Chippewa

The Bible is a pretty new book. Its only been around for less then 2000 years, and was written 200 years after the Jewish Leader Christ Died. So in a time of no computers, and really no books. How could anybody remember such a long made up ficticious story about a Jewish Leader who died 200 years earlier at the hands of his own people. The Bible was made up of Hear Say stories, and is the most bull crap story in the world. If anybody was cured of the Bible, im sure it was the First Nations in Residential Schools they were forced into Slave Labour, Internment Camps, and abducted from there families, all for the Bible. Bible toughting Terrorists are no better then any other Terrorist Organizations in the world.

Most wouldn't have any access to these Trust Accounts. But it has funded all the Terrorist Activity and Bombings for the Canadian Military such as in Afgahnistan, and Iraq. Canada would never give credit to First Nations for using there money to support Terroist Activitys around the world. The amount on these accounts are into the Trillions. The economic Terrorism has been such to ensure that First Nations don't get access to there money to build healthy environments or clean water. Phil Fontaine was just a puppet boy for the Liberal Party. He sold out all of the First Nations people by selling them out with that Residential School Payments, for the Genocide, and Canadian Haulocast First Nations had to endure. Fontaine was so bad, his Truth and Reconcilation Committee didn't even have the Church involved, and there was no process to ensure that the Church and Government were accountable. The Committee just sat you in a room to listen to some politician who doesn't give a crap. The Liberal Party couldn't have picked a better sellout to bring to the forefront. Fontaine denied allegations he was involved with the Liberals and now his lie is staring him straight in the face. This guy doesnt care about First Nations and there Treaty rights, which is why it is a smart move on part of the Liberal Party.

I think he ment a "Caucazoid Majority Status". This thread is sorta funny. The European Caucazoids are immigrating at such a high rate, because they can't afford to have kids anymore, is plain laughable. Thats what happens when you have 2 dollar litres of gas, and 3 dollar bottles of water. It really makes sense now. Immigrate at such a high rate so that FIrst Nations are denied there rights.

The Indian Act 1961: Amended to end the compulsory "enfranchisement" of men or bands. So the compulsory enfranchisement was ended in the early 60s, and alot of those cases have been overturned. First Nations have Aboriginal and Treaty Rights which Canadians don't. A First Nations person has every right to be PM, since this there original territory, and country. Most treatys were never done with a country called Canada, and when Britin left and abandoned those treaties, some would argue that everything would go back to First Nations. Is Canada a country or a corporation? If you read some of the treatys, none of them are ever written in any Native Language to the Territory, and letters sent to the Crown contridict what most of the Treaties say. I would think that most are invalid, and be ruled that way in an international court system. Article 15 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations. 1. Everyone has the right to a nationality. 2. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/opinion/columnists/liberals-could-turn-to-first-nations-for-leader-124904229.html I guess the Liberals not only want to sink the party deeper into a craphole, but it also seems like an act of despiration from the Liberal Party. First Nations have went on the record and accused Fontaine of being a Card Carrying Liberal, but he refuted reports and accussations that he had any party involvement. A few First Nations leaders I spoke to said that "Phil, had been promised a seat in the senate for his deal on Residential School Payment". The problem is, the Liberals aren't in power, and they seem to want to rack up the loosly 2 million First Nations votes just sitting around. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "With Parliament set to break for the summer, it's time for the Liberal party to start thinking about the future. After such a drop in the polls in the last election, the Grits need a major makeover if they want to win back all those supporters they lost. They need to reinvent themselves, or "rebrand" themselves, to borrow a PR term. If it were up to me, I know exactly what I'd do to fix things. I'd go and find a new leader. And I wouldn't find just any leader, but an aboriginal leader. There's nothing like an aboriginal person to shake up the political landscape. Anyone remember Elijah Harper and the Meech Lake Accord? Since this is a nation forged on land that was once all indigenous territory, it only stands to reason we need more brown people in the house. So here are my top three picks for leader of the Liberal party. Phil Fontaine is the former long-time leader of the Assembly of First Nations and the most obvious choice as an aboriginal Liberal party leader. Fontaine has earned respect both in the aboriginal community and with mainstream Canadians, so he would appeal to both groups. He's known to be "Liberal friendly" and he's done some memorable things in his long political career which has stretched over several decades; such as his involvement with Harper (Elijah, not Stephen) in killing the Meech Lake Accord, as well as the National Residential School apology and settlement. He was awarded the Order of Manitoba in 2004. I've met Fontaine a few times, and he's got the charisma it takes to be a national leader. That's why some people call him "the Silver Fox." He also has the experience to take on the job. Thomas King is known by most people as a gifted novelist, and for his long-running CBC Radio show The Dead Dog Cafe Comedy Hour that ran in the late 1990s. King was made a member of the Order of Canada in 2004. But King is more than just a creative spirit. He's also got an interest in a career as a public servant. King was an NDP candidate in the Guelph riding back in 2007. He didn't win the seat, but hopefully it isn't the last we'll see of him. Like many politicians, it may take several tries for him to get elected. But if King were chosen Liberal leader, his inventiveness would come in handy, and definitely help bring the Liberal party back to its former grandeur. Sophia Rabliauskas is my final pick for Liberal party leader. If you haven't heard of her, you are missing out. Rabliauskas is a member of Poplar River First Nation, and an environmental activist. She is best known for working with other community leaders to secure two million acres of pristine land in the heart of the boreal forest, and develop a management plan for that land. She won the Goldman Environmental Prize in 2007 for her efforts, as well as the Order of Manitoba in 2008. She is a spokeswoman for Pimachiowin Aki -- The Land That Gives Life. It's a group committed to safeguarding a chunk of land about the size of Denmark and working to have it designated a World Heritage Site by the United Nations Educational and Scientific and Cultural Organization. Rabliauskas has something every leader should have -- integrity. She's the closest thing we have these days to our traditional leaders of the past. She has a passion for her people, and is driven to protect the land for future generations. Of course, if there were more aboriginal women like Rabliauskas -- and just more women in politics in general -- things would be a lot different. And maybe electing an aboriginal Liberal leader could eventually lead to electing an aboriginal prime minister. Over the years that's been a tantalizing prospect, one I hope to see become a reality one day. Colleen Simard is a Winnipeg writer."

