Blue Terrorists Try Again

[Hodad]

6 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Do you want to do the right thing now? 

No idea what you're talking about. I already did the right thing. 

 

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Edited reels of a professional provocateur arguing with students? -- You're very easily impressed. 

Ya...common sense does impress me.

How 'bout you? 

[gatomontes99]

20 minutes ago, Hodad said:

No idea what you're talking about. I already did the right thing. 

 

Not surprised. Not even really disappointed. Just documenting. 

[CdnFox]

34 minutes ago, Venandi said:

And as we draw ever closer to PNR, there's a palpable sense of glee that lovingly embraces that hatred. I've seen it before and smelled it before, but I still don't know what region of hell it hails from. Maybe Robo can shed some light on it... I never stayed long enough to figure it out.

Robo is like our own little forum glow stick, most of the time you just want to snap him in half and shake him till he sees the light

 

34 minutes ago, Venandi said:

Quote of the day about Pam Bondi:

The TikToker says, "Dear MAGA Lord Jesus, please let her end up with a hole in her throat that she has to push every time she speaks. Dear God, if there is a MAGA God, please let Pam Bondi's throat cancer be the worst case of cancer anybody's ever seen."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/tiktoker-fired-from-job-after-praying-pam-bondi-suffer-worst-case-cancer-anybodys-ever-seen

And that is the left today. It is perfectly acceptable on the left to hope and pray for and applaud the death of people they don't like including violent death. We had the "We got charlie in the neck" songs, we had all manner of slow clapping and fist pumping when that medical insurance exec got killed, every attempt at trump gets full approval and rounds of applause here and elsewhere.... 

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Not surprised. Not even really disappointed. Just documenting. 

Why isn't there a yawning reaction? Would be really appropriate in these situations. 

Have fun documenting whatever you're documenting. 🙄

[robosmith]

9 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Off topic. Point is, another lwnj decided to try to blow up the widow Kirk and leave their kids orphaned. All because people like @robosmith and most Democrats are so deranged that they view homicide as a valid means of expression.

You're ^LYING AGAIN, withZERO EVIDENCE for your ^FANTISIES..

NO ONE "LIKE" me wants to blow up widow Kirk and you're an A-HOLE to claim that.

Just shows how desperate and LAME you are. 🤮

[gatomontes99]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

You're ^LYING AGAIN, withZERO EVIDENCE for your ^FANTISIES..

NO ONE "LIKE" me wants to blow up widow Kirk and you're an A-HOLE to claim that.

Just shows how desperate and LAME you are. 🤮

No evidence? You've spent this thread defending him. Hodad outright said Charlie deserved it so his wife probably did too. You've been told, repeatedly, that calling people fascist, hitler, threat to democracy, et. al. is encouraging these people and yet you refuse to stop. You are the cause of these events. You. It is your fault. You create this environment where hate is permissible, preferable even. You. You spread lies in the face of mountains of evidence. You are the problem. 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

No evidence? You've spent this thread defending him. Hodad outright said Charlie deserved it so his wife probably did too. You've been told, repeatedly, that calling people fascist, hitler, threat to democracy, et. al. is encouraging these people and yet you refuse to stop. You are the cause of these events. You. It is your fault. You create this environment where hate is permissible, preferable even. You. You spread lies in the face of mountains of evidence. You are the problem. 

A. You are a liar. I said no such thing. 

B. Your argument is that we shouldn't call a spade a spade because occasionally someone commits violence against spades. 

I've got a better idea. If people don't want to be described as fascists, don't say and do the things that categorically align to fascism. 💡

 

If you don't like being called out for what you're doing, stop doing it. 

Kirk was not a full blown fascist, but there was a huge overlap in that Venn diagram and he clearly want above supporting fascism to achieve his ends. But that's not actually what motivated his shooter. Kirk was a hateful f*cker punching down at already marginalized people and the shooter reacted to that. 

[gatomontes99]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

A. You are a liar. I said no such thing. 

Really? What does this mean: 

Quote

Charlie Kirk was a professional a-hole and the world is better off without that vitriol. I don't know much about Erika Kirk, but she's elected to continue his work and by that signal is almost certainly an a-hole. 

