Leaderboard

Apparently the oh-so progressive and inclusive Liberal members of the National Security Committee are concerned that people in Canada who support terrorism are having their rights to express that support in propaganda curtailed by the evil Conservative law which bans it. No, I'm not making this up. Currently, a judge can order the seizure of propaganda that “advocates or promotes the commission of terrorism in general.” The MPs want to limit seizures to materials that counsel or instruct the commission of a specific terrorist offence. A section of the Criminal Code that makes it illegal to advocate or promote “terrorism in general” should also be changed by removing the words “in general,” according to the committee, chaired by Liberal MP Robert Oliphant. So the Liberals want to make sure "Canadians" are free to engage in terrorism propaganda, as long as they don't advocate a specific terrorist action. I'm trying to figure out why this would concern anyone and the only thing I can come up with is that most Muslims voted Liberal last election, and that Hamas and Hezbollah are considered terrorist organizations. So the Liberals appear to be trying to please Muslim "Canadians" who want to engage in propaganda on behalf of such entities. If anyone can suggest an alternative reason do please state it. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/canada/national-security-committee-recommends-watering-down-laws-on-terrorism-peace-bonds-propaganda

Yes....too difficult to use effectively with prevailing weather conditions and precursor storage was a pain. Thousands of sheep died in one incident. Easier to just nuke 'em !

I was serious about this Betsy. No sarcasm...looking for your opinion.

The US gave-up nerve agents during the Nixon administration....long, long ago.

If it keeps on raining, the levee is going to break. If the levee breaks I'll have no place to stay!

Don Meredith should resign. It's the right thing to do.

And yet, you evidently only have a problem with lies when they're told by Conservatives.

Charlie I sympathize with you. South Korea lives next door and in missile and physical striking distance of clearly some strange alien who looks like the product of incest and/or someone who has eaten too many babies. I feel for you. No I would not be too happy with the crap that's been going on in South Korean politics with all that corruption with your crazy lady who I think is the reincarnation of Imelda Marcos and now this fat boy next door, the ever dangerous China and certainly the never predictable Donald Trump. Look you live in a dangerous part of the world. You have China bullying its way with Vietnam anc off the coast of Taiwan, you guys constantly having to worry about the fat boy and your own internal situation and highly competitive and tough economy and stressful lifestyle it brings, not too mention a very very unstable Japanese economy, some mad man in the Philippines. All I will say is this and call me naïve. I think when it comes to military foreign policy, there are sufficient people surrounding Trump who prevent him from doing anything stupid. There is no doubt with domestic foreign policy he is one crazy unpredictable lunatic. He yells at South Korea fre free trade like he does Canada free trade. Yah its strange-he is sending signals to South Korea like he does Canada. however when it comes to military foreign policy he is insulated by some good generals. The guy now in charge of the Defence Ministry in the US and the National Security advisor are very stable people. I was more concerned with Obama then them in charge of US military interests. North Korea makes a lot of noise to get attention. You know its m.o. Make loud noises and the US throws food at it to shut it up. You've seen that for years. Is the rhetoric any different then its ever been? Probably not. sure I saw that last military parade like youw ith the goose stepping and garbage cans. Lol are they really full of nuclear material? I doubt it. All show. Could North Korea harm you of course but you know it would probably be with conventional missiles and/or chemicals. They have more chemicals than they do nuke weapons. I think the nuke story whether its the Korean peninsula o r the Middle East is a cover for concern about germ warfare myself. Should you worry? Yes and no. If you worry about things you have no control over you go nuts. South Korea already is so competitive and stressful just to make it then you have to worry about Fat Boy or Trump? Too much overload man. Take it one day at a time. Go day by day on this and thank every day. I guess I am saying is have a little faith. Man I know that is corny but in a crazy world its all you got. Hey man I drive a Kia. I am on your side!

Trump will just have "Fat KiM" over to the WH for dinner and all will be well.

Agreed....Prime Minister Paul Martin had no problem cutting deals with Libya's dictator ( Moammar Gaddafi). http://storage.torontosun.com/v1/blogs-prod-photos/2/f/2/d/b/2f2dbaa14cbe6ce7685cd30f2239d716.jpg?stmp=1319138395 So President Trump can do it too....and will.

Perhaps you weren't listening to QP as often as I was when Harper was constantly lying over, oh, for instance the $90k check to Duffy. When you get it from the horses mouth you don't have to worry about the messenger.

Unfortunately this is not a good website. The website appears to be associated with Dr. Jeremiah, who is a well-known TV preacher but whoever wrote the website does not appear to be particularly knowledgeable on the version issue or a defender of the King James Version (1611). Probably not written by Dr. Jeremiah but it does appear to be associated with him. Like most modern preachers, they have adopted modern versions and are not particularly interested in the issue of the versions or they have fallen for the arguments of modernists on the version issue. Most churches use corrupt modern versions. Therefore it is no surprise to find much of these modern versions being advocated on the internet. This website recommends the New King James Version which is also a unsatisfactory version with many changes in it. Also it recommends the Good News Bible which is more like a newspaper or a Readers Digest type of Bible. Very inaccurate and far from the accuracy and trustworthiness of the King James Bible (1611). This site is into modern versions of the Bible which have departed in many respects from the inspired original. It is not good to recommend even a new christian or a prospective christian use a modern version because this will be teaching them the serious error using corrupt modern versions and teaching them it is not really important what version they use. Another point to remember is many if not most of these modern preachers do not believe that any Bible today is the inspired Word of God. If you look at their church websites and see what they believe, you will see they profess to only believe the original manuscripts are inspired. This is incorrect and misleading information. God promised in his word he would preserve his word forever. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever." Ps. 12:6,7, "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away." Matthew 24:35 How can a believer have confidence that he really has the word of God if he believes these modern preachers who deny there is an inspired Bible. He cannot. I would recommend the website which has countless articles defending the King James Version 1611: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/1611_authorized_king_james.htm

Fun to watch Team Trudeau squirm with their self inflicted wounds. If a Conservative minister had told such "whoppers", the Liberals would want their head on a pole. Stolen Valour

The Liberals can't help themselves....lying is just part of the game for them. Liberal leadership has counted on the majority of Canadians being kept in a bubble of half truths and falsehoods, especially when it comes to foreign policy. But that is becoming more and more difficult in a world with a much wider access to democratized "news". Squirm Liberals...squirm.