Hal 9000

Ahhh yes, that takes me down memory lane.

I wouldn't allow my wife or daughter to be moved over this issue. If the Jews want to sit with men, then that should be arranged before people are already seated. My only objection, is people misrepresenting the reasons why they do it.

And the police killed more bikers than either of the 2 gangs.

We've got one thread where the guys acting obnoxious are being sexist and now one thread where the men don't want to inadvertently touch a woman and they're sexist too.

So, just a couple questions; Can the male reporters charge these guys with sexual harassment too? And...Can the women who shout FHRITP, be charged with sexual harassment?

I don't think it's about finding you repulsive. It's closer to the opposite, not wanting to be sexually aroused from having impure contact with you.

So, the only criteria for a sexual harassment charge is that a woman hears something that she doesn't like?

C'mon, you're talking about violence, rape and now making comparisons to sexual predators and child abuse. These guys shouted something rude towards a camera, please try to keep some perspective.

It's funny that a group of people who have such love, understanding and forgiveness for Omar Khadr, just can't quite understand the concept of shouting something inappropriate into a camera. There ought to be a law - not to deal with the killer Muslim, but to punish the guys who have an inappropriate sense of humour.

You think everyone is gonna understand what constitutes offensive speech? You lefties always want to make more laws against speech.

You didn't pay attention to the Hunt interview, did you?

It's not splitting hairs, it changes the meaning completely.

This trend will end. However, if the past is any indication of the future (and it always is), it'll be replaced with something else.

That all seems pretty understandable. You can draw a correlation to interactions on this site for pretty good proof of that.

Did I really make make excuses? Or...did I just listen to what they said in the interview, and ask Wilbur if he did the same? I was interested in the "why", but you guys seem to be willfully ignorant.

You're right, it's not an addiction or medical condition. However, my point remains!

You can't solve a problem or change a behaviour if you don't understand what it is or why it's happening. I thought you were just being difficult, but you really don't get it, do you?

So, do you understand how and why they do it now? And, who they feel they are doing it to?

You really think thats a sustainable business plan? WoW! Oh yea, self worth (I think you said) will carry the economy! WOW, can you really vote?

This video holds a lot of answers.

Did I really say that? Hmmm.

If that's what you think, then you haven't read the post you quoted - or any of my posts for that matter.

What a ridiculous cliche! Sure , I think the dude making the vibrator comment should've been fired, but just because we don't get our panties in a knot overtime some screams "sexism", doesn't mean we are the problem. I place this in the category of "1st world problems".

C'mon, doesn't every government claim that?

The NDP know who they want to take money from and they know who they want to give it to, the problem with the NDP is that they never know how to generate money - and that should be the only real issue here. If the economy is good, or at least stable then everything else falls into place. We need foreign money to sustain ourselves and and our social structure, and the NDP has never been able to to secure that. Alberta is patting themselves on the back for tossing out the conservatives - great, lets see them in a years time when we can gauge their buyers remorse. What they did there is the definition of "throwing out the baby with the bathwater".