WestCanMan

How do you know what he was 'hoping'? And FYI, there are no 'damaging revelations'. Just more Dem lies and media hype. Hs campaign isn't tied to Dem/MSM bullshit. It's tied to a need for solid, adult leadership in the WH. Thanks for comin' out.

I chose the 3rd option: Up until approximately 16 weeks it should be legal, and only for health/medical reasons thereafter.

After you vote, please comment on where you voted.

That's a series of inaccurate, childish and undemocratic statements. 1) The constitution is important. Not abiding by it is what causes a loss of confidence in the republic. 2) FYI the SC doesn't "make laws' and 'grant rights', they interpret the constitution and laws on the books to make legal rulings. Overturning was the proper interpretation of the constitution, even RBGinsberg said so. The original decision was quite improper, and was nothing less than judicial overreach. Only legislation and amendments to the constitution can create laws. 3) The vast majority of Americans are in favour of abortion until approximately 15 weeks. It's not even close. At some point, the laws/constitution need to be amended to match the will of the people. Not fringe groups at either end of the debate. 4) Lying media, lying politicians, illegal mandates, a corrupt federal police force (FBI), and judges ruling from the bench are the things which do the most damage to confidence in the Republic. You support them all. Don't gripe when democracy goes down the toilet when you're the one who's twisting the lever.

At around week 16 the fetus is making choices. It can taste what the mother recently ingested, and if they like it, they drink more amniotic fluid. If she eats something they don't like, or she smokes or drinks alcohol, it drinks less. That's how smoking causes low birth weight. It's not viable at that point, but it's no longer just a blob of proteins. At ~ 7 months it can survive outside the womb. It's a 'baby', i.e. a 'human', it's just not born yet. Killing it is sickening.

People make choices that I would never make and that I don't respect all the time, but not all of them are worth bitching about. The "choice" to kill healthy post-viability fetuses is worth more than just bitching about. It abhorrent.

You're obviously the dropout here, you're posting articles which you don't even understand. That's a political litmus test - if you don't know what it means then you're so stupid that you have no hope of being anything but a leftist. I hope you enjoyed eating those paint chips when you were a kid because this is the end result.

You're pro-abortion by definition. You can re-brand it however you like within your echo chamber, but people who are more interested in accuracy and the truth are 100% correct to call you pro-abortion, because your liberal use of abortion is what differentiates you from healthy members of society. It just is what it is.

He's crazy now. There's nothing rational left there to deal with anymore.

Stop egging the pro-abortion trolls on, they're not responding to logic and humanity. They're just getting sicker and sicker. I don't think this is a healthy place for them.

Oh man, you'll just go to any level of stupidity and lies just to keep on saying words. I hope that the day comes when you look back on that post and feel shame because otherwise, you're completely off your rocker.

Clearly your reading comprehension is failing you drastically. I can't even believe that a "mainstream" political party would want to force people to do abortions if they don't want to. It's beyond absurd. Do they really think that someone's gonna go all the way through medical school just to do something which they know is immoral? Most people wouldn't be able to stomach a job killing chickens, how much would you have to be paid in order to chop the heads off of babies that are 1 minute old? Is there a difference between a baby that's 1 minute old and a healthy fetus just 1 minute before it crowns? Could you easily kill one and not the other? Could you quite happily kill both? Healthy humans would absolutely not do either. I think that there's something really wrong with you. I'd be surprised if you're not on a terrorist watchlist. You really ought to be.

It's not Republicans who are mostly to blame. The Dems made a brazen attempt to pack the SC with an extra 9 activist judges, then they appointed an unqualified SCJ purely on the basis of her race, gender and political activism. In most countries judges are supposed to stay out of the political arena, KBJ worked on Obama's election campaign. It's atrocious that she was put in the highest court in the land.

Surely you must know that comment makes you, and pro-abortion people in general, look ridiculous, right?

What's wrong with you, that you can't look into this for yourself? It's not just Tucker Carlson that says that the FBI went to retrieve her diary, the MSM isn't hiding that fact. Instead of getting butt-hurt and assuming that everything is lies and disinformation, get off your ass and do a Google search for Ashley Biden's diary.

I gtg watch the Vcr Canaidans game, cheers D93. It's been educational, sir.

Maybe Xi is worried, but I think that the power behind the throne might be getting stronger. The Chinese citizens aren't much of a risk to revolt imo.

