Chippewa

Thanks for your support. People like Betsy make me sick to my stomach.

You are right. Havn't seen it yet. Neither have you. Someday we might. Have to see what happens.

Does it really matter?? The fact a person on this forum compared First Nations children to adopt a highway, and dropping of children at a daycare when in Indian Residential Schools. Told a person who went to residential school, to not be mad, and don't be angry after you were raped, abducted, and given TB. I said nobody has ever went to prison for these crimes, and a child molesting rapest so it seems "Betsy" calls the Church the Victim, and tells First Nations people to forget about it, like it never happened. Like someone to turn off the tap like water, when thinking about it. Like I said, nobody has been put to justice. Yet. Maybe they never will. But someday, some people will have justice whether its blowing up a church or some priests head off. What does it matter. Just like the Bible says. "Eye for an Eye". If justice can't be served in Court, maybe its time for natural justice. People don't care about child tourchering, raping, murdering priests and how they killed First Nations people in Canada.

Nobody wants to see that prison rate. Its mostly all First Nations. Most of them went straight from Residential School, to Prison. Thats what the system was really set up for.

Simmer it just perfect. Let the coon meat age for a few days on the side of the highway. Tender, juicy meat for the homeless.

Because Canada is a slave to the U.S system. Canada is really the United States little Bit**. Canada ships off most of its oil, and sells off all the resources there. Can't bit the hand that feeds you. Aside from that, Canada gets all the fancy bombs and missles from the U.S. Maybe we are upgraded military options like which kind of bombs we can drop in Afgahnistan and Lybia. That country Lybia. They just sound like a bunch of wussys. That country sounds like they are named after a female part.

This kind of statement wants me to go into all the churches and blow every priests head right off, at the alter. I would feel no guilt or shame. Infact, I would feel relieved. Because if nobody goes to jail, maybe somebody will atleast get there heads blown off with a shot gun. After maybe write a book, and have a best seller.

So you think that human rights are a joke. You think peoples lives who have been terrorized by the Churches is all a joke. You think that a 51% death rate is all a joke, and in Canada. Let me guess, you think that the Jews are a joke, and you think that the Holocaust they went through is a joke. So you and your religion really doesn't have any reguard for human life. What kind of religion is that. So you think that murdered chilren are just like adopt a highway in Residential Schools. Because the Bible teaches you all this right. I think your anger and hate towards human life, and humanity is a real shame. How can somebody like yourself, say, hey after you were raped, abducted, torchured, and ripped away from your family because the Bible, and Canadian Law says so. After nobody went to prison for War Crimes. That one shouldn't be mad?? What planet you from?? So for instance, Jewish people who endured a 44% death rate have no reason to have anger and feel mad?? Well, lets try an experiment. Howabout you let your 5 year old child, get abducted, raped, torchured, infected with TB, and sent back to your household at the age of 16 with a tampered bumhole, and new Religious experience. Then tell that child. Don't be mad and angery after nobody goes to prison.

In section 35 of the Canadian Constitution. First Nations are not recognized, but aboriginal rights and treaties are. First Nations means non immigrants in other words. What is the word "Indian" in the "Indian Act". Is that a word to take away from the Nationhood of First Nations in Canada. Or is a word that makes people "non humans" but "Indians" under this act. If so, until 1953 when canada made all First Nations or "Aboriginal" children "Wards of the state" they broke some major laws. Maybe you heard of them. United Nations Declaration. Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ In Canada "Wards of the State" are not considered Human. So according to the Canadian law, First Nations have only been considered Human since 1953. I would say Canada is guilty of the following United Nations declaration Articles. Article 7. All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination. This is called the Indian Act Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law. Canada will not go to court over genocide they committed with the Churches. Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks. The 60s baby scoop, when RCMP, and Church officials were granted permission to abduct and murder children in Canada. Article 15. (1) Everyone has the right to a nationality. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality. This means that an "Indian" under the "Indian Act' should never have been recognized. It is the most racist legislation left in the world. Article 16. (1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution. (2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses. (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State. Canadian Residential Schools made sure that this never happened. Article 17. (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property. Today this law is diguised as Land Claims in Canada. Article 20. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association. (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association. Except if you were an Indian in Canada. Article 21. (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives. (2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country. (3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures. Still nobody went to prison for crimes committed against First Nations in Canada Article 23. (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment. (2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work. (3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection. (4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests. Everyone has the right to work, but only in the form of child slavery in Canadian Residential Schools. Article 24. Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay. When your an overworked 7 year old in a field, with no vacation pay, no rest, little food, and barely surviving. Some would say that Canadian Residential Schools violated this section as well. Article 25. (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control. (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection. This is true if your a Canadian. But if you are a First Nations person, medical experimentation, involuntery sterolization, and the mental torchure children had to go through in Residential Schools, then this article didn't apply either. Article 30. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. Oh.. Ya.. the Indian Act.. I think Canada is guilty as charged. Its too bad they will never be accountable for there genocidal actions.

