Which part of science is most important to you?

[LinkSoul60]

40 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Yeah he's been insensitive in some ways, but in other ways, like with CNN, he's been pretty funnyand also accurate - CNN is in the pocket of the left-wing overlords, so he rightly stated that they are fake news.  

You have to remember something, LM60, people like you are the reason a guy like Trump is in office. It's you and your radical leftism that created him. I just wanted a real statesman in office but we got the Donald instead. I was pissed at first, but then I saw that he'd be the antidote to the woke pathogen. So here we are, with the country in as good a shape as it can be while wiping out the woke stain. 

If you can overlook his lack of morals and human decency that's your choice.  Whether it's him or anyone else who lacks them, it doesn't work for me...

I never helped create him.  I'm Canadian and can't vote in the US...  It's all on you and your fellow citizens who are responsible for creating this guy.  

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...so stop replying then. I mean...I'm just gonna keep pointing out your lack or morality and decency...

You display FAR MORE lack of morality and decency that any lib here. 

Your continual defense of our entirely UNETHICAL POTUS is only the beginning, of which you excuse for EVERY VIOLATION of ETHICAL standards.

I have to wonder why your wife is OK with you making excuses for a guy who BRAGS ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT.

I'm sure YOU would not EXCUSE him grabbing her by the pu$$y but it's OK for any other woman, right? 🤮

And that comes directly from HIS mouth AND his conviction for doing EXACTLY THAT.

Go ahead and defend HIM for that AGAIN.

[Deluge]

11 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. If you can overlook his lack of morals and human decency that's your choice.  Whether it's him or anyone else who lacks them, it doesn't work for me...

2. I never helped create him.  I'm Canadian and can't vote in the US...  It's all on you and your fellow citizens who are responsible for creating this guy.  

1. It doesn't work for you when Trump's doing it. Everyone else you can overlook. 

2. I said people like you. If you WERE a US citizen, you'd also be a democrat and an active part of the problem. 

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

1. It doesn't work for you when Trump's doing it. Everyone else you can overlook. 

2. I said people like you. If you WERE a US citizen, you'd also be a democrat and an active part of the problem. 

1. Is there anyone else to look to other than the President and his adminsitration?

2. If I was, yes I'd probably have been democrat...?  I spent half my life in the US and towards the end of my career was often in different regions of your country, or on what seemed like daily calls with every region of the country.  Interesting to listen to the underlying political tones which weren't necessarily voiced, but clearly heard from both sides (if that makes sense).  Maybe if we were out and having some drinks I'd say something, but never too much because I wasn't an American.

 

[Deluge]

18 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. Is there anyone else to look to other than the President and his adminsitration?

2. If I was, yes I'd probably have been democrat...?  I spent half my life in the US and towards the end of my career was often in different regions of your country, or on what seemed like daily calls with every region of the country.  Interesting to listen to the underlying political tones which weren't necessarily voiced, but clearly heard from both sides (if that makes sense).  Maybe if we were out and having some drinks I'd say something, but never too much because I wasn't an American.

1. Lots of others: It's not just the President; there are two other branches of government. 

2. Your problem is that Trump isn't getting onboard with the rest of the West. You think that the US adheres to an "antiquated" belief system and it's time for us to get rid of it and submit to the globalist point of view. I'm telling you now there is no way in hell that is going to happen. Either we stay sovereign and free, or we pushback a lot harder. 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

You display FAR MORE lack of morality and decency that any lib here. 

Your continual defense of our entirely UNETHICAL POTUS is only the beginning, of which you excuse for EVERY VIOLATION of ETHICAL standards.

I have to wonder why your wife is OK with you making excuses for a guy who BRAGS ABOUT SEXUAL ASSAULT.

I'm sure YOU would not EXCUSE him grabbing her by the pu$$y but it's OK for any other woman, right? 🤮

And that comes directly from HIS mouth AND his conviction for doing EXACTLY THAT.

Go ahead and defend HIM for that AGAIN.

Ur a basket case.

[LinkSoul60]

37 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Lots of others: It's not just the President; there are two other branches of government. 

2. Your problem is that Trump isn't getting onboard with the rest of the West. You think that the US adheres to an "antiquated" belief system and it's time for us to get rid of it and submit to the globalist point of view. I'm telling you now there is no way in hell that is going to happen. Either we stay sovereign and free, or we pushback a lot harder. 

1. The general news only pays attention to what the id!oits in the administration are doing.  A finely tuned machine there wouldn't you say...

  2. Why do you think you know what I think when I've already told you.  I think Trump is a POS for the reasons I mentioned, so regardless of what you want to talk about for protectionism it's irrelevant.  I understand what he wants to do and I only blame him for how he's approached it with once strong allies, not the reason for.