The Criminal Code is honored in every First Nation. The fact the "Indian Act" contains no road laws, people still get charged just like any other place. The fact you point out that gitting rid of crime on the reserves is a problem, why not solve all the crimes that happened in the past such as the Residential School Murders, Genocide, Abduction, and Ethnic Cleansing, both Churches and the Canadian Government are guilty of first. First Nations need there own Justice system, Supreme Court System, and Constitution which is empowered under section 35 under the Constitution. If organizations can still charge Nazi Warcriminals 60 years later, im sure racking up a bunch of priests, and politicians responsible for both the precise killing and murders, medical experimentation, torchure, rape, bioligical warfare and biological terrorism they are both guilty of, can be charged. The Indian Act. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Act 1881: Amended to make officers of the Indian Department, including Indian Agents, legal justices of the peace, able to enforce regulations. The following year they were granted the same legal power as magistrates.[3] Further amended to prohibit the sale of agricultural produce by Indians in Prairie Provinces without an appropriate permit from an Indian agent.[3] This prohibition is, as of 2008[update], still included in the Indian Act, though it is not enforced.[4] 1884: Amended to prevent elected band leaders who have been deposed from office from being re-elected. 1885: Amended to prohibit religious ceremonies (such as potlatches) and dances (such as Tamanawas dances)[5][6] 1894: Amended to remove band control of non-natives living on reserve. This power now rested exclusively in the hands of the Superintendent-General of Indian Affairs.[7] 1895: Amended to outlaw all dances, ceremonies and festivals that involved the wounding of animals or humans, or the giving away of money or goods.[6] 1905: Amended to allow aboriginal people to be removed from reserves near towns with more than 8,000 residents.[8] 1906: Amended to allow 50 % of the sale price of reserve lands to be given to band members, following the surrender of that land. 1911: Amended to allow municipalities and companies to expropriate portions of reserves, without surrender, for roads, railways, and other public works.[8] Further amended to allow a judge to move an entire reserve away from a municipality if it was deemed "expedient."[7] These amendments were also known as the Oliver Act. 1914: Amended to require western Indians to seek official permission before appearing in "aboriginal costume" in any "dance, show, exhibition, stampede or pageant."[3] 1918: Amended to allow the Superintendent-General to lease out uncultivated reserve lands to non-aboriginals if the new lease-holder used it for farming or pasture.[7] 1920: Amended to allow the Department of Indian Affairs to ban hereditary rule of bands.[8] Further amended to allow for the involuntary enfranchisement (and loss of treaty rights) of any status Indian considered fit by the Department of Indian Affairs, without the possession of land previously required for those living off reserve. Repealed two years later but reintroduced in a modified form in 1933.[7] 1927: Amended to prevent anyone (aboriginal or otherwise) from soliciting funds for Indian legal claims without a special license from the Superintendent-General. This effectively prevented any First Nation from pursuing aboriginal land claims.[3] 1930: Amended to prevent a pool hall owner from allowing entrance to an Indian who "by inordinate frequenting of a pool room either on or off an Indian reserve misspends or wastes his time or means to the detriment of himself, his family or household". The owner could face a fine or a one-month jail term.