Leaderboard

We are 100% a weak democracy. And I'm not sure that one could point at free and fair elections as the salient feature to buttress a claim that Canada is a democracy, I mean sure a free and fair election is absolutely a critical component to a democracy. But there seems to be something that I see being consistently left out of the conversation surrounding democracy. An engaged and politically informed citizenry. The last time that half of the population even voted was in 1993. That's the highest that we have set the bar in 27 years. The bar is on the floor. Sure the constitution allows us the right to speak free, but were not fully using that right are we? We seem to forget that troubleshooting any circumstance is at least a 3 phase process. Phase 1: identify the issue (we are great at this part no doubt, complaining is our forte) Phase 2: Collaborate on solutions/Brain storm (were meh on the visionary stage, we prefer to yell and divide becoming further entrenched along the way) Phase 3: Action (Plain and simple think first then proceed). Now the reason we are great at phase one is because its oh so easy. Phase two requires real work, working through difference's and maligned agendas. But phase 3 is of the utmost importance and no voting does not count as action that's just a prerequisite like breathing. See self governance means that we as citizens have to play an active role and it is your/my responsibility to uphold freedom, it requires vigilance and it requires a real response like for example running for office (any citizen is entitled to do so). The death of democracy is apathy and the seeds of tyranny are sown by the other cheek.

Politicians are the problem and never the solution. They create problems and then they try to pretend that they are going to try and fix those problems up. And when they try to pretend that they will fix things up they create even more problems. It never ends with these losers that we call politicians. We do not have real and true political leaders in this country anymore. We are stuck with a bunch of leftist spend crazy buffoons who are out to destroy this once great country rather then try to create something worth while for Canada and Canadians. We get what and who we vote for. It seems that most people in Canada want more chaos and havoc rather than for more peace, less government and more freedom.

Canada died in 1980 when comrade old man Trudeau was elected dictator of Canada. When making his victory speech to they the dumb ass people that voted for that commie buffoon, the first words out of his comrade mouth were "welcome to the new Canada". Now we can all see today as to what that commie buffoon really meant when he mentioned those words above. Canada as we once knew it will soon be gone and it will be replaced by the millions of people from the third world that have been allowed into Canada already with more to come. Canada was once a great mostly conservative British European country with real and true values, traditions, morals and decency. Common sense and logic and loyalty ruled those days. Today, look we have as a country. A country that is being filled with way too many other foreign cultures and religions and traditions by "paper Canadians" who do not really give all that much of a dam about this country. If they did they would all become Canadian and stop acting like they are still back home. All they want to do these days is to try and get all of their family members as many as they can to immigrate to this country so they can make Canada become even more of a multicultural and diversity messed up country to what it is already today. All this was started by that old communist Trudeau and his punk globalist communist kid who is trying to finish off the old Canada that we all once knew. Buffoons like Singh is more than happy to help comrade Trudeau finish his destruction of Canada. Liberalism, socialism and communism have done a wonderful job of trying to destroy the old British/European Canada to be replaced with a new third world multicultural Canada. Sadly, it is working well for the likes of those two fools because white people don't appear to give much of a chit about this country either anymore. It's all about me-me-me and what can I get out of Canada.

You're such a worthless liar Bubber. We played that game and I rubbed your nose in it. CTV said exactly what I accused them of, word for word. The fact that you're ok with their deception or that you lack the reading comprehension to fully understand how twisted their narrative was is no fault of mine. Go read a book, kid. CNN's false narratives are legendary. I challenged all of you leftits to name a major news story that CNN didn't skew beyond belief and the entire lot of you came up with nothing. Zip, zero, zilch.

