Leaderboard

Well, maybe. But it's kind of a new thing.

We know, you have CBC envy

In this regard, a politician’s behaviour can no longer be barely legal. We are entitled to expect more than that. His conduct fell below the standard required.

Gotta love how extorting the passengers of the St Louis was "giving them a chance."

Your posing as someone who cares how Jews were treated by McKenzie King is a joke.

Yeah, I saw that. It's also interesting that Trudeau stressed that there is no rule book and each case will be different. Suddenly, due process for the accused appears to be important to him.

Nonsense my point is still the same. The organizations wanting funding still have to respect charter rights and reproductive rights as I have said above. What the court limits has nothing to do with what I said. Religious people aren't prevented from expressing themselves or holding opinions. They just can't use funding to violate rights of others and their summer students.

I think it's common knowledge that the Roman Catholic Church made up their own doctrine. Thus the reason for a reformation. It's the biggest irony that the Christian church became the exact thing that Jesus preached against. Many Christian sects use the NT interpretation of Jesus, and only that, as their guiding principals.

Maybe, but more realistically for the time is that Pierre Trudeau wanted to battle separatism in Quebec for lots of reasons, and as demonstrated in the Canadaland podcast, also succeeded in creating another (internal) boundary to be more dismissive of Quebec hate crimes in the rest of Anglo Canada. So we get..."That is not who we are"....comparisons to America, and Quebec. This naive mindset is consistent across much of Canadian media, and is more properly translated as, "We don't want to believe what we are...and have been".

I'm sure that "high intellect" elitists watched it all very carefully and are still trying to figure out how Donald Trump kicked all their political asses.

It was odd that Trudeau made a point of purposely not differentiating himself from sexual harassment prohibitions, as if anybody would have presumed otherwise. Very arrogant.....

The Pope leads probably the wealthiest corporation in the world, worth billions of dollars. Read the book "The Vatican Billions" online for free. Just Google it. It is a very controlling, authoritarian and unbiblical religious system that controls hundreds of millions of people, who are basically slaves to this system.

1. You don't have to respect any such belief. You certainly can discriminate against people for individual beliefs. You're starting to get into a grey area if you discriminate in hiring people based on beliefs. 2. You have a fundamental misunderstanding on why Groucho's famous question was set up as a damnable riddle. The question assumes that you are currently hitting your wife. My question is straightforward: what is your view ? I guess you don't want to answer so I'll assume you want to get rid of religion then. 3. But no one is required to respect that law...