively, and the more emotion that surrounds an event the more of an indelible impression it leaves, and it aids in the assignment of blame with their narrative. CTV is pure filth and their viewers are idiots and muppets at best.

The dictionary disagrees:

Buddy, every story on CTV is garbage. Every. Single. One. It was on the TV on the ferry this weekend when I was coming back from Victoria, they were playing up the hysteria around the Buffalo shooting and trying to act like white racists were the biggest threat to America again. They were showing some people crying at the funerals and showing stats about how terrified black people were of another attack. It was the opposite of the coverage of the Christmas parade attack at Waukesha. I can promise you that when black people and Chinese people walk around outside that it's not white people that they're afraid of, it's black people. At the beginning of covid, when Chinese people were the subjects of racially motivated attacks, the media tried to act as if it was white racists, but almost all of the attacks caught on camera were by black people. Black people kill 50 other black people in the US almost every weekend. Yes, black people do live in fear of violence, but if they're being honest, it's almost exclusively from other blacks. Racial division would be far less of an issue in the US if CNN et all weren't pushing it as much as they possibly could.

To a leftist, a Dr Seuss 'novel' looks like that. It's always a mix of power & ideology. The need for power is central to the 'big government' philosophy, which is leftist by definition. Being a conservative government is quite the opposite of lusting for power. It's about giving more power to individuals. The ideology of making war on others isn't part of the left-right scale, but you'll find that big government types like Hitler are the most keen to make war on others. Trump was as conservative as any leader America has had in a long time, he didn't start any wars. Almost no American soldiers died under Trump. I'm sure that you must love Trump deep down inside, even if you can't admit it. $10 says that May is a worthless simpleton who would have destroyed this country. The environment was the biggest issue among Canadians in the 2019 election yet her greenies got less than 7% of the popular vote. The BQ even got more votes than the greenies did, and BQ is only in 1 out of the 13 provinces & territories.

I disagree that someone has to be ready to fight for their country to be considered a real American, it's a complex society with a lot of vital roles to be played by a lot of people with entirely different skill sets. For example, a nerd might twiddle away at a desk for a few years and come up with a system for a cruise missile which gives the US a huge advantage over their enemies. He wouldn't be risking his life but he'd accomplish far more than any one man on a battlefield ever could. I think that anyone who contributes to the greater good of the US in whatever way they can is a real patriot, but I think that in a lot of cases they may be misguided and do more harm than good. I'm not saying that someone could be as self-serving/off-base as AOC, Pelosi or the Bidens are and still be considered a patriot, but for sure there would be some Dems who think they're serving their country, even though they're doing the opposite.

As it stands, 2000 Mules has proven, using reliable tracking info which was corroborated by video evidence from gov't time-stamped cameras, that in the swing states, illegal election activity resulted in the casting of enough fraudulent ballots to swing the election in favor of the Dems. People definitely should watch it and judge it for themselves.

So between Nov 6th and Nov 23rd they fully investigated the election and proved that there's nothing more to discuss, ever. ? In other words, your head is firmly lodged in the sand and nothing will ever extract it. Russian collusion was disproven in January of 2017, you entertained that topic for 3 more years. What changed, MH?

No, it means that you don't have any reasonable arguments, so you want me to run and fetch opinions which you can then then refute based entirely on your own assessment of their objectivity. That's from Nov 2020. What's your point?

No, Dinesh made a claim, and people who watched the movie were talking about its content in a thread about the movie. You refused to watch it, tried to discourage others from watching it, and then your best argument against it was "You can't find an objective 3rd party that supports it" lol. Your debate tactic of just saying "find an objective 3rd party that supports it" is just a way of saying "I have no leg to stand on, but I challenge you to find something that meets my approval." Yeah, you did. By your own admission you didn't watch the movie but you felt the need to weigh in against it, and to discourage others from watching it, and your best argument was "I have no leg to stand on, but I challenge you to find something that meets my approval."