We are living in an age when it seems almost anything goes and is condoned by much of society including governments and political parties. Yet when there are controversies about assault in the RCMP and military, politicians claim offence or disapproval, yet they support much of the perversion and immorality in society under the claim of being "inclusive". In fact, women in the RCMP and military and non-consenting prisoners in prisons are being sexually assaulted continuously. Lawlessness seems to reign. Laws and the public education system is designed now to promote and facilitate these behaviors. It is the law of the jungle. This article goes into some of the issues: "The Plague of Perversion By Wayne Jackson One of the most devastating movements to evolve from human degeneracy in recent decades is the so-called “Gay Pride Movement.” The growing popularity of homosexual and transgender lifestyles is a growing phenomenon. They’ve been buoyed by considerable support from the entertainment industry and significant publicity from the news media. No longer content to practice perversion behind closed doors, the LGBTQ axis has moved into the mainstream of society and flaunts their immorality in the most extravagant ways. Marching in gay-pride parades, they thrust lewdness in the faces of men, women, and children. They’ve invaded school systems at every level. Their agenda has no limits. They are demanding full “human rights,” which according to them includes the right to hold influential governmental positions, teach in schools, marry, and to not be discriminated against in any job based on a chosen sexual behavior. Huge corporations have capitulated to the powerful LGBTQ lobby. Cities, states and even the Supreme Court have caved to this movement so that private businesses have been forced to acknowledge “civil unions.” In 2015, the nation-wide “gay marriage” agenda was achieved thanks to the Supreme Court decision. Incidentally, it should be noted that one of the justices weighing in on this opinion was a homosexual woman appointed by President Obama. The very fact that so many in our country have become sympathetic to this perverted movement ought to be a danger signal to every moral person. The Cause of Homosexuality Exactly what is responsible for a homosexual or gender alteration? Some medical authorities assert that homosexuality is either the result of genetic problems (abnormal chromosome variations) or psychological aberrations. It is now known that in most instances of homosexuality this is not the case. More than a half-century ago, Pritchard’s study of male homosexuals found a normal complement of XY chromosomes in every case (1962, 108). In 1974, the American Psychiatric Association voted to remove homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses. In the spring of 1979, after a decade-long study, sex researchers Masters and Johnson (who were not pillars of moral virtue) concluded that homosexuality for most persons is neither a physical or emotional illness, nor is it a genetic disorder. Rather, it is a learned behavior. Study of this subject led Dr. Jerry Bergman to state: For more information, see the article on the so-called Gay Gene by Dave Miller. The Biblical View of Homosexuality In the sacred Scriptures, homosexuality is not viewed as a medical issue. Rather, it is a moral problem. The name of Sodom lives in the infamy of history. So well known is the biblical narrative concerning the perversions of Sodom and Gomorrah, that across the centuries the term “Sodomite” became synonymous with a homosexual. Recent allegations by modernistic theologians who suggest that the sin of Sodom was mere inhospitality or an intended “gang rape” contains not a shred of evidence. When Jehovah’s messengers came to Lot’s house in Sodom, certain base men surrounded the dwelling and urged Abraham’s nephew to send out the visitors “that we may know them” (Gen. 19:5). The word “know” (Hebrew yada; Greek ginosko) is sometimes employed in the Bible as a euphemism for “to have sexual relations with” (cf. Gen. 4:1; Mt. 1:25). The men of Sodom clearly wanted to engage in sexual activity with Lot’s guests. These men were characterized as “wicked” and their sin is said to be “very grievous” (Gen. 18:20ff). In the New Testament, the inspired Peter affirmed that God turned the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah into ashes and “condemned them with an overthrow, having made them an example unto those that should live ungodly.” Yet righteous Lot, who was “sore distressed by the lascivious life of the wicked” and daily vexed with their “lawless deeds,” was delivered (2 Pet. 2:6-8). Later, the law of Moses declared: Some claim, however, that since many Old Testament regulations are obsolete today (e.g., the wearing of a garment of mingled fabric — Deut. 22:11), so also injunctions against sodomy may be similarly ignored. This is a woeful blunder. Some Old Testament regulations were strictly ceremonial in nature and thus solely a part of that temporary system. Homosexuality is a moral evil that assaults the home, the very foundation of human society. It has never been tolerated by God. The Teaching of Jesus Christ Some religionists (homosexuals and their sympathizers), while admitting that certain New Testament passages appear to condemn homosexual conduct, nonetheless deny that Jesus personally censured such acts. This is totally inaccurate. First, Christ clearly taught that the doctrine of his inspired spokesmen ultimately was from him. To the seventy disciples under his commission, he said, “He who hears you hears me; and he who rejects you rejects me” (Lk. 10:16). Paul, who was very outspoken about sodomy, affirmed that the things he wrote were “the commandment of the Lord” (1 Cor. 14:37). Second, when Jesus spoke of marriage as that which was ordained of God, he stated it was for male and female (Mt. 19:4-6). There is no authority or provision for “gay marriage.” Third, the Lord’s concession, that fornication against an innocent spouse is grounds for divorce by the victim, condemns sodomy since this vile practice is a form of fornication. This point needs some elaboration. Unless there are contextual indications (either immediate or remote) which suggest that biblical terms have been given special meanings, the words of the sacred text are to be understood as they were commonly employed by the writers of that era. The word “fornication” (Greek porneia) was used in antiquity in a generic sense "of various kinds of “unsanctioned sexual intercourse” (Danker et al. 2000, 854). It includes such sins as prostitution, incest, homosexuality, bestiality, and such like (Reisser 1975, 497-501). Jude explicitly declares that Sodom and her neighbors had “given themselves over to fornication and gone after strange flesh” (Jude 7). Finally, Christ indicated that ancient Sodom was in need of repentance and that they justly were destroyed (cf. Mt. 11:23, 24; Lk. 17:29). Additional New Testament Evidence Paul’s inspired rebuke of homosexuality in his letter to the Romans could be misunderstood only by the willfully ignorant. In Romans 1:26-27, homosexual conduct is characterized as: the result of vile passions; a perversion from the natural to that which is against nature (note Jude’s reference to “strange flesh” [vs. 7]); lust causing males to burn for males and females for females; unseemliness; error that was due recompense. Further, in 1 Corinthians 6:9 the apostle declares that the “effeminate” (malakos “pert. to being passive in a same-sex relationship, effeminate, especially of catamites, of men and boys who are sodomized by other males in such a relationship” [Danker et al., 613]). Also condemned are “abusers of themselves with men” who cannot (in that condition) inherit the kingdom of God. This latter phrase translates the Greek word arsenokoites (from arsen — a male and koite — bed). Literally, it is males in bed with males! In 1 Timothy 1:9-10, Paul puts homosexuals in the same lawless class with murderers of parents. Some attempt to wrest the Scriptures by suggesting that Paul was not condemning homosexuality per se, rather, only the abuse of this practice. But there is, liberals maintain, a proper homosexual relationship that would be approved. How absurd! The same type of logic would imply that there is a legitimate form of drunkenness, idolatry, murder, etc. — that only the perversions of such acts are condemned! The Matter of Rights The contention is frequently made these days that sexual preference is entirely a private affair. We are told that what homosexuals do is their business. Those who fancy themselves as broadminded intellectuals allege that the “rights” of all must be protected. There are several things wrong with this reasoning: First, the homosexuals and other sexually aberrant practitioners are pushing for public acceptance of their conduct. They want to teach in public schools, and they’ve gotten their way. But do parents have any rights? As a parent, do I have the right to expect that my children will receive their education from reasonably moral people? Should those who champion incest and bestiality be denied their “rights” to teach children? It seems there is no restraint on the “rights” of the wicked, only those who are trying to live godly lives. Secondly, one spokesperson for the Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights has stated that the ultimate goal of the gay liberation movement is “freedom of sexual expression for young people and children.” The writer says, “We gain nothing by limiting our defense of homosexual love to consensual sex between adults. It is absurd to charge gay men who share their sexuality with boys as ‘child molesters’” (Stockton Record, 1979). Is this what the Constitution of the United States was designed to protect? What Shall We Do? It would be most desirable if we could simply teach sinful homosexuals to abandon their wickedness, obey Christ, and accept his forgiveness (Acts 2:38). This is precisely what some in the first century did (1 Cor. 6:9-11). However, the so-called gay community is totally unconcerned with anything the Bible says. These people must be dealt with differently. This approach is thus suggested: Virtually every person has a threshold of morality at some point. Those opposed to this depravity must demand that homosexuals defend their practice on some moral basis. For example, is bestiality immoral? What about incest? If the homosexuals endorse this type of activity, let them come out and publicly say so. If they feel that such conduct is immoral, by what standard is their judgment made? They must be pressured to logically and consistently defend their views. It will become apparent that when one rejects God as the ultimate standard of right and wrong (as his will is revealed ultimately in the New Testament), there is absolutely no stopping place for human immorality. Who is willing to accept the inevitability of this type of thinking? Scarcely anyone except those who have no regard for logic and who revel in debauchery. Let us, therefore, kindly, but forcefully, press these truths upon our contemporaries. We must take the initiative in this struggle for decent conduct. The future of generations yet unborn depends upon how intelligently, spiritually, and vigorously we engage this battle. The Plague of Perversion : Christian Courier

