Hal 9000

Sure call it 53 if that turns your crank, it's still not the point of anything.

24 days out and the media is trying to run the clock by simply making Trumps issues seem worse than the Wikileaks documents. Americans must be really naive to not see this.

I'm not trying to be historically accurate. I'm sure the decline in America happened earlier than what I suggested, some might point to the 70's - sure and i'm also sure many books will be written and many have already been written, however, almost zero people will know what the hell you're talking about with the Powell Memorandum and regular people really have no idea about money or debt when it streams into the 10's or 100's of billions or trillions. Regular people know that affirmative action or NAFTA hurt them, and they know that they can't afford a healthcare system being forced on them etc.etc. Whether it is blamed on The Clintons, Obama or Bush makes little difference to the Trump revolution, all they know is things have gotten progressively worse since the Reagan years.

Oh, I'll see it all. In fact, I'll look for it through different outlets as well. I read the web page, they seem to have missed the email about Bill get a $1Million birthday present from Qatar while Hillary was SOS. You see, CNN can say there are wikileaks emails, and show the lightest ones with the caveat that they aren't really bad. I read a Vanity Fair article yesterday that supposedly had the 6 most damning emails and it was a joke.

I haven't seen it, but I'll bet Don Lemon and Anderson Cooper bring on a panel ready to explain it all away. Wanna make a wager?

Most of those reasons are fed to you by the press as reasons, emotional reasons why you shouldn't like the guy. I don't want to get into a "prove it" argument, but taking quotes from a shock radio program is desperate. As for the billion dollar loss, you know he actually didn't lose a billion dollars right? As for the last question, for me it's not so much about accepting or rejecting either candidate, for me it's the establishment and the press. The press is looking more and more like that found in Russia or North Korea, I find this to be the most dangerous by-product of this election. I want the press to lose.

Nobody talks about what Hillary will do, Hillary hasn't been seen, let alone said anything, the MSM says nothing about policy (Hillary or Trumps) or wikileaks. They have spent over a week straight talking negatively about Trump and this audio recording. So, why are the polls changing in favour of Clinton?

Which is emotional, thank you!

If this campaign is not about voting your emotions, then what is it about?

Not really, it's not about making objective decisions, women can do that just fine. They won't make an objective decision because they're not being asked to, they're being asked to make the emotional decision. Elections aren't always about being objective - and certainly not this one. This election is all emotion based, there has actually been very little that Hillary has said that she would do. She hasn't been out on the campaign trail espousing her ideas, she's basically only appeared at private fundraisers and everything on the news is Trump and these controversies. The emails should show people what and who Hillary is, but people don't want to know it, is this objective? Are Hillary voters being objective when they refuse to even read, let alone think about the implications of the wikileaks dumps? Not a chance! Tell me, do think there is anything that Hillary could do that would have her lose the support of someone like WCR?

Exactly, and that's what I mean when I say that Trump has taken the pressure off their dilemma. I'll slow it down for you, if the republican nominee was somebody else (say Rubio or Carson), then women would still vote for Hillary, but would have to justify their decision without admitting that it's merely about sisterhood.

Sure, but you know it's true. You know it's all about making history, about sisterhood. Women were and are always gonna vote for Hillary, Trump just takes the pressure off their dilemma.

And that's all it comes down to for you people, women must vote for the woman or you can no longer be one of us! Right?

I don't think anybody sees it that way, except maybe democrats who try their best to shirt the actual issue.

You see cyber, this is the sense I get from the woman in the article. Eyeball clearly doesn't have the same knack for wordplay as she does, but the sentiment seems the same. The idea almost completely disregards their issues and places it squarely on their anger, bigotry and their misinterpretation of who is responsible for their problems. Nothing new here. As an edit; she spent 5 years and talked to only 60 people and regurgitated the same liberal talking points that many of us could've predicted. She leaned nothing. Congratulations lady!

Youre derailing your own thread.