If I have to explain the difference to you then you obviously won't understand it. Let's just leave it at "Most people understand how important it is to take drastic measures against terrorism, and those same measures aren't warranted in every other circumstance known to man." Of course I know that you won't understand that, but it still needed to be said. Anyone familiar with the topic of covid in the US knows that there were only 5 Americans killed by covid when Trump blocked people who had been to China in the past 14 days from flying to the US. Anyone familiar with the topic of covid in the US knows that there were less than 100 Americans killed by covid when Trump shut down a large part of the economy. By contrast, the WHO was busy telling the world that H2H wasn't happening and that they shouldn't be blocking flights, which turned out to be a catastrophic mistake. People like DeBlasio and Pelosi were telling people to ride the subway like normal and hug people in large crowds, Trudeau left Canada open to flights from China, Gov Cuomo won an Emmy for bragging about his covid awesomeness while he was sendng infected people into care homes and then fudging the death tolls to hide the care home massacre. Given that everything that you said was hooey, the likelihood of covid being a potential bioweapon remains unchanged. Extremely intelligent people have been acknowledging the possibility that covid was a bioweapon right from the beginning of the covid outbreak. Check my history here if you don't believe me. Democrats are far to the left of conservatives, supporting policies like free medical and dental for illegal immigrants, paying off student loans, free tuition, free housing, etc. FYI those are conservative vs liberal issues. The fact that Obama was into drone-striking people has nothing to do with liberal or conservative policy. You're trying to plunk the price of corn onto a graph of drinking & driving arrests and acting like it means something.

Find an objective 3rd party that doesn't back his claim. That's your own debating tactic, I'm sure you can handle it.

Not confused at all. You're trying to send me on a wild goose chase, and find people who confirm what Dinesh says, just so that you can say "He wasn't objective!". I turned it back on you. Find someone objective who doesn't believe the evidence. You're the one who's trying to debunk all of the evidence without even glimpsing at it. You're the one who needs to provide a good reason for doing such a childish thing. ? That's lame, weak and stupid all at the same time. You spend hours and hours opining about politics. You're on here every day. Of course you have time. You just have to support a narrative, and you can't do that if you allow yourself to be exposed to the facts. As usual, facts are your enemy.

So name your objective party who has commented on the movie then... You can't, so instead you randomly pontificate on the underpinnings of democracy, as if there's some straw in there to keep your idiotic debate points afloat while they're spinning into the toilet-vortex of your mind. There are 3 kinds of people: 1) people who have watched 2000 Mules, who understand it, and are willing to discuss the content 2) people who have watched it and desperately want to challenge the content but can't, so they pretend that they haven't seen it because they are above watching it 3) people who refuse to watch it because they know that it will upset their apple cart, and who also pretend that they are above watching it. It's not my first rodeo. I know for a fact that you'd be regurgitating the leftist propaganda, claiming to refute the evidence laid out in the movie, if it was worth regurgitating, but it only works in an echo chamber, so the good little leftist's only defence in an actual debate is "WE DON'T NEED TO SEE IT! THE ELECTION WAS DECLARED TO BE THE MOST SECURE ELECTION IN AMERICAN HISTORY RIGHT ON CNN! TALKING ABOUT 2020 ELECTION FRAUD IS TREASON! JAN 6th WAS AKIN TO PEARL HARBOUR AND 9/11!", i.e. - "WE REFUSE TO HAVE OUR NOSES RUBBED IN THE TRUTH!"

The Dems love to say "bipartisan support" if they get a single Republican to come to the dark side, but they sure don't tolerate their own members voting with their own conscience. Their attack dogs will harass women going to the bathroom if they don't conform.

