Hal 9000

Yes, we get it! the USA are terrorists! Guess what? I'm not going to play the whole we're terrorists, you're terrorists...so i guess we're all the same. If this is true, I'll take the side of the terrorists killing Muslims over the terrorists killing Christians every time. We're all choosing a side...aren't we?

It's not genetics. It's social, environmental and natural.

He is what he was born and bred to be...a terrorist! Sorry

When that dude pulls off a terrorist attack...and he will, maybe the lefties will wise up and stop coddling these terrorists.

It looks like a gay pride thing to me.

Sorry, you misunderstood! I never said you excused the atrocities, I said you excuse the reasons for the atrocities.

You're excusing the reason these cops were shot dead, just as you people excuse the reason every time a muslim chops off somebody's head.

What's with all the "anecdotal" crap? Are we not allowed to use our own experiences and common sense to form an opinion anymore? Do we really have to be told by some blog or wiki article what to think now? I've been in school, i've been seeing my kids in school for 15 years now, I know a lot of teachers and some of them are people that I went to school with and still communicate with on a regular enough basis to know what goes on inside our schools. Am I really supposed to dismiss everything I know for the sake of some bias article written by who knows? I know teachers plug in a video when they just don't want to teach I know teachers direct they students to various web sites for instruction I know that they play on their cell phones during class I know that they are aware of ticket sale day and spend that day booking vacations I know that they consider sick days as paid day offs to spend on the mountain or beach I know that pro-d days are scheduled around long weekends simply to give teachers a 4 day weekend I knew that after the strike the teachers would have no intention of reducing their spring break to make up some lost time Sorry, I'll trust my "anecdotal" evidence more that some article written by a left wing rag (likely planted by teacher unions) like the Huffington Post or Globe and Mail.

Teachers are 95% women, so when we talk about teachers, we're basically talking about women. The fact is; people are people, women are women and men are men - simple as that. A teacher who happens to be a woman is no different than any other woman. My sister is a nurse, she spends most of her working nights knitting and being on her phone. My brother works at a mill, they watch hockey games at work. It's nature! doesn't matter what job a person holds.

They actually bring home papers for homework that tell them things to google...oh, and Wiki too. P.S - They are using their phones the same way as any woman does, Facebook and candy crush. Unless it's cheap flight day

What was posted by these men?

I agree that teachers have it easier today. I've got kids in school and the teachers usually do 1 of 2 things, they plug in a video or direct students to google/youtube. Teachers are as guilty as anyone else of getting on their cell phone and tuning out on the kids, I hear about it all the time.

Are you serious?

Well, he picked the wrong day to do his very first bad thing when strong arm robbed a corner store, assaulted a police officer and tried to take his gun.

Why do we always break this down to a racism demographic? I would suggest that no matter the colour of a person, less educated people are shot more often than those with education, that someone who is poor or from a broken family has a greater chance than someone who is rich or has a good home life. There are more shootings per capita in the inner city than there is in the country and men are shot way more than women. Why are men shot by police more than women? Is there a war against men.

I don't like this at all!

Yeah, that always happens in politics.

You haven't watched many elections, have you?

Woman "A" (by her own words) had few drinks at a bar, went to a dude's hotel...at 2am, gave him a condom and they had sex. Now, she regrets it and wants to ruin his life. What is there to investigate?

Oh yeah, guaranteed they'll go that route.

The only thing egregious is the fact that it even to a grand jury. I'm sure that was only done to protect his own skin. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see Dorian Johnson and the others try to lie their way through a trial, I just don't see the need.

Read it again and leave out the "opinion". OK, now...read the actual quoted testimonies from "witness 10" and Johnson and see what you get. While you're at it, there are many links that will direct you to actual evidence and photos...but you don't want to see that, do you?

OGfT, you should give these a read http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/01/witness-10-proves-darren-wilson-had-a-reasonable-belief-he-needed-to-shoot/ http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/02/why-michael-browns-best-friends-story-is-incredible/

Kind of a strange coincidence, but Wilson told Brown to get off the yellow lines - presumably for safety reasons, and right on the yellow lines is exactly where he dropped. Not being funny or ironic, it's just a weird coincidence.

The easiest thing in the world would've been for the grand jury to indict, they would have just pushed it off to some other group of people. As it is, I'm sure many of them worry for their own safety. We all knew that not indicting would be cause for riots and they made the decision anyway - I applaud that.