If Tucker said it, I'll vouch for it. How's that?

Is that what we are calling the left now commies, as much as i dislike the left i would not pigeon hole them as commies dicks maybe but not commies.. As far as having no moral principles, take a good look around and what is happening in this country, and we have little left of traditional Canadian morals and values on both sides.... for the most part Canadians don't give a shit about anything, well with the exception of the NHL, poggy checks, CERB checks now, and what time does the liquor store close.. it is the land of free money and benefits .... nothing more. There is very little patriotism, millions of immigrants are paper Canadians only with more loyalty to their home countries than Canada. Most only want the passport, our free money and benefits. And it is this way because most Canadians want it this way, how else can you explain Justins continued status as PM... with all the drama that he has brought to this country.. They don't give a F****, I am not the one that needs to rethink anything, i have no more love for this country than they do, that was beaten out of me a long time ago....

Yet gladly hold out their hand for that 'free' government money . . . . . you know, the lovely $10.- bills with Sir John A. on them. Justin Trudeau should be on the new $5.- bills. First off, that note is worth f.a., and will be worth nothing whatsoever in a short while, and his face on one side of the note, and his 'other' face on the other side. One face is white, the other is black. Endless possibilities here . . . .

What we are dealing with from those who want to abolish the Constitutional Monarchy is the cancel culture crowd or the illiterate who have been brainwashed with Marxism. They don't understand how the real world works but want to tear down our history and institutions but have no idea what would replace them. Same crowd that tear down statues of Sir John A Macdonald and deface the statue of the Queen in Victoria. We can thank our hopeless public school system which no longer teaches loyalty to our institutions but now teaches progressivism and Marxist ideas. This is why we getting deeper into the doo doo and have ongoing protests and demonstrations against everything.