robosmith Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 Trump DOJ Files Bonkers Motion to Keep Epstein Files Sealed Quote The Trump administration is seemingly pulling out all the stops to get out of releasing the remaining Epstein Files. On Friday, Trump’s Department of Justice quietly filed a motion to block Representatives Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie’s request for an independent monitor to oversee the release of Epstein Files in the closed case against Ghislaine Maxwell. In a new motion, the DOJ urged Judge Paul A. Engelmayer to reject the request, stating that the court had no authority to approve it because neither Khanna nor Massie were involved in the criminal case against Maxwell that landed her behind bars. Khanna and Massie filed an amici curiae brief, typically done by individuals who are not parties in a case, with Engelmayer on Jan. 8. Engelmayer previously ordered the unsealing of grand jury materials in the Maxwell case in order to comply with ongoing release of investigative materials related to Epstein. Trump's DoJ is getting desperate to find new ways to avoid complying with the LAW HE SIGNED. Turns out that was just a political move to TRY to quash the momentum. Just like invading Venezuela, his ICE provocations, and his Greenland FANTASIE. Quote
Politics1990 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 both partys need to stop playing annoying games the democrats didn't give a damn when biden was in then once trump got in they wanted the files but not when biden was lol.. and trump only doesnt want them out cause he and his friends are in the files.. both partys are looking awful in this situation. i bet anything if a democratic canidate whos moderate like newsome wins in 2028 the majority of party shuts up and ignores the files again Quote
Venandi Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 (edited) 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump's DoJ is getting desperate to find new ways to avoid complying with the LAW HE SIGNED. The DOJ is clearly behind schedule and the release date has clearly been missed.... but on the other side of it, there are some 500 people (mostly lawyers) working on this and the delay is mostly about the redactions needed to protect victims. I'm guessing you don't believe that though. So..... A couple of simple question then: are you advocating for release without those redactions in place and would you support a court order (for immediate release) knowing that redactions would not be in place? I haven't followed this too closely but as far as I can see, that's really what this comes down to now. Edited January 17 by Venandi Quote
John Stone Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 4 minutes ago, Venandi said: The DOJ is clearly behind schedule and the release date has clearly been missed.... but on the other side of it, there are some 500 people (mostly lawyers) working on this and the delay is mostly about the redactions needed to protect victims. A couple of simple question then... are you advocating for release without those redactions and would you support a court order (for immediate release) knowing that the redactions would not be in place? ........ the objective x 3.000,000 pages The volume is not the delay ........ the delay is the strategy. . Imagine dumping 3,000,000 electronic copies that look like the reference all at once? ah, NO! I would agree that the 'delay' is political fodder for the black and white cats and honestly, they're grateful. Hacks, brother. Quote
West Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 Oddly enough the DEMOCRATS have been in power for 12 of the past 17 years and have refused to unseal the Epstein files. Probably just made shit up like they did with Russia on their way out the door Quote
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 1 hour ago, Politics1990 said: both partys need to stop playing annoying games the democrats didn't give a damn when biden was in then once trump got in they wanted the files but not when biden was lol.. and trump only doesnt want them out cause he and his friends are in the files.. both partys are looking awful in this situation. i bet anything if a democratic canidate whos moderate like newsome wins in 2028 the majority of party shuts up and ignores the files again The tranche of files at SDNY were not known to Biden, or most others, before Bondi demanded them to be delivered to HER. Quote
West Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 1 minute ago, robosmith said: The tranche of files at SDNY were not known to Biden, or most others, before Bondi demanded them to be delivered to HER. ... SDNY.. The most politicized part of Bidens doj. Enough saif Quote
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 1 minute ago, West said: Oddly enough the DEMOCRATS have been in power for 12 of the past 17 years and have refused to unseal the Epstein files. Probably just made shit up like they did with Russia on their way out the door Probably you don't know JACK SHIT about what happened with the files. Just like you know JACK SHIT about all the Trump cronies who were talking to RUSSIANS and that's why they were RECORDED. Just now, West said: ... SDNY.. The most politicized part of Bidens doj. Enough saif Nope, your OPINIONS mean NOTHING without EVIDENCE, Canuck. Quote
