Help is on its way: Trump sends medical ship to take care of Greenland's people left behind by socialist medicine in Greenland

[LinkSoul60]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Stop deflecting. It is what it is....

1. Carney is the one who said that he could get trade deals done in 6 months, not me, so stop trying to change his timeline now, donkey. If you thought that 6 months was impossible then you shoulda called him a liar when he said it. 

2. Oh yeah, the China agreement, that just set Canada/US trade relations to cold-war status. Good job???

3. Objectively, Carney's business - the one that he lied to Canadians about - has profited mightily since he became PM, more than once, while Canada has gained nothing. 

Do you have any facts to counter with, or are you done here? 

1.  Then you got scammed I guess.  Don't worry, only another decade of liberal government. Time will fly.

2. lol... Cold War?  That's a little dramatic don't you think.  Your conservative voters liked the deal why don't you? 😂

3. You had to google the spelling and meaning of objective...and still have no idea what it means.  

Yes, I'm done.  You can go back to your PP crying pillow now 👉

 

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1.  Then you got scammed I guess.  

We all got scammed, cultist

Quote

 Don't worry, only another decade of liberal government. Time will fly.

Hopefully the country will be in pieces ten years from now.

Quote

 2. lol... Cold War?  That's a little dramatic don't you think.  Your conservative voters liked the deal why don't you? 

It's your gov't that keeps insulting China, India, the US, Japan and Korea. 

Quote

 Yes, I'm done.  You can go back to your PP crying pillow now 👉

You're not done. You think you had a mic drop moment but you still can't deny that Carney has failed the country totally, while he has created massive amounts of business for Brookfield.

[LinkSoul60]

18 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. According to LinkMissing, The biggest ldiot to walk the planet is a billionaire. Let that sink in, everyone. lol

2. Oh, I think you do. His ESG score reflects his resistance to woke wankery. YOU are a woke wanker, therefore everyone who ISN'T a woke wanker is an ldiot. That's how you've been trained to think. 

3. Look at it this way: Every f*cking thing that you wokejobs think is good, is actually evil; Joe Biden was evil; his administration was evil; he spread evil over the entire country for four years - Trump needs to turn that all around. 

4. His mandate is inflation, immigration, the woke pathogen etc. See Agenda 47 for further details. 

5. Well, when you let 15 million aliens break into the country, you can afford to kick 5 million out - that still nets the a$$holes 10 million illegals. Trump has had the lower courts fighting him the entire way - he also has the media fighting him, NGO's, dumbf*cks like you, the list goes on and on and on. What I find interesting is that the Left treats immigrants like cattle. lol

6. Oh no, pervert, I am way WAY ahead of you on this. I see the left for what it is - all you see is the inside of the left's ass. 

1. Yes, and fortunately for him people as numb as you voted him back into office so he can grift his way to another billion because of his position.  Conflicts of interest....who cares we love Diaper Don!

2. The rest of the world is going down the road of clean energy and fools like you believe the dumbest SOB in history calls it fake news.  Something tells me you won't be laughing much when China laps you in the world order soon enough.

3. Why do you always bring up Biden?  He's been out of office for a year so just focus on the grifter you support.

4. No, his mandate was inflation and immigration and he's done little there has he....

5. Your Trump Dick Sucker syndrome is embarrassing....

6. The only pervert in this convo is your orange idol.  Good thing he has teams kissing his fat *ss  to cover up and redact files.

[robosmith]

6 hours ago, Deluge said:

Trump is not a m*ron. You're just pissed off that his ESG score is zero.

Apparently you're an lDIOT bragging about a REALLY BAD ESG score. LMAO

[LinkSoul60]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

We all got scammed, cultist

Hopefully the country will be in pieces ten years from now.

It's your gov't that keeps insulting China, India, the US, Japan and Korea. 

You're not done. You think you had a mic drop moment but you still can't deny that Carney has failed the country totally, while he has created massive amounts of business for Brookfield.

Again, sucks to be you with another 10 years of complaining and crying.  

Good comment AH.  If you're hoping for the country's demise get the f*ck out of here.  We'd all be better off without dipsh*ts like you anyway.

Insulting who.... You have no idea what the hell you even say.  Freakin clown....

I'll totally deny has failed the country and I have no idea how much 'business he's created for Brookfield'.  You're not too bright are you...  you complain in the first part of the sentence that he's done nothing, then comma and now he's created business opportunity for Brookfield companies.  LOL....f*ck are you dense 😂

 

[Deluge]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1. Yes, and fortunately for him people as numb as you voted him back into office so he can grift his way to another billion because of his position.  Conflicts of interest....who cares we love Diaper Don!