So it's like I said, you still haven't watched it because you'd rather keep your head up your ass like a good little leftist. "We, the sheeple, will not gaze upon that which is forbidden to us." You're an expert on living within conspiracy theories, you just don't know it. "When you're dead, you don't know you're dead, it's only difficult and painful for others. It's the same thing for stupid people (eg, conspiracy theorists)." Huh? How much time, exactly, was spent on considering whether or not this was a bogus topic? CNN declared right on election night that the 2020 election was "completely legitimate" after spending 4 years saying that the 2016 was completely fraudulent, and they never managed to come up with any evidence that either claim was true. They've never wavered from that position. At what point was any time spent on this topic? Coming up with proof of widespread voter fraud wasn't easy, but it's important to look at. When someone has indisputable evidence of voter fraud in the world's foremost democracy, shouldn't you at least look at it? What do you have to do with your time that's more important than that, aside from posting your lies on an internet forum? Name a single objective 3rd party from anywhere in the world, MH.

The only way to be a liberal now is to wallow in absolute ignorance. They grasp at virtue signalling like a drowning man clutching at straw, they regurgitate the propaganda like birdies crying for mama's worm, but above all else, they ignore the scandals, lies, slander and all of the utter failings of their demagogues. If they suddenly gained hindsight they'd have to come to terms with the fact that they were just useful idiots this whole time, while they thought that they were paragons of virtue.

In other words, you want to keep your head up your ass. Shocker. Glad to see that you didn't let your overwhelming ignorance stop you from acting like an expert on the subject. You need to stop posting here, you're tanking the level of discourse on this forum. How is that a reply to anything that I said? I said that you are here trying to convince people that they should keep their heads in the sand with you. I didn't say anything about "tha man tryin'a keep D'Souzan dowwwnnn", bruh. You say that, yet you haven't even uttered a single word about the content of the movie..... The only thing that's not standing up is your ignorance and drivel.

CTV has never told the truth the truth about anything. They spread all of BLM's narratives, they regurgitated all the lies and hysteria about Trump and about Russian collusion, they ignored Trudeau's hatemongering, they told lies about the Freedom Convoy 24/7, they've lied about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, they completely downplayed all of Trudeau's scandals, etc. What topic do you think that CTV has covered honestly and fairly?

We need to understand everything we see on CTV and CNN is lies and disinformation, if we watch it at all then we are left to sift through it all and try and figure what portion of their story might be true. When a gutless criminal like Justin Trudeau calls me a racist just because I didn't take the jab there's no room left for polite discourse. When a known terrorist supporter like Jagmeet Singh starts slandering the Freedom Convoy and calls them racists and hatemongers there's no room left for polite discourse. People should be yelling at them. Those people need to understand that what they are doing is wrong, and they need to fully understand how wrong it is, and how people feel about them. It's absolutely legal to yell at those clowns.

Back on topic, THE MOST RACIST/BIGOTED THING THAT ANYONE CAN ASPIRE TO IS CREATING A NEW COUNTRY WHERE YOUR __________ IS ALL THAT MATTERS. "We need all of Texas to be a country that's only black people" - it's been said by people who believe it. "Other countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia aren't muslim enough, we need a caliphate where only muslims live" - islamic state. "White people are being replaced by darkies" white nationalist racists "We need a new country that is Sikh in every way, shape and form!" - Khalistani separatists, including Jagmeet Singh. Most Canadians are completely ignorant of what that would look like, but Pakistan was created from partitioning India in the late '40s and it resulted in genocides which killed 10M people. People haven't gotten any better in all that time. The Pakistanis committed another genocide in 1971 killing another 3M people. They even planned it - Pakistan's top general was quoted as saying "If we kill 3 million of them the rest will eat out of our hands." The separation of Khalistani would have no chance whatsoever of being peaceful. The only time that there was ever a peaceful partitioning of a country is when Israel was created (the Israelis have killed far less than 100,000 people, and 99% of them are foreign soldiers who attacked Israel). The existence of Israel is still considered an abomination by the vast majority of the Arab world, and complete genocide against all Israelis may be an eventuality.