[3] 1936: Amended to allow Indian agents to direct band council meetings, and to cast a deciding vote in the event of a tie.[7] 1951: Amended to allow the sale and slaughter of livestock without an Indian Agent permit. Status women are allowed to vote in band elections. Attempts to pursue land claims and the use of religious ceremonies (such as potlatches) are no longer prohibited by law. Further amended for the compulsory "enfranchisement" of First Nations women who married non-status men (including Métis, Inuit and non-status Indian, as well as non-aboriginal men), thus causing them to lose their status, and denying Indian status to any children from the marriage.[7] 1961: Amended to end the compulsory "enfranchisement" of men or bands. 1985: Amended to allow First Nations women the right to keep or regain their status even after "marrying out" and to grant status to the children (but not grandchildren) of such a marriage. This amendment was debated in Parliament as Bill C-31. Under this amendment, full status Indians are referred to as 6-1. A child of a marriage between a status (6–1) person and a non-status person qualifies for 6-2 (half) status, but if the child in turn married another 6-2 or a non-status person, the child is non-status. If a 6–2 marries a 6–1 or another 6-2, the children revert to 6–1 status. Blood quantum is disregarded, or rather, replaced with a "two generation cut-off clause".[9] Under amendments to the Indian Act (Bill C-31), Michel Band members have individual Indian status restored. No provision made in Bill C-31 for the restoration of status under the Band enfranchisement provision that was applied to the Michel Band. According to Thomas King, around half of status Indians are currently marrying non-status people, meaning this legislation accomplishes complete legal assimilation in a matter of a few generations.[9] 2000: Amended to allow band members living off reserves to vote in band elections and referendums.[10] As you can see, the Indian Act is the same as the Aparthied Act. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_legislation_in_South_Africa The "apartheid laws" were enacted following the 1948 South African election and subsequent declaration of "grand apartheid". The principal pieces of legislation to enforce apartheid were as follows:[5] [edit] 1940sProhibition of Mixed Marriages Act, Act No 55 of 1949 [edit] 1950sEarly 1950s Immorality Amendment Act, Act No 21 of 1950; amended in 1957 (Act 23) Population Registration Act, Act No 30 of 1950 Group Areas Act, Act No 41 of 1950 Suppression of Communism Act, Act No 44 of 1950 Bantu Building Workers Act, Act No 27 of 1951 Separate Representation of Voters Act, Act No 46 of 1951 Prevention of Illegal Squatting Act, Act No 52 of 1951 Bantu Authorities Act, Act No 68 of 1951 Natives Laws Amendment Act of 1952 Natives (Abolition of Passes and Co-ordination of Documents) Act, Act No 67 of 1952 Mid 1950s Native Labour (Settlement of Disputes) Act of 1953 Bantu Education Act, Act No 47 of 1953 Reservation of Separate Amenities Act, Act No 49 of 1953 Natives Resettlement Act, Act No 19 of 1954 Group Areas Development Act, Act No 69 of 1955 Natives (Prohibition of Interdicts) Act, Act No 64 of 1956 Late 1950s Bantu Investment Corporation Act, Act No 34 of 1959 Extension of University Education Act, Act 45 of 1959 Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act, Act No 46 of 1959 [edit] 1960sColoured Persons Communal Reserves Act, Act No 3 of 1961 Preservation of Coloured Areas Act, Act No 31 of 1961 Urban Bantu Councils Act, Act No 79 of 1961 Terrorism Act, Act No 83 of 1967 [edit] 1970sBantu Homelands Citizens Act of 1970 So basically the plan is to basically, steal all the land and resources, oppress Both Civilizations, Label them anything but a Human Being.