2. The rest of the world is going down the road of clean energy and fools like you believe the dumbest SOB in history calls it fake news.  Something tells me you won't be laughing much when China laps you in the world order soon enough.

3. Why do you always bring up Biden?  He's been out of office for a year so just focus on the grifter you support.

4. No, his mandate was inflation and immigration and he's done little there has he....

5. Your Trump Dick Sucker syndrome is embarrassing....

6. The only pervert in this convo is your orange idol.  Good thing he has teams kissing his fat *ss  to cover up and redact files.

1. And people as numb as you voted for the empty headed pronoun slut. It was either open borders or secure borders. America chose the latter because the former really didn't give a shit. 

2. Tell you what: you cultists find a way to make clean energy cheaper, more powerful, more efficient, and accessible, and I'll be right there with you.  

3. Because Biden is a piece of shit and a representative of the traitorous democrat party. I will bring him all day everyday - especially since you're asking why I am bringing him up. 

4. Wrong. His mandate is Agenda 47. Go check it out. 

5. That's funny coming from a male vagina. Harris lost, pu$$y, get over it. 

6. There are lots of perverts in this country, and I'd say 90% of them are leftoids, like you. 

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Apparently you're an lDIOT bragging about a REALLY BAD ESG score. LMAO

Excuse me, dumabass. Only woke degenerates find tragedy in a zero ESG score.  

[LinkSoul60]

29 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. And people as numb as you voted for the empty headed pronoun slut. It was either open borders or secure borders. America chose the latter because the former really didn't give a shit. 

2. Tell you what: you cultists find a way to make clean energy cheaper, more powerful, more efficient, and accessible, and I'll be right there with you.  

3. Because Biden is a piece of shit and a representative of the traitorous democrat party. I will bring him all day everyday - especially since you're asking why I am bringing him up. 

4. Wrong. His mandate is Agenda 47. Go check it out. 

5. That's funny coming from a male vagina. Harris lost, pu$$y, get over it. 

6. There are lots of perverts in this country, and I'd say 90% of them are leftoids, like you. 

I'm not a US citizen so didn't vote for Biden. I certainly would have though and actually would have voted for bozo the clown rather than the POS you got now.  I'm partial to people with morals and human decency.

It's happening and the world, but China in particular has lapped the US not only in clean energy tech, but in most critical tech.  Certainly wouldn't put falling behind in most categories on Trump but he'll accelerate the delta in the downward direction.  He's not a smart man...

Buckle up...  the POS you voted for is doing his best to ensure American citizens don't vote for spineless republican polititians in future elections. 

I may have looked it up after Trump was elected but no interest now.

Again, I'm not a US citizen so Harris losing doesn't matter to me one way or another...with the exception of the morally devoid grifter who was elected.  

You and the far right talk fools about trans and male vaginas a lot.  What other sites to do you frequent besides repolitics?

I have no idea how to respond to that.... fool.

 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Again, sucks to be you with another 10 years of complaining and crying.  

Better than being a cultist like you, on your knees saying "Please, sir, may I have another?"

[User]

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, you've had years to get up to speed. Now you're just a f'ing liar.

No, once again, you prove to be your usual dishonest self. You completely ignored the whole part about any official agreement or any official NATO agreement. 

None of this was part of the actual final deal agreed to. 

As usual, you are full of shit and might as well hae Putins hand up your ass moving your mouth. 

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

If everything in those labs was supposedly legitimate, then what difference would it make if the Russians got their hands on it? 

You have no evidence, just a speculative question, because, as usual, you are full of shit. 

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So, you think that the US bringing down the gov't of Ukraine was a-ok? It's their job? 

The US did not bring down the Ukrainian government. You are, as usual, full of shit. 

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Nuland was caught in a phone call saying that the US didn't want Klitchko to become president. And he didn't run.

OK, and? These events were years apart. You have no real evidence. You are, as usual, full of shit. 

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So, like I said, Ukraine was killing the people of Donbas, using artillery shells. Thanks. 

And like I said, woefully missing any context. So what is your point?

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

BS. I have eyes you f'ing weasel. I know what it means when NATO and its members oust presidents, control elections, fund and organize violent riots, and break their most critical p r o m i s e s. 

Nothing BS about it. Where did NATO do any of this?

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG you sound like a leftard cultist now.

