More Vax-Fascism: College of Physicians and Surgeons

[Goddess]

I mean you can't even admit that in the above data set, ALL the hospitalizations and deaths, whatever their number, would have been in the vaxxed category, therefore - the vaxxed were dying and being hospitalized at greater rates than the unvaxxed.

So I very much doubt that all the studies I posted in the Trickle thread would have swayed you from your belief that verges on religious fervor.

By the way - there was only one true placebo vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study ever done on the childhood vaccine schedule and the doctor who conducted the study, was a top doc from the Henry Ford Health Center.  He used the exact criteria that the CDC published a white paper on outlining the criteria and methods that would need to be included for such a study. When the study concluded, he refused to publish the results.

Can you guess why?

You seem unable to reason on, or accept anything that contradicts your already-formed beliefs.  I saw the same thing when I was in the cult.

Edited November 28, 2025 by Goddess

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, User said:

No, there were a multitude of reasons to get vaccinated: The core reasons being to stop people from being seriously harmed or dying. 

There were reasons for people who believed in the jabs to get vaccinated. 

When I caught the vax-pimps lying to me, I stopped believing in them. 

Finding out that they didn't work and that they injured/killed people wasn't a surprise for me. 

Quote

Hospitalizations went up with a large COVID wave. Show me what proportion of those hospitalizations were vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Show me what proportation of hospitalizations led to severe ICU treatments and death. 

Why? They tripled, dude. It's not like they went up fractionally. That's a FAIL. 

If there were a lot of unvaxed deaths then I'd say that maybe the majority of the hospitalizations were unvaxed as well, but that's not the case.

There's no reason on God's green earth to assume that more than 15% of hospitalizations were among the unvaxed, aside from "you love propaganda". 

Quote

THOSE are the numbers that matter. If you can't show those numbers, you are just full of shit. 

The number of deaths matters more, dummy. The number of multi-vaxed deaths is the second most important number, and it was "almost 90%". 

And FYI you can't move the goalposts that far dude. LMAO. You're out in left field now. 

The vaxed set the record for the number of deaths in a year by any group, but "if no one can prove that the majority of hospitalizations in 2022 were among the vaxed" then you're gonna call the vax a success 😂

"The Blue Jays lost G7 but I call them the world champs because their uniforms were nicer". 

Quote

The problem with your analogy here is that in this instance, people like you refused to use Security while others did. So while robberies went up, they were among those who didn't have security. 

Now you are here, dishonestly trying to claim security doesn't work. 

So dumb lol. 

Quote

Again, show me what proportion of the dead bodies were vaccinated vs unvaccinated. 

I did. It was 85.7% multi-vaxed over the last 6-week period that Health Canada released those stats. For all we know it went up to 90% after that, and then 95%, and then 99%. 

All we know is that the people who forced us to vax stopped showing us the stats that mattered the most. 

v

[User]

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

Have you looked at the Czech data?  It's quite damning.

You guys can't even make a coherent argument on the Canadian data... 

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

Yes, those are the numbers that matter.  There's a myriad of studies with data sets that show the vaccinated get covid way more than the unvaccinated.  I discussed the Cleveland Study with a cohort of 50,000 extensively in the Trickle thread.

Give me your best study, also, this has nothing to do with the numbers that matter. I pointed out that what matters here was the vaccinated vs unvaccinated who were hospitalized, then also the proportions of those in ICU and death. 

So... your response is, to bring up who gets COVID more?

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

Why do you think no one in any of the alphabet entities wants to do a vax vs. unvaxxed study? 

I don't think this at all, this is another one of your baseless assertions. 

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

And you guys reject all independent studies of data sets, which do show increased hospitalizations and deaths for vaxxed people. 

No... but if they are some fringe "study" that is not really much of a study at all, I will of course point that out. 

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

The studies also show that the jabs damage immune systems, so vaxxed people are also dying at higher rates of pretty much everything. 

More BS. 

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

Infections that were no big deal before covid, now people are dying from them becuase the jabs have damaged their immune systems and what goes on the death certificate?  Not death from immune damage from covid jabs, that's for sure.  But that is exactly what is happening.

More BS. 

7 hours ago, Goddess said:

You are the one claiming the jabs are safe and effective.  The onus is on YOU to prove they are. 