You got played, son. If people cared about a guy who got kneeled to death they would also care about this guy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Tony_Timpa If the murder of George Floyd had anything to do with race just by virtue of the way that it happened then the murder of Timpa was racist as well. I said that BLM was marxist and they absolutely are. By their own admission they're "trained Marxists". They even advocate for strange ideas which have nothing to do with "the importance of black lives", like abandoning the nuclear family. Their stooges, aka protesters, have an emotional reaction to the incendiary name, and anyone who disagrees with their violence and disinformation can automatically be branded a racist because "they're arguing against the fact that black lives matter" (you did it yourself, pathetic). BLM selectively edits videos of police interactions to make the police look bad all the time, it's part of their job description. They lie about the details, and they push, push, push so loud and so publicly that their lies outpace the truth. They just generate the emotions and their stooges get violent. "Brionna was killed for sleeping black!" https://www.thenation.com/article/society/breonna-taylor-was-murdered-for-sleeping-while-black When the dust settles and the truth comes out it doesn't even matter, because the MSM has moved on. They knew this day would come and they already have the next bullshit story lined up to distract their minions. You were a police officer ffs. Imagine if you were out at a residence, protecting a mother and her children from the violent father, and he punches you in the face, and then you get involved in a possibly life and death struggle, so you aggressively put the man on his back and wrestle to get him under control, no holds barred. He hits his head on a coffee table, stone cold dead. The whole thing is on video, but guess what the public gets to see... everything that happened after you got punched in the face. That's it. Kids were crying "Don't hurt my daddy!". And BLM's social media accounts are hyping the story of a cop on FB, Twitter, youtube, and even CNN and MSNBC are showing the cop "who murdered an innocent black man in his own house, in front of his kids, by bodyslamming him on the coffee table that his great-grandpa made for his great-granny when they were still slaves!". Your whole career is reduced to the 2 minutes from after you got punched in the face by a wife-beater, and the entire MSM of a whole country is pushing the BS story. That's what happened to the cop in Ferguson in his own car. He showed up to respond to a violent robbery, went to question a suspect (not a lot of guys are as big as M Brown was), all of a sudden he's reaching into your car trying to steal your gun, saying he's going to kill you. Then the MSM hyped that bullshit to death. "A cop drove up to a group of teens and murdered one from his car in front of hundreds of witnesses!" - that was the MSM's narrative and they went with that for a long time. They called Brown "The Gentle Giant" and told stories about him giving his mom flowers, how much his teachers liked him, but they refused to show the videos of his violent robberies from moments before he was killed. Imagine that you're a cop hearing the MSM telling horrible lies about you for weeks after something like that. YOU SUPPORT THAT SHIT. Pathetic. Decent cops who go risks their lives every night hate - your - guts. No, what you said was stupid, what I did was tell the absolute truth about BLM. They are absolutely 100% every single thing that I said and there's nothing else that's really worth knowing about them. They edited videos to make cops look bad and they spun narratives to make cops look bad and then they stopped investing their money back into false narratives and started buying lots of houses, even though they're "Marxists". I believe that BLM's leaders are Marxists because the leaders of BLM said "We are trained Marxists." I didn't trick them into it. https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/ Google it. It's everywhere but the MSM sources that you trust. It's bizarre that after all this time you still question my statements of fact and believe everything that you see on CTV and CNN. The perpetrators of the arson and looting were the people who were stooged into believing that Brown was a gentle giant, Rayshard was shot "for no reason while he was just running away", Brionna was killed for sleeping black, "you can tell that Floyd's murder was racist by the way he was killed", etc. CNN and the rest of America's MSM pimped the false narratives and glossed over the violence. Kamala Harris gushed "It's a movement. It won't stop. It shouldn't stop. This will go on until after Christmas!" She didn't say "YAY VIOLENCE!" but that's what her words meant. Michelle Obama told kids to "stay angry" at the height of the rioting. And... you're their stooge. You repeat their mantra "If you're against BLM then you think that black lives don't matter."