No, you are the woke leftist twisting the facts as any other would to label people like this. 

I don't have time for your stupid BS, so here you go, I cheated:

 

“They called themselves Nazis”

Partly false.

• Some individual founders and early members of the Azov Battalion had neo-Nazi or ultranationalist views.
• The unit as an organization did not officially declare itself a Nazi organization.
• Many later members had no connection to those ideologies.

---

“They put Nazi insignias on their banners and uniforms”

Partly true, but often misrepresented.

• Early Azov used a symbol called the Wolfsangel-like emblem, which resembles imagery used by Nazi units.
• The group said the symbol meant “National Idea” in Ukrainian.
• Extremist symbols did appear among some fighters early in the war.
• Later versions of the unit reduced or removed controversial imagery.

---

“They put Nazi tattoos on their bodies”

True for some individuals, not the unit as a whole.

• Journalists documented some fighters with neo-Nazi tattoos or symbols in the early years.
• This does not mean the entire battalion shared those beliefs.

---

“They committed war crimes”

Allegations exist, but the claim is overstated.

• The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights reported allegations of abuses by multiple armed groups in the Donbas conflict.
• Some allegations involved Azov fighters in 2014–2015.
• The UN did not determine that Azov committed systematic or widespread war crimes as an organization.
• Documented abuses in the war involved Ukrainian forces, separatists, and Russian-backed units.

---

“The UN agreed Azov were committing war crimes”

False.

• UN reports documented allegations and incidents, not confirmation of systematic war crimes by Azov as a unit.
• The UN consistently reported abuses on all sides of the conflict.

---

“Ukraine made them an official unit while they were committing war crimes”

Misleading framing.

• Volunteer battalions across Ukraine were incorporated into state forces in 2014 to bring them under command and regulation.
• This was done with many volunteer units, not just Azov.

---

“If it wasn’t Azov, then Ukraine’s army was killing POWs”

Oversimplified claim.

• Human rights groups reported abuses by various Ukrainian units, especially early in the war.
• They also documented extensive abuses by Russian-backed separatists, including torture and unlawful detention.

---

Big picture supported by most research

• Azov’s early membership included far-right extremists.
• The unit later became a regular formation within Ukraine’s National Guard.
• Claims portraying Ukraine’s military as dominated by Nazis are not supported by election results, military structure, or independent research.

[Deluge]

13 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

1.I'm not a US citizen so didn't vote for Biden. I certainly would have though and actually would have voted for bozo the clown rather than the POS you got now.  I'm partial to people with morals and human decency.

2. It's happening and the world, but China in particular has lapped the US not only in clean energy tech, but in most critical tech.  Certainly wouldn't put falling behind in most categories on Trump but he'll accelerate the delta in the downward direction.  He's not a smart man...

3. Buckle up...  the POS you voted for is doing his best to ensure American citizens don't vote for spineless republican polititians in future elections. 

4. I may have looked it up after Trump was elected but no interest now.

5. Again, I'm not a US citizen so Harris losing doesn't matter to me one way or another...with the exception of the morally devoid grifter who was elected.  

6. You and the far right talk fools about trans and male vaginas a lot.  What other sites to do you frequent besides repolitics?

I have no idea how to respond to that.... fool.

 

1. For the purpose of this thread you are a US citizen. You think like a democrat, therefore you ARE a democrat. 

2. We're not into climate scare, so we don't give a shit about clean energy. All we care about is fossil fuel, and lots of it. 

3. And that's a good thing. We want capable leaders who love this country, not spineless hypocrites who hate this country. It's a no-brainer. 

4. Look it up again, or you can simply stfu. 

5. Again, for the purpose of this thread you are a US citizen. You think like a democrat, therefore you ARE a democrat - you hate the US and freedom just like Harris does. 

6. We talk about what you are, weakestLink, you ARE a male vagina. You're a male vagina because you embrace all the wrong things - there isn't one thing you stand for that suggests you're a real man. Physically you're a man, but in your head you're a f*cking menace to society because you're  a white male. 

6. You don't have to respond; just nod your empty head like a good little marxist.  

 

 

[LinkSoul60]

 

37 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. For the purpose of this thread you are a US citizen. You think like a democrat, therefore you ARE a democrat. 

2. We're not into climate scare, so we don't give a shit about clean energy. All we care about is fossil fuel, and lots of it. 

3. And that's a good thing. We want capable leaders who love this country, not spineless hypocrites who hate this country. It's a no-brainer. 

