Leaderboard

I've been wondering about this. (It apparently bugs Putin too. But I've never considered Russia and Soviet as synonyms.) After Brest-Litovsk, what was Russia? After 1945, what was the Soviet Union? -East Prussia, "Poland", etc. ===== Truman was resolute - he started the Korean War. Eisenhower accepted a peace treaty, DMZ, separation of Korea. Stalin died. Khruschev took power. Kennedy was resolute - he started the Vietnam War. Brezhnev took power. Nixon made deals. Reagan refused any contact with the Soviets. Gorbachev took power. The Soviet Union imploded in August 1991.

Believe it or not, you "stating" something doesn't make it a fact. Refusing to look at evidence doesn't stop it from existing. Telling us not to believe our lying eyes or mocking the reasonable doesn't make you the rationale one. It makes you look silly.

Again, you're lying sap. Dozens of people signed affidavits and testified in court that they saw serious breaches of election protocols and that they witnessed actual fraud. You have literally no way in the world of ever knowing that all of those people lied, so by definition, your absurd accusation that they are lying is just another example of your actual lying. Fact: you have just been proven to be a liar once again. People such as yourself, who have been proven over and over again to be liars and fabricators, and who are well known to intentionally propagate the blatant lies of others, don't actually get a free pass sap. People here know that you're just a liar and your opinions are valued accordingly.

I'm not sure if your question is rhetorical or not. If it is there's no point in my going to the massive bother of laying out how the massive fraud happened in detail. I think you can see by reading BCsapper's post it doesn't matter how much evidence I lay out or how clearly I show what it indicates to some people. Their minds can't be changed. I'll just get snot, smears, lame attempts at what they think might be humor, peppered with out the butt claims from them. I will show you some detail on what I believe happened though if you seriously want to discuss it. I'd start by showing you that in spite of everything you describe the fix didn't just happen out of the blue. The coming election steal was seen by many in the months approaching it. The president warned of it. Media personalities not under control of the fixers saw it. So, in spite of that, how were the oft spoken of but rarely specified "they" able to fix a presidential election under the noses of their leaders, the populace, the bureaucracy and administration? Tell me your question isn't just rhetorical and I'll try to explain to you what I believe is the obvious answer based on the evidence.

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/former-finance-ministers-trip-to-caribbean-caps-off-year-of-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do-from-political-leaders/wcm/e977cd20-c09f-492f-8632-6a9b7722ef1b/amp/ I remember a time when people would throw tomatoes at guys like that.

You've got nothing. You know you've got nothing. Your smears and slurs aren't working so now you think you'll try to be funny. Heavy emphasis on "try."