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 27 minutes ago, Venandi said: The DOJ is clearly behind schedule and the release date has clearly been missed.... but on the other side of it, there are some 500 people (mostly lawyers) working on this and the delay is mostly about the redactions needed to protect victims. I'm guessing you don't believe that though. So..... A couple of simple question then: are you advocating for release without those redactions in place and would you support a court order (for immediate release) knowing that redactions would not be in place? I haven't followed this too closely but as far as I can see, that's really what this comes down to now. Those files have been subpoenaed for over a year with nothing but STALLING from the Bondi on orders from Trump. MAYBE 2% have been released with ADDITIONAL redactions and FAILURE to explain them in violation of the law. Quote
West Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: Probably you don't know JACK SHIT about what happened with the files. Just like you know JACK SHIT about all the Trump cronies who were talking to RUSSIANS and that's why they were RECORDED. Nope, your OPINIONS mean NOTHING without EVIDENCE, Canuck. Democrats are running another mid term campaign on fake rape allegations. Lost already but trying to run the same playbook. Quote
herbie Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 You'll get to see the files and Trumps taxes 95 years after he's dead, It's a matter of National Security. Quote
User Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 2 hours ago, robosmith said: The tranche of files at SDNY were not known to Biden, or most others, before Bondi demanded them to be delivered to HER. Here we go... this same dishonest argument. There were more files than that and regardless of those specific ones, we all knew there were sill more and you clowns could care less until it became a political talking point to go after Trump for. 1 minute ago, herbie said: You'll get to see the files and Trumps taxes 95 years after he's dead, It's a matter of National Security. Show us your tax statements Quote
robosmith Posted January 17 Author Report Posted January 17 2 hours ago, West said: Democrats are running another mid term campaign on fake rape allegations. Lost already but trying to run the same playbook. Prove it. WHO said there were "fake rape allegations"? And PROVE they were "fake." Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 5 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump DOJ Files Bonkers Motion to Keep Epstein Files Sealed Trump's DoJ is getting desperate to find new ways to avoid complying with the LAW HE SIGNED. Turns out that was just a political move to TRY to quash the momentum. Just like invading Venezuela, his ICE provocations, and his Greenland FANTASIE. Reality, no files are being blocked. What is not happening is an 3rd party "independent" monitor. The Independent monitor would have to have clearance to view the files, some of which are classified. There in lies the part that needs to be seen. Why is Epstein in classified files? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
herbie Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 10 minutes ago, User said: Show us your tax statements So you can see in 95 years he paid less tax than someone on a pension? In both taxes and Epstein cases he's too chickenshit to let anyone see reality. It would be the end of him. But you'd still be his biggest fan, right? Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 17 Report Posted January 17 10 minutes ago, herbie said: So you can see in 95 years he paid less tax than someone on a pension? In both taxes and Epstein cases he's too chickenshit to let anyone see reality. It would be the end of him. But you'd still be his biggest fan, right? Then publish your taxes on here and prove what a chickenshit he is. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 26 minutes ago, herbie said: So you can see in 95 years he paid less tax than someone on a pension? In both taxes and Epstein cases he's too chickenshit to let anyone see reality. It would be the end of him. But you'd still be his biggest fan, right? No, because you seem to think this stuff is public information or should be, so lets see them. 1 Quote
herbie Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 (edited) So you twats think the same privacy you observe should apply to someone running for President? No wonder you reaped what you sowed. Edited January 18 by herbie 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 21 minutes ago, herbie said: So you twats think the dame privacy you observe should apply to someone running for President? No wonder you reaped what you sowed. What would it change? Biden did not release his taxes for most of his career. Only as President did he do that and not until 2023. What did it change? Absolutely nothing. Did you look at Joe's taxes? Obama's? Bush's? No. You did not. I know I didn't. So why Trump? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
User Posted January 18 Report Posted January 18 43 minutes ago, herbie said: So you twats think the dame privacy you observe should apply to someone running for President? No wonder you reaped what you sowed. Yeah. You have no special rights to see his tax records any more than I do to see yours. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.