California Election Fraud Charges Coming

[Hodad]

49 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Ya ta ya...blah blah woof woof.

Tha fact is, Flynn was setup by Tweenkies and cheaters like you...and Barry.

Absent facts, you resort to verbal diarrhea, as always. 

He did the crimes (and pled guilty--twice) but was "set up" by law enforcement holding him accountable for his actions. 🙄

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Absent facts, you resort to verbal diarrhea, as always. 

He did the crimes (and pled guilty--twice) but was "set up" by law enforcement holding him accountable for his actions. 🙄

They threatened his son to get him to enter a guilty plea.

Face it. Your heros are nothing but filth.

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ya ta ya...blah blah woof woof.

Tha fact is, Flynn was setup by Tweenkies and cheaters like you...and Barry.

^Defeated followed by BUPKIS and your ad hominems ALWAYS FOLLOW. You're so predictable, dropout.

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

They threatened his son to get him to enter a guilty plea.

Face it. Your heros are nothing but filth.

If his son wasn't guilty then the threat would be EMPTY. Duh

[Nationalist]

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

^Defeated followed by BUPKIS and your ad hominems ALWAYS FOLLOW. You're so predictable, dropout.

If his son wasn't guilty then the threat would be EMPTY. Duh

Ok. So your good with lawfare.

I guess youll be ok if Conservatives use it too.

[gatomontes99]

Uh oh...

 

I hope he brings it. 

[Reg Volk]

Yes by striking Spencer down with ballot fraud they have made him 10x more powerful.

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Ok. So your good with lawfare.

You're an lDIOT. Prosecuting crimes with EVIDENCE is the job of the DOJ. Duh

You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Obama/Biden interfered with their DOJ.

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I guess youll be ok if Conservatives use it too.

Trump promised HIS DOJ would prosecute HIS POLITICAL ENEMIES and ORDERED Bondi to do it.

You're so stupid you CANNOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE.

Quote

President Donald Trump accidentally published a direct message on Truth Social intended for then-Attorney General Pam Bondi. Addressed simply as "Pam," the post demanded the immediate prosecution of several of his political opponents, including former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Sen. Adam Schiff. [1, 2, 3, 4]

The Truth Social Post and Backlash

In the late-night post, President Trump expressed his frustration with the pace of justice. He wrote, "We can't delay any longer... it's killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice and indicted me five times over nothing. Justice must be served now". [1]

Reports from outlets like The Wall Street Journal and NBC News revealed Trump thought he was sending a private message, and was surprised when it went public. Bondi reportedly grew upset over the public mandate and reached out to Trump, which led to him issuing a subsequent post praising her as "very careful" and doing a "GREAT job". [1, 2, 3]

 

[Legato]

4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're an lDIOT. Prosecuting crimes with EVIDENCE is the job of the DOJ. Duh

You have ZERO EVIDENCE that Obama/Biden interfered with their DOJ.

Trump promised HIS DOJ would prosecute HIS POLITICAL ENEMIES and ORDERED Bondi to do it.

You're so stupid you CANNOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE.

 

Biden promised his DOJ would prosecute his political enemies and ordered Merrick Garland to do it.

See the difference.

[Reg Volk]

2 hours ago, Legato said:

Biden promised his DOJ would prosecute his political enemies and ordered Merrick Garland to do it.

See the difference.

Not enough derogatory statements are made about the giant spineless imbecile Merrick Garland.  Most people also forget that he was the fool that the bonehead Obama put up for the Supreme Court.  How f-ed up would it have been to have had that brain-dead fool Garland on the Supreme Court right now?  Yikes.

[Legato]

40 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

Not enough derogatory statements are made about the giant spineless imbecile Merrick Garland.  Most people also forget that he was the fool that the bonehead Obama put up for the Supreme Court.  How f-ed up would it have been to have had that brain-dead fool Garland on the Supreme Court right now?  Yikes.

 

[Fluffypants]

Problem you have is California won't let anyone audit their rolls because they haven't clean them in decades. Everyone stays active whether they are alive or dead or living there or not which means they ALL get ballots. 

Since they made mail in voting their primary voting method they can EASILY cheat. You hire a bunch of people to verify signatures who get to see the ballots and use their judgement to verify signatures.

Id love to see the breakdown of the people rejecting Republican ballots vs Democrat ballots but of course they probably will keep that info hidden.

[robosmith]

12 hours ago, Legato said:

Biden promised his DOJ would prosecute his political enemies and ordered Merrick Garland to do it.

See the difference.

Like I said, ^NO EVIDENCE from the LYIING CLOWN.

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

Not enough derogatory statements are made about the giant spineless imbecile Merrick Garland.  Most people also forget that he was the fool that the bonehead Obama put up for the Supreme Court.  How f-ed up would it have been to have had that brain-dead fool Garland on the Supreme Court right now?  Yikes.

Couldn't be worse or more corrupt than it is NOW, with Alito and Thomas getting payoffs from wealthy RepubliCONS.

Maybe you don't know about the expensive vacations and the quarter $million motor home that Thomas received from Harlan Crowe among OTHERS.

I know FOS LIES never told you about those. LMAO

[Fluffypants]

Interesting watch on how the data came down. Most of Rahman votes came from skid row, the homeless center of LA. What did we see happening there with people getting paid to vote.

Also how did Rahman at the very very end of the election get SOOOOO many people to vote for her. She went up 80% after the election was over and actually got more votes than Bass did from late mail in ballots.

Seems weird right? 

I guarantee you this has been happening for a long time, they only reason it was caught this time was because for the first time a a non Democrat actually had a chance of winning and watching how a woman who has polled behind him somehow beat him after the election was over. Which you should of seen the mail in ballots continuing roughly in the same proportion Rahman jumped ahead of even Bass. it doesn't make any sense.

Edited 19 hours ago by Fluffypants

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Interesting watch on how the data came down. Most of Rahman votes came from skid row, the homeless center of LA. What did we see happening there with people getting paid to vote.

Also how did Rahman at the very very end of the election get SOOOOO many people to vote for her. She went up 80% after the election was over and actually got more votes than Bass did from late mail in ballots.

Seems weird right? 

I guarantee you this has been happening for a long time, they only reason it was caught this time was because for the first time a a non Democrat actually had a chance of winning and watching how a woman who has polled behind him somehow beat him after the election was over. Which you should of seen the mail in ballots continuing roughly in the same proportion Rahman jumped ahead of even Bass. it doesn't make any sense.

It's not impossible that something untoward happened, but those kinds of shifts in distribution aren't any kind of evidence, let alone proof. Those kinds of voting patterns are not even statistically improbably, let alone impossible. It looks like that was about 60-something percent of the vote reported by June 3. You SHOULD NOT expect the vote distribution to hold going forward, particularly when considering differences in voting patterns by area and method.  

And, don't forget, this is just a primary. Pratt wouldn't have been competitive in a general election anyway. So the idea that there was a conspiracy to cheat to exclude Pratt from an election in which he wouldn't be competitive seems pretty far fetched. Why? To what end are people taking such risks for no reward?