Nope, wrong again, follow this discussion. I was responding to WestCanMan
 

[User]

7 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What you're desperately clutching for is "anything that tickles your confirmation bias" but sorry, 1) it's not my job to find that for you and 2) you won't find that in real-world results.

That's only found in secret lab tests, which are subject to be downgraded weekly, as the goalposts are shifted along with them.  

No, I am just pointing out the problems with your assertions. It is not about what I want... it is YOUR claim. To the point, you can't support it. 

 

[User]

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Why? They tripled, dude. It's not like they went up fractionally. That's a FAIL. 

So... you can't show me those things. Once again, you can't support your claims.

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The number of deaths matters more, dummy. The number of multi-vaxed deaths is the second most important number, and it was "almost 90%". 

What was 90%? 

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

The vaxed set the record for the number of deaths in a year by any group, but "if no one can prove that the majority of hospitalizations in 2022 were among the vaxed" then you're gonna call the vax a success 😂

No, I am calling your assertion BS. Which it is. 

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So dumb lol. 

Yes, your analogy was dumb. 

4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I did. It was 85.7% multi-vaxed over the last 6-week period that Health Canada released those stats. For all we know it went up to 90% after that, and then 95%, and then 99%. 

All we know is that the people who forced us to vax stopped showing us the stats that mattered the most. 

No, you never showed me that, and why are you only focused on 6 weeks? 

Again, why do you believe these stats but call them liars and ignore the stats you don't like?

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, User said:

No, I am just pointing out the problems with your assertions. It is not about what I want... it is YOUR claim. To the point, you can't support it. 

There's no problem with my "assertions". None at all. 

the vax was forced on people in order to make two things better, and not only did they not get better, they got much worse. 

You can't point to anything that got better after the vax campaign. Not one thing. I pointed out that everything got much worse. And then the failure was completely ignored by our lying media. 

[User]

36 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There's no problem with my "assertions". None at all. 

Well, I mean, other than the complete lack of evidence, sure. 

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

the vax was forced on people in order to make two things better, and not only did they not get better, they got much worse. 

Well, this is your strawman argument and you still can't prove it either way. 

37 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You can't point to anything that got better after the vax campaign. Not one thing. I pointed out that everything got much worse. And then the failure was completely ignored by our lying media. 

Well, first, I don't need to point to anything other than the complete lack of evidence you have for your assertions. 

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, User said:

Well, I mean, other than the complete lack of evidence, sure. 

Health Canada's own data is not evidence?

They're the ones who posted a graph showing that hospitalizations tripled in 2022. 

I didn't "make an assertion", dummy, I just showed you their data and helped you interpret it.

If you think that I was wrong then tell me what you see when you look at that graph. I'd honestly love to hear it, because I could use a good laugh.

It's also Health Canada's own stats that show that almost 90% of covid deaths in 2022 happened among the multi-vaxed. 

I didn't "make an assertion" about that either, dummy, I just showed your their data and explained what it means.

Fact: hospitalizations tripled in 2022. That's from Health Canada's own stats, which I posted a link to.

Here's a link to statista, where I hot the Health Canada data from:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1257040/number-covid-deaths-canada-by-vaccination-status/

It still ends at Sept 25, 2022. Right at the point when 85.7% of covid deaths were among the unvaxed. Health Canada stopped sharing that data over 3 years ago now. 

Here's a take on the hospitalization rates: 

• When 100% of the population was unvaxed, hospitalizations were far lower
• When 50% of the population was unvaxed, hospitalizations were far lower
• But you think the fact that 85% of the population was vaxed in 2022 somehow made 15% of the population spend 3x as much time in the hospital as THE ENTIRE F'ING COUNTRY did in 2020? Doesn't that seem a little ret4rded to you? And by a little, I mean "You make herbie look like a freaking genius". 

Here's some math that's maybe random lol. Maybe you try to guess why I'm doing this, and what it means...

3 divided by 0.15 = 20.

What do you think that means, dummy?

It means that if something happens 3x as often, but it's only happening among 15% as many people, then it's happening to those people 20x as often as it happens to the larger group. 

Do you think that the 15% of the population in 2022 was spending 20x as much time in the hospital as those exact same people did in 2020? How is that possible?

How did that small part of the population spend such an outrageous amount of time in the hospital and then end up with only 1/7th of the deaths? 😂

FYI, no matter how you twist the stats into whatever you want them to be, you lose, dummy. There's no combination of "% of hospitalizations that occurred among the unvaxed" plus "but somehow 86% of the covid deaths were among the vaxed" that makes the vaccine look successful.

