Je suis Omar

The Boston brothers - not motivated by greed. Knew that they likely would die. The USA - motivated by greed. Knew that tens of millions of innocents would die, hundreds of millions would have their lives wrecked. The USA would become fabulously wealthy from their stolen wealth. That wasn't at all difficult, now was it, Boges?

They will pay fines of $2.5 billion in a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice. An additional $1.8 billion in fines has been levied by the U.S. Federal Reserve against six major banks. ----------------- For their coffee and beer petty cash.

Because it is highly pertinent and completely germane to this topic. How is it that you have missed that terrorists and war criminals, and those that offer material support to them, are hardly the ones to be trusted in adjudicating matters of this nature?

What on earth would lead you to the preposterous notion that anyone would be the least bit interested in yet another of your outdated sources that you, yourself, don't understand?

Your rolleyes doesn't do anything save for illustrating you're young. Many of the millions of people the USA has murdered and stole from are of Islam. Unlike you, and more than a few others, I'm not attempting to absolve anyone. What's good for the goose to get hung for is good for the gander to get hung for. What is happening today would not be happening if the USA wasn't a terrorist rogue nation which has, with no doubt whatsoever, committed vastly more terrorist actions, with much much greater lethal results, than the sum total of all the current usual suspects. Another bad, uninformed guess, Boges. And they only killed how many, Boges? Take just one of the myriad illegal invasions of sovereign nations by the USA and from that, take just one bombing, out of tens of thousands of bombings, and you could count thousands of civilians, children included, who were blown to smithereens by one event. All done because the USA wanted to steal their wealth. Compare the motives of the two brothers to the motives of the USA.

One would have to know some history before making such an assumption, Boges. But let's assume for a minute that that is the case, the only case. That means that you have proven the USA to be a terrorist group for the basest of reasons. People of power in the USA commit crimes against poor people to garner votes. How low, how vicious, how amoral is that?

Only indirectly, Boges, but one would have to know some history to understand the connections. Certainly, USA terrorism around the world has a great deal to do with what happened in Boston.

Is there a racketeering law whereby proceeds of crime are taken away? Why are gangsters, drug dealers, motorcycle gangs being discriminated against?

How many academics, lawyers, politicians, ... do you see describing the true nature of the USA? It's not something that is at all well received. As you know full well, some people will go to extraordinary lengths to try to curtail discussion of USA terrorism and war crimes.

So now you've fallen back to "may not have known". But come on, Michael, he was a lead investigator for NIST. Even if what you suggest was true, which it isn't, talk about gross incompetence.

Do you mean in the same manner that the USA terrorist regime did for the 61 years where, after making a huge pretense that the USA was saving the Cuban people from Spanish oppression, tyrannized them and oppressed them further until 1959? Stole all their wealth and kept them as slaves and prostitutes? You really have to know some history before you attempt to discuss these issues.

The lies came from John Gross of NIST. I have previously posted a video illustrating his lies. He stated that he knew of no eye witnesses, that nobody had produced examples of molten steel/iron. Then numerous eye witnesses were brought forward.

Precisely, which is why I repeatedly raise the highly pertinent, completely factual issue that everyone else is too terrified to mention, the USA is the leading terrorist nation/group in the world. And yes, it is perfectly apt to compare this criminal nation to Al Capone because they have acted like gangsters from the outset. If anything, I have, with my comparison, unduly slighted Al Capone.

And to boot, a hostile foreign army that was committing the ultimate war crime under international law, the illegal invasion of a sovereign nation. That same hostile foreign army, whose leaders had previously set up the Taliban as their chosen government, who the Americans were very comfortable with until the Taliban made decisions to not support American business as enthusiastically as the USA wanted. Notice the close similarity to other USA installed right wing brutal dictatorships?

Do you rely on Larry the Cable Guy for all your science questions? An inline water heater is no different than a tank heater. It is all a matter of science, of sizing capacity to expected demand.

That's awfully funny. Speaking of delusion, how are you able to ignore all the Jews who describe the same things as Marcus and others?

Y'all love it when it suits your propagandist memes, Rue. Nous sommes Palestinians.

I see you do now understand the futility of comparing ancient history to modern international law, Argus, but you're just not capable of admitting it.

The world's leader in terrorism, by a gigantic margin, over all terrorists worldwide combined, attempts to pervert justice with this mockery of a trial, and you think it shouldn't be discussed. It's Al Capone conducting a trial for a neighbourhood petty thief.

You do understand, don't you, the futility of comparing ancient history to post WWII Nuremberg principles.

True, I forgot to include the UK and others of the usa's supporting cast.

Killing little children, not so much. The bad behavior of other Jews doesn't, in a thinking person's mind, bring disrepute on "us".

This brings to mind, "There's a sucker born every minute, ... . " What have you got against the free enterprise system, Argus?

On the topic of terrorism, you think that terrorism shouldn't be discussed, OGFT. Is that an example if clear thinking?

This is illustrative of either profound ignorance (non pejorative sense) or the deliberate willfull blindness of way too many westerners. How can you ignore the fact that the USA pretty much invented terrorism? That the USA has been employing terrorism since before it became a "nation". The Philippines, Hawaii, Cuba, every South and Central American country, Vietnam, Korea, Angola, Laos, Cambodia, ... . "By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In 78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation." -- Lt General William Odom You're looking the wrong direction for the scourge that is threatening humanity. If the total number of deaths that have been caused by "terrorists" to the USA since 1980, let's assume that total is 5000, and if this number were to continue on a yearly basis, it would take about six centuries for the tally to become equal. And that's only for the USA terrorism against the people of Vietnam. There's still Korea, another six centuries; Cambodia, another two centuries; ..., ..., ... .