WestCanMan

Are you surprised when Hamas supporters have parents who commited genocide? Because I'm not.

I bet if Trudeau forced everyone to take a dangerous jab that they didn't need, left4rds wouldn't hold a single no kings protest. The only thing dumber than a leftist is more than one leftist.

If brains were dynamite, you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose.

A psychiatrist noted that "hate Trump syndrome" can be traced to an individual's insecurities and low self esteem. They resent the masculinity, success and confidence that they themselves can never achieve. I noticed that it's always the more effeminate posters here that don't like Trump. The pearl-clutching man-buns like @Boges, @eyeball, @ExFlyer, @BeaverFever, @Hodad, @robosmith, @Moonbox, @herbie, @Michael Hardner are also the most severe TDS sufferers. Anyone who has ever drank a beer, won a fistfight in a bar, and had sex with a woman because they wanted to, always supports Trump. I stole the above quote from Legato, in the Meme thread.

According to CNN, left4rds are there to protest "the rising cost of living" lol: “No Kings” demonstrations have taken place from coast to coast today, with attendees rallying against President Donald Trump’s policies, the rising cost of living and the war with Iran. Funny, these f-t4rds didn't care about record-setting inflation under Biden, but when gas prices get back to where they were when Joe was theoretically president, "IT'S TOO MUCH!!!!"

First I ever heard of this was today: Between 1981 and 1991, the Somali military in which Colonel Nur Omar Mohamed, Ilhan Omar’s father, served as a senior officer executed a brutal and systematic campaign of genocide targeting the Isaaq people of the modern day Republic of Somaliland. This dark chapter in Africa’s history, which was known as the Isaaq Genocide, was a merciless military campaign that resulted in the killing of over 200,000 Isaaq civilians. It was carried out through relentless aerial bombardments – planes repeatedly strafed fleeing refugees – summary executions, burning of entire villages, deportations, land‑mining of water sources and homes, Holodomor style government enforced man-made famines (the Dabadheer Drought) and the use of paramilitary units such as the Somali Armed Forces’ “Dabar Goynta Isaaqa” (The Isaaq Exterminators), composed exclusively of non-ethnically Isaaq soldiers, to enact mass killings under Somalia’s military direction. It seems as though Ilhan isn't a 1st-generation hateful pig, her father was at least as bad as she is. Ilhan Omar's father, Nur Omar Mohamed, left Somalia in 1991. He and his family fled the country following the outbreak of the Somali Civil War and the collapse of the Siad Barre regime. The Siad Barre Regime was the group that was committing the genocide there. When they were defeated, her father fled the country to escape the repercussions for his actions. Is anyone even surprised to see that level of hate and malice within her immediate family? Doesn't the fact that her father was in a leadership role during a genocide seem to explain everything about her?

So you're denying all that was said about Nancy Pelosi and Ilhan Omar?

Gawd damn, man. Now they're even incapable of using 5-letter words. What's next? Going to the bathroom on the floor? Does robobigot need a diaper now?

It says that Van Epps was the Republican and he won....

JD Vance's anti-fraud task force 'ramps up' identifying fraud across US after suspending 70 providers in LA Maybe the winning streak was snapped lol. #PrayforNancy! #PrayforGavin!

From the "I'm going to hell because I laughed dept": OMG the Bee has balls to post some of their memes.