4. Look it up again, or you can simply stfu. 

5. Again, for the purpose of this thread you are a US citizen. You think like a democrat, therefore you ARE a democrat - you hate the US and freedom just like Harris does. 

6. We talk about what you are, weakestLink, you ARE a male vagina. You're a male vagina because you embrace all the wrong things - there isn't one thing you stand for that suggests you're a real man. Physically you're a man, but in your head you're a f*cking menace to society because you're  a white male. 

6. You don't have to respond; just nod your empty head like a good little marxist.  

 

 

Lol...  not that it was needed but lasts nights reminder of just how truly embarrassing Trump is only validates your stupidity.  I used to think he was the dumbest SOB known to mankind but I was wrong....  Clearly you and your fellow lost minions are for believing anything that comes out of his mouth.  What a fool 😂

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, User said:

No, once again, you prove to be your usual dishonest self. You completely ignored the whole part about any official agreement or any official NATO agreement. 

Now you're just proving that you're a liar by saying: "It doesn't matter what words come out of your mouth, all that matters is signed contracts.

FYI a verbal contract is still binding in Canadian law, just as long as you have the proof it was made.

• Manfred Woerner (NATO Secretary-General): In a speech on May 17, 1990, Woerner promised that NATO would not expand beyond the current borders of the Federal Republic of Germany.
• James Baker (U.S. Secretary of State): On February 9, 1990, in Moscow, Baker told Gorbachev that if Germany were unified in NATO, there would be "no extension of NATO's jurisdiction or NATO's forces one inch to the east". This is frequently referred to as the "not one inch" statement.

Those things happened, User. There is no denying that a verbal contract was made. 

And these are just the things that were said in public, which we all know about, 100%. What we don't know is how many more verbal assurances were given behind closed doors.

We made those PROMISES, then we went back on our word, 100%. That might not bug you, but IDGAF about your ultra-low ethical standards.

Quote

“They called themselves Nazis”

Partly false.

• Some individual founders and early members of the Azov Battalion had neo-Nazi or ultranationalist views.
• The unit as an organization did not officially declare itself a Nazi organization.
• Many later members had no connection to those ideologies.

---

“They put Nazi insignias on their banners and uniforms”

Partly true, but often misrepresented.

• Early Azov used a symbol called the Wolfsangel-like emblem, which resembles imagery used by Nazi units.
• The group said the symbol meant “National Idea” in Ukrainian.
• Extremist symbols did appear among some fighters early in the war.
• Later versions of the unit reduced or removed controversial imagery.

---

“They put Nazi tattoos on their bodies”

True for some individuals, not the unit as a whole.

• Journalists documented some fighters with neo-Nazi tattoos or symbols in the early years.
• This does not mean the entire battalion shared those beliefs.

---

“They committed war crimes”

Allegations exist, but the claim is overstated.

• The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights reported allegations of abuses by multiple armed groups in the Donbas conflict.
• Some allegations involved Azov fighters in 2014–2015.
• The UN did not determine that Azov committed systematic or widespread war crimes as an organization.
• Documented abuses in the war involved Ukrainian forces, separatists, and Russian-backed units.

---

“The UN agreed Azov were committing war crimes”

False.

• UN reports documented allegations and incidents, not confirmation of systematic war crimes by Azov as a unit.
• The UN consistently reported abuses on all sides of the conflict.

---

“Ukraine made them an official unit while they were committing war crimes”

Misleading framing.

• Volunteer battalions across Ukraine were incorporated into state forces in 2014 to bring them under command and regulation.
• This was done with many volunteer units, not just Azov.

---

“If it wasn’t Azov, then Ukraine’s army was killing POWs”

Oversimplified claim.

• Human rights groups reported abuses by various Ukrainian units, especially early in the war.
• They also documented extensive abuses by Russian-backed separatists, including torture and unlawful detention.

---

Big picture supported by most research

• Azov’s early membership included far-right extremists.
• The unit later became a regular formation within Ukraine’s National Guard.
• Claims portraying Ukraine’s military as dominated by Nazis are not supported by election results, military structure, or independent research.

Holy shit, dummy. You are really going all-out to distort the truth.

But, in fairness to you, you're taking the exact same approach that this AI search took lol:

• The Azov unit did not generally, officially, or openly call themselves Nazis, and in recent years have vehemently denied holding Neo-Nazi ideologies. However, in its early stages (around 2014-2015), 1) the group was formed by members of far-right, ultranationalist, and neo-Nazi groups, and some members openly identified as National Socialists. [National Socialists = Nazis. It's the Nazis' official name, dummy]

  Al Jazeera +3
  Key details regarding this history include:
• Early Ideology: The battalion was formed in 2014 from members of the "Patriot of Ukraine" gang and the "Social National Assembly" (SNA), 2) both of which were known for neo-Nazi ideals and xenophobia.