I will let you pick your own number to represent the percentage of the hospitalizations that were among the unvaxed. Do you want it to be 10%? Look what that means:

• 10% of the hospitalizations were among the unvaxed, but 14% of the covid deaths were among the unvaxed
• That still means that the vaxed accounted for 90% of the hospitalizations and 86% of the deaths, IN THE YEAR WHEN WE SET A HUGE RECORD FOR COVID DEATHS!

That's a MASSIVE fail for the vax.

Ok, wait, what if 90% of the hospitalizations were among the unvaxed...:

• 90% of the hospitalizations were among the unvaxed, but only 14% of the covid deaths were among the unvaxed
• That means that the vaxed somehow managed to have 6x as many deaths from 90% fewer infections, which means that they had an outrageously high Case Fatality Rate (60x higher), and the only thing that your precious Big Pharma stats pretended to show was that"the jabs lower the CFR". 

That's also a massive fail for the vax... It means that THE ONLY THING THAT YOU PRECIOUS BIG PHARMA STAT SAID THAT THE VAX WOULD DO (lower negative outcomes) completely failed to happen, in spectacular fashion. 

It's like if they said "This mystery liquid will extinguish 97% of the candle's flame", and the liquid turned out to have the exact same properties as f'ing gasoline. 

 

So, in short, you can pick whatever hospitalization rate you want between the two groups, but in the end, you're skewering the "jab-success" story either way.

Are you done yet, numpty? Because I can beat your stupid little twit-posts like a rented mule all day. 

Edited November 29, 2025 by WestCanMan

[User]

38 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Health Canada's own data is not evidence?

Not for your assertion, no. 

39 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

They're the ones who posted a graph showing that hospitalizations tripled in 2022. 

Sure, but that was not your big assertion about the data. 

39 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I didn't "make an assertion", dummy, I just showed you their data and helped you interpret it.

Ah, there it is. There is your problem right there! 

40 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If you think that I was wrong then tell me what you see when you look at that graph. I'd honestly love to hear it, because I could use a good laugh.

If? We just spent several pages with me telling you that you were wrong and why. 

41 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's also Health Canada's own stats that show that almost 90% of covid deaths in 2022 happened among the multi-vaxed. 

Prove it. Also, show the proportions because percentages matter. If 80 out 100 people get vaccinated, and 2 people out of the 80 die and 1 out of the 10 die, that means that 10% of the unvaccinated died from COVID while 2.5% of the vaccinated died. That means the vaccine helped cause less death. 

The underlying problem of your whole claim here is that you are looking at total numbers, which doesn't prove anything other than your inability to understand statistics.

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I didn't "make an assertion" about that either, dummy, I just showed your their data and explained what it means.

You made an assertion. LOL

46 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you think that the 15% of the population in 2022 was spending 20x as much time in the hospital as those exact same people did in 2020? How is that possible?

I don't have to think anything other than you are full of shit and can't back up your claim. 

47 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

FYI, no matter how you twist the stats into whatever you want them to be, you lose, dummy. There's no combination of "% of hospitalizations that occurred among the unvaxed" plus "but somehow 86% of the covid deaths were among the vaxed" that makes the vaccine look successful.

Yet again, you only show your ignorance of statistics. 

What was the total number of hospitalizations compared to the total population of unvaccinated? Because... if there were 1,000,000 unvaccinated and 20,000 hospitalizations, that is entirely plausible that many/most of them were the unvaccinated. 

But again, this is the problem with your assertion: you don't have those numbers, and without them, you are full of shit. 

And again, proportions matter. 

 

49 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Are you done yet, numpty? Because I can beat your stupid little twit-posts like a rented mule all day. 

LOL, you are not beating anyone here. 

 

[Goddess]

On 11/28/2025 at 8:43 PM, User said:

So... your response is, to bring up who gets COVID more?

Studies show jabbed people get more covid than unjabbed people, due to their immune systems being destroyed by the jabs.  (See all the studies on IGg4 switch, P53, antibody lowering, etc in the Trickle thread.  It's happening, my dude.  It's well-documented.)

So if jabbed people get covid say......6-10 times (like many of the jabbed people I know) and unjabbed people (like me) get covid ZERO times or maybe once and now have natural immunity (which is better than vax immunity), which group has a better chance of experiencing hospitalization and death?