The names of the and locations of the internment camps are known as Residential Schools and Indian Reserves . Today, Reserves have have been upgraded to "Ghettos". http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/ Witnesses testify that Priests from Churches were just throwing New Born Babys into furnaces while still alive. Witnesses also testify that "Terrorists on gunboats, called the RCMP, were abducting children from my community". These are just some of the stories of the genocidal terrorism Churches and Canadian government put First Nations through, including my dad, aunts, uncles, grandparents, and the rest of my family. To this date, no church or government has been charged with "War Crimes", "Genocide", or crimes against humanity. Although in Australia an international court found Australia guilty of "Genocide". Still there is no closure on the Genocidal Terrorism that the Canadian Government and churches put the First Nations through. 51% death rate for decades at a time Churches and Canadian Government were responsible for at Indian Residential Schools, made whatever the Jews and others went through in the world look like Boy Scouts. First Nations had to fight against Biological Warfare, Biological Terrorism, Terrorism, Economic Terrorism, Socio-Economic Terrorim, Genocide, Ethnic Cleansing, and the Indian Act for hundred or hundreds of years.

"Not Subject to any siezure under any legal process". That means it superceeds, both Provincial and Federal Laws. I think you are forgeting that First Nations have Treaty and Aboriginal Rights. Nothing in Canadian law would ever superceed any of those rights. ITs like The U.S.A charging Canada for genocide of First Nations people. U.S has No jurisdiction on Canadian Territory. Treatys were Nation to Nation basis. First Nations would need to charge them under there own laws, and judicial system, like the U.S.A has allowed First Nations to set up in the States. It would be the same as Canada siezing the 15 billion dollar poppy fields in Afgahnistan, then charging them with producing and selling Heroin. Since Canada went to Afgahnistan, the poppy industry grew from a 6 billion dollar business to a 15 billion dollar business.

Anybody have any idea of how to approach either organization of crimes of genocide, terrorism.

Ive seen one in person. They still exist, and a few books have been written on them. look it up yourself. History has a lot of secrets.

Well after Nam, Iraq, and Afgahnistan, i guess you are right. None of them ever agreed to go to war with us.

Under section 87,88,89 of the Indian Act. " personal property of an indian is not subjected to seizure by any legal process." The Indian Act superceeds both Provincial, and Federal Laws.

Jefferson. was actually the president who accomplished "Biological Terrorism" on First Nations in the U.S.A. Some of these tin's are still around, and yes, they were tested, and tested positive for smallpox. Yes it worked.

The Ojibways didn't make laws, and subject the Lakota's to a 50% death rate over decades of time by placing them in Residential Schools. War is war. Germany went to war. Different then Terrorism For all First Nations knew at the time. Japan was bombing North America to save them from the internment camps, and residential schools and a 50% death rate at those schools, or maybe Japan was trying to save First Nations kids from being abducted and murdered illegally by Churches and Government. The difference between Terrorism, and how Canada applied it to First Nations, is the fact, Canada and the Commonwealth did the same thing all around the world. The Genocidal Terrorism that happened in Canada, Australia, and most of the Commonwealth area's is a fact. Examples are the Aparthied Act, Indian Act, Austrailia's Stolen Generations, Canada's 60's Baby Scoop If organizations can place Nazi war criminals in prison, and have them sent to trail for crimes 60 years ago, then why can't the Churches, Canadian Governments be charged for "War Crimes", "Genocide", "Terrorism". Churches were responsible for moving Nazi War Criminals, and the genocide of First Nations in Canada. The reason why nothing hasn't been done and nobody has been charged, is the fact Governmental Terrorism, and Genocide is being covered up. The racketeering laws need to be applied to both the Church and Government.

