New photos from Epstein’s personal collection show Trump, Clinton and much more

[robosmith]

43 minutes ago, User said:

What crimes?

You throw out these baseless, vague assertions and then run away like the coward you are. 

Why would I NEED to stick around to educate YOU when you're incapable of understanding?

You don't even know about all the indictments for Trump's CRIMES that have been extensively covered by the legitimate news sources. AKA NOT FOS LIES. LMAO

Instead you just make worthless IGNORANT POSTS.

[User]

20 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Why would I NEED to stick around to educate YOU when you're incapable of understanding?

You don't even know about all the indictments for Trump's CRIMES that have been extensively covered by the legitimate news sources. AKA NOT FOS LIES. LMAO

Instead you just make worthless IGNORANT POSTS.

I don’t need an education from you. I know you are full of crap, I’m just pointing it out. 

[WestCanMan]

On 12/12/2025 at 10:16 PM, TreeBeard said:

Exploited underage prostitutes, more than likely.  

Look 5 posts down, chucklehead 🤣

All the Demi cattle have hoofinmouth disease.

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, robosmith said:

Why would I NEED to stick around to educate YOU when you're incapable of understanding?

FYI people don't try to "understand" BC. Tht's why we ignore you.

Quote

You don't even know about all the indictments for Trump's CRIMES that have been extensively covered by the legitimate news sources.

Like who? CNN?

Everyone on the left: "I don't watch CNN. I get their propaganda from someone else." 🤣

[John Stone]

15 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I've been trying to tell them this for a long time now.

Like it or not, the general public will never know the greasy details.

.........no ....... course that doesn't mean there won't be details ........ supposedly even Biden managed a pudgy visiting Epstein's isle. 

My fav tho has to be 9/11 was a Zionist conspiracy. 

Jan 6th never happened.

Germany bombed Pearl. 

Elvis alive on Mars 

Moon landing staged

 

[Nationalist]

16 minutes ago, John Stone said:

.........no ....... course that doesn't mean there won't be details ........ supposedly even Biden managed a pudgy visiting Epstein's isle. 

My fav tho has to be 9/11 was a Zionist conspiracy. 

Jan 6th never happened.

Germany bombed Pearl. 

Elvis alive on Mars 

Moon landing staged

 

Brandon's competency is my favorite. 

 

 

[John Stone]

30 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Brandon's competency is my favorite. 

 

 

Denile was the beginning of the end ............her Party did her in tho. 

[Nationalist]

29 minutes ago, John Stone said:

Denile was the beginning of the end ............her Party did her in tho. 

They all did her in. Her included.

They're so enamored by their righteous indignation that they make normal people sick.

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

They all did her in. Her included.

They're so enamored by their righteous indignation that they make normal people sick.

.............. both Parties have been hijacked by extremists. 

They are both morally corrupt. 

[Nationalist]

2 minutes ago, John Stone said:

.............. both Parties have been hijacked by extremists. 

They are both morally corrupt. 

Oh I agree with that sentiment. 

But when given a choice between socially destructive and just plain stupid...and loud and obnoxious but doing what's needed...

I vote for the latter.

[John Stone]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Oh I agree with that sentiment. 

But when given a choice between socially destructive and just plain stupid...and loud and obnoxious but doing what's needed...

I vote for the latter.

Indeed. 

The Left moved far too fast with their proposed social reforms - added to that the border, covid, wars, Biden obvious debilitation,  Harris, 'I would change nothing',  and as you say, just plain stupid made Trump's campaign a slam dunk.

OMG - what a bunch of maroons. 

Trump's 3rd term is in the works - strategy should be interesting - can't wait.  

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, John Stone said:

Indeed. 

The Left moved far too fast with their proposed social reforms - added to that the border, covid, wars, Biden obvious debilitation,  Harris, 'I would change nothing',  and as you say, just plain stupid made Trump's campaign a slam dunk.

OMG - what a bunch of maroons. 

Trump's 3rd term is in the works - strategy should be interesting - can't wait.  

3rd term?

Oh please dont tell me you believe that clap-trap?

[John Stone]

13 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

3rd term?

Oh please dont tell me you believe that clap-trap?

............. I certainly wouldn't say it's an impossibility. 

 

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, John Stone said:

............. I certainly wouldn't say it's an impossibility. 

 

I would. If he tried, he'd lose.

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI people don't try to "understand" BC. Tht's why we ignore you.

You're NOT ignoring me. LMAO

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Like who? CNN?

Everyone on the left: "I don't watch CNN. I get their propaganda from someone else." 🤣

Like EVERY OTHER SOURCE outside your ECHO CHAMBER.

Diverse MSM sources are NOT PROPAGANDA just because you don't like the truth. Duh

[John Stone]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

I would. If he tried, he'd lose.

This is how it could be done. 

Keep in mind he wouldn't need to be elected, he could be appointed - end run around the Constitution. Putin did something similar - brilliant. For this to work Trump would be on the ticket as a running mate - top of the ticket is elected and retires for health reasons - VP takes over - all legal. Civil dissent to some degree would be expected but it would be a legitimate maneuver and endorsed by SCOTUS. Military / NG would need to aide the civil power. 

The other caveat is a National Emergency delaying the election - SCOTUS would need to play a part. The National emergency play would need the support of the Military or NG to control the domestic dissenters. Again SCOTUS would need to endorse any delay giving the sitting gov legitimacy. 