If they have Quebec in the House, then why not First Nations. In one of the Treatys the French are known as "English-French Canadians". They are the only immigrant group to be identified in a treaty other then the British.

Well the day First Nations has a seat or multiple seats in Parliment, I will begin to take them serious. First Nations have no representation in any Canadian Parliment. They don't own any seats in Parliment in every level, from MPs to the senate. Everybody is politically appointed with political aspirations to take another chunk out of First Nations rights and Treatys. They are all the same, and have been for centurys.

Well to support the troops is always the right choice. Why we send our troops to war is another. What happens next time when the world doesn't believe us about our aspirations for war, and they turn against our government. The people will suffer, but the government lives on. Who is really the victim. The government who decides to send our kids to war for no real reason, other then economy drive, and economy stability. Or the people that we have to go to war against. So for instance, why did the U.S.A sell Germany 24 million gallons of fuel to go to war, when the U.S.A had to go to war against them later on. Why did we arm Iraq, then make the choice to go to war 2 times since after. Why is canada in Afgahnistan. The Poppy Industry, or the Heroin Industry has since went from a 5 billion dollar market, to a 15 billion dollar market. That was 2 years ago, who knows how big it has grown since. We are doing nothing but protecting the Heroin World Market with our troops, and letting it grow in Afgahnistan. Maybe the fact war is bad, but driving governments of the world market need it for stability, and a driving force in the economy. Things need to become so tough to go to war, the world should agree on one thing, and one thing only. If countrys decide to go to war, then everything that country imports should be cut off. Make sanctions against building weapons, guns, missles, and testing of weapons of mass destruction. If anybody fails, then cut them off, and make the governments who are oppressing a people, left on an island to deal with things enternally. War should be so difficult to do in the world, that countrys who are in wars need to know that they can't operate without an economy. look at whats going on in North America. Jobs leaving, because big corporations know the is no money here, and they are leaving with all the money in there pockets. War is like 2 kids at a playground, although the driving economy force is really the industrial military complex in disguise.

10. President Bush obstructed justice and corrupted United Nations functions as a means of securing power to commit crimes against peace and war crimes. President Bush caused the United Nations to completely bypass Chapter VI provisions of its Charter for the Pacific Settlement of Disputes. This was done in order to obtain Security Council resolutions authorizing the use of all necessary means, in the absolute discretion of any nation, to fulfill UN resolutions directed against Iraq and which were used to destroy Iraq. To obtain Security Council votes, the U.S. corruptly paid member nations billions of dollars, provided them arms to conduct regional wars, forgave billions in debts, withdrew opposition to a World Bank loan, agreed to diplomatic relations despite human rights violations and threatened economic and political reprisals. A nation which voted against the United States, Yemen, was immediately punished by the loss of millions of dollars in aid. The U.S. paid the UN $187 million to reduce the amount of dues it owed to the UN to avoid criticism of its coercive activities. The United Nations, created to end the scourge of war, became an instrument of war and condoned war crimes. The conduct violates the Charter of the United Nations and the Constitution and laws of the United States. http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

They are called the International Warcrimes Tribunal. So if that isn't an International Court, I don't know what is.

Look at residential Schools, and the genocide committed in those residential schools in both Canada and U.S.A. That is clear violation of International Law. Read the Human Rights Declaration sometime.

Another Option is pull out of the United Nations. Both Canada and U.S.A. SInce they don't follow the Human Rights Declaration anyways. Or even follow international law.

Those aren't indictments. Those are complaints. international court system wants to try him and charge him. If Canada and U.S.A both hides behind NATO, and the United Nations when they invade and bomb foreign countrys, then why are they not accountable to the laws, and international laws they hold other countrys too, when they don't follow the law themselves. Its 2 face, terrorist tactics. Thats what the governments have done. Become terrorist, while labeling others terrorist. All the while, the use the U.N to hide behind, but never follow the law. Maybe thats what First Nations need to do. Say, well since they don't follow the law, why should we.