I added an extra 0. Canadians have to remember also, that no treaty was ever signed with a Country called Canada, but rather the BRitish Crown. So none of the Treaties recogize Canada as a country. Thats the fundimental difference.

Well there are about 250 Thousand Aboriginals enlisted in the Armed forces in the U.S, and 70% of the Canadian Army Rangers are Aboriginal, along with only 15000 full time Canadian soldiers. With 600 First Nations reserves, thats about 22 soldiers per reserve from the Canadian Armed Forces. And to convince the U.S military to perticipate, would be out of the question since nobody would shot there own people. If anything, I think the First Nations are entering any negotiations on good faith. A U.S general once said "If we gave the Palestinians the same resources, as Isreal, they might be double effective then Isreal is".

The Ojibway were at war with the Lakota, Sioux, blackfoot people for centurys, much like how centurys of war happened in europe. The difference between a mutual war, and terrorism, is in war, 2 or more countrys agree to go to war mutually. In terrorism, one group might have a "Peace Treaty", or "Treaty" like in Canada, and the outright extermination of people and culture is deliberate. There is a big difference between the Lakota's and Sioux and Ojibway people. all the while dividing up lands and terroritory. Aside, the war was over the fur, and flint trade. Look at the Chippewa/Ojibway people who defeated General St.Clair and 600 of his men. That was a mutual war. General St.Clair was quoted as saying "The Indians don't fight fair, they hide behind trees, and rocks". The Chippewas/Ojibways lost just 40 men. They went in with 200 warriors. The 1st President later was involved with a peace offering. He was a silversmith, and he hand made a bunch a little tins, and inside of the tins, were smallpox blanket squares. Then most of the Anishnabe died off. The Canadian Government, and Commonwealth, upped the ante a bit, and actually spread Tuberculosis purposely with the intent of killing off the rest of the First Nations population in Residential Schools with a 50% death rate. This is the start of terrorism, and its history. Another question you might ask yourself is. Why didn't the Government pick up and abduct any of the non-english speaking children like the Koreans, Germans, Jews, Chinese who immigrated to Canada. Place them next to the First Nations in every Residential School across Canada. Simply because at the highest levels, the terrorist plot for genocide was going according to plan. This was all to ensure that every immigrant, whom most never had a right to own land before they came to Canada, could sell off the resources, land, and launder the commidities back to each other. This could be coined as "Economic Terrorism", since the First Nations were denied a right to make a profit by Canadian law and the INdian Act. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Indian Act 1881: Amended to make officers of the Indian Department, including Indian Agents, legal justices of the peace, able to enforce regulations. The following year they were granted the same legal power as magistrates.[3] Further amended to prohibit the sale of agricultural produce by Indians in Prairie Provinces without an appropriate permit from an Indian agent.[3] This prohibition is, as of 2008[update], still included in the Indian Act, though it is not enforced.[4] 1884: Amended to prevent elected band leaders who have been deposed from office from being re-elected. 1885: Amended to prohibit religious ceremonies (such as potlatches) and dances (such as Tamanawas dances)[5][6] 1894: Amended to remove band control of non-natives living on reserve. This power now rested exclusively in the hands of the Superintendent-General of Indian Affairs.[7] 1895: Amended to outlaw all dances, ceremonies and festivals that involved the wounding of animals or humans, or the giving away of money or goods.[6] 1905: Amended to allow aboriginal people to be removed from reserves near towns with more than 8,000 residents.[8] 1906: Amended to allow 50 % of the sale price of reserve lands to be given to band members, following the surrender of that land. 1911: Amended to allow municipalities and companies to expropriate portions of reserves, without surrender, for roads, railways, and other public works.[8] Further amended to allow a judge to move an entire reserve away from a municipality if it was deemed "expedient."[7] These amendments were also known as the Oliver Act. 1914: Amended to require western Indians to seek official permission before appearing in "aboriginal costume" in any "dance, show, exhibition, stampede or pageant."[3] 1918: Amended to allow the Superintendent-General to lease out uncultivated reserve lands to non-aboriginals if the new lease-holder used it for farming or pasture.[7] 1920: Amended to allow the Department of Indian Affairs to ban hereditary rule of bands.[8] Further amended to allow for the involuntary enfranchisement (and loss of treaty rights) of any status Indian considered fit by the Department of Indian Affairs, without the possession of land previously required for those living off reserve. Repealed two years later but reintroduced in a modified form in 1933.[7] 1927: Amended to prevent anyone (aboriginal or otherwise) from soliciting funds for Indian legal claims without a special license from the Superintendent-General. This effectively prevented any First Nation from pursuing aboriginal land claims.[3] 1930: Amended to prevent a pool hall owner from allowing entrance to an Indian who "by inordinate frequenting of a pool room either on or off an Indian reserve misspends or wastes his time or means to the detriment of himself, his family or household". The owner could face a fine or a one-month jail term.[3] 1936: Amended to allow Indian agents to direct band council meetings, and to cast a deciding vote in the event of a tie.[7] 1951: Amended to allow the sale and slaughter of livestock without an Indian Agent permit. Status women are allowed to vote in band elections. Attempts to pursue land claims and the use of religious ceremonies (such as potlatches) are no longer prohibited by law. Further amended for the compulsory "enfranchisement" of First Nations women who married non-status men (including Métis, Inuit and non-status Indian, as well as non-aboriginal men), thus causing them to lose their status, and denying Indian status to any children from the marriage.[7] 1961: Amended to end the compulsory "enfranchisement" of men or bands. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Not only did First Nations get terrorized by churches and governments, but they were stripped of there nationhood and labelled an "Indian" by law. Indians couldn't even sell livestock for a profit until the 50s. And they were only considered Humans by law in the 1950s in Canada from "Wards of the State".