The irony of you going on to spew copius amounts of vitriol is not lost on me. I guess you did say "that vitriol". Does that mean your vitriol is ok? Of course it is. 

 

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

B. Your argument is that we shouldn't call a spade a spade because occasionally someone commits violence against spades. 

Nope. My argument is that lying about people and calling them names, that you admitted did not fit ...

Quote

Kirk was not a full blown fascist...

...is causing the violence. As such, you are to blame for the violence. You have created an environment where violence is a perfectly acceptable expression of one's frustration. You have lifted up martyrs that have attacked our country. You are to blame. 

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

I've got a better idea. If people don't want to be described as fascists, don't say and do the things that categorically align to fascism. 💡

Like what? The tax breaks we want? International trade deals? Lower crime? Lower drug use? More freedom for small businesses? More secure elections? What exactly is fascist? 

We are embrassing anyone on the left that just has a moment of sanity. That is all we want. That is why, despite their very liberal views, people like Bill Maher, Jon Stewart and John Fetterman are celebrated by the right. They aren't TDS Zombies that run around calling everything they don't like fascist. All you have to do to be accepted is cut out the hysterical bull shit and we can be cool too. 

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

Kirk was not a full blown fascist, but there was a huge overlap in that Venn diagram and he clearly want above supporting fascism to achieve his ends.

Don't reply unless you have conclusive proof of both of those lies. Hell, I would take even one.

Charlie did not support fascism or anything like fascism, in any way. In fact, his entire tour was based on the premise "when the talking stops, violence begins." He gave his life trying to be an ambassador to youth. All he did was talk. He let these kids pick the topic. He sat the mic down and let them say their entire thesis.  Then he came back with a rebuttal. 

The problem you have is that he had a rebuttal. You cannot tolerate dissent. It drives you crazy. You get angry reading posts like this. The hatred in you consumes you and you blurt out stupid shit like "he's a fascist!" 

Then what? What is the logical next step if fascists run the country?

Kill them.

You spurred that. That was your baby. You raised it and you turned it loose. Now you want absolution for your sin. But you are not sorry and there can only be forgiveness if you are contrite.

That is what I documented before. You have no remorse for your role in the discarding of morals on the left. Until you understand your role and are truly sorry for what you have done, there is no point in discussing this further. 

[Hodad]

5 hours ago, Venandi said:

Do me a favour...watch the video (second post up) and then cite specific examples of what you mean. Broad brush assertions like that are meaningless without specific examples, give me an idea of what you mean based on the video and use that as a starting point. Otherwise, you are simply treading insults with people who are happy to do so for a hundred more pages. 

Do we really need to do this all over again? The last Charlie Kirk thread wasn't enough?

[robosmith]

On 5/29/2026 at 10:01 AM, Nationalist said:

Hilarious...

Yes IT WAS.

The entire foundation of North American society is based on Christian morals and beliefs. It is indisputably so because all the governmental officials, up until recently, have professed to be...Christians. If they didn't, they wouldn't have been elected.

Just because Natives and assorted others swung hammers, does not mean much more than squat. 

Your refusal to acknowledge this very basic fact, only serves to further exemplify your need to oppose your own history...your own society...and your own nation.

Hence...you are a traitor...ANTIFA.

Hence ALL you have is ^this BULLSHIT.

[robosmith]

On 5/30/2026 at 4:09 AM, gatomontes99 said:

No evidence? You've spent this thread defending him. Hodad outright said Charlie deserved it so his wife probably did too. You've been told, repeatedly, that calling people fascist, hitler, threat to democracy, et. al. is encouraging these people and yet you refuse to stop. You are the cause of these events. You. It is your fault. You create this environment where hate is permissible, preferable even. You. You spread lies in the face of mountains of evidence. You are the problem. 

^LYING AGAIN. You give me and this marginal forum way too much credit with ZERO EVIDENCE, just BULLSHIT.

[gatomontes99]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^LYING AGAIN. You give me and this marginal forum way too much credit with ZERO EVIDENCE, just BULLSHIT.

