Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, robosmith said:

Because he's always trying to distance HIMSELF from the crimes he knew all about and probably participated in.

TIL that if you report a crime it's proof that you're guilty. 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

According to the story he did in fact report the allegations to the police

Only AFTER Epstein was already arrested. Duh

FOOLS like you completely miss that is an ONGOING strategy of Trump to deflect his OWN accountability.

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Lame.

The left: "Why didn't Trump turn him?"

Also the left: "he is an ahole for turning him in!"

I'm deeply skeptical that he "turned him in" at all. If he turned him in, why would he pretend that he wasn't even aware of the crimes? Why would his say anything nice about Maxwell. 

But the point was that any time something goes wrong, Trump will immediately throw his associates under the bus to save himself. It doesn't mean that he wasn't taking partaking in his buddy's party favors. It might simply mean that it was time to cut ties for self preservation. 

 

Edited by Hodad
  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
27 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I'm deeply skeptical that he "turned him in" at all. If he turned him in, why would he pretend that he wasn't even aware of the crimes? Why would his say anything nice about Maxwell. 

But the point was that any time something goes wrong, Trump will immediately throw his associates under the bus to save himself. It doesn't mean that he wasn't taking partaking in his buddy's party favors. It might simply mean that it was time to cut ties for self preservation. 

 

Just admit you were wrong. These fantasies and what ifs aren't fooling anyone. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
51 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Just admit you were wrong. These fantasies and what ifs aren't fooling anyone. 

What conversation are you paying attention to? Wrong about what? You don't even make sense. 

Trump told the public that he had no idea what Epstein was up to. 
A third party said that Trump both knew for a long time and then finally contacted the authorities once an investigation was open. 

Neither of those is a good thing for Trump. So WTF are you even talking about?

  • Thanks 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Hodad said:

What conversation are you paying attention to? Wrong about what? You don't even make sense. 

Trump told the public that he had no idea what Epstein was up to. 
A third party said that Trump both knew for a long time and then finally contacted the authorities once an investigation was open. 

Neither of those is a good thing for Trump. So WTF are you even talking about?

Ok, whatever. 

Let me ask you this, if Trump had been clairvoyant and predicted what Epstein would do and stopped him before he did it, would that be enough for you? 

You people hold him to ridiculous standards and then when he meets those standards you change the rules. Say whatever you want. No one cares.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok, whatever. 

Let me ask you this, if Trump had been clairvoyant and predicted what Epstein would do and stopped him before he did it, would that be enough for you? 

You people hold him to ridiculous standards and then when he meets those standards you change the rules. Say whatever you want. No one cares.

They would argue the only reason he stopped epstien was so that there'd be MOAR children for him to rape!!!!  The bastard! 

 

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

They would argue the only reason he stopped epstien was so that there'd be MOAR children for him to rape!!!!  The bastard! 

 

Yep. 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok, whatever. 

Let me ask you this, if Trump had been clairvoyant and predicted what Epstein would do and stopped him before he did it, would that be enough for you? 

You people hold him to ridiculous standards and then when he meets those standards you change the rules. Say whatever you want. No one cares.

Reporting a pedophile sex trafficker is a ridiculous standard? My expectations are too high? Jeebus.

I'll tell you the same thing I told Nationalist: that's just table stakes--the barest minimum for being a decent person. Super basic. 

If you found out, as Trump must have, that your "best friend" was trafficking underage girls for sex, how long would you sit on that information? Would you just wait until someone got around to investigating it? 

Even in Reiter's account Trump said that everyone in NY knew, yet neither he nor any other "everyone" engage authorities to put a stop to it? 

You think the Reiter story is a story about Trump being a hero, but if true, it's really a story about Trump letting many, many more girls be abused and raped. 

Meanwhile, Trump said publicly that he didn't know-which no one believes. 

My theory is that he pretends that he didn't know because he doesn't want to explain why he allowed it to go on for years. Got an alternative theory?

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Reporting a pedophile sex trafficker is a ridiculous standard? My expectations are too high? Jeebus.

Increasingly higher and higher. Every time you set a bar and it gets exceeded, you just raise the bar. 

First you said his name is in the files so he is guilty of pedophilia. So you demanded to see the files. 

He issued an executive order to release the files. But that wasn't enough. 

So he signed a law to release the files and they were. That wasn't enough. 

The files disproved this pedophilia slander. So you said he knew so he should have told the police. 

The files proved that he did, so you said he only did it for political gain. But the testimony was ten years before he was charged and seven years before Trump ran.

So now you say he should have said something sooner. 

It is comical. It is comical how blatant your goal post moving is. 

  • Like 4

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Increasingly higher and higher. Every time you set a bar and it gets exceeded, you just raise the bar. 

First you said his name is in the files so he is guilty of pedophilia. So you demanded to see the files. 

He issued an executive order to release the files. But that wasn't enough. 

So he signed a law to release the files and they were. That wasn't enough. 

The files disproved this pedophilia slander. So you said he knew so he should have told the police. 