Nancy Pelosi is so famously corrupt that there's an anti-corruption bill named after her: the Nancy Pelosi Act. With all the inside knowledge that she gets from being in congress and on various committees, her husband cleans up in the stock market, heavily outpacing the S&P: Stock Trading Performance: Critics point to the high returns of the Pelosis' stock portfolio, which reportedly grew by 65% to 70% in recent years, significantly outperforming the S&P 500. Some observers, including figures like Jon Stewart, have characterized this as "legal corruption" because members of Congress have access to non-public, sensitive information that can influence markets. The Pelosis really cleaned up with the timing of their Visa stock trades: January–March 2008: Visa engages in a "full-court press" lobbying effort to stop legislation aimed at curbing "swipe fees". March 18, 2008: Visa launches its IPO, then the largest in U.S. history ($17.9 billion). Paul Pelosi purchases 5,000 shares at the $44 IPO price. March 20–25, 2008: The stock price quickly rises to $64. Paul Pelosi purchases an additional 10,000 shares at $64. June 4, 2008: Paul Pelosi purchases another 5,000 shares at $86. July 21–23, 2008: Visa’s PAC donates $1,000 to Pelosi's campaign. Two days later, Pelosi meets with Visa executives in her office. September 23, 2008: Under Pelosi's leadership, the House passes the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights, though critics note that other "swipe fee" regulations more damaging to Visa were delayed or never reached a floor vote. 2009 Annual Performance: Visa stock showed a strong positive return in 2009, with some sources listing an annual performance increase of over 60% "💰💰Thank you Nancy💰💰." - Visa "No, thank you 💰💰💰." The Pelosis But the Pelosis didn't just know when to buy Visa stock... You got to know when to hold ‘em know when to fold ‘em know when to sell away and know when to keep You never count your money when you’re sittin’ in the congress there’ll be time enough for countin’ when the stealin’s done - Nancy Pelosi, from “The Non-Gambler Chapter 1: Listen in Congress, Profit NYSEly” They also knew exactly when to sell Visa stock: July 1, 2024: Paul Pelosi sells 2,000 shares of Visa, valued between $500,000 and $1,000,000. September 24, 2024: The Department of Justice files a major antitrust lawsuit against Visa, alleging an illegal monopoly in the debit card market. Visa’s stock price dropped following the announcement. If you had Visa stocks, wouldn't you wanna know when they were about to be hit with a massive lawsuit? Well, truth be told, Nancy wasn't allowed to tell you, because that's called "insider trading", and you'd go to jail if you got caught trading based on the possession of that type of information, just like Martha Stewart did. Nancy was only allowed to use that information to profit herself 🥰. "NOW DO ILHAN OMAR!!!!!!", you say.... Fine: Early Career and Entry into Politics (2006–2018) Initial Disclosure (2018): Upon entering Congress, OpenSecrets estimated her net worth at -$45,001. Liabilities: Her early filings showed student loan debt between $15,001 and $50,000 and a car loan of $10,000 to $15,000. Wealth Surge as a Member of Congress (2019–2026) Standard Salary: Since 2019, Omar has earned the standard congressional salary of $174,000 per year. Book Deal (2019): She signed a memoir deal worth an estimated $100,000 to $250,000, though her agent claimed the advance went to her co-author and she has not personally profited from royalties. Husband's Business Growth: The most significant jump occurred in her 2024–2025 disclosures, which showed assets between $6 million and $30 million. Venture Capital: Her husband's firm, Rose Lake Capital LLC, jumped in valuation from under $1,000 in 2023 to between $5 million and $25 million in 2024. Winery: His winery, eStCru LLC, rose from a value of $15,000–$50,000 to $1 million–$5 million in the same period. Not done yet lol....... Her winery: Key Status and Operational Details Business Model: A company spokesperson described eStCru as a "direct-to-consumer wine company" rather than a traditional physical winery. It operated out of a wine "collective" in Santa Rosa called Punchdown Cellars, where it processed grapes purchased from other sources. Operational Status: As of late 2024, the business appears to be defunct or inactive. Its website went dark in November 2024, and social media accounts have not been updated for an extended period. Controversy and Valuation: Despite its lack of physical assets and reports that it had only $650 in the bank by early 2024, Rep. Omar's 2024 financial disclosure (filed in 2025) listed the company's valuation between $1 million and $5 million. This massive jump from a previous valuation of ~$50,000 has triggered investigations by the House Oversight Committee and the Department of Justice. Legal Challenges: The company has been at the centre of a lawsuit filed by D.C. restaurateur Naeem Mohd, who alleged he was defrauded after investing $300,000 based on promises of a 200% return. The suit was settled out of court. Her "winery" is soon to be renamed "Smoke and Mirrors" ^^ All the above info is just from Google's AI search feature.

Shut up robobigot. I know more about everything than you do, and that's not a boast. Maggots are born knowing more about the world than you will ever know.

I would have felt the same way myself, but apparently most Iranians aren't drooling savages. Theoretically only a small percent are jihadis.

With leftists there's no such thing as a spurious allegation from their own side. If one of them accuses Trump of being from Pluto tomorrow, then the official party line will become "Trump is from Pluto" and they will all go along with it.

Candice has been seeming really unhinged lately. Her and Tucker really went off on a tangent.

Justification is a shitty word that's only ever used in defence of things that can't be justified. This war was necessary. Without this war Iran would have ended up with nukes and ICBM's within Biden's lifetime, and that could not be allowed to happen. Not for his sake, for everyone's. I knew that the US would eventually end up at war with Iran at some point, decades ago. It was just a matter of whose terms it was gonna be on. Even Hillary knew this war was coming, and she's a Democrat. Ie, not one of the sharpest tools in the shed. It's despicable that Democrats can't admit to what's happening and why, and that they have to lie to their cultists just in the hopes of getting votes, but that's where we are nowadays: Democrats think that they can count on the anti-patriot vote to win an election. Sad. Wrong. The IRBM that Iran just fired was a 2-stage missile with a high velocity and trajectory, and a tough re-entry. Experts believe that it was maneuverable, and it used solid propellent. It's range was 4,000km, ICBM's go 5,500km. It had enough range to hit most European capitals. They are not exactly hovering over the target, but the target is in sight. Was in sight. Until a week ago no one knew that they even had IRBM's, so no one really knows what they have and don't have. And don't forget that modern leaps in technology make things that took decades in the '60's can happen in years now. But the ware was somehow not necessary? For Iran. It bought them time to grow their BM and drone capabilities to the point where they were almost too strong to be reckoned with. If Hezbollah would fired their 150,000 rockets, this war likely would have gone the other way while Biden was still POTUS. Ideally, negotiations aren't with the current regime at all.

