Deluge Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 minute ago, John Stone said: Jan 2025 – U.S. withdraws from Paris Accord Feb 2025 – Fed Climate Date Purged from Fed websites Mar 2025 – EPA Environnemental Justice Program Dismantled Apr. 2025- FY 2026 Budget Proposes Deep 27 percent cut to NOAA May 2025 – Climate Monitoring Centers Shut Jun 2025 – Mauna LOA Observatory Funding Terminated (measured atmospheric CO2) July 2025 – Repeal of Greenhouse Gas health risk finding – NCA web portal removed, 400 scientists fired. ........... science probes, it doesn't prove, bro. I think we can all agree that by removing the 'probes' we make it a bit more difficult to 'prove', tho.? In any event, this be more apropos than 'blowing him out of the water' .................this be the Trump administration ...... logical in pursuit of an agenda, destructive and calculated But more the pity are those that are consciously ignorant? Ya know anyone like that? 😁 Looks good to me. So why are you crying? Quote
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 Just now, Deluge said: Looks good to me. So why are you crying? I do that sometimes out of pity for an individuals ignorance. Quote
Nationalist Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 5 minutes ago, John Stone said: Jan 2025 – U.S. withdraws from Paris Accord Feb 2025 – Fed Climate Date Purged from Fed websites Mar 2025 – EPA Environnemental Justice Program Dismantled Apr. 2025- FY 2026 Budget Proposes Deep 27 percent cut to NOAA May 2025 – Climate Monitoring Centers Shut Jun 2025 – Mauna LOA Observatory Funding Terminated (measured atmospheric CO2) July 2025 – Repeal of Greenhouse Gas health risk finding – NCA web portal removed, 400 scientists fired. ........... science probes, it doesn't prove, bro. I think we can all agree that by removing the 'probes' we make it a bit more difficult to 'prove', tho.? In any event, this be more apropos than 'blowing him out of the water' .................this be the Trump administration ...... logical in pursuit of an agenda, destructive and calculated But more the pity are those that are consciously ignorant? Ya know anyone like that? 😁 Yes I do know someone like that. In fact, millions are like that. Hell hundreds of millions worldwide. They know the climate scare was all based on crap reporting and that we've wasted too much on fantasies of floods in NYC. Now...take your wrecking ball and go play in the freeway. There's a good Tweenkie. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 minute ago, Nationalist said: Yes I do know someone like that. In fact, millions are like that. Hell hundreds of millions worldwide. They know the climate scare was all based on crap reporting and that we've wasted too much on fantasies of floods in NYC. Now...take your wrecking ball and go play in the freeway. There's a good Tweenkie. ............ how's high the water mama? Quote
Nationalist Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 4 minutes ago, John Stone said: ............ how's high the water mama? Ya...bye... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 Just now, Nationalist said: Ya...bye... ............... haha .......... get ur ears checked. 😁 Quote
Deluge Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 7 minutes ago, John Stone said: I do that sometimes out of pity for an individuals ignorance. That's not a strong enough reason. It's because you're a feminazi cuck and you hated that the girls lost in the general elections. 2 Quote
Nationalist Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 2 minutes ago, John Stone said: ............... haha .......... get ur ears checked. 😁 Haha...go change your diapers kid. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 10 minutes ago, Deluge said: That's not a strong enough reason. It's because you're a feminazi cuck and you hated that the girls lost in the general elections. .............. u saying u know anything about girls ............. figured u for a 'pegg'n' puppet. 🤣 9 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Haha...go change your diapers kid. ............ u first ......... and get the soother out of ur a$$ ........ wrong hole. 😅 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 29 minutes ago, John Stone said: Jan 2025 – U.S. withdraws from Paris Accord We know that but what science suggests that he shouldn't have? Or do you agree that he should have and you're just pointing it out Quote Feb 2025 – Fed Climate Date Purged from Fed websites And? Quote Mar 2025 – EPA Environnemental Justice Program Dismantled Ok, and where's the science that says he shoudn't have done that? Quote Apr. 2025- FY 2026 Budget Proposes Deep 27 percent cut to NOAA And? Quote May 2025 – Climate Monitoring Centers Shut And? Quote Jun 2 025 – Mauna LOA Observatory Funding Terminated (measured atmospheric CO2) And? Still not seeing any science here big guy..... Quote July 2025 – Repeal of Greenhouse Gas health risk finding – NCA web portal removed, 400 scientists fired. AAAAANNNNNNDDDDDD? Quote ........... science probes, it doesn't prove, bro. Science does indeed arrive at conclusions. Science is all about observation, experimentation, and evidence-based analysis. That's what it does, it produces theories and formulas that make accurate predictions. It's not "probes". It not just observation. And science absolutely 100 percent seeks to 'prove'. Quote I think we can all agree that by removing the 'probes' we make it a bit more difficult to 'prove', tho.? Not relevant. For it to be relevant you would have to provide evidence that we are facing a situation where it's critical that we continue to monitor. I asked you for the science that shows that he is wrong to take these steps, that there is a crisis that we need to spend money monitoring, and that this monitoring is somehow very important to that. And I'm not seeing you producing that. Quote In any event, this be more apropos than 'blowing him out of the water' .................this be the Trump administration ...... logical in pursuit of an agenda, destructive and calculated Or it's trump eliminating wasteful bureaucracy that costs money at a time of extremely high deficits. You haven't actually made an argument either way all you did was make a statement that you don't seem to be able to back up Quote But more the pity are those that are consciously ignorant? I wouldn't be that hard on yourself but still, obviously you can do better Quote Ya know anyone like that? 