1. My own replies to the above... AI just slithered like Justing f'ing Trudeau there, but they still eventually had to admit that the Azovs called themselves "National Socialists" lol. Just like the... Nazis. It was their official name.
2. Both of which were Nazis.

Did they wear Nazi symbols? Simple, declarative statement: did they or did they not...? (from AI, below)

• Yes, the Azov unit (initially a battalion, later a regiment/brigade) historically used insignia that are considered neo-Nazi or closely linked to Nazi symbolism. 
  While Azov has since rebranded and tried to distance itself from its far-right origins, the following is an overview of the controversy surrounding their insignia:
• Wolfsangel (Wolf's Hook): From 2014 until roughly 2022, the Azov battalion used a stylized Wolfsangel (wolf trap) on a yellow background, with a "Black Sun" (Sonnenrad) behind it. The Wolfsangel was used by several SS divisions during World War II.
• "National Idea" Explanation: Azov members and supporters have often argued that the symbol is not a Nazi Wolfsangel but rather an intertwined "N" and "I," representing the Ukrainian words for "National Idea" (Ідея нації).
• "Black Sun" (Sonnenrad): The "Black Sun" is a symbol often used by neo-Nazis and white supremacists, which was present in early, unofficial Azov insignia.
• Rebranding: Following the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 and to combat Russian propaganda, the unit largely moved away from the controversial symbols. The newer insignia, often called the "Three Swords" or a redesigned trident, replaced the Wolfsangel.

Honestly, that BS exactly mirrors your BS.

They didn't wear "neo" Nazi symbols though, as the AI reply tried to say, they used actual Nazi symbols, as worn by the most devoted Nazis of WWII. In fact, the whole division of the SS was branded as war criminals, and then the Azovs started wearing their actual SS insignias. The Black Sun logo was designed by Himmler himself. 

FACT: Many Azov members openly called themselves Nazis. 

FACT: Many Azov members had Nazi tattoos. 

FACT: Their insignias WERE ALL NAZI INSIGNIAS

FACTS: The Azovs committed war crimes (below)

• 2016 UN Report: The report documented incidents between November 2015 and February 2016 where the Azov battalion was accused of looting civilian properties, occupying civilian buildings, and displacing residents.
• Allegations of Torture: The same 2016 report accused members of the battalion of raping and torturing detainees in the Donbas region.

 Again, when I said that the Azovs were war criminals and Nazis when they were welcomed into the fold, I don't mean 'maybe'. It's an absolute fact, and if it wasn't, I wouldn't have said it. 

Their subsequent rebranding and the attempted whitewashing of their sordid history by western journalists and cult-handlers doesn't change the F A C T S. They were Nazis. N a z i s. By their tattoos, statements, actions, and insignias they were Nazis. If they call themselves Nazis, they get to be considered Nazis. End of story.

If someone goes to an Antifa riot, then a BLM riot, throws a brick at the cops, loots a building, burns it down, yells at GOP members in a restaurant, calls a severed-head effigy of Trump 'comedy', cheers for genocide against Jews at a Hamas rally, cheers when a trans boxer beats up a woman boxer, cheers when they see a baby aborted, has an Obama tattoo, carries a DNC membership card, and says they're a Democrat, they're a Democrat. They're as Demi as they could possibly be, and you don't get to tell them otherwise.

Edited February 25 by WestCanMan

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

 

Lol...  not that it was needed but lasts nights reminder of just how truly embarrassing Trump is only validates your stupidity.  I used to think he was the dumbest SOB known to mankind but I was wrong....  Clearly you and your fellow lost minions are for believing anything that comes out of his mouth.  What a fool 😂

"Twump stoopid"

-- the left

[User]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI a verbal contract is still binding in Canadian law, just as long as you have the proof it was made.

There is no verbal contract. None of these people had any authority to bind NATO to any such deal, these were negotiations BEFORE the final deal was ever made or comments made by people with no such authority. 

This has been explained to you repeatedly by me on here. 

This is shit pushed by Russia, long debunked, and not a serious argument.

 

 

[User]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Holy shit, dummy. You are really going all-out to distort the truth.

Nope.