7. The United States used prohibited weapons capable of mass destruction and inflicting indiscriminate death and unnecessary suffering against both military and civilian targets. Among the known illegal weapons and illegal uses of weapons employed by the United States are the following: fuel air explosives capable of widespread incineration and death; napalm; cluster and anti-personnel fragmentation bombs; and "superbombs," 2.5 ton devices, intended for assassination of government leaders. Fuel air explosives were used against troops-in-place, civilian areas, oil fields and fleeing civilians and soldiers on two stretches of highway between Kuwait and Iraq. Included in fuel air weapons used was the BLU-82, a 15,000-pound device capable of incinerating everything within hundreds of yards. One seven mile stretch called the "Highway of Death" was littered with hundreds of vehicles and thousands of dead. All were fleeing to Iraq for their lives. Thousands were civilians of all ages, including Kuwaitis, Iraqis, Palestinians, Jordanians and other nationalities. Another 60-mile stretch of road to the east was strewn with the remnants of tanks, armored cars, trucks, ambulances and thousands of bodies following an attack on convoys on the night of February 25, 1991. The press reported that no survivors are known or likely. One flatbed truck contained nine bodies, their hair and clothes were burned off, skin incinerated by heat so intense it melted the windshield onto the dashboard. Napalm was used against civilians, military personnel and to start fires. Oil well fires in both Iraq and Kuwait were intentionally started by U.S. aircraft dropping napalm and other heat intensive devices. Cluster and anti-personnel fragmentation bombs were used in Basra and other cities, and towns, against the convoys described above and against military units. The CBU-75 carries 1,800 bomblets called Sadeyes. One type of Sadeyes can explode before hitting the ground, on impact, or be timed to explode at different times after impact. Each bomblet contains 600 razor sharp steel fragments lethal up to 40 feet. The 1,800 bomblets from one CBU-75 can cover an area equal to 157 football fields with deadly shrapnel. "Superbombs" were dropped on hardened shelters, at least two in the last days of the assault, with the intention of assassinating President Saddam Hussein. One was misdirected. It was not the first time the Pentagon targeted a head of state. In April 1986, the U.S. attempted to assassinate Col. Muammar Qaddafi by laser directed bombs in its attack on Tripoli, Libya. Illegal weapons killed thousands of civilians and soldiers. The conduct violated the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg Charter and the laws of armed conflict. http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm If that isn't enough on War Crimes I don't know what is.

He already has.. I have about 20 more indictments if you want. Fact is a fact. Can't hide away from facts.

4. The United States intentionally bombed and destroyed civilian life, commercial and business districts, schools, hospitals, mosques, churches, shelters, residential areas, historical sites, private vehicles and civilian government offices. The destruction of civilian facilities left the entire civilian population without heat, cooking fuel, refrigeration, potable water, telephones, power for radio or TV reception, public transportation and fuel for private automobiles. It also limited food supplies, closed schools, created massive unemployment, severely limited economic activity and caused hospitals and medical services to shut down. In addition, residential areas of every major city and most towns and villages were targeted and destroyed. Isolated Bedouin camps were attacked by U.S. aircraft. In addition to deaths and injuries, the aerial assault destroyed 10 - 20,000 homes, apartments and other dwellings. Commercial centers with shops, retail stores, offices, hotels, restaurants and other public accommodations were targeted and thousands were destroyed. Scores of schools, hospitals, mosques and churches were damaged or destroyed. Thousands of civilian vehicles on highways, roads and parked on streets and in garages were targeted and destroyed. These included public buses, private vans and mini-buses, trucks, tractor trailers, lorries, taxi cabs and private cars. The purpose of this bombing was to terrorize the entire country, kill people, destroy property, prevent movement, demoralize the people and force the overthrow of the government. As a result of the bombing of facilities essential to civilian life, residential and other civilian buildings and areas, at least 125,000 men, women and children were killed. The Red Crescent Society of Jordan estimated 113,000 civilian dead, 60% children, the week before the end of the war. The conduct violated the UN Charter, the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg Charter, and the laws of armed conflict. http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

