The UNs scientist admits they are wrong about climate change

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

"Follow the science!"

And by "science,"you mean whatever your ignorant, orange Jesus posts on Twitter. 🙄

 

No.

I mean science.

 

You lose...

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Legato said:

It's known as "satisfactory outcomes will be required".

By who? ^Resident CLOWN? LMAO

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

No.

I mean science.

 

You lose...

You're the one who has LOST (your mind) since you believe that science is involved in a Trump "truth." LMAO

[Legato]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

By who? ^Resident CLOWN? LMAO

You're the one who has LOST (your mind) since you believe that science is involved in a Trump "truth." LMAO

Trump? never heard of him. Is he/she your ping pong partner?

[robosmith]

1 minute ago, Legato said:

Trump? never heard of him. Is he/she your ping pong partner?

Ask your MAGAt bretheren.

[Nationalist]

8 hours ago, robosmith said:

By who? ^Resident CLOWN? LMAO

You're the one who has LOST (your mind) since you believe that science is involved in a Trump "truth." LMAO

Well...

https://www.gbnews.com/science/apocalypse-forecasts-climate-scientists

See, prissy one, the truth has always been that you climate religious have been cheating...what a shocker. 

"Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather and climate researcher Glen Peters warned in 2020 that the scenario was being misunderstood.

Writing in Nature, they said: “RCP8.5 was intended to explore an unlikely high-risk future.

But they warned it had been “widely used by some experts, policymakers and the media as something else entirely: as a likely ‘business as usual’ outcome”.

In other words...you fckin' greenies cheated all along. You used a grossly over-blown, implausible scenario to fuel your destructive fear-porn grip on the weak minded.

There was no need for your panic...for your war on fossil fuels...for driving inflation. 

You lied and cheated and now...you will have to either face the truth, or dig yourselves deeper in the hole of disgrace.

[Hodad]

13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No.

I mean science.

 

You lose...

Lol. I (correctly) accuse you of confusing Trump's Twitter ramblings for science. 

Your response? Re-posting Trump's Twitter ramblings and literally calling it science. 

 

All-time great...

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Well...

https://www.gbnews.com/science/apocalypse-forecasts-climate-scientists

See, prissy one, the truth has always been that you climate religious have been cheating...what a shocker. 

"Climate scientist Zeke Hausfather and climate researcher Glen Peters warned in 2020 that the scenario was being misunderstood.

Writing in Nature, they said: “RCP8.5 was intended to explore an unlikely high-risk future.

But they warned it had been “widely used by some experts, policymakers and the media as something else entirely: as a likely ‘business as usual’ outcome”.

In other words...you fckin' greenies cheated all along. You used a grossly over-blown, implausible scenario to fuel your destructive fear-porn grip on the weak minded.

There was no need for your panic...for your war on fossil fuels...for driving inflation. 

You lied and cheated and now...you will have to either face the truth, or dig yourselves deeper in the hole of disgrace.

How many million times on this site and others did we ask to see the actual science.  

And not once could ANY of these freaks could produce a  SINGLE DROP of actual science.  It was always "well here's a webpage that says the science exists somewhere and it says it's really bad honest! So you don't need to see the science".  Well now we know why they didn't want us to see it. 

 

 

 

5 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Lol. I (correctly) accuse you of confusing Trump's Twitter ramblings for science. 

Your response? Re-posting Trump's Twitter ramblings and literally calling it science. 

 

All-time great...

Well, go ahead then . Show us the 'real' science. 

Show us the actual original works that prove that a) climate change is a crisis and b) that anything we can do about it would make a substantial difference. 

I'll wait. 

[Nationalist]

1 minute ago, CdnFox said:

How many million times on this site and others did we ask to see the actual science.  

And not once could ANY of these freaks could produce a  SINGLE DROP of actual science.  It was always "well here's a webpage that says the science exists somewhere and it says it's really bad honest! So you don't need to see the science".  Well now we know why they didn't want us to see it. 

 

 

 

"FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!!!"

What a pack o' jackels.  Those who pushed this doom's day chickenshit were in positions to KNOW what they were choking down the public's throats was implausible. But they did it anyway.

And pee-wee little shits like this @Hodad here, deep-throated the stream of lies like a 2-bit whore. 

[Hodad]

24 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!!!"

What a pack o' jackels.  Those who pushed this doom's day chickenshit were in positions to KNOW what they were choking down the public's throats was implausible. But they did it anyway.

And pee-wee little shits like this @Hodad here, deep-throated the stream of lies like a 2-bit whore. 

You have no idea what the science is. You are just a braindead Trump parrot, repeating whatever his latest nonsense is without question. 

 

Let’s translate this from caps-lock into reality: Trump is throwing a victory party because climate scientists looked at global data and said, 'Hey, because the world actually started adopting renewable energy and cutting back on coal over the last decade, our absolute worst-case, apocalypse-tomorrow scenario is now less likely.'

It's sort of like crashing your car into a guardrail, walking away with a broken leg instead of being dead, and screaming, 'HA! The doctors said I was gonna die! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Broken legs are a scam!' That is the exact level of logic we are dealing with here.