The files proved that he did, so you said he only did it for political gain. But the testimony was ten years before he was charged and seven years before Trump ran.

So now you say he should have said something sooner. 

It is comical. It is comical how blatant your goal post moving is. 

That's how Hodad and the left debates. He thinks he's winning!!! 

 

 

image.gif

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Increasingly higher and higher. Every time you set a bar and it gets exceeded, you just raise the bar. 

First you said his name is in the files so he is guilty of pedophilia. So you demanded to see the files. 

He issued an executive order to release the files. But that wasn't enough. 

So he signed a law to release the files and they were. That wasn't enough. 

The files disproved this pedophilia slander. So you said he knew so he should have told the police. 

The files proved that he did, so you said he only did it for political gain. But the testimony was ten years before he was charged and seven years before Trump ran.

So now you say he should have said something sooner. 

It is comical. It is comical how blatant your goal post moving is. 

I'll just take this as confirmation that you would keep your pedophile friend's secret until someone asked. 🙄

Because even in the most generous interpretation here, that's quite literally the complicity you're defending. 

Not even table stakes for human decency. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

I'll just take this as confirmation that you would keep your pedophile friend's secret until someone asked. 🙄

Because even in the most generous interpretation here, that's quite literally the complicity you're defending. 

Not even table stakes for human decency. 

 

Of course you will. You're easily that stupid

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted

Woke crusader Ro Khanna, in their quest to stay relevant, falsely accuses four innocent people of child molestation and sex trafficking 

sick stuff

 

Posted
3 hours ago, West said:

Woke crusader Ro Khanna, in their quest to stay relevant, falsely accuses four innocent people of child molestation and sex trafficking 

sick stuff

 

IF Trump's DoJ was SERIOUS about holding perpetrators accountable, Khanna and Massie wouldn't have needed a LAW to force the release of the Epstein Files. AKA you are a FOOL to believe anything from a MAGAt in Bondi's DoJ.

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, robosmith said:

IF Trump's DoJ was SERIOUS about holding perpetrators accountable, Khanna and Massie wouldn't have needed a LAW to force the release of the Epstein Files. AKA you are a FOOL to believe anything from a MAGAt in Bondi's DoJ.

 

Trump wasn't even in office a year. Biden had 4 years. Obama had 8 years. 

Yet woke crusader Ro Khanna decided to falsely claim 4 men who stood in a police lineup with Epstein were guilty of heinous crimes against children. And you are okay with that.. sad.

Posted
26 minutes ago, West said:

Trump wasn't even in office a year. Biden had 4 years. Obama had 8 years. 

The files were SEALED for YEARS.

26 minutes ago, West said:

Yet woke crusader Ro Khanna decided to falsely claim 4 men who stood in a police lineup with Epstein were guilty of heinous crimes against children. And you are okay with that.. sad.

Prove it. And NOT with a tweet. You never have any real EVIDENCE for your ridiculous claims.

Posted
22 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The files were SEALED for YEARS.

Prove it. And NOT with a tweet. You never have any real EVIDENCE for your ridiculous claims.

You just proved you do not accept information that doesnt come from woke crusaders. AKA you are not to be taken serious and aren't discussing in good faith. Sad

Posted
On 2/11/2026 at 9:46 AM, CrakHoBarbie said:

Screenshot_20260204_201741_Facebook.thumb.jpg.924e4106d53f9186a17a05d082800f65.jpg

Nobody would ever deny your expertise when it comes to goat love Crackho :) 

And nobody's ever suggested that trump doesn't like to have sex with women. Especially pretty women

But that's not the same as having sex with underage women or children.

That's where your lies fall apart. As of this date I'm unaware of any credible accusations of him sleeping with anyone underage, the one case where it came forward it turned out to be a hoax perpetrated by a media personality and the girl was forced to be can't and withdraw her charges. Twice. And he's never been accused of actually being involved with pedophilia which is sex with someone who hasn't hit puberty yet

The more you lie the less people pay attention to the truth that they should be with regards to trump and this is something that was mentioned to the left-wing many times. Every false allegation makes people care less about the true allegations cuz they lump them all in together

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
48 minutes ago, West said:

You just proved you do not accept information that doesnt come from woke crusaders. AKA you are not to be taken serious and aren't discussing in good faith. Sad

Your OPINIONS sans EVIDENCE mean NOTHING. A tweet from a MAGAt is NOT EVIDENCE.

 

Posted
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your OPINIONS sans EVIDENCE mean NOTHING. A tweet from a MAGAt is NOT EVIDENCE.

 

So you admit that he's right

  • Thanks 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Your OPINIONS sans EVIDENCE mean NOTHING. A tweet from a MAGAt is NOT EVIDENCE.

 

Well well well looks like your woke crusader Ro Khana is a pervert who appears in the Epstein files. 

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

Well well well looks like your woke crusader Ro Khana is a pervert who appears in the Epstein files. 

 

Did you read the list? LMAO

Marilyn Monroe (among other ludicrous examples) is also in that list, so it's OBVIOUSLY FAKE since she died in 1962. What a FOOL you are.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...