What do you think the end game is, Link? Are the Americans losing so much right now that they need the war to stop? The end game is: achieve all the primary objectives achieve as many secondary objectives as possible ditto for tertiary objectives etc Basically just keep on achieving objectives as possible until either you capabilities are too diminished to continue, or your losses are too steep to continue, or resistance is too hard or costly to overcome, etc. Right now Trump is Daniel Negreanu playing poker against a ret4rded kid with $50B dollars, so his "end game" is to keep playing until that kid no longer has bus fare.

OK? Because I said that he was the best since Stephen Harper, which was also a comparison. Then I acknowledged Trump's flaws, and qualified how they compared to the flaws of his contemporaries. That's normal. It was a factual and forthright reply, complete with examples, which should be appreciated. It was not and example of a whataboutism. You just operate at a very low level of communication, in terms of both clarity and honesty. There's no "justifying" being done, it's all about proper perspective. NBC was not being honest, they were intentionally deceiving you. As always. I just pointed that out to you. I will fact-check your fact-checkers for you, and point out where they did their level best to deceive you. The start of their "fact-checking": NBC News has picked out eight key claims to provide context and data for. Trump said: “Wages are going up much faster than inflation.” Wages are outpacing inflation, but “much” is up for some debate as the pace of wage growth has slowed significantly this year. In January, average wages were increasing at a pace of 4.1%. As of Tuesday, when the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the October and November jobs report, the pace had fallen to 3.5%. Inflation is currently at 3.0% and has risen every month since April. It is also worth noting that while the Biden administration endured far higher rates of inflation, wages broadly kept pace with rising prices even for lower-paid workers. BOTTOM LINE: What Trump said was just "true". As in, "Every word was true, none were false, so why is NBC "fact-checking" it to lend the impression it's not all that accurate?" By their own admission, wages were increasing by anywhere from 3.5% to 4.1% over the period of time Trump talked about, and inflation was never above 3%. So wages were always rising by a bare minimum of anywhere from .5% to 1.1% faster. If wages continue to average being faster by .75%, that is a very big deal. By their own admission, wages under Biden topped out at "even with inflation", but it wasn't always like that, just "broadly". So NBC took Trump's factual statement, and tried to twist his economic numbers in into pretzels to make them look unimpressive, and then polished Biden's turd-like numbers to try to make them look better than they were. FYI that's "minimizing" Trump's success, while simultaneously "exaggerating" Biden's below-water performance. Do you understand me? That means "NBC TOLD LIES IN THEIR OWN FACT-CHECKING ARTICLE." You just posted lies, Link. Thank you for that. In the future, just know that whenever a left-leaning rag claims to be "fact-checking" something, they are lying to some extent.

You're just a cultist idjit, Link. You're about 1 month from donating to Hamas's Go Fund Me.

He's not my idol, but he is by far the best leader that we have had in North America since Stephen Harper. Is he a lier? Does he lie down every night? Yes. Is he a serial liar? No. I acknowledge his flaws all the time. But a crass, obnoxious narcissist is better than a traitorous narcissist like Trudeau or Obama. Inflation was the worst in 48 years. It was the worst since 1971. Go llok. It was up to 9.1% at one point Maybe higher. In some cases drugs might have come down to 1/6th of what they were, that could easily be true, and it probably is. Eggs were down by 60% when he said "82%". It's possible that in some places, it was 82%. The US is a big place. AI: "Yes, gasoline prices fell below $2.50 a gallon, and even under $2.00 in some areas, during Donald Trump’s presidency," NBC is not known for their dedication to the truth. You should never cite them. Still, saying "Eggs were down by 82%" when it was only 60% isn't the same as saying "That guy r4ped E J Caroll" when you know that to be false. One lie is borderline criminal, one is still a ballpark figure. NBC should be happy that eggs were down by that much NBC missed all of Biden's lies about "little" and "no inflation". Is that weird that they missed lies that were a thousand times bigger?

Bottom line: What lie has Trump ever told that's a serious as a false r4pe allegation? That's a daily occurrence from left4rds. But you just name 1 Trump lie that's that serious and we will go from there.