 

[Goddess]

On 11/29/2025 at 3:43 PM, User said:

That means the vaccine helped cause less death.

Did it?

We went from "The jabs do not cause myocarditis in children" to a black box warning on the label now and the only countries jabbing kids are Canada and the US.

How many dead and disabled kids are acceptable for a product that doesn't stop transmission and doesn't prevent death?

We went from "If it just saves one life" to burning children to keep octogenarian adults warm.....while failing at its intended goal.

[User]

27 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Studies show jabbed people get more covid than unjabbed people, due to their immune systems being destroyed by the jabs.  (See all the studies on IGg4 switch, P53, antibody lowering, etc in the Trickle thread.  It's happening, my dude.  It's well-documented.)

So if jabbed people get covid say......6-10 times (like many of the jabbed people I know) and unjabbed people (like me) get covid ZERO times or maybe once and now have natural immunity (which is better than vax immunity), which group has a better chance of experiencing hospitalization and death?

 

Show me your best study. 

[Goddess]

The FDA recently put out a memo saying the covid shots killed at least 10 kids.  We all know that's under-reporting.

The report deserves more than just a knee-jerk dismissal by "experts" and narrative poseurs.

The report is not an "anti-vaccine playbook" tactic, as critics suggest.  It's a courageous step forward towards transparency and accountability in a public health system that has, for too long, prioritized narrative over evidence.

The memo's reliance on VAERS is a feature.  VAERS is designed as an early warning system.  While it's true that reports are unverified, the FDA's internal analysis concluded that " no fewer than 10 deaths were related to vaccination, likely due to myocarditis, a risk signal identified as early as 2021.  Dismissing this ignores the fact that VAERS has historically flagged serious issues, like the Johnson & Johnson covid vax clotting issue, which later prompted action, and the Astra Zeneca vax, which was completely pulled from the market.

Remember - 2 out of the 4 covid vaccines that were forced on people were pulled for safety issues, and then Big Pharma immediately went into "lock down the data" mode to keep the other 2 on the market.

 

[User]

28 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Did it?

You cherry picked a comment that was part of a statistical hypothetical explaining the concept for how just saying more in the context West was using was not accurate, we need to use proportions.

in my example, yes, it does in fact mean that vaccines showed better results for helping people in that comparison.

[Goddess]

15 minutes ago, User said:

Show me your best study. 

In the Trickle thread.

All the studies are there. 

Don't be lazy.  I've already done all the research for you.  All you have to do is look at it.

We've been down this road before - you and I.

I put a LOT of effort and time and research into that thread.  I'm not re-capping it again for you here just because you're too lazy.

You refused to look at it last time, I suspect you will refuse again.

Because in reality - you're not interested in it.  You're interested in supporting the narrative that's been spoon-fed to you.

The fact that you keep demanding a "best study" tells me you don't understand science.  Science is not about "one best  study".  It's cumulative knowledge.  It's looking at all the studies and thinking critically.

The studies were showing myocarditis in children from 2021.

You all denied those studies because it didn't fit your narrative.

You were all wrong.

Just that fact alone should humble you.  But it won't.  You're still here pushing a narrative and refusing to follow evidence.

[User]

11 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Don't be lazy.  I've already done all the research for you.  All you have to do is look at it.

Nothing to do with being lazy, it’s your claim.

Not my job to go figure out where you supported it, if you ever actually did. 

Based on your comments, I’m guessing it was some crap “study” or didn’t say what you say it does… 

14 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The fact that you keep demanding a "best study" tells me you don't understand science.  Science is not about "one best  study".  It's cumulative knowledge.  It's looking at all the studies and thinking critically.

I was making it easy for you, just asking for the best example you have, presuming it is garbage or you can’t produce it.

If you want to give me more, let’s see them.

 

[Goddess]

I watched a presentation by Dr. Nic Hulscher, an epidemiologist with a BS in Pre-Health Professional studies and a Masters in Public Health degree with a specialization in epidemiology, give a presentation to some public health authority ....Chelan-Douglas Health District Board of Health in Washington.

