Hal 9000

He said he didn't know Putin! Why do you people pull this shit?

Yeah, that's what we're told. Anyway, why no talk about Hillary and her suggestion about going to war with Russia...over a despot fighting some terrorist groups? And why no talk about Trump's idea that Iran would end up with control over Iraq? You people are all the same people who laughed when Romney said to beware of Russia.

Well then, who are these people in the video and what do they do for the DNC? It would appear to me that these groups get paid indirectly from the DNC to cause havoc at Trump rallies, but maybe you could explain it away for me.

Why hasn't this been playing non-stop on the main stream media?

I wish you'd have read the earlier messages because the conversation was about the Clinton Foundation. As far as their personal money goes, that of course comes from (ironically) many of the same people who donate to the charity, but another conversation.

Just so it's on record, I have no doubt that these countries are all cyber spying on each other. My issue is about the leaks.

Well, then I guess we'll see the US gov't take legal action against Russia - I'll bet they don't though. I bet it'll all go away, just vanish into dust as soon as the emails stop.

Well, that's not really what was asked.

WTF! A cite? A cite for what?

I guarantee you that they will never find out - never ever find out who leaked those emails.

Well, I'm glad you asked. I rely on common sense and a smattering of skepticism of coincidence. Hillary brings up the beauty queen and by morning she is all over the TV - The media already had interviews in the can - what a coincidence. An audio recording shows up days before a debate, AC pounds Trump to say that he's never done what was mentioned in recording, almost immediately women show up to tell their stories (Not strange until you look at timeline and the fact they've already secured lawyers like Gloria Allred), another coincidence or just good luck for Hillary? I seriously doubt it. All this while wikileaks is getting buried, actually hidden by the MSM. The US Gov't is not gonna tell the public who is hacking them, unless it serves a purpose. And who better to lay it on than the Russians? Russia is an adversary in Syria and they've spent months tying Trump to Putin and the Dems are fighting Trump - how convenient. Sorry, but this is 100% orchestrated. Oh yeah, as an edit - the women showing up are staggered to not only for dramatic effect, but to make sure that every day, there is a new, but the the same continuing story - better make sure the media doesn't blow their load in one weekend.

It's hogwash that the Russians are behind email leaks, this stunk from the first whisper campaign. Why on earth would the dems tell us the Russians are behind it? Fear, that's why. And to try to draw that line between Trump and Russia (Putin). It's so transparent that it's laughable. The Dems must be laughing their asses off that you people actually bought it. It's just as likely to be Iran, China, N.Korea, or any other hacking groups. They've been getting hacked for years, now all of the sudden when the emails show up, they know exactly who is behind it. It sounds like a scene from "Wag the dog". It's hogwash that Putin fears anything remotely close to a Hillary presidency, although you'd love the world to be in fear of a woman, wouldn't you? He'd tell her to pound sand, just like he did with Obama. How exactly is Clinton going to impose a no-fly zone...or should I say, how is she gonna enforce it? Are you suggesting that she start a war with Russia for no other reason than overthrowing a despotic gov't who is fighting a rebel terrorist group? Real smart!

Good F'N Grief! How the fck do you think they get that money? That should be what people are asking.

Hogwash!

I'll slow it down, the issue of using charity money for personal purposes is bad, yes, but all we know that that is part of the deal. The Clintons do it and I'm sure Trump has done it, I'm pretty sure that nearly every charity spends at least some donor money inappropriately. With that said, my concern is more about what the Clintons do to raise money (and from whom) for their organization.

Dude, everyone uses their charity for their own purposes, it's sort of expected. The Clintons pay for their entire "organization" through the foundation, that's not the issue. The Issue is how the Clinton foundation makes it's money, and it appears that unlike other similar organizations who sell guns or drugs, they are selling contracts, influence and policy to their clients. Of course, maybe you believe that all these countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are so overcome with humanitarian feelings that they just can't help but to donate millions to the cause.

Assigning someone independent and free from corruption to investigate is not a witch hunt. Hillary has done things illegal, that we actually know as fact. The other 2 things are complete hysteria, probably came from Lawrence O'Donnell or somebody just as bad, perhaps Hayes or Lemon.

Except, there is no evidence that Trump would do that whereas there is documented proof that the Clintons have. See Haiti.

I can't believe that you people don't understand the implications of a government giving favours in exchange for money. It's inconceivable really!

People can't afford to care about selling favours to Arab nations for personal profit or leaving Haiti in ruins because the Clintons sold contracts to their buddies? And all because Trump may or may not have kissed somebody inappropriately 20 years ago? Really?

Hillary is corrupt, how anyone can deny that is truly worrisome...and she has the media, the IRS, the DOJ and now the FBI covering for her. This is the most dangerous scenario any country can face and all people will talk about is Trump allegedly giving unwanted kisses to women 10-35 years ago.

I don't know if you posted this by accident, but you're exactly right.

No, for the purpose of the thread and the questions posed. This isn't about dissecting the decline of western civilization, it's about understanding what people are feeling - and why.

Dude, I couldn't give a sheet about corporations or what you think is the actual reasons for the decline of America, I'm telling you what the perception is. And, you don't think Trump is the solution - fair enough, but to think a Clinton presidency is going to take that country anywhere but down even lower is sheer naivety.