Barquentine Posted Wednesday at 02:33 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 02:33 PM On 6/23/2026 at 10:31 AM, I am Groot said: There is no known alternative to this. Bullsh!t! Survival of the fittest is not even true in nature. Animals will group together and protect the weak. And Forchrissake, we're thinking, feeling humans. At least some of us are! 22 hours ago, CdnFox said: honest answers to legitimate questions It is a crisis. It was a slow build that is speeding up, snowballing. You haven't heard about loss of Arctic sea-ice, multiplying droughts and heat waves, warming oceans...? But there are actions we can and have taken that will show relatively quick results. Dropping coal use, electric vehicles... Some results that show we can take effective actions: AI Overview "City smog is dramatically improved today compared to the 1970s. Thanks to strict regulations like the Clean Air Act, emissions from cars and factories are roughly 99% cleaner. While cities still experience occasional poor air quality, the thick, lung-searing, yellowish-brown hazes typical of the 1970s are mostly a thing of the past." AI Overview "In the 1970s, scientists were just discovering ozone-depleting substances, and the Antarctic ozone hole had not yet formed. By 2025, robust global regulations had successfully halted rampant expansion, resulting in one of the smallest and shortest-lived holes observed in decades." 1 Quote
Michael Hardner Posted Wednesday at 04:42 PM Report Posted Wednesday at 04:42 PM 2 hours ago, Barquentine said: By 2025, robust global regulations had successfully halted rampant expansion, resulting in one of the smallest and shortest-lived holes observed in decades." Thanks in part to legislation signed by President George Herbert Walker Bush. 1 Quote Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase ! Michael Hardner
I am Groot Posted Wednesday at 08:31 PM Author Report Posted Wednesday at 08:31 PM 5 hours ago, Barquentine said: Bullsh!t! Survival of the fittest is not even true in nature. Animals will group together and protect the weak. Who said there shouldn't be social welfare programs? Not me. But there will always be those who are so much better, smarter, more energetic, more determined, and who will make way more money, hit more home runs, sell more records, sell more movie tickets, sell more books, or whatever. There are always those who thrive beyond the pack, and Capitalism needs that. It needs people to work to be one of them. Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
Barquentine Posted Thursday at 01:26 PM Report Posted Thursday at 01:26 PM 16 hours ago, I am Groot said: There are always those who thrive beyond the pack, and Capitalism needs that. And yet, as wealth is ever more concentrated in the hands of a very few, homelessness, food banks, the number of working poor, all soar. Coincidence? Quote
I am Groot Posted yesterday at 01:38 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:38 PM (edited) On 6/25/2026 at 9:26 AM, Barquentine said: And yet, as wealth is ever more concentrated in the hands of a very few, homelessness, food banks, the number of working poor, all soar. Coincidence? Stop bringing in half a million immigrants and a million foreign workers and remove the million illegal foreign workers and that pretty much stops the homelessness, cuts 90% of the business from the food banks, and increases wages for low-income people. But the Left refuses to do that. The Left's view is "We MUST keep bringing in massive numbers of brown people, no matter how violent, uneducated, and hostile they are to us, no matter what the damage! How else can we signal our moral superiority!!?" Edited yesterday at 01:40 PM by I am Groot Quote "A civilization is not destroyed by wicked men; it is destroyed by weak men who cannot defend what is good.” — G. K. Chesterton
eyeball Posted 23 hours ago Report Posted 23 hours ago 7 hours ago, I am Groot said: The Left's view is "We MUST keep bringing in massive numbers of brown people, no matter how violent, uneducated, and hostile they are to us, no matter what the damage! How else can we signal our moral superiority!!?" Cite? Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted 16 hours ago Report Posted 16 hours ago 7 hours ago, eyeball said: Cite? google.com Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
eyeball Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 11 minutes ago, CdnFox said: google.com Google says... The exact origin of this highly specific, multi-sentence quote cannot be definitively traced to a public official, prominent commentator, or documented media source. Extensive searches across public records, news archives, and literature return no official index for this exact arrangement of words. Sounds like he pulled it out of his butt. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
CdnFox Posted 15 hours ago Report Posted 15 hours ago 34 minutes ago, eyeball said: Google says... The exact origin of this highly specific, multi-sentence quote cannot be definitively traced to a public official, prominent commentator, or documented media source. Extensive searches across public records, news archives, and literature return no official index for this exact arrangement of words. Sounds like he pulled it out of his butt. Ahhh but it goes on to say "However, most sources indicate that the quote is correct and accurate and was said by a politician at one point". So there you go Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.