CARNEY GIVES CABINET MINISTERS THE POWER TO EXEMPT ANYONE OR ANY CORPORATION FROM LAWS FOR 6 YEARS

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The suggestion that it’s for friends and in exchange for private favours is just your made-up conspiracy.  

Nope. Perfectly legit.  And unless you can provide some clause or line that says otherwise the law absolutely allows it. 

Quote

It’s obviously to help juice major projects and investments and it’s all a matter of public record.  Could the law be abused? Sure any law can be abused but who gets what under this law is all a matter of public record. 

The fact that he's already broken the ethics commissioner's requirements is a matter of public record. Trudeau taking bribes from the aga khan is a matter of record. That means nothing to these people, they correctly believe people like you will always forgive them and stand up on their behalf and conitnue to vote for them. 
 

Quote

And if conservatives truly do the believe in private favours why do so many support Trump and his minions who have basically turned the White House into their own private racket machine?

I'm a little shocked i have to explain this....  there is a border between canada and the country you're referencing. They're not the same country. And conservatives aren't some unified massive block entity, we're different people in different places, 

but your question is interesting. The answer is because the dems did and nobody punished them. So now the republicans do. 

Right now the libs are. ANd nobody's punishing them. What kind of canada do you want? You better choose quick, the libs won't be in forever and the CPC more and more is going to want payback. 

Edited December 11, 2025 by CdnFox

[eyeball]

12 hours ago, Goddess said:

You should just face the fact that you are a gullible useful id10t, highly susceptible to propaganda, who completely believes in submission to government, as long as it's the Liberal party. 

This sounds like typical garden variety gas-lit nonsense.

So what do you think of Trump's plan to examine five years worth of people's social media posts to see if they've badmouthed him or America?

Too little too late?

[eyeball]

On 12/8/2025 at 5:10 PM, CdnFox said:

I see you put a vote on this comment, but you couldn't reply. 

I was laughing to hard at it.

[Goddess]

16 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The suggestion that it’s for friends and in exchange for private favours is just your made-up conspiracy.

Oh, please. 🙄

If it was a Conservative prime minister doing this, you'd be lighting your hair on fire with conspiracies.

[eyeball]

On 12/6/2025 at 8:08 PM, CdnFox said:

This is INSANE.  The house puts laws in place, and now any minister can just set that aside at a whim?

Why is this such a shock to you? During the numerous time you've attacked proper robust measures to prevent corruption you've always argued that any new minister can change whatever laws they want on a whim. Even murder you've said.

Why is that little x you propose all we need again?

[CdnFox]

12 hours ago, eyeball said:

I was laughing to hard at it.

I guess that's a pretty good way of saying you knew it was right and couldn't argue it  

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

Why is this such a shock to you?

Fact that the public including even liberal supporters isn't up in arms over this kind of corruption still surprises me. But then again I don't really understand rapists either.

Quote

During the numerous time you've attacked proper robust measures to prevent corruption you've always argued that any new minister can change whatever laws they want on a whim. Even murder you've said.

I've never attacked proper robust mechanisms or measures to prevent corruption. You constantly propose measures which will perpetuate corruption and I'm not supportive of them. And no I didn't argue that any new minister can change whatever. I argued that a new prime minister and his government could. And they can and if they go to do that that's one thing because they do it through the  parliament in full scrutiny of the public.

But this is something very different than that

Quote

Why is that little x you propose all we need again?

He could get up in arms right now with a minority government and send a clear message to the liberals that this kind of behavior will be punished. We could do that right this second as a group, the public could stand up and say this is outrageous and won't be tolerated. And Kearney who is well aware that an election is probably not far off would have to seriously reconsider this.

It would be a very effective tool. The problem of course is that liberals like yourself support corruption if it's liberal.

Which is why you don't want anybody to even vote in an election. You insisted in elections are useless and we should give them up. And that's simply not true. We could use our power as voters right this second to correct this problem if people like you weren't supportive of corruption

[eyeball]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Fact that the public including even liberal supporters isn't up in arms over this kind of corruption still surprises me. 

Yes but you still cry yourself to sleep every night thinking about when your mom told you Santa actually wasn't real. This must be a painful time of year for you.

5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

I argued that a new prime minister and his government could. And they can and if they go to do that that's one thing because they do it through the  parliament in full scrutiny of the public.

Now you're saying Trudeau threw out Harper's Accountability Act with another Act in Parliament in full sight of the public no less?

That's a new twist. Let me guess, because it was so effective at preventing corruption? LMAO!

What was the name of the legislation that nullified Harper's Accountability Act that Trudeau pushed through Parliament again? 

12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It would be a very effective tool. The problem of course is that liberals like yourself support corruption if it's liberal.

LMAO! Yup, you say that to everyone around here.  Good grief you're such a loser it's cringeworthy.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Yes but you still cry yourself to sleep every night thinking about when your mom told you Santa actually wasn't real. This must be a painful time of year for you.

LOL I can always tell when you're beginning to have a bit of a mental breakdown you have these weird little fantasies about me.   Like you come up with the strangest little Daydreams about me having bad days or things like that. I suspect it's the trauma of your youth being projected on to others that you hope are having a bad day  

It's not a sign of good mental health bud  

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Now you're saying Trudeau threw out Harper's Accountability Act with another Act in Parliament in full sight of the public no less

You're lying about what I said because you can't cope with what I actually said?

How very left wing of you  

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

That's a new twist. Let me guess, because it was so effective at preventing corruption? LMAO!

Trudeau himself was caught in harper's laws. Snc-lavin was a direct result of harper's changes to the law. Justin tossed a lot of other things but I guess he missed that one

So yeah, pretty effective.

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

LMAO! Yup, you say that to everyone around here.

Sure, everyone! Why just yesterday I said it to nationalist and the day before the west can man! I'm always on about it to deluge, I never stop bugging shady,..... ohhhh wait!!!

LOL  i say it to scumbag liberals like yourself.    and that's it

[eyeball]

12 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Trudeau himself was caught in harper's laws. Snc-lavin was a direct result of harper's changes to the law. Justin tossed a lot of other things but I guess he missed that one

So yeah, pretty effective.

LMAO!

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, eyeball said:

LMAO!

I accept your surrender  

[eyeball]

19 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I accept your surrender  

Sorry, I was lying.