Je suis Omar

I wonder if bcsapper has read this. He is of the opinion that Canadian and USA media present the truth. Egregious omissions are equally lies and propaganda.

You tell us that you used your reading skills but you somehow missed this:

Congratulations, poochy, on being right. The "panama canal thing" is another excellent example of the USA stealing from its poor neighbors to help the greedy and rapacious USA. You should start a new thread on that.

They can be. Your terrible misreading and lack of understanding of the information found therein is the problem.

Nevertheless, just a cursory read of a few articles written by academics and former USA officials who grew disillusioned with USA war crimes and terrorism would bring you far closer to reality than your 50 years of news watching has done.In all that 50 years have you heard of the 100 years of USA terrorism against Cuba, the 50 plus years of the same against Korea, or Vietnam, or Nicaragua. These weren't USA enemies. These were countries that wanted their independence, the freedom to choose their own government, the freedom to use their own wealth. The USA murdered millions, it should be obvious that you don't murder those you purport to be saving, in order to steal the wealth from these poor countries. TV failed to inform you of that. What it has done, shamelessly, is provide the USA great cover for its myriad war crimes and terrorism. This grand reluctance to address head on the volumes of information available to support all this doesn't at all speak well of your much vaunted freedom of speech, our free and open societies.

That's hardly evidence that you are an informed individual. The USA knew that the vast majority of Vietnamese wanted independence with Ho Chi Minh as their leader. Instead of aiding them in that endeavour, as Ho Chi Minh repeatedly asked and begged the USA to do, the USA lied lied lied and launched a long long series of vicious war crimes against Vietnam and its people.

A lame response, BCS. The simple fact is that you do support war crimes and terrorism committed by the USA. You support "yes, absolutely, I would join a USA death squad" Freddy. You state that you don't support war crimes and terrorism then you write at length how you support war crimes and terrorism because they are your chosen war crimes and terrorism crew. You so desperately want to believe that nonsense that you are adamantly and totally opposed to finding out the truth.

But you are not a German national, nor were you one back in the 1940s. You are Freddy, a Canadian. The question is a hypothetical, like the one I asked you about concerning participation in an American death squad. This is a hypothetical you being transported back in time to the 1940s. Would you have willingly worked in a Nazi concentration/death camp, performing whatever tasks were needed to maintain the efficiency of said camp, to ensure your standard of living remained constant?

And many have been executed for those crimes. Why haven't any Brits or Americans?

That lame defense doesn't wash. Had you attempted that phony excuse as a German Nazi at Nuremberg, the Americans still would have hung you.

Freddy, on 22 May 2015 - 10:25 PM, said: Yes we are violent, best if you don't piss us off then I guess. Freddy is that, "honest", Graham. When asked, "Would you then volunteer, or accept being conscripted into a USA death squad?" he answered, Yes, absolutely.

No, I most certainly would not, bcsapper. My posts have, numerous times, indicated that I believe that the rule of law should be followed. But you have stated, correct me if I'm wrong, that you support the USA in their war crimes and terrorism.

Pointing out the myriad war crimes and terrorism of the USA isn't whining, Freddy. Breathlessly panting and drooling and expressing admiration for the USA's Nazi like behavior seems to have given you quite a following of admirers.

No, you didn't, Freddy. You ferociously danced around it. Would you have willingly worked in a Nazis concentration/death camp, performing whatever tasks are needed to maintain efficiency, to ensure your standard of living remained constant?

Which you have stated you fully support. What is more extremist than the illegal invasion of two sovereign nations in a mindless, planned retaliation? What is more extremist than two centuries of USA terrorism, the raping and plundering of numerous countries, countless vicious war crimes, ... ?

Perhaps you can explain the fevered pitch that overtook the USA and then Canada that causes so many people to deny reality. That caused both of the aforementioned countries to illegally invade a sovereign nation. That causes everyone to unthinkingly accept ludicrous notions like, "they hate our freedoms". That causes vast swaths of Americans and Canadians to be so ignorant and unempathetic that they absolutely refuse to entertain the completely logical idea (supported by CIA/pentagon officials) that there are people who have finally decided to retaliate against the USA for their century plus of murder and mayhem. These USA agencies were saying that it was something that should have been expected. All pushed under the carpet, mindless patriotism has ruled the dayS. You, yourself, have attempted to explain away genocide, war crimes and terrorism with the "well others have done it too/others would have done it if we hadn't beat them to the punch". Is this the ignorance and lack of empathy you spoke of? The news is full of ISIS, Boko Haram, other boogeymen and their evil doings. Beheadings are the USA's and the other righteous western nations horror du jour, when the USA has engaged in these same horrendous behaviours, again, by a huge margin over the entire collection of all these other "terrorists". Is this not the very ignorance and lack of empathy you speak of?

Yeah, he's redirected money his way. Can you say major conflict of interest?

That's gonna be some event when they set off a new New Madrid.

Typical cowardly harper stuff.

I guess it can.

So now genocide is considered generous. Can this get any more Twilight Zone?

Circular reasoning, but nevertheless, it's very compelling.

Helllllllllllooooooooo, Freddy. This is 2015. That's not what I asked. This is what I asked: Can I assume from this that your answer to, Would you have willingly worked in a Nazis concentration/death camp to ensure your standard of living remained constant? is also a resounding "Yes"? You have mentioned that your standard of living is important to you.

Can I assume from this that your answer to, Would you have willingly worked in a Nazis concentration/death camp to ensure your standard of living remained constant? is also a resounding "Yes"?

Which "source" are you referring to, Poochy? Do you mean this? ---------------- Je suis Omar, on 22 May 2015 - 9:10 PM, asked Freddy: Would maintaining these obvious high standards find you willingly taking part in, say, a USA death squad? Freddy: Yes. Absolutely. Without hesitation. Edited by Freddy, Today, 03:36 AM.