I found the article to be patronizing of these people, like they "just don't get it", they don't see the big picture like liberals do. You know what Trump supporters want? It's quite simple really, they just to be left alone. They want to go to work (most of them), build their monster trucks, ride their Harleys, watch football and Nascar, go to the gun range, fly their flag and perhaps go to church every once in a while. I think the seeds for the Trump revolution began with the Bill Clinton presidency. I think "affirmative action" was a problem, political correctness, NAFTA eventually became a problem, the housing crisis and wall street was an issue that began in the Clinton years that eventually burst during Bush's tenure, and terrorism became front page news during the Clinton years. Not to mention the Clinton scandals. With Bush we saw 9/11 happen and with that Bush entered into what most people call an illegal war, the bubble burst and it seemed that the Bush administration cared for nothing more than than the war in iraq, the US spending trillions of dollars on the middle east, while regular people were losing everything at home. Businesses leaving or shutting down ad the revelation that corporations were in bed with politicians. Obama! Obama was going to provide a change you can believe in. Many of these people saw a fresh face in the political world, he wanted to keep business in the US, invest in business, get the ball rolling again (Canadians were actually worried that he would protect US interests to the extent that it would hurt Canada's economy), Obama would make it right with the middle east, get out of a losing war, improve health care and would mend racial fences. Instead, with Hillary at his side, he proved weak and ineffectual. The real world didn't buy into the old "hey man, lets all just get along" schtick. In between rounds of golf, he half heartedly tried to stand up to Syria and pushed "regime change" in Syria, Libya and Egypt meanwhile Russia grew back to superpower status (as Romney predicted). Healthcare was/is a disaster, ISIL grew and we watched beheadings on TV, business didn't come back and the economy was slow. Blacks are shooting each other in the streets at an alarming rate, The IRS is found to to targeting republicans and Tea party members, Obama is seen to provoke racial violence and intolerance toward christian values and his big concerns seem to revolve around "safe spaces" and who is allowed in what bathroom. Hillary. Hillary represents the worst of the Clinton era with her scandals and back room deals, the worst of the Bush era with her willingness go to war and the worst of the Obama administration in regards to foreign policy, religion and liberal ideology with sanctuary cities and immigration (or lack there of). And, Trump supporters now know that everybody is on the take, they know how incestuous the Clinton circle is and know that the media is carrying the ball for her. Hillary has been running for the presidency for 40 years, and has bought and sold to get there, she has backstabbed and thrown everyone under the bus (maybe literally) and has changed her views depending on the donations and public polls. We know she is crooked, what we don't know is just how many people around her are on the take and how many people are terrified to cross her. Liberals can call Trump supports dumb or stupid and patronize them all day long (and they do), but really they're not, they're not racists and xenophobes, they're not deplorable, they're just fed up and they want to get back to watching football - without seeing Kaepernick disrespect their anthem. Essentially, the Clintons and Obama have created Trump and his supporters.

It's all about context and perspective, if it wasn't nearly everybody (if not all of us) could be accused of sexual assault. I'm not saying it's not seedy, it is, but probably only because he was married.

Would you get off the "philandering" routine, it has nothing to do with philandering, nobody cares that Bill was a philanderer. For a bunch of people who insist that Bill's adultery should be left out of this campaign, you sure do want to bring it around to Bill when we talk about Hillary's threats.

This entire scandal is about nothing more than securing the women vote. Nothing here has happened by chance, no information "just came out". We all knew Hillary would play the women card, I don't think any of us knew just how much or how much the press would be involved, but we all knew that this was her biggest play. When the press can literally cover this "story" for 24 hours straight for a week and hardly (some not at all) mention wikileaks or emails, don't you people consider for a minute that you're being manipulated? "10 years ago, he kissed me...and I didn't want to be kissed", "30 years ago, he put his hand hear my inner thigh on an airplane"....C'mon people really! Both those things have happened to me and it was just some female "hitting on me", I never considered it sexual assault. If you want to hear what sexual assault is, try finding stories of Clinton's accusers - and you will have to try because they're certainly not being shown by the MSM.

The polls are in her favour, but answering a poll is one thing, going out to vote is quite another. They're afraid of people staying at home because of complacency or indifference.

I prefer to use Haiti as a microcosm of what the Clintons are all about.

Who would've guessed that a country with 350 million people would be deciding between a reality star without a lick of experience and a woman leading an organized crime syndicate.

And another thing, why is DeNiro applauded for calling men (as in Trump) a dog, a pig and stupid...and how he wants to punch him in the face, when Trump is ostracized and called a misogynist for saying less than that to Rosie O'Donnell? Maybe DeNiro hates men, maybe Trump treats women equally.

So, If bringing out Alicia Muchado was something that america had to see and releasing Trumps audio tapes were something that america should hear, why then are the CNN pundits calling it disgusting that Trump brought out Hillary and Bills assault victims?