[Deluge]

33 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. The general news only pays attention to what the id!oits in the administration are doing.  A finely tuned machine there wouldn't you say...

  2. Why do you think you know what I think when I've already told you.  I think Trump is a POS for the reasons I mentioned, so regardless of what you want to talk about for protectionism it's irrelevant.  I understand what he wants to do and I only blame him for how he's approached it with once strong allies, not the reason for.

1. The general news protected the previous administration so you can't really say anything about the news, other than they are propagandists for the left. 

2. Because what you tell me is rarely the truth. Everyone knows that you people are global marxists, so it's kind of pointless for you to talk about anything that doesn't promote that bullshit. 

 

[LinkSoul60]

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. The general news protected the previous administration so you can't really say anything about the news, other than they are propagandists for the left. 

2. Because what you tell me is rarely the truth. Everyone knows that you people are global marxists, so it's kind of pointless for you to talk about anything that doesn't promote that bullshit. 

 

1. What if I said I got I get all my news from Truth Social, Rebel News, X, and Fox,

2. I see you have no idea what you're talking now....  I told you that I understand what Trump is trying to do and no problem with that. My problem is with how we went about it.  What's the bullshit in that?

Edited March 24 by LinkSoul60

[WestCanMan]

On 3/23/2026 at 7:24 AM, John Johnston said:

Cognitive Function: Breakfast consumption is linked to improved academic performance and better mood regulation. It provides essential nutrients that support brain health and cognitive performanc

You're obviously quoting a conservative, Johnny. Look at all those words with 6 letters or more...

It would take 10 leftists and 3 AI platforms to correctly use that many large words in two sentences.

[WestCanMan]

On 3/23/2026 at 9:01 AM, John Stone said:

Those that believe in God are likely conflicted with some scientific beliefs ........

Christians  believe that God made  all beings. This belief is rooted in the Christian  doctrine of creation which asserts that God created the universe and all that is within it. 

I'm an atheist myself, and was never able to believe in Santa, God, etc, but at the same time it's hard not to notice that religious people are quite successful, on avg.

Maybe it's because prayer is a really effective goal-setting method, maybe it's because of the discipline and work involved in memorizing large parts of the various bibles, or maybe it's because those people flock together to help each other out to a greater extent than atheists do, but they definitely got it goin' on. 

Jews are just a small fraction of the population on earth and yet they control vast sums of money. No other group of people even comes close on a per capita basis. Most people who are successful in politics or sports are religious. 

I personally can't understand how genius-lvl IQ people can reconcile the enormity and age of the universe with the story of a magical being that just willed itself into existence before there was even a molecule of oxygen or carbon, but those people are out there and their inability to reason doesn't prevent them from doing well in both academia and the real world. 

I'll also say this about religion: almost everyone has a very deep need to just blindly love and follow something, and if it's not a God then it's gonna be something else, it's just a matter of what. 

People who don't believe in God are usually either dems, communists, druggies, alcoholics, or some type of addicts. 

I think that as an atheist who isn't a druggie, alcoholic, or left-wing cultist, or some other kind of addict, my group probably only accounts for about 0.05% of the earth's population. 

[John Stone]

13 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I'm an atheist myself, and was never able to believe in Santa, God, etc, but at the same time it's hard not to notice that religious people are quite successful, on avg.

Maybe it's because prayer is a really effective goal-setting method, maybe it's because of the discipline and work involved in memorizing large parts of the various bibles, or maybe it's because those people flock together to help each other out to a greater extent than atheists do, but they definitely got it goin' on. 

Jews are just a small fraction of the population on earth and yet they control vast sums of money. No other group of people even comes close on a per capita basis. Most people who are successful in politics or sports are religious. 

I personally can't understand how genius-lvl IQ people can reconcile the enormity and age of the universe with the story of a magical being that just willed itself into existence before there was even a molecule of oxygen or carbon, but those people are out there and their inability to reason doesn't prevent them from doing well in both academia and the real world. 

I'll also say this about religion: almost everyone has a very deep need to just blindly love and follow something, and if it's not a God then it's gonna be something else, it's just a matter of what. 

People who don't believe in God are usually either dems, communists, druggies, alcoholics, or some type of addicts. 

I think that as an atheist who isn't a druggie, alcoholic, or left-wing cultist, or some other kind of addict, my group probably only accounts for about 0.05% of the earth's population. 

Often been said there's no atheists on the battlefield. 

I've seen how faith can be a balm for people in times of great tragedy -  envy them at that moment.

Religion has been a method of control for hundreds of years. 

Faith should be personal thing - without bricks-n-mortar, scripture interpretation, condemnation or discrimination. 

 

 

[Deluge]

16 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. What if I said I got I get all my news from Truth Social, Rebel News, X, and Fox,

2. I see you have no idea what you're talking now....  I told you that I understand what Trump is trying to do and no problem with that. My problem is with how we went about it.  What's the bullshit in that?

