
WWWTT
Member-
Posts
6,561 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by WWWTT
-
Ok heres my take on this topic. And it reads similar to "Apocalypse Now" My wife is from Nanning,Guangxi autonomous region of southern China wich gives me unique insight(Nanning is about a two hour train ride to north Vietnam). China did support North Vietnam during the war against the Americans(it was the anti-American thing to do).But soon after the American departure they started going after each other! According to my wife thousands of Chinese died fighting against the Vietnamese after the Nam war.I assume there would be similar numbers on the other side! Heres the twisted part.According to my wife,the USA is supporting Vietnams position now(because its the anti-Chinese thing to do). Why aren't the Americans trying to be the peacemaker hear(their so-called traditional roll). Or are the US intentionally trying to escalate this conflict? WWWTT
-
Does England have the same total political representation as Canada? Meaning municipal,provincial and federal(upper and lower houses) combined? WWWTT
-
Agreed! But didn't the Bloq at one time win a seat in Newfoundland and Labradour? WWWTT
-
Ya you know what man I'm getting uncomfortable with where this is going so I'm not going to continue engaging in this debate. I look forward to debating on other issues! Good Luck! WWWTT
-
Yes actually where music and art start getting involved it becomes more complicated. Another example would be Marylin Manson,Ozzy,Black Sabbath and even rock'n roll for that matter going all the way back to the 50's. Publication and distribution of material plays a role aswell in all of this too. But going back to your flyer example.Why would you distibute a flyer in the first place? WWWTT
-
Then why make the comment if it was not meant to hurt someone? In Canada we wear seat belts and have air bags in the cars we drive,aswell there are speed limits posted because of safety. We all understand that we have to have cars and transportation but there must be proper steps taken to help promote safety!Aswell there has to be some level of enforcement!As far as I'm concerned the same applies to speach! WWWTT
-
I do not believe it is that simple. Nor is it that difficult to understand. I believe this argument should be debated with examples,or I should say I will rely on example to debate my point. I'm going to risk getting kicked off this site doing this but here goes! I believe an example everyone is familiar with is the Danish cartoon artists work about Mohammed whearing a turban/bomb. The artist portrayed a religuos prophet as a mad man using a technology that did not even exist during his lifetime.And this portrayal of Mohammed is therefore false,thats a no brainer(among other reasons aswell).Is that freedom of speech,or is that making a false statement with the sole intent to harm or belittle the people who follow the Islamic faith. I must remind everyone here I am only using this example to argue the limitations of freedom of speech and in no way am I expessing any approval for this such artists work! WWWTT
-
If a homosexual man commits suicide over something like that would you care then? Or would you still argue that there is insufficient evidence to prove such actions were in any way a contributing factor? WWWTT
-
Why? Why should it ever be allowed to let people/interest groups/organizations be vocal against people of a different lifestyle,color,race,religion,etec,etc, that are just minding their own business and not harming anyone? WWWTT
-
What if the comments lead to someone commiting suicide? WWWTT
-
Because we do not usually agree with each other. This is the first that I am aware of. WWWTT
-
Excellent points. Who else is a member of NATO? OK there's also Portugal and I believe Turkey aswell,28 countries all together! There is probably many more cases too. WWWTT
-
Wow I'm suprised! Thank You for expressing your opinion in support of my,err sorry "our" position! WWWTT
-
Excellent point made! An attack on one is an attack on all! The question still remains that "Why was the US attacked" Another question to ask is if we help one nation that was attacked,can we change or direct that countries policy or circumstance to prevent from future incidents from happening.After all it wasn't Canada that was attacked,should our help come without any strings attached? Furthermore,to this date I have not seen,heard or read any evidence other than circamstantial evidence indicating whom was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. WWWTT
-
You did not read my previous comments where I have stated I checked out the definition on wikipedia.They are not clear.They even suggest that a better term to use is islamic militant or something like that for islamic followers who use violence against others. Unless you can provide any further support for your claim then the term "Islamism" does not include the use of violence against innocent people. Furthermore I do not believe "Islamism" is outlawed or banned in Canada.Or if the Canadian government has deemed followers of Islamism to be terrorists. WWWTT
-
Still waiting for a site that can back up your claim. WWWTT
-
You have a site to back your opinion? WWWTT
-
What makes you think I'm brainwashed by the media like 99% of the population? Is it wrong that I'm not brainwashed by the media? WWWTT
-
You have a link to back up your claim or is this your perception? I checked out wikipedia and it is not clear. Aswell can you provide a site stating that "Islamism" is outlawed or banned in Canada? Are "Islamists" deemed to be terrorists? I am very familiar with the term "Islamic terrorist",but as far as I know at this point an "Islamist" is a follower of Islam who lives by strict Islamic ritual.Or another way of describing the term can be an orthodox Islamic.The terrorist uses violence against others,the other doesn't. WWWTT
-
Insite Ruling poses danger on a number of fronts
WWWTT replied to Argus's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
There is a show on TVO right now "Raw opium, Part 2" Watch it! WWWTT -
Insite Ruling poses danger on a number of fronts
WWWTT replied to Argus's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
I don't think venting out your frustration over the Canadian constitution, how it is interpreted and applied will change anything? Do you really believe if you get mad or angry enough people will actually turn around and say "hey wait a minute,maybe this guys onto something.we should all listen"? Man thats freekin funny WWWTT -
What about improving society? After all if the crime rate were to plumet wouldn't our society greatly improve? Or is this task somehow left up to an elected government,and at different levels municipal,provincial and federal? I find it very hard to believe that the body responsible for applying the law would completely deny any responsibility for making observation(and then conveying its findings) for the purpose of suggesting areas/circamstance or parts thereof where improvements can be made. Actually it would be very disturbing if this in fact was true! Would this process actually leed to a self fullfilling demise? After all if we lived in a eutopia or actually achieved a nirvana within our society would their be any need for our justice system and all the related bodies(or at least a much smaller version)? WWWTT
-
Islamist? What does this word mean? To me it's on the same lines as "Catholic","Jewish" or "Athiest" a religious belief/or no belief.(I hope I'm not opening a can of worms here) Is it a crime to have a faith or belief of your own choice? Your faith is protected in the Canadian constitution! Are you implying that NATO attacked Afganistan because the people there are "Islamist"?!?! There is nothing wrong with being Islamic! WWWTT
-
You are making a very questionable comment here! Are you suggesting that there is something wrong with following the Islamic faith? And that he must reject this relegion to be accepted into Canadian society? WWWTT
-
I would not be so quick to brush off the fact he was 15 yrs old when this happened.He must have bein yonger still when he was brainwashed into this cult. I do not believe anything was said about forgiving this person?(thats more like granting a pardon) Does Khadr still hate this country?Did he ever really hate Canada?Does Khadr actually want to come back to Canada and try to make good on a second chance?Does he deserve a second chance?And if not then why? You claim or imply that he still hates Canada,does he or is this just your opinion.If I looked would I find a site backing you up? WWWTT