Deluge Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 5 hours ago, robosmith said: Thanks for demonstrating ONCE AGAIN how thoroughly you've been CONNED by Trump. Killing OBL was authorized by Congress passing the AUMF Act due to him MURDERING over 3000 US citizens. Trump unilaterally committed an ACT OF WAR against Venezuela by abducting their current head of state without authorization from ANY ONE. LIE all you want, but selling drugs to Americans is NOT MURDER and NOT a capital offense. Do you understand now? You and every f*cking democrat are infected with the woke pathogen. That means ZERO help for America. Trump made the right move based on the gross disfunction within your piece of shit party. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 1 hour ago, ironstone said: I had no idea about that reward until I watched Michael Knowles channel today. And Knowles talks about some of the other justifications for Trump's action. At least you're honest about it 👍 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
WestCanMan Posted January 5 Author Report Posted January 5 5 hours ago, robosmith said: Trump unilaterally committed an ACT OF WAR against Venezuela by abducting their current head of state without authorization from ANY ONE. Did you see Ironstone's post on P1, about the bounty that was out for the capture of Maduro? https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-issues-25-million-bounty-on-venezuela-president-on-day-of-his-oath-7445900 the outgoing Biden administration increased its reward for information leading to the arrest or conviction of Maduro on drug trafficking charges to $25 million, from a previous $15 million. Care to comment on the legality of having someone capture him in Venezuela and then ship him to the US to face trafficking charges? Isn't that kidnapping? Was Biden's autopen trying to encourage illegal activity against the leader of a sovereign nation? Are you gonna shut your pie-hole and run away again? 🤣 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted January 5 Report Posted January 5 50 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Did you see Ironstone's post on P1, about the bounty that was out for the capture of Maduro? https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/us-issues-25-million-bounty-on-venezuela-president-on-day-of-his-oath-7445900 the outgoing Biden administration increased its reward for information leading to the arrest or conviction of Maduro on drug trafficking charges to $25 million, from a previous $15 million. Care to comment on the legality of having someone capture him in Venezuela and then ship him to the US to face trafficking charges? Isn't that kidnapping? Was Biden's autopen trying to encourage illegal activity against the leader of a sovereign nation? Are you gonna shut your pie-hole and run away again? 🤣 Upping Trump's bounty doesn't make it legal to try Maduro in the US instead of the ICC. Nor to STEAL Venezuelan oil. 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 6 Report Posted January 6 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: Upping Trump's bounty doesn't make it legal to try Maduro in the US instead of the ICC. Nor to STEAL Venezuelan oil. Maduro was indicted in a New York court in March of 2020(during Biden/Harris) including charges of narcoterrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine into the US. 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nor to STEAL Venezuelan oil. The Chavez government in 2007, nationalized the oil industry, taking control of several major oil fields and refineries that were previously operated by foreign companies, including American firms like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. Nationalizing might be considered just a fancy term for stealing. Do you believe that the Biden administration had no right to offer a reward for the arrest of capture of Nicolas Maduro? Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
WestCanMan Posted January 6 Author Report Posted January 6 55 minutes ago, robosmith said: Upping Trump's bounty doesn't make it legal to try Maduro in the US instead of the ICC. Biden still had a bounty on Maduro to bring him to the US to face charges. He didn't get rid of it "because it was illegal", he upped it. So what's the difference between "paying someone to capture him" and "just capturing him"? Is one legal and one not? 🤣 Quote If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. "I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul "It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot
robosmith Posted January 6 Report Posted January 6 1 hour ago, ironstone said: Maduro was indicted in a New York court in March of 2020(during Biden/Harris) including charges of narcoterrorism and conspiracy to import cocaine into the US. The Chavez government in 2007, nationalized the oil industry, taking control of several major oil fields and refineries that were previously operated by foreign companies, including American firms like ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips. Nationalizing might be considered just a fancy term for stealing. Do you believe that the Biden administration had no right to offer a reward for the arrest of capture of Nicolas Maduro? The oil companies didn't own the oil. They had a license to pump and sell for a share of the profits. They were paid reparations for their lost equipment. As with all such arrangements, they are subject to change and the change they took. They had NO RIGHT to continue under Venezuelan law. Quote
User Posted January 6 Report Posted January 6 29 minutes ago, robosmith said: The oil companies didn't own the oil. They had a license to pump and sell for a share of the profits. They were paid reparations for their lost equipment. As with all such arrangements, they are subject to change and the change they took. They had NO RIGHT to continue under Venezuelan law. You are such a pathological liar. To this day, no, not all of the payments have been made, some were. Venezuelan law was little more than what the current dictator at the time did. America is looking out for the interest of our companies and people, just because it is "lawful" for whatever tinpot dictator to do in their own country doesn't mean it is not also lawful for the countries they rob to come get their payback. Quote
John Stone Posted January 6 Report Posted January 6 .......... rumor is the Venezuela's VP has put a 50 million dollar bounty on Trump's head. Quote
John Stone Posted January 8 Report Posted January 8 (edited) Looks like the strategy was not regime change - depending on Delcy's compliance. haha If the dumb beotch has a modicum of sense she'll deal. Corruption in Venezuela is essential for a stable government. Bolivar must be turning in his urn. Still don't get the strategic gain here tho............... a shit hole country not worth the squeeze. A minor speed bump for China and Russia would be happy to see production cut completely. Cuba is likely fk'd - suppose Mexico is an option for oil - but that has likely been negotiated. Edited January 8 by John Stone Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.