1. I'd day you're full of shit. 

2. What's the problem with how he did it? 

[LinkSoul60]

12 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. I'd day you're full of shit. 

2. What's the problem with how he did it? 

1.  Lol... you'd be spot on.  If it were the only sources of news, I guess I wouldn't be looking at news.

2. Good business practice with a so-called partner is to give them a heads-up of what you're going to be doing and give them some time to pivot accordingly before slamming them financially (economically in this case).  

[Deluge]

8 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1.  Lol... you'd be spot on.  If it were the only sources of news, I guess I wouldn't be looking at news.

2. Good business practice with a so-called partner is to give them a heads-up of what you're going to be doing and give them some time to pivot accordingly before slamming them financially (economically in this case).  

1. I pretty much rely on my own eyes, now. 

2. Huh, I didn't know. Oh well, chalk that up on the negative side and get on with your life. I know I already have.  

[LinkSoul60]

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. I pretty much rely on my own eyes, now. 

2. Huh, I didn't know. Oh well, chalk that up on the negative side and get on with your life. I know I already have.  

1. We all have eyes to read (except for CdnFxx), but it's the factualness of content that matters (except to CdnFxx).

2. It's not holding my life back whatsoever. Just add's to the ammo I like to sling his way when in the mood.  

Edited March 25 by LinkSoul60

[Deluge]

22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. We all have eyes to read (except for CdnFxx), but it's the factualness of content that matters (except to CdnFxx).

2. It's not holding my life back whatsoever. Just add's to the ammo I like to sling his way when in the mood.  

1. Oh, I believe you have eyes, it's just that your eyes are for global marxism. 

2. That may be true, as it looks your life revolves around what your globalist masters have been feeding you. 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

Often been said there's no atheists on the battlefield. 

One of my grandmas was an atheist. Never even got the last rights when she was dying, so I dunno.

Her dad was quite religious, a mason even, so I dunno where her break with religion came from but she was serious about it. 

I would probably pray myself if I was in a war though. Even just .762 rounds whizzing by are terrifying (in basic we were in bunkers spotting and the bullets fly overhead), let alone .50 cal or tank rounds. There are lots of awful ways to be killed in a war, but maybe the ones that seems the worst are the quickest.

Quote

I've seen how faith can be a balm for people in times of great tragedy -  envy them at that moment.

Religion has been a method of control for hundreds of years. 

I think we'd both agree that politicians/media outlets have that level of control now. 

[LinkSoul60]

4 hours ago, Deluge said:

1. Oh, I believe you have eyes, it's just that your eyes are for global marxism. 

2. That may be true, as it looks your life revolves around what your globalist masters have been feeding you. 

I find it amusing that the people who appear to be the most influenced by someone or some movement are the first ones to tell others that they're being influenced.  I don't even know what a globalist marxist is but if I happen to run into one, I'll be sure to learn more about it.

 

[Deluge]

58 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

I find it amusing that the people who appear to be the most influenced by someone or some movement are the first ones to tell others that they're being influenced.  I don't even know what a globalist marxist is but if I happen to run into one, I'll be sure to learn more about it.

I'm motivated by the success of my country, so yes, I won't hesitate to be the first to tell you that your head is up the Left's ass. Would you like to know how to remove it? 

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

I'm motivated by the success of my country, so yes, I won't hesitate to be the first to tell you that your head is up the Left's ass. Would you like to know how to remove it? 

As you should be.  Too bad it's not happening under the guy you elected.

Doesn't matter where my head is... I know it's not stuck up a 79 year olds diaper ridden àss.  Enjoy the stench.

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, LinkSoul60 said:

As you should be.  Too bad it's not happening under the guy you elected.

Doesn't matter where my head is... I know it's not stuck up a 79 year olds diaper ridden àss.  Enjoy the stench.

Now you're past your shoulders. Are you trying to fit your entire body into the left's anal cavity? Will that be your new safety space? 

 

 

 

[LinkSoul60]

14 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Now you're past your shoulders. Are you trying to fit your entire body into the left's anal cavity? Will that be your new safety space? 

 

 

 

Lol... says the guy who's close to strangulation with Trump's diaper wrapped around his neck.

Whatever.... find a new hero.

[Deluge]

On 3/25/2026 at 3:57 PM, LinkSoul60 said:

Lol... says the guy who's close to strangulation with Trump's diaper wrapped around his neck.

Whatever.... find a new hero.

There you go, projecting from deep within the left's anal cavity. 

I am free - you are not free. Get that through your third world indoctrinated brain. 

[CdnFox]

On 3/23/2026 at 7:14 AM, John Johnston said:

The Science of Breakfast... 

With a doctorate in 'second breakfast'