2. President Bush from August 2, 1990, intended and acted to prevent any interference with his plan to destroy Iraq economically and militarily. Without consultation or communication with Congress, President Bush ordered 40,000 U.S. military personnel to advance the U.S. buildup in Saudi Arabia in the first week of August 1990. He exacted a request from Saudi Arabia for U.S. military assistance and on August 8, 1990, assured the world his acts were "wholly defensive." He waited until after the November 1990 elections to announce his earlier order sending more than 200,000 additional military personnel, clearly an assault force, again without advising Congress. As late as January 9, 1991, he insisted he had the constitutional authority to attack Iraq without Congressional approval. While concealing his intention, President Bush continued the military build up of U.S. forces unabated from August into January 1991, intending to attack and destroy Iraq. He pressed the military to expedite preparation and to commence the assault before military considerations were optimum. When Air Force Chief of Staff General Michael J. Dugan mentioned plans to destroy the Iraqi civilian economy to the press on September 16, 1990, he was removed from office.[7] President Bush coerced the United Nations Security Council into an unprecedented series of resolutions, finally securing authority for any nation in its absolute discretion by all necessary means to enforce the resolutions. To secure votes the U.S. paid multi-billion dollar bribes, offered arms for regional wars, threatened and carried out economic retaliation, forgave multi-billion dollar loans (including a $7 billion loan to Egypt for arms), offered diplomatic relations despite human rights violations and in other ways corruptly exacted votes, creating the appearance of near universal international approval of U.S. policies toward Iraq. A country which opposed the U.S., as Yemen did, lost millions of dollars in aid, as promised, the costliest vote it ever cast. President Bush consistently rejected and ridiculed Iraq's efforts to negotiate a peaceful resolution, beginning with Iraq's August 12, 1990, proposal, largely ignored, and ending with its mid-February 1991 peace offer which he called a "cruel hoax." For his part, President Bush consistently insisted there would be no negotiation, no compromise, no face saving, no reward for aggression. Simultaneously, he accused Saddam Hussein of rejecting diplomatic solutions. President Bush led a sophisticated campaign to demonize Saddam Hussein, calling him a Hitler, repeatedly citing reports - which he knew were false - of the murder of hundreds of incubator babies, accusing Iraq of using chemical weapons on his own people and on the Iranians knowing U.S intelligence believed the reports untrue. After subverting every effort for peace, President Bush began the destruction of Iraq answering his own question, "Why not wait? . . . The world could wait no longer." The course of conduct constitutes a crime against peace. 3. President Bush ordered the destruction of facilities essential to civilian life and economic productivity throughout Iraq. Systematic aerial and missile bombardment of Iraq was ordered to begin at 6:30 p.m. EST January 16, 1991, eighteen and one-half hours after the deadline set on the insistence of President Bush, in order to be reported on television evening news in the U.S. The bombing continued for forty-two days. It met no resistance from Iraqi aircraft and no effective anti-aircraft or anti-missile ground fire. Iraq was defenseless. The United States reports it flew 110,000 air sorties against Iraq, dropping 88,000 tons of bombs, nearly seven times the equivalent of the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima. 93% of the bombs were free falling bombs, most dropped from higher than 30,000 feet. Of the remaining 7% of the bombs with electronically guided systems, more than 25% missed their targets, nearly all caused damage primarily beyond any identifiable target. Most of the targets were civilian facilities. The intention and effort of the bombing of civilian life and facilities was to systematically destroy Iraq's infrastructure leaving it in a preindustrial condition. Iraq's civilian population was dependent on industrial capacities. The U.S. assault left Iraq in a near apocalyptic condition as reported by the first United Nations observers after the war.[8] Among the facilities targeted and destroyed were: electric power generation, relay and transmission; water treatment, pumping and distribution systems and reservoirs; telephone and radio exchanges, relay stations, towers and transmission facilities; food processing, storage and distribution facilities and markets, infant milk formula and beverage plants, animal vaccination facilities and irrigation sites; railroad transportation facilities, bus depots, bridges, highway overpasses, highways, highway repair stations, trains, buses and other public transportation vehicles, commercial and private vehicles; oil wells and pumps, pipelines, refineries, oil storage tanks, gasoline filling stations and fuel delivery tank cars and trucks, and kerosene storage tanks; sewage treatment and disposal systems; factories engaged in civilian production, e.g., textile and automobile assembly; and historical markers and ancient sites. As a direct, intentional and foreseeable result of this destruction, tens of thousands of people have died from dehydration, dysentery and diseases caused by impure water, inability to obtain effective medical assistance and debilitation from hunger, shock, cold and stress. More will die until potable water, sanitary living conditions, adequate food supplies and other necessities are provided. There is a high risk of epidemics of cholera, typhoid, hepatitis and other diseases as well as starvation and malnutrition through the summer of 1991 and until food supplies are adequate and essential services are restored. Only the United States could have carried out this destruction of Iraq, and the war was conducted almost exclusively by the United States. This conduct violated the UN Charter, the Hague and Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg Charter, and the laws of armed conflict. http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