 

You’re mostly repeating things that were already acknowledged and then treating them as if they prove something new.

1. “Some members called themselves National Socialists.”
True for some early members. That still doesn’t mean the unit as an organization declared itself Nazi. Large volunteer units often contain ideological factions.

2. “They came from far-right groups.”
Also true. The Azov Battalion was partly formed from activists connected to far-right movements in 2014.
That’s already widely documented.

3. “They used Nazi symbols.”
Some early imagery resembled symbols later used by Nazis, like the Wolfsangel.
Important detail you’re leaving out: that symbol existed centuries before Nazi Germany and appears in European heraldry.
That’s why historians describe the symbolism as associated with neo-Nazis, not proof that the unit itself was Nazi.

4. “Some had Nazi tattoos.”
Correct. Journalists documented individuals with extremist tattoos.
Again, individuals inside a militia ≠ the ideology of the entire formation.

5. “UN confirmed Azov war crimes.”
That’s not what the reports say.
The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights documented allegations involving multiple armed groups in the Donbas war.
They did not conclude Azov was systematically committing war crimes as a unit.

6. “Ukraine welcomed Nazi war criminals.”
What actually happened is Ukraine incorporated many volunteer battalions into state command in 2014 to bring them under government control during the war.

---

The logical problem in your argument

You keep restating the same premise:

• Some early members were extremists.

Then jumping to:

• Therefore the entire unit is Nazi.

Those are not the same claim, and repeating it louder doesn’t make it more accurate.

---

The basic facts most researchers agree on

• Early Azov included far-right members and controversial symbolism.
• The unit later became part of Ukraine’s National Guard and expanded far beyond that original core.
• Evidence does not support the claim that the unit or Ukraine’s military as a whole is Nazi.

[LinkSoul60]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

"Twump stoopid"

-- the left

'Twump stoopid'

-- fact

[Deluge]

Just now, LinkSoul60 said:

'Twump stoopid'

-- fact

Woke fact, which means it's activist bullshit. 

[LinkSoul60]

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

Woke fact, which means it's activist bullshit. 

But in fairness and seeing your TDS, he probably is smart if you're comparing him to yourself.

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

But in fairness and seeing your TDS, he probably is smart if you're comparing him to yourself.

Trump Derangement Syndrome (also known as TDS) is a common illness exhibited by deranged left-wingers. 

An example of TDS is shown below: 

 

[User]

11 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

But in fairness and seeing your TDS, he probably is smart if you're comparing him to yourself.

I mean, it doesn’t say much for the political left that they lost two elections to someone you think is so stupid. 
 

Maybe… just maybe… he can say some stupid things, do some stupid things, and be someone you adamantly disagree with on policy, but still be a reasonably intelligent person and not a complete dolt like you think. 

[LinkSoul60]

42 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Trump Derangement Syndrome (also known as TDS) is a common illness exhibited by deranged left-wingers. 

An example of TDS is shown below: 

 

Your Trump Dick Sucker syndrome (also known as TDS) is always on full display.  I'll pass on the YouTube vid....

[LinkSoul60]

42 minutes ago, User said:

I mean, it doesn’t say much for the political left that they lost two elections to someone you think is so stupid. 
 

Maybe… just maybe… he can say some stupid things, do some stupid things, and be someone you adamantly disagree with on policy, but still be a reasonably intelligent person and not a complete dolt like you think. 

I'd look at it as it says everything about the Maga-wing people that voted for him.  I could 'almost' understand those in the middle who bought his sh*t about taking care of inflation on day 1 which obviously hasn't and won't happen.  People always vote with their pocketbooks.  How has that worked out for you so far?

If you consider him reasonably intelligent I'd suggest your apptitude leaves a lot to be desired.  Reasonably intelligent people in the position act presidential in both words and actions and of which, he's done neither.  

[Deluge]

3 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Your Trump Dick Sucker syndrome (also known as TDS) is always on full display.  I'll pass on the YouTube vid....

That TDS doesn't exist - it's something you, as a TDS sufferer, made up to deflect from true TDS which you are afflicted with. 

Of course you pass on that video because your TDS has forced you into denial. 

Here's another one, and I hope you're taking notes...

 

[LinkSoul60]

Just now, Deluge said:

That TDS doesn't exist - it's something you, as a TDS sufferer, made up to deflect from true TDS which you are afflicted with. 

Of course you pass on that video because your TDS has forced you into denial. 

Here's another one, and I hope you're taking notes...

 

You got something on your chin...