So what does that have to do with the subject of Terrorism and how its been applied to First Nations. You want to make it a subject of Tax Dollars, and Land Ownership. Well if you ever read the Indian Act, then you would know that current Terrorism consists of Keeping First Nations out of the Economy by not allowing them to develop there own resources. Its seems that immigrants who leave there countrys, assume that since they buy, sell, and launder stolen Land and resources, that automatically the rights of FIrst Nations are automatically depleted, because immigrants, immigrated illegally, and purchased and maintained stolen property. The plan should be as simple as Canada. Why not immigrate by the millions into Iraq and Afgahnistan, set up resource companies, steal reasources, place the Iraq people under another version of the "Indian Act", maintain , and keep the Iraq's out of the economy, while placing all the kids in residential schools at a 50% death rate, and then blame them for all of there social and economic problems afterwords. It seems to work for Canadians. First Nations can't even get clean water, because the immigrants have tainted all the water, and the government has the immigrants believing that since they get citizanship, its o.k to keep stealing, selling, and attempt genocide on First Nations people in Canada in over 120 First Nations communities that have contaminated water. Thats about 120 "Walkertons" across Canada. First Nations could be saying the same thing about all the immigrants or "Canadians", that they run away from there own countrys, to squat, launder, steal, and sell stolen property and resources. Not 1 treaty is done in any Native Languague so, the question of whether or not they are valid is another question. How can First Nations create an economy if they own less the 1% of the land. Infact, the Theives, Religious Outcasts, and Surfs that didn't get sent to Australia, ended up abviously in Canada. The Churches should also be up on Terrorism Charges, they were responsible for moving Nazi Warcriminals, and helping Canada experiment on First Nations Children through Residential School. If you are wondering about school. The government just dropped 127 million dollars from the education fund, and only fund till the children are 16 years old. Thats not exactly free schooling. If it was immigrants, the funding should have increased that amount. So the new terrorist plot by the government is to ensure that First Nations are never educated, underfunded, and never know there real Aboriginal and Treatie Rights.

So what does anything have to with the subject of terrorism? Im not sure you no what you are talking about. This is about 505 Billion profit, or trillions of dollars in stolen resources such as oil, gold, and any other resource, should about cover the 7 billion dollar bill. I think reverting the subject of how much a person gets paid is off the subject of how terrorism has applied to First Nations, and how it has affected them. If you know anything about how funds work on a reserve, the Government a lots money to social programs. This is still no reason to keep over 120 First Nations communities without clean water, and a chance at a healthy life. This is either one of the worse tainted water plots to kill First Nations with dirty water, or its just more of the same attitude First Nations face every day. And another Terrorist Plot to kill pretty much endangered species Language, Culture, and Way of life. First Nations has every right to all the tax dollars. They were never defeated in any war, they never surrendered any of there rights. If an International Court was to ever hear both sides of the Case, it would show that through Genocide, Theivery, and Immigration, that First Nations were being denied the right to a culture, heritage, and way of life. Not long ago baby thiefs called the Church was going around and abducting children from there homes without ever telling the parents. Not even Al Jahid or other Terrorist organizations have ever went to the extent of making oppressive laws, and become baby killers by intent, and precision.

