Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS"

Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner.

We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted

A search function would be great so we can make you and several others eat your words .

So please Re-Politics, put in a search function. LOL

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 2

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted

You do know that Greg doesn't write the code for the forum? And waiting for an official fix is better than a function with glitches?
Took weeks of searching to hunt down, learning and reworking when one of the Wordpress RSS aggregators wasn't compatible with the newest version... and no one's paying you for it.


 

Posted
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Of course leftists don't want the search function here, because it turns this jumble of a forum into "The North American Repository of Debunked Left4rd Lies and Cultist BS"

Right now, all of their lies are scattered across 600 pages of thread titles on this form that can never be accessed in a timely manner.

We really need the search function back. There's no good reason why there isn't one. 

It's extremely easy to find reputable data on anything. Takes a couple seconds. No idea whatesoever what in hell your talking about. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

It's extremely easy to find reputable data on anything. Takes a couple seconds. No idea whatesoever what in hell your talking about. 

Posts from this forum.

And FYI it's not easy to find anything on Google that leftists don't want you to find.

For example, if you search for the excerpt from Bergdorf-Ho's book about the Trump story it's no longer available.

It was everywhere when it was new, but those actual accounts have been replaced by misleading summaries now.

Eg, instead of a site showing her actual quote, which reads like: "I went into the changeroom, and he came in behind me and closed the door. Then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me, and I giggled" it will say "He followed her into the changeroom and r4ped her."

FYI that's about as accurate as "Trump said 'Can I kiss you, my darling?', to which she breathlessly replied "No, just stick something in my snatch."

Try to find the actual excerpt from her book, JJ. Use quotation marks however you want. It doesn't matter. Her actual book excerpt isn't on Google searches anymore. You get disinformation, exclusively.

  • Downvote 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Posts from this forum.

And FYI it's not easy to find anything on Google that leftists don't want you to find.

For example, if you search for the excerpt from Bergdorf-Ho's book about the Trump story it's no longer available.

It was everywhere when it was new, but those actual accounts have been replaced by misleading summaries now.

Eg, instead of a site showing her actual quote, which reads like: "I went into the changeroom, and he came in behind me and closed the door. Then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me, and I giggled" it will say "He followed her into the changeroom and r4ped her."

FYI that's about as accurate as "Trump said 'Can I kiss you, my darling?', to which she breathlessly replied "No, just stick something in my snatch."

Try to find the actual excerpt from her book, JJ. Use quotation marks however you want. It doesn't matter. Her actual book excerpt isn't on Google searches anymore. You get disinformation, exclusively.

Wow. 🙄

  • Haha 1
Posted

As I have said before, some communication would be nice. 

He already last advertised this function as being fixed with an update that was supposed to have happened already. 

It would just be nice to have some updates either way. Otherwise, we are all speculating.

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
26 minutes ago, John Johnston said:

Wow. 🙄

Yeah, Google basically operates as a confirmation bias filter for CNN, CBC, BBC, WashPo, NYT, FB, YouTube and all their other TNI partners. They don't just give preference to disinformation, they also hide information that they don't like.  

Twitter was part of TNI until Elon Musk bought it, breaking up the monopoly. 

That's how it was proven that all the Demi bot-accounts and the shadowbans of conservative userswere real. Before that they were all just "conservative conspiracy theories", remember? 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Posts from this forum.

And FYI it's not easy to find anything on Google that leftists don't want you to find.

For example, if you search for the excerpt from Bergdorf-Ho's book about the Trump story it's no longer available.

It was everywhere when it was new, but those actual accounts have been replaced by misleading summaries now.

Eg, instead of a site showing her actual quote, which reads like: "I went into the changeroom, and he came in behind me and closed the door. Then he pushed me against the wall and kissed me, and I giggled" it will say "He followed her into the changeroom and r4ped her."

FYI that's about as accurate as "Trump said 'Can I kiss you, my darling?', to which she breathlessly replied "No, just stick something in my snatch."

Try to find the actual excerpt from her book, JJ. Use quotation marks however you want. It doesn't matter. Her actual book excerpt isn't on Google searches anymore. You get disinformation, exclusively.

HA HA HA...if it can't find it  in google. or Google AI...it's because it is in your imagination LOL

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.

Posted
17 hours ago, User said:

As I have said before, some communication would be nice. 

I don’t think this is much of a priority for him.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted (edited)

Oh FFS I just love it when some smooth brain tells me how easy something is to do. Duh, you can dredge up a congealed fatberg from page 523 of Google why can't you do it on something that's not Google/

Offer to pay for the latest version of the software and pay the hosting and maintenance fees ro run it perfectly.

Edited by herbie
Posted
On 4/16/2026 at 7:47 PM, herbie said:

Oh FFS I just love it when some smooth brain tells me how easy something is to do. Duh, you can dredge up a congealed fatberg from page 523 of Google why can't you do it on something that's not Google/

Offer to pay for the latest version of the software and pay the hosting and maintenance fees ro run it perfectly.

If the owner were more transparent on these things, maybe we could. We have no idea what is going on or why. I am not even trying to be mean or attack the guy, I am sure there is a lot going on with running a place like this... just pointing out the facts - 

The last thing we got was a message from over a year ago talking about an update that would restore the search function that should have already taken place. 


 

 

 

Posted

The forum has been in maintenance-mode for years.  I think it's better to not expect anything and just be pleasantly surprised if something happens.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he is for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...