You aren't just doing it here. You are doing it on Facebook and YouTube. You become part of a collective group of radicals that normalize hatred and inspire violence. 

[Hodad]

On 5/30/2026 at 2:36 PM, gatomontes99 said:

Really? What does this mean: 

That means exactly what it says. I also explicitly said that he/they shouldn't be harmed just for being a-holes. That is, quite literally, the opposite of "he had it coming." You're simply lying. Full stop. 
 

Quote

...is causing the violence. As such, you are to blame for the violence. You have created an environment where violence is a perfectly acceptable expression of one's frustration. You have lifted up martyrs that have attacked our country. You are to blame. 

You're doing it again. Trying to use the potential for violence as a shield against criticism. It roughly translates to "No one would resort to violence if they didn't know all the bad stuff we intend to do to them."  A really trite argument. 

Let me be clear: freedom of speech is a two way street. A-holes are allowed to say shitty things. Other people are free to criticize and contextualize those things. 

 

Quote

Like what? The tax breaks we want? International trade deals? Lower crime? Lower drug use? More freedom for small businesses? More secure elections? What exactly is fascist? 

I don't think you're playing dumb anymore. Scapegoating immigrants, masked thugs terrorizing neighborhoods and murdering people in the streets, concentration camps, sham prosecutions of political enemies, militarization of domestic law enforcement, illegal extrajudicial murder of accused criminals, corrupt self-dealing, using the force of government to target individuals, businesses and universities for political reasons, politicizing the civil service--LITERALLY attempting a coup. You know, the small stuff. 

 

Quote

Charlie did not support fascism or anything like fascism, in any way. In fact, his entire tour was based on the premise "when the talking stops, violence begins." He gave his life trying to be an ambassador to youth. All he did was talk.

All he did was talk... about replacement theory, Christian nationalism, "stop the steal," denigration of DEI, CRT, affirmative action, civil rights and basically all things related to racial justice. 

He was the more palatable fig leaf on a very ugly MAGA movement. You are welcome to agree with his ugly rhetoric, but let's not pretend that he was a bridge builder. The man on a mission to destroy the legacy of MLK Jr. was not a good person.

Quote

Then what? What is the logical next step if fascists run the country?

Kill them.

You spurred that. That was your baby. You raised it and you turned it loose. Now you want absolution for your sin. But you are not sorry and there can only be forgiveness if you are contrite.

That is what I documented before. You have no remorse for your role in the discarding of morals on the left. Until you understand your role and are truly sorry for what you have done, there is no point in discussing this further. 

"Whaaaaaaa. People pointed out the terrible things we're doing to other people and the victims got angry and lashed out."

I'm not sorry in the least--not one iota--for calling out bad behavior. Your phony victim narrative has no power here. 

[User]

46 minutes ago, Hodad said:

"Whaaaaaaa. People pointed out the terrible things we're doing to other people and the victims got angry and lashed out."

I'm not sorry in the least--not one iota--for calling out bad behavior. Your phony victim narrative has no power here. 

Lashed out?

You are downplaying murdering someone. Shooting them in the neck in broad daylight in front of a crowd of people.

You are a such a pathetic cowardly weasel. 

[gatomontes99]

37 minutes ago, Hodad said:

That means exactly what it says. I also explicitly said that he/they shouldn't be harmed just for being a-holes. That is, quite literally, the opposite of "he had it coming." You're simply lying. Full stop. 

Oh bullshit. You go on and on about how he deserved what he got. Adding a qualifier at the end does not change that you full throated endorsed his murder. Maybe you believe your own lies, but I don't. 

 

38 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You're doing it again. Trying to use the potential for violence as a shield against criticism.

It is not criticism. Criticism is "that policy will have negative consequences to the geopolitical, socioeconomic blah blah blah." When you demonize people you create a justification for violence. You cannot deny that your words are being used by these monsters. They are literally using all the left wing talking points about Trump, like fascist and Hitler. Stop with the equivocating and start owning up to the fact that you are responsible. 