The problem with a entire justice system, is the PC's, and SCC are politically oppointed judges, and judicial system. In alot of cases, some of these politicians and there internal aspirations, superceed any rights and treaties that may exist. This has been the case for decades. First Nations have been asking for International Court to hear the cases, but Canada rejects. So another alternative may be to do the same kangaroo court system by setting up PC's and SC of First Nations. The response may be mutual.

Ironically First Nations have been saying the same thing about there property for years. Only today, people call them "Land Claims".

Canada says it is apart of the United Nations, but fails to be apart of the United Nations Declaration. If that is Canada's stance on Palestine, then it is no different then Canada saying its a Country on First Nations territory. So it makes sense as to why they oppose, because First Nations are in the same situation. No treaty ever said anything about land sales, setting up a country, immigration, Indian Act or resource sales.

The word "Savage" can be used in the same context in historical references, such as the "Savage, Terrorists" who forced First Nations into Residential Schools, Internment Camps, were simply the "Peasent" immigrants who thought that Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing was the way of there "Savage God Jesis Christ". This "Savage" of a god "JEses Christ" tought local savages that it was o.k to murder, and with brutal and process tatics such as "Scalping", for the purpose of profiting for each scalp. This also allow for local peasents to steal, launder, and sell stolen land, and resources. This savage history, of rape, torture, and genocide, by peasent immigrants will go down in history as one of the worst momements in World History. The continued savagery of the Canadian Government to oppress First Nations, through Canada's version of the Aparthied Act (INdian Act), continues to allow immigrant peasents to proceed to infringe on aboriginal rights, and treaties. The brutal savage canadian government, and churches haven't been put to justice by any justice system in the world. In a lot of sense, the First Nations were just like the Jews in Germany. The world never went to help the Jews from Hitlers oppressive, and savage ways, but the world simply went out to help another white man country like Polland, England ext, and only ever used the Jews for an excuss afterwords. The only difference, nobody in the world will help First Nations, and never have. Which is why all First Nations reserves are 3rd world country conditions inside of a 1st world country "Canada." The Terrorist Canadian GOvernment has cut down Education Funding, and choose to break another Treaty Right, and become Political, and Economic Terrorist at the same time. The fact they can spend billions of immigrants from around the world, and oppress the First Nations at the same time, speaks volumes as to the Terrorist ways of Canada. Plan seems simple. Keep first Nations non educated. Keep First Nations politically oppressed Keep First Nations in 3rd world ghettos Keep First Nations out of the economy with the "Indian Act" Keep First Nations under the Indian Act Keep First Nations from getting land they own back. Keep First Nations in Prison Keep First Nations under funded in every social program Keep First Nations on a reserve so that Peasent Immigrants may buy up stolen property without proper ownership.

Simply if you steal, launder, and exploit resources that were never sold, or dicussed, Ownership never discussed, and government gives it away to peasent immigrants who have no right to buy the resources in the first place. Then some would call it Economic Terrorism. No different the Theft. The fact government allows all the Theft to go on, and support it, is still lude, and outrageous. After all this theft, and economic terrorism, Canadians have the balls to go and say they pay for everything that First Nations owns, after they steal, launder, an profit off of stolen property or resources. Terrorism lives everyday, it just disguises itself as government, law, and the Indian Act.

I still don't get it. Why is it so easy for the government to throw some guy in jail for 10 years, when Canada has a whole history full of Socio-Economic Terrorism against the First Nations, and there resources. About a 100,000 missing First Nations children don't have a grave site from Residential Schools, set up by the Government and Churches. I imagine that it would have been to hard to throw a "white" skin person in jail for terrorism, when TB was being spread around purposely to commit genocide against First Nations people. Wait, the Charter of Rights, and United Nations only step in when it suits there economic needs for big resource companies.