😁 Yup But i have faith you can do better. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Deluge Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 9 minutes ago, John Stone said: .............. u saying u know anything about girls ............. figured u for a 'pegg'n' puppet. 🤣 Juan projects because he still can't define woman. lol Quote
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: We know that but what science suggests that he shouldn't have? Or do you agree that he should have and you're just pointing it out And? Ok, and where's the science that says he shoudn't have done that? And? And? And? Still not seeing any science here big guy..... AAAAANNNNNNDDDDDD? Science does indeed arrive at conclusions. Science is all about observation, experimentation, and evidence-based analysis. That's what it does, it produces theories and formulas that make accurate predictions. It's not "probes". It not just observation. And science absolutely 100 percent seeks to 'prove'. Not relevant. For it to be relevant you would have to provide evidence that we are facing a situation where it's critical that we continue to monitor. I asked you for the science that shows that he is wrong to take these steps, that there is a crisis that we need to spend money monitoring, and that this monitoring is somehow very important to that. And I'm not seeing you producing that. Or it's trump eliminating wasteful bureaucracy that costs money at a time of extremely high deficits. You haven't actually made an argument either way all you did was make a statement that you don't seem to be able to back up I wouldn't be that hard on yourself but still, obviously you can do better Yup But i have faith you can do better. ............. and I have absolute faith u can be even more voluminous............be even less convincing and substantive. Quote
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 4 minutes ago, Deluge said: Juan projects because he still can't define woman. lol Dodge, a woman is not ur right hand .............. or the left for variety. 🤣 Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 2 minutes ago, John Stone said: ............. and I have absolute faith u can be even more voluminous. Delusion is not faith. But I can understand your confusion Quote ...........be even less convincing and substantive. In other words you couldn't understand what I said so you're hoping i'll dumb it down for you? I really feel like you didn't think that all the way through before making that statement Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Stone Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 Just now, CdnFox said: Delusion is not faith. But I can understand your confusion In other words you couldn't understand what I said so you're hoping i'll dumb it down for you? I really feel like you didn't think that all the way through before making that statement ah, no .......the delusion would believing that u could get ur point across without writing a tome that should be weighed, vice read. Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 (edited) 33 minutes ago, John Stone said: ah, no .......the delusion would believing that u could get ur point across without writing a tome that should be weighed, vice read. And you thought that slipping into the kind of English we see from the average teeny bopper combined with your admission that you consider five or six paragraphs to be "a really long read" is making you look better in this? LOL Sorry kid, I'll try and keep it to crayons and dr seuss rhymes for you next time LOLOL oh sorry, i meant "4 u next time". Didn't mean to confuse you Edited May 26 by CdnFox Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Nationalist Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 hour ago, John Stone said: .............. u saying u know anything about girls ............. figured u for a 'pegg'n' puppet. 🤣 ............ u first ......... and get the soother out of ur a$$ ........ wrong hole. 😅 So in reality...you have no argument. Ok. 2 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: So in reality...you have no argument. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted May 26 Author Report Posted May 26 6 hours ago, John Stone said: FWIW: Trump's administration enacted regulatory rollbacks, withdrawals from international commitments, and public messaging that undermined climate science, reinforcing impressions that Trump's stance treated climate risk as illegitimate. It's all part of his payout return to US oil companies for the part of the $1B he demanded that they delivered. AKA blatant corruption. 5 hours ago, Legato said: It is rather difficult to undermine something that only exists in the minds of those with weak deductive acumen abilities. YOU are undermined here all the time, CLOWN. Quote