 

44 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I don't think you're playing dumb anymore. Scapegoating immigrants, masked thugs terrorizing neighborhoods and murdering people in the streets, concentration camps, sham prosecutions of political enemies, militarization of domestic law enforcement, illegal extrajudicial murder of accused criminals, corrupt self-dealing, using the force of government to target individuals, businesses and universities for political reasons, politicizing the civil service--LITERALLY attempting a coup. You know, the small stuff. 

None of that is real. It is all lies used to justify the verbal attacks that are then used to justify attempts at murder. And you are doing it again. You just said you are not saying Charlie deserved it and then you create a list of why he deserved. Good gawd man, you can't even separate the posts. 

 

48 minutes ago, Hodad said:

All he did was talk... about replacement theory, Christian nationalism, "stop the steal," denigration of DEI, CRT, affirmative action, civil rights and basically all things related to racial justice.

That's not fascism. Use the dictionary. It is on the web. It is free. 

 

49 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I'm not sorry in the least--not one iota--for calling out bad behavior. Your phony victim narrative has no power here. 

Yeah. Believe your own lies. Fine.

 

[Nationalist]

Just look at how these Libbies argue in support of rioting. Any excuse will do for them, as long as casts a shadow on the object of their insanity and rage...

Donald J. Trump

And isnt it interesting that these brave men hide behind their women at these riots?

Gutless little Tweenkies and their delicate feelings (sniff sniff).

[robosmith]

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Just look at how these Libbies argue in support of rioting. Any excuse will do for them, as long as casts a shadow on the object of their insanity and rage...

Donald J. Trump

And isnt it interesting that these brave men hide behind their women at these riots?

Gutless little Tweenkies and their delicate feelings (sniff sniff).

You're the lDIOT who doesn't understand it was RIOTS which finally put an end to Jim Crow in the '60s.

When injustice PERSISTS, indefinitely, VIOLENCE is the ONLY alternative.

Quote

The widespread "race riots" or "urban rebellions" of the 1960s (such as the 1965 Watts Rebellion in Los Angeles, and the 1967 riots in Detroit and Newark) were the result of the slow pace of desegregation, severe poverty, and police brutality. While these uprisings did not cause the legal end of Jim Crow, they forced the federal government to confront the deep-seated economic and social inequalities that persisted.

 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

You go on and on about how he deserved what he got.

 

I stopped reading right here. Again, you are simply, plainly, brazenly lying. Full stop. 

[robosmith]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I stopped reading right here. Again, you are simply, plainly, brazenly lying. Full stop. 

Lying is why I put gato on ignore. Not worth my time to debate with a LIAR

[gatomontes99]

25 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I stopped reading right here. Again, you are simply, plainly, brazenly lying. Full stop. 

Couldn't handle the truth. Ok. 

[User]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Lying is why I put gato on ignore. Not worth my time to debate with a LIAR

LOL, you are the most prolific liar on this forum. By far. 

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Couldn't handle the truth. Ok. 

Night is day. Black is white. Up is down.

If you want to have a conversation with someone, try not lying about what they say. Your dishonesty is your choice. 

[gatomontes99]

15 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Night is day. Black is white. Up is down.

If you want to have a conversation with someone, try not lying about what they say. Your dishonesty is your choice. 

Look in that and do an honest assessment and then get back to me. 

You can't list all these made up reasons why someone should attack Charlie and then say it is good that he is gone and pretend that you are just criticizing. 

[Hodad]

2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Look in that and do an honest assessment and then get back to me. 

You can't list all these made up reasons why someone should attack Charlie and then say it is good that he is gone and pretend that you are just criticizing. 

Did your incessant gooning over Charlie Kirk finally break your brain?

You say stupid shit here constantly. Yes, the world would be better off if you didn't say stupid shit--if nobody said stupid shit. 

But I don't think that someone killing you is the best way to rid the world of stupid shit. Can you think of any alternatives?

Are you so farking simple that it's a binary proposition for you? That ugly rhetoric and political wrongness can only be ended by killing?

No, nobody is that dumb. But you are DEFINITELY that dishonest, as you keep doubling/tripling/quadrupling down on right here.