I don't know how much of a risk it is in a country where the gov't has 3 billion guns and the civilians have 7. If it's not Xi running the country it could be someone worse. I don't think that they're in danger of becoming a democracy any time soon. The covid crackdowns are ensuring that.

Some say that the Chinese aren't fighting covid with all of their restrictions, they're fighting freedom and other poisonous American ideals. They're cracking down on a mindset. Cowing people. Subjugating them. I laughed when terrorists attacked a subway station in China, killing ten people, because I just knew how much of a mistake it was to fuck with China like that. It's like biting a hornet's nest to kill ten of them. Just, plain, stupid. I'm not laughing now. The Chinese gov't was willing to kill millions of their own people in the '40s-late '50s. They would not be kind masters.

But you don't have to turn an entire country into glass to win a war. If you weaken them enough, and they can't prove that you did it, and they lack the ability to counterstrike in kind, you can just wait for them to collapse. China doesn't play a ten-minute game, or a 3-month game, they play a 100-yr game. Covid was a brilliant strike in a 100-yr game.

Look what covid did to the US: it economically crippled them. Turned them (& us) into a bunch of puling whelps who ran to a pseudovax for protection, and then turned on each other like dogs. There's still a distinct possibility that covid was a bioweapon, although that's a wildly unpopular consideration. Still, it came from a Chinese lab and seems like it appears tailor-made to kill Americans.

From my post above:

I don't expect Russians to 'spare' Canada. I just don't expect Russians to 'attack' Canada if they're unprovoked. I appreciate America's defence. If they were as weak as we are then a country like Iran could come here and take over, and that's worse than Russia. I'm just not gonna pretend that the CMC was "awesome and justified" but Russia "has to accept NATO on their doorstep". Never will.

Bioweapons don't destroy infrastructure, just people. You could win a war with bioweapons and not have that much of a rebuild to do on your newly acquired land if enough of that population survives to bury the bodies. That's why it's such a huge deal that the US is researching cures/preventive measures for bioweapons - bioweapons are not all that usable if they're a threat to yourself. Ebola's 'downfall' as a bioweapon isn't it's lethality, it's the fact that it's not transmissible until you're visibly affected by it. If there's an ebola outbreak you can avoid it by staying away from violently ill people. Not so with covid. Theoretically you can spread covid when you're not sick enough to know that you have it. That's a "great" bioweapon. Consequently, it came from a biological research facility in China, and it kills fat people with co-morbidities. It's almost like a bull's eye on Americans.

I don't hate the US at all. I'm just not a total hypocrite like some here. I understand why the US didn't allow the Russians to keep nukes in Cuba. I never said it was wrong at all to blockade Cuba, I'm just saying that you have to hate the CMC if you hate that Russia is standing up for themselves. I understand why the US had nukes in Turkey - they were trying to have an advantage. I understand why the US and Russia agreed to move their missiles out of Turkey and Cuba. I understand why the US does bioweapons research, they'd be dumb AF if they weren't because Russia, Iran, NoKo and China certainly are. I understand why the US wants to put NATO in Ukraine, they want NATO's influence and power to grow. But if you want to say that Russia was wrong to attack Ukraine, then you have to say that the US was wrong to do all of the above. Get it? Wrong doesn't change as a matter of convenience. If you think it does then you're a hypocrite by definition. Russia CAN NOT ACCEPT a NATO border that's 3,000 kilometres long just a few hundred km from Moscow. Their backs ARE against a wall. I know that you don't understand it because it's not happening to you. I get it. I'm not a dunce. And unlike you, I'm able to empathize with people whom I don't agree with. You're freaking out daily about the number of guns in the US but if you put it into perspective, 20 kids die every 5 years or so. I get it, that's bad, and school-kids aren't as safe as you'd like them to be. Good for you. They're not and that sucks. Yet you think that the Russians should let all of the children within 200 miles of Ukraine should grow up with NATO troops right at their border. FYI that's not safe either. The Russians would be stupid to just accept that. They're not. Good for them. The word justified is almost always synonymous with 'evil' - I hate it with a passion and I try not to use it. The war in Ukraine is "mutual". The war in Ukraine was not inevitable from Ukraine's POV. The Ukrainians didn't have to do anything for Russia that the US wouldn't demand of Canada. You just have a very elementary/self-centred understanding of geopolitics. As long as Ukraine wants to pay the victim card they can go to hell.