The Charges 1. The United States engaged in a pattern of conduct beginning in or before 1989 intended to lead Iraq into provocations justifying U.S. military action against Iraq and permanent U.S. military domination of the Gulf. In 1989, General Colin Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and General Norman Schwarzkopf, Commander in Chief of the Central Command, completely revised U.S. military operations and plans for the Persian Gulf to prepare to intervene in a regional conflict against Iraq. The CIA assisted and directed Kuwait in its actions. At the time, Kuwait was violating OPEC oil production agreements, extracting excessive amounts of oil from pools shared with Iraq and demanding repayment of loans it made to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war. Kuwait broke off negotiations with Iraq over these disputes. The U.S. intended to provoke Iraq into actions against Kuwait that would justify U.S. intervention. In 1989, CIA Director William Webster testified before the Congress about the alarming increase in U.S. importation of Gulf oil, citing U.S. rise in use from 5% in 1973 to 10% in 1989 and predicting 25% of all U.S. oil consumption would come from the region by 2000.[6] In early 1990, General Schwarzkopf informed the Senate Armed Services Committee of the new military strategy in the Gulf designed to protect U.S. access to and control over Gulf oil in the event of regional conflicts. In July 1990, General Schwarzkopf and his staff ran elaborate, computerized war games pitting about 100,000 U.S. troops against Iraqi armored divisions. The U.S. showed no opposition to Iraq's increasing threats against Kuwait. U.S. companies sought major contracts in Iraq. The Congress approved agricultural loan subsidies to Iraq of hundreds of millions of dollars to benefit U.S. farmers. However, loans for food deliveries of rice, corn, wheat and other essentials bought almost exclusively from the U.S. were cut off in the spring of 1990 to cause shortages. Arms were sold to Iraq by U.S. manufacturers. When Saddam Hussein requested U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie to explain State Department testimony in Congress about lraq's threats against Kuwait, she assured him the U.S. considered the dispute a regional concern, and it would not intervene. By these acts, the U.S. intended to lead Iraq into a provocation justifying war. On August 2, 1990, Iraq occupied Kuwait without significant resistance. On August 3, 1990, without any evidence of a threat to Saudi Arabia, and King Fahd believed Iraq had no intention of invading his country, President Bush vowed to defend Saudi Arabia. He sent Secretary Cheney, General Powell, and General Schwarzkopf almost immediately to Saudi Arabia where on August 6, General Schwarzkopf told King Fahd the U.S. thought Saddam Hussein could attack Saudi Arabia in as little as 48 hours. The efforts toward an Arab solution of the crisis were destroyed. Iraq never attacked Saudi Arabia and waited over five months while the U.S. slowly built a force of more than 500,000 soldiers and began the systematic destruction by aircraft and missiles of Iraq and its military, both defenseless against U.S. and coalition technology. In October 1990, General Powell referred to the new military plan developed in 1989. After the war, General Schwarzkopf referred to eighteen months of planning for the campaign. The U.S. retains troops in Iraq as of May 1991 and throughout the region and has announced its intention to maintain a permanent military presence. This course of conduct constitutes a crime against peace. http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm

http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrim2.htm Here is the link International War Crimes Tribunal United States War Crimes Against Iraq Initial Complaint Charging George Bush, J. Danforth Quayle, James Baker, Richard Cheney, William Webster, Colin Powell, Norman Schwarzkopf and Others to be named With Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and Other Criminal Acts and High Crimes in Violation of the Charter of the United Nations, International Law, the Constitution of the United States and Laws made in Pursuance Thereof. These charges have been prepared prior to the first hearing of the Commission of Inquiry by its staff. They are based on direct and circumstantial evidence from public and private documents; official statements and admissions by the persons charged and others; eyewitness accounts; Commission investigations and witness interviews in Iraq, the Middle East and elsewhere during and after the bombing; photographs and video tape; expert analyses; commentary and interviews; media coverage, published reports and accounts gathered between December 1990 and May l991. Commission of Inquiry hearings will be held in key cities where evidence is available supporting, expanding, adding, contradicting, disproving or explaining these, or similar charges against the accused and others of whatever nationality. When evidence sufficient to sustain convictions of the accused or others is obtained and after demanding the production of documents from the U.S. government, and others, and requesting testimony from the accused, offering them a full opportunity to present any defense personally, or by counsel, the evidence will be presented to an International War Crimes Tribunal. The Tribunal will consider the evidence gathered, seek and examine whatever additional evidence it chooses and render its judgment on the charges, the evidence, and the law.

get with the program. that is a fact. about switzerland.

don't shoot the messenger. Fact is, Bush is a wanted for war crimes. He will never leave the U.S.A because of it. I think he made his own prison, which may be hell enough for any individual. If a neutral country like Switzerland is willing to place Bush in prison, and charge him for war crimes says alot about the situation. Maybe this subject is a matter for the International Courts. Look at Canada, First Nations, and other Human Rights groups have been asking International Courts to hold all people involved with Residential Schools accountable for the Genocide commited in Canada. Still nothing is done, and in eyes of people, some like yourself, would never consider those people criminals, because nobody can hold them accountable.