Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

First, the bill did not fail, an amendment did. Second, if the bill fails, it is because the Democrats desperately want to cheat. 

You're LYING as USUAL. The Bill is all about RepubliCONS suppressing the vote by placing ONEROUS requirements on VOTERS with FEAR MONGERING that YOU REPEAT HERE.

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING as USUAL. The Bill is all about RepubliCONS suppressing the vote by placing ONEROUS requirements on VOTERS with FEAR MONGERING that YOU REPEAT HERE.

 

The only one lying here is you. It's in no way shape or form suppresses the legitimate vote. The only people suppressed will be those who vote illegally. Every country has something like this except the US

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
18 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're LYING as USUAL. The Bill is all about RepubliCONS suppressing the vote by placing ONEROUS requirements on VOTERS with FEAR MONGERING that YOU REPEAT HERE.

 

Do you have voter ID?

Posted
5 hours ago, Reg Volk said:

 

I think we all appreciate your efforts to help poor @robosmith  by providing that book and reading material, but I think you forgot that for it to be of any use we would have to teach him how to read first.

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

Voter ID in Canada for federal elections:

Quote

Canada

Federal elections

In Canada, the Federal government mails an Elections Canada registration confirmation card, which the voter takes to the polling station. The card tells the individual where and when to vote. Voters must prove their identity and address with one of three options:[20]

  • Show one original government-issued piece of identification with photo, name and address, like a driver's license or a health card.
  • Show two original pieces of authorized identification. Both pieces must have a name and one must also have an address. Examples: student ID card, birth certificate, public transportation card, utility bill, bank/credit card statement, etc.
  • Take an oath and have an elector who knows the voter vouch for them (both of whom must make a sworn statement). This person must have authorized identification and their name must appear on the list of electors in the same polling division as the voter. This person can only vouch for one person and the person who is vouched for cannot vouch for another elector.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_identification_laws#Canada

 

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

Voter ID in Canada for federal elections:

 

In America, conservatives have fought to keep National ID cards OUT.

Quote
While some conservatives historically opposed a unified national ID card over privacy, surveillance, and federal overreach concerns, the modern Republican platform now strongly pushes for nationwide voter identification laws, such as the SAVE Act, requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote. 
image.png.ed45db2ddd33dc701d0d00b5e7e05d73.pngAmerican Civil Liberties Union +2
Key details regarding the debate include: .....
  • Opposition to a "National ID": Historically, conservatives and civil liberties groups have opposed a single, mandatory national identification system, fearing an "unprecedented invasion of the privacy rights"

 

Posted
20 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

As well they should...voter id is a different discussion.   I always show my id when voting, even when it freaks out the poll workers.   Only U.S. citizens should be able to vote in U.S. elections...just sayin'.

Why would any non-citizen vote when their single vote means so little and the penalties are so HIGH? 

Insanity or stupidity?

The FACT is, mass voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent because it is ineffective and easily detected.

Just to gain 1000 votes would almost guarantee to be discovered because mass knowledge does NOT remain secret.

AKA you're wasting your time with your futile display of ID.

Posted
4 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why would any non-citizen vote when their single vote means so little and the penalties are so HIGH? 

 

If there's no chance of getting caught why wouldn't they?

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Why would any non-citizen vote when their single vote means so little and the penalties are so HIGH? 

Insanity or stupidity?

 

Because they want to...they pay taxes and have children in schools...want to influence election outcomes and "feel" like a citizen.   Some are paid to do so.

 

Quote

The FACT is, mass voter impersonation fraud is virtually non-existent because it is ineffective and easily detected.

Just to gain 1000 votes would almost guarantee to be discovered because mass knowledge does NOT remain secret.

AKA you're wasting your time with your futile display of ID.

 

Doesn't matter....any election fraud is unacceptable...strange you don't seem to mind a little bit of election fraud.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Here is why we need the SAVE Act:

During the Biden Admin we allowed millions of illegal aliens to enter the country. Rather than giving them a court date for their asylum claims, we just released them into the country. 

After six months, they became eligible for work status and social security numbers:

“Asylum seekers whose application has been pending for more than six months who apply for and are granted work authorization can get SSNs,” Gelatt also said. “People who cross the border illegally who have not applied for asylum usually cannot get work authorization or an SSN.”

Not every state is the same, but most states are similar. In Illinois, for example, a SSN and living history is all that is needed to get a driver's license: Illinois

 Now they can work and they can drive so they can vote. All they have to do is check "US Citizen" on the voter registration they are required to be given when the get their DL and they are registered to vote and have an ID to vote with. Even in states like Texas and Florida, they can't be caught unless someone goes through and verifies citizenship: Justice.gov

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted

In bad news for Trump, judge who blocked his last anti-voting order will hear challenge to new one

 

Quote

 

April 2, 2026

E._Barrett_Prettyman_United_States_Court

The E. Barrett Prettyman United States Court House in Washington, D.C., home to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA/FISC).

Democrats’ lawsuit to block President Donald Trump’s new anti-voting executive order has been assigned to the federal judge who quickly blocked his last executive order on elections — finding that the president holds no power whatsoever to dictate election policy.

The Framers “assigned no role at all to the President” in running elections, wrote District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in a 110-page opinion in January that permanently enjoined most of Executive Order No. 14,248, which attempted to impose documentary proof of citizenship requirements and limits on mail voting. “Put simply, our Constitution does not allow the President to impose unilateral changes to federal election procedures.” 

The assignment is a coincidence — lawsuits are effectively assigned to federal judges on a given district court at random. But it makes it that much more likely that the new executive order will meet the same fate as the last. 

 

LMAO

 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^lDIOT believes random tweets are evidence. LMAO

Awww, Triggered leftie is triggered again :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
42 minutes ago, Reg Volk said:

 

At the end of the day a democracy survives only because people believe that the system is a fair representation of the will of the public. Currently that is not the case and despite the whining from the democrats it is not the case for either side. Polling is clear that whichever side wins the other side has no faith in the process

The Americans desperately need to pass anything they can that restores faith that the process is substantially fair and free of fraud. Both sides should be engaged in creating that impression whether they genuinely feel there has been significant fraud or not

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...