I concede that for either of these schemes to work, the sitting Presidents popularity plays a part - the National Emergency 'play' not so much tho. 

Edited December 17, 2025 by John Stone

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

3rd term?

Oh please dont tell me you believe that clap-trap?

Trump says it and you believe every thing else the pathological LIAR says. LMAO

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, John Stone said:

.............. both Parties have been hijacked by extremists. 

They are both morally corrupt. 

There is NO COMPARISON between Trump corruption and any other Party in US history.

No one else NEEDED immunity from the SCOTUS to shield him from a half dozen INDICTMENTS.

Except Nixon who got the pardon from Ford.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Oh I agree with that sentiment. 

But when given a choice between socially destructive and just plain stupid...and loud and obnoxious but doing what's needed...

I vote for the latter.

You forgot TOTALLY CORRUPT. Or just don't see it due to your PARTISAN BLINDERS.

[John Stone]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump says it and you believe every thing else the pathological LIAR says. LMAO

Trump is honest in one respect - he telegraphs his strategy as a 'taster'. 

The 'thought' provokes the action.

I don't even condemn him for it - fascinating scenario IMO. 

Keep in mind  SCOTUS has given the Presidency unprecedented amnesty in their actions. Quite literally, a President could commit murder and not be held responsible. 

Why did they do that? 

Is SCOTUS really just a bunch of political hacks ............with their own future vision of the Country? 

Edited December 17, 2025 by John Stone

[robosmith]

40 minutes ago, John Stone said:

Trump is honest in one respect - he telegraphs his strategy as a 'taster'. 

The 'thought' provokes the action.

I don't even condemn him for it - fascinating scenario IMO. 

Keep in mind  SCOTUS has given the Presidency unprecedented amnesty in their actions. Quite literally, a President could commit murder and not be held responsible. 

Why did they do that? 

Is SCOTUS really just a bunch of political hacks ............with their own future vision of the Country? 

Clearly they are. There is no founding principle for giving the POTUS immunity from breaking the law.

Clearly the FF abhorred MONARCHIES and wanted the RULE OF LAW.

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, John Stone said:

This is how it could be done. 

Keep in mind he wouldn't need to be elected, he could be appointed - end run around the Constitution. Putin did something similar - brilliant. For this to work Trump would be on the ticket as a running mate - top of the ticket is elected and retires for health reasons - VP takes over - all legal. Civil dissent to some degree would be expected but it would be a legitimate maneuver and endorsed by SCOTUS. Military / NG would need to aide the civil power. 

The other caveat is a National Emergency delaying the election - SCOTUS would need to play a part. The National emergency play would need the support of the Military or NG to control the domestic dissenters. Again SCOTUS would need to endorse any delay giving the sitting gov legitimacy. 

I concede that for either of these schemes to work, the sitting Presidents popularity plays a part - the National Emergency 'play' not so much tho. 

Naw...the emergency wouldn't fly. There were elections during wars before. 

The VP thing is interesting. It would scare the skin off of all the Tweenkies.

[Nationalist]

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

Trump says it and you believe every thing else the pathological LIAR says. LMAO

That i called it "clap-trap" would make it rather obvious that I dont believe everything I hear from anybody.

You missed that. Typical...

3 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is NO COMPARISON between Trump corruption and any other Party in US history.

No one else NEEDED immunity from the SCOTUS to shield him from a half dozen INDICTMENTS.

Except Nixon who got the pardon from Ford.

You forgot TOTALLY CORRUPT. Or just don't see it due to your PARTISAN BLINDERS.

Son...go play with your zucchini. 

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Naw...the emergency wouldn't fly. There were elections during wars before. 

The VP thing is interesting. It would scare the skin off of all the Tweenkies.

The VP thing has been floated a couple of times. It hinges on the idea that the way the law is worded it says that a person may not run for presidency more than twice, it doesn't say they can't serve as president more than twice.

Kind of interesting. But from a practical point of view I don't think it's very likely. There are a number of problems with it, legal challenges would probably prevent it, and honestly they would be at such a huge disadvantage, they would literally have to have someone like Vance when the presidency after having gone through all of that give it up despite the fact that the voters chose them and passed the whole thing to trump. I just don't see it happening. And anybody that was a yes man is going to have a hell of a time winning unless they're up against somebody completely and utterly unelectable from the democrats

[robosmith]

46 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

That i called it "clap-trap" would make it rather obvious that I dont believe everything I hear from anybody.

You missed that. Typical...

Son...go play with your zucchini. 

^LYING AGAIN. LMAO

You don't even understand the meaning of "everything ELSE."

Edited December 17, 2025 by robosmith

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

The VP thing has been floated a couple of times. It hinges on the idea that the way the law is worded it says that a person may not run for presidency more than twice, it doesn't say they can't serve as president more than twice.

Kind of interesting. But from a practical point of view I don't think it's very likely. There are a number of problems with it, legal challenges would probably prevent it, and honestly they would be at such a huge disadvantage, they would literally have to have someone like Vance when the presidency after having gone through all of that give it up despite the fact that the voters chose them and passed the whole thing to trump. I just don't see it happening. And anybody that was a yes man is going to have a hell of a time winning unless they're up against somebody completely and utterly unelectable from the democrats

Well...they did gift us Kamala...