robosmith Posted May 26 Author Report Posted May 26 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Lets play this game. His BS is like Astrology its vague enough that you can point to any leader as a fascist. We can present examples of what Obama did and Biden did that would make them fascist. Fascism is funny because no one can really define it and people know its bad so therefore anyone can be a fascist. The inventors like Musolini defined it, dummy. Quote Benito Mussolini defined fascism as a totalitarian, anti-individualistic ideology that subordinated all personal and group interests to the absolute power of the state. He famously described it as "the marriage of corporation and state", emphasizing the forced coordination of private enterprise and labor under state control. San Jose State University +4 Mussolini outlined this ideology most famously in his 1932 essay, The Doctrine of Fascism, which was co-authored with the philosopher Giovanni Gentile. The core tenets of his definition include: Columbia University +1 Primacy of the State: The state is an absolute entity, and individuals only hold value and liberty insofar as their interests align with it. Outside the state, no spiritual or human values exist. Rejection of Liberalism and Socialism: Mussolini explicitly denounced 18th-century Enlightenment liberalism, democracy, and Marxism (including class struggle). Fascism sought to replace these with a unified, disciplined, and classless national identity. Corporatism: The economy was organized into "corporations" that merged state authority with corporate and labor powers, eliminating free trade unions and strikes in favor of state-directed production. Imperialism and Militarism: Mussolini defined the fascist state as a "will to power and empire". Territorial and spiritual expansion were considered essential signs of national vitality, while pacifism was viewed as a sign of decay. Vancouver Island University (VIU) +7 To explore Mussolini's complete philosophical rationale in his own words, you can read “The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932) courtesy of San Jose State University, or view the Benito Mussolini: What is Fascism (1932) archive provided by Vancouver Island University. 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Playing a video of some facebook loser that no one but Robo watches isn't proof of anything. He is an expert on nothing except maybe extorting old people by selling them crap they don't need. He did RESEARCH and CITED IT. That is EVIDENCE, of which you know nothing about. 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: His research consisted of him going on Google putting in the search bar "Why is Trump a fascist". Not why isn't Trump fascist as well. He at no point ever signals he looked at the other side and stay within his echo chamber. He counts on people like Robo to slurp it up. EVIDENCE from EXP:ERTS CITED. Duh 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: I looked at his other videos and the vast majority are all Orange Man Bad. It's an easy and rich target of malfeasance. Duh 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: Most of the time here I don't present ultra biased views from my echo chamber. I actually try to find the news stories from main stream news organizations and try to stay away from Fox so Robo and his ilk can't call it Faux News. It's FOS NEWS for an $800M REASON. 5 hours ago, Fluffypants said: See the difference between me and most liberals is that I can admit Fox has a conservative bent but Robo will tell me with a straight face that MSNOW is unbiased and real news. MSNOW was never found LIBEL for LYING to the tune of $800M. That is serious money even to Murdoch. LMAO Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: The inventors like Musolini defined it, dummy. He did RESEARCH and CITED IT. That is EVIDENCE, of which you know nothing about. EVIDENCE from EXP:ERTS CITED. Duh It's an easy and rich target of malfeasance. Duh It's FOS NEWS for an $800M REASON. MSNOW was never found LIBEL for LYING to the tune of $800M. That is serious money even to Murdoch. LMAO His research and his cites are Bupkis. Their entirely flawed and a joke. Something he shares in common with you Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Legato Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 28 minutes ago, robosmith said: MSNOW was never found LIBEL for LYING to the tune of $800M. That is serious money even to Murdoch. LMAO Yet! Quote
CdnFox Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 7 minutes ago, Legato said: Yet! That we know of. They have been sued many times and the amount of the settlement has been undisclosed. They could be 900 million for all we know Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted May 26 Author Report Posted May 26 1 hour ago, Legato said: Yet! ^BUPKIS until it happens. Quote
Fluffypants Posted May 26 Report Posted May 26 (edited) 3 hours ago, robosmith said: The inventors like Musolini defined it, dummy. He did RESEARCH and CITED IT. That is EVIDENCE, of which you know nothing about. EVIDENCE from EXP:ERTS CITED. Duh It's an easy and rich target of malfeasance. Duh It's FOS NEWS for an $800M REASON. MSNOW was never found LIBEL for LYING to the tune of $800M. That is serious money even to Murdoch. LMAO Ok Commie. Ive decided your a Communist which is way worse that Fascism. Way more people have been killed under Communism than Fascism. None of this persons facebook videos you put on here will matter because he will be President for 2 more years. I wonder if you all will have actual platform when the next Presidential election comes around other than Trump poopoo head. Edited May 26 by Fluffypants Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.