The UN didn't 'admit' climate change isn't real. They pointed out that RCP8.5—a model that assumed humanity would actively try to burn five times more coal by 2100—is no longer our baseline because green tech actually worked. The planet is still warming, the data is still real, and the transition to clean energy is literally the reason the worst-case scenario was avoided.

But please, tell us more about how the administration that suggested injecting bleach to fight COVID and altered a hurricane map with a Sharpie is the true bastion of 'TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT.'"

[Legato]

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You have no idea what the science is. You are just a braindead Trump parrot, repeating whatever his latest nonsense is without question. 

 

Let’s translate this from caps-lock into reality: Trump is throwing a victory party because climate scientists looked at global data and said, 'Hey, because the world actually started adopting renewable energy and cutting back on coal over the last decade, our absolute worst-case, apocalypse-tomorrow scenario is now less likely.'

It's sort of like crashing your car into a guardrail, walking away with a broken leg instead of being dead, and screaming, 'HA! The doctors said I was gonna die! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Broken legs are a scam!' That is the exact level of logic we are dealing with here.

The UN didn't 'admit' climate change isn't real. They pointed out that RCP8.5—a model that assumed humanity would actively try to burn five times more coal by 2100—is no longer our baseline because green tech actually worked. The planet is still warming, the data is still real, and the transition to clean energy is literally the reason the worst-case scenario was avoided.

But please, tell us more about how the administration that suggested injecting bleach to fight COVID and altered a hurricane map with a Sharpie is the true bastion of 'TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT.'"

Yes Dear...what a gull-a-bull.

[CdnFox]

18 minutes ago, Hodad said:

You have no idea what the science is.

Says the guy who STILL can't produce the science. 

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

You have no idea what the science is. You are just a braindead Trump parrot, repeating whatever his latest nonsense is without question. 

 

Let’s translate this from caps-lock into reality: Trump is throwing a victory party because climate scientists looked at global data and said, 'Hey, because the world actually started adopting renewable energy and cutting back on coal over the last decade, our absolute worst-case, apocalypse-tomorrow scenario is now less likely.'

It's sort of like crashing your car into a guardrail, walking away with a broken leg instead of being dead, and screaming, 'HA! The doctors said I was gonna die! WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Broken legs are a scam!' That is the exact level of logic we are dealing with here.

The UN didn't 'admit' climate change isn't real. They pointed out that RCP8.5—a model that assumed humanity would actively try to burn five times more coal by 2100—is no longer our baseline because green tech actually worked. The planet is still warming, the data is still real, and the transition to clean energy is literally the reason the worst-case scenario was avoided.

But please, tell us more about how the administration that suggested injecting bleach to fight COVID and altered a hurricane map with a Sharpie is the true bastion of 'TRUTH, SCIENCE, and FACT.'"

AS USUAL, predictions based on the PREMISE that no mitigation is done, are MORE DIRE than RESULTS AFTER MITIGATION is IMPLEMENTED.

And  THEN Trump cancels wind and solar projects to boost fossil fuel industry executives.profits. 🤮

No, Donald Trump did not receive $1 billion from fossil fuel industries, though he did ask for it. While the final exact figures are heavily debated due to the nature of dark money and PACs, estimates indicate the oil and gas industry poured around $445 million into influencing the elections. 

Instagram·US Senator Sheldon Whitehouse +2

The $1 Billion Request:
In April 2024, Trump hosted a secretive meeting at his Mar-a-Lago estate where he asked top oil executives to raise $1 billion for his presidential campaign. In exchange, he vowed to enact policies benefiting the fossil fuel industry, including rolling back electric vehicle mandates, wind energy initiatives, and other environmental regulations. 

The Washington Post +3

Actual Contributions:
Although the industry did not hit the $1 billion threshold, they contributed heavily to his campaign and political operations. Estimates for total oil and gas spending (including direct campaign donations, PACs, and supportive advertising) range from $150 million to over $400 million. Major contributors included billionaires like Kelcy Warren and Timothy Dunn, who provided millions of dollars in support. 

The Guardian +2

Industry Returns:
The fossil fuel sector's financial support yielded significant policy benefits. The Brennan Center for Justice highlights how Trump's agenda has rewarded donors with expansive tax incentives and swift deregulation. You can read further reporting and analysis on these donations from The Guardian, The Hill, and Politico. 

 

Edited May 18 by robosmith

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Yes Dear...what a gull-a-bull.

Your BUPKIS is JUST BULLSHIT as USUAL

AS USUAL, predictions based on the PREMISE that no mitigation is done, are MORE DIRE than RESULTS AFTER MITIGATION is IMPLEMENTED.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Your BUPKIS is JUST BULLSHIT as USUAL

AS USUAL, predictions based on the PREMISE that no mitigation is done, are MORE DIRE than RESULTS AFTER MITIGATION is IMPLEMENTED.

Man,. why are you always so fixated on @Nationalist's bupkis? It's like you dream about his bupkis, 

It's always "His bupkis is soooo full and i get so excited talking about his bupkis!  I think about my zucchini and his bupkis all the time, like 24/7!"

Yikes.  Honestly if i were him, i'd be a little flattered but very disturbed.