Stop with the BS. You see what you want to see. FYI if Trump can achieve something just by making a threat, that's preferable to making a massive strike against Iranian infrastructure, which only harms the civilian population. If his threat doesn't achieve the desired result, that's not "TACO"ing, and you actually know that, unless you're ret4rded. In case you forgot, Trump already killed a bunch of ayatollahs. He has already smashed the IRGC directly and in a sustained manner. There's nothing that he can do to make terrorists angrier. He crossed the TACO Rubicon in the first second of this war. Right?

If by that you mean that you were being an annoying little dweeb, then yeah. But I think that's your shtick.

Let's agree what "lying" means... There are lots of different forms of lying, some far worse than others. And then there's saying something that's false, which you believed to be true, and that is actually not lying at all. When you said that Biden was classy, you weren't necessarily lying, and I just proved that you were wrong. And that's an extremely important distinction imo. Being wrong is nothing at all like lying. We are all gonna be wrong at some point, but not everyone is going to lie, because it's a conscious choice. But even within the realm of actual lying, sometimes we lie to make other people feel good, which is generally considered to be good. Then there are things like minimization/exaggeration that are low-lvl forms of actual lying, omission which is a serious lie, bold-faced lies which means saying something that is directly the opposite of the truth, and even worse is fabrication, where you invent a story and tell it to someone. Compounding the severity of the above lies, is the matter of whether or not they are "material" lies. Are they lies about something important, like your health, or are they about something trivial, like "whether or not there was a light drizzle for 15 seconds out of 17 minutes". The grand-daddy of all forms of lying is slander. A malicious lie, used to wrongfully undermine or even incriminate another person. So when we get to the topic of "lying", it's never a 1 v 1 comparison. "You said it was warm out but I had to wear pants and a light jacket" is not the same as "You said that he molested a child and you just made that up." You could make the case that 1,000 minor 'lies' are still less serious than one really nasty whopper. And our justice system is a proof of that. You could go to jail or be fined hundreds of millions of dollars for one really bad lie, but you can lie about insignificant things every day and a judge won't even listen to a complaint about that. SERIOUS LIES: Leftists tell SERIOUS lies, constantly. For example, it's a serious lie to say that someone r4ped someone when they didn't. Eg, you and I both KNOW that Trump never r4ped E J Caroll, even according to the details of her own version of the story. The story from her own book goes like this: he saw her out walking in front of Bergdorf's wearing 4" stilettos, guessed that she was a floozy (correctly, it turns out), made a really crass sexual overture ("wanna model lingerie for me? I'm looking for a gift for my wife.") which she went along with to the extent of taking some lingerie to the changeroom with him, she let him come into the changeroom with her without a complaint (she just said "he came in and closed the door behind him"), and he pushed her against the wall and kissed her and she giggled, then he stuck his fingers in her cooter and she giggled again, and then as soon as she pushed him away with one arm he let her go. That is her story, and that is not even close to being a r4pe. It's debatable if she was even disrespected. Her own version of the story contains layer upon layer of her own implied consent, and then at her first sign of objection, the incident ended. He is a much stronger person, and she was in 4" heels, and she pushed him away with 1 arm... Now, some people say that he r4ped her out of ignorance: they were lied to themselves and they just passed on what they heard, mainly because they really wanted to believe it. But TBH, can you ever really perpetuate an accusation that serious without at least looking into it? (Just added in an edit: Furthermore, it's a really serious "lie by omission" to tell that story without mentioning the parts where her own actions display consent. "He followed her into the changeroom, threw her against the wall, and stuck his fingers into her cooter" is quite different from the story SHE herself described. It's like two opposite versions of one story.) In any event, anyone who has been exposed to all the information that I just wrote there, can never reasonably accuse Trump of r4pe in that scenario again without being labelled "liar", because now they have been exposed to the truth, at which point they need to confirm the details of the story before they continue with the r4pe accusation. Now, there are even lawyers accusing Trump of r4pe, and lawyers fully understand what implied consent means. No one in North America passed their bar exam without knowing that, just like you can't pass a driving test without knowing where the signal light is. Do members of the MSM know? Absolutely. They even have legal teams to spell it out for them. So they know. So... Every. Single. Time. they bring up the allegation, and give the r4pe accusation credibility, they are engaging in deceit. Even if they don't actually say that "he's a r4pist" themselves, they are engaging in deceit by quoting. So, the E J Caroll lie was huge, and repeated constantly by hundreds of thousands of leftists, if not millions. And mind you, that is even with me just taking E J Caroll at her word, 100%. That's with me assuming that every single word and every single suggestion in her story was 100.00% accurate. I'll type this slowly: if her whole story (say "her whole story" with a Chinese accent and it makes sense) was 100.00% true, she was not r4ped. Period. Bottom line: What lie has Trump ever told that's a serious as a false r4pe allegation? That's a daily occurrence from left4rds. But you just name 1 Trump lie that's that serious and we will go from there.