Some notes from the presentation:

• A total of 450 peer-reviewed studies show that covid vaccines are net harmful to the human body.
• Vaccine components are now being detected in individuals over 3 years since last injection.
• Thousands of genes critical for immune function, mitochondrial function and cancer surveillance become severely disrupted.
• The vax spike has been found directly in affected tissues, including the heart, the brain and the adrenal glands at autopsy.
• The vax spike was being expressed in the cerebral arteries of hemorrhagic stroke patients for up to 17 months since last injection.
• Post-mortem analyses of 325 peer-reviewed autopsy reports indicate a high likelihood of causal links between covid jabs and deaths from multiple organ systems.
• The highest estimate of post-injection deaths is up to 17 million.
• 8 studies have documented negative efficacy once the antibodies wear off.  When the efficacy wears off (which is about 6-8 months post-injection) you face increased infection risks.
• There is now documented direct evidence of genetic material from the vax integrating in the human genome.
• The jabs increase the risk of any cancer by 23%, breast cancer by 54%, bladder cancer by 62% and colorectal cancer by 35%

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, User said:

Nothing to do with being lazy, it’s your claim.

Not my job to go figure out where you supported it, if you ever actually did.

 

Yes.  Which I supported in the Trickle thread.

You don't even have to "figure out where you supported it" - I just told you where. 🤣

Everybody who's been on this board for the last few years knows where it is.

You're clearly not interested or you would go right there.  You do this all the time.
 

"Where's the studies?"

"Right here in *this* thread."

"Meh.....  I'm too lazy.  Post it again for me now."

When you are ready to look at what has been posted, let me know.

Otherwise, have a great day. ☺️

P.S. 

I do realize it's a bit harder without a Search function here.

[User]

6 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Yes.  Which I supported in the Trickle thread.

And I have repeatedly responded to you in that thread as well…

This is your claim, you want to drag it up here, then you support it here. 

[WestCanMan]

18 hours ago, User said:

Not for your assertion, no. 

Sure, but that was not your big assertion about the data. 

Ah, there it is. There is your problem right there! 

If? We just spent several pages with me telling you that you were wrong and why. 

Prove it. Also, show the proportions because percentages matter. If 80 out 100 people get vaccinated, and 2 people out of the 80 die and 1 out of the 10 die, that means that 10% of the unvaccinated died from COVID while 2.5% of the vaccinated died. That means the vaccine helped cause less death. 

The underlying problem of your whole claim here is that you are looking at total numbers, which doesn't prove anything other than your inability to understand statistics.

You made an assertion. LOL

I don't have to think anything other than you are full of shit and can't back up your claim. 

Yet again, you only show your ignorance of statistics. 

What was the total number of hospitalizations compared to the total population of unvaccinated? Because... if there were 1,000,000 unvaccinated and 20,000 hospitalizations, that is entirely plausible that many/most of them were the unvaccinated. 

But again, this is the problem with your assertion: you don't have those numbers, and without them, you are full of shit. 

And again, proportions matter. 

 

LOL, you are not beating anyone here. 

Just grow up and look at the facts, User. Indisputable facts, which you have never challenged. And FYI saying "Pfizer's lab tests say they actually worked!!!!" isn't challenging anything. Death stats and hospitalization stats are where the rubber meets the road, buddy, and the jabs are roadkill. 

We FORCED Canadians who didn't even need protection from covid to take the jabs, based on all the lofty promises of vaccine safety and efficacy. That's a fact. In the end, we now know that the jabs:

1. stop the spread of covid
2. slow the spread of covid
3. prevent people from getting sick
4. prevent people from going to the hospital
5. prevent people from going to ICU
6. prevent people from dying
7. don't kill people
8. don't permanently damage the hearts of young people

^^Those^^ are all the vax-promises that we heard, on which we based our decision to force-vax our youth. 

Here's what we actually got from our forced-vax campaign in Canada:

1. We set a huge record for covid deaths in 2022
2. almost 90% of the covid deaths in Canada in 2022 were from the m-vaxed whether you want to admit it or not
3. we set a massive record for hospitalization time and ICU time in 2022
4. the jabs killed people
5. the jabs injured people so badly that they suffered for years before they opted for death
6. the jabs permanently injured the hearts of young people who didn't need the jabs but were forced to take them

^^Those^^ are all the vax-outcomes.

100%, certified, guaranteed facts. 

Like it or not, User, there are 8 facts up top and 6 facts in the second part which are all 100% proven by HEALTH CANADA'S OWN STATS. Those stats form the absolute basis for determining vax success or failure, and in every instance, the jabs score zero percent. 0.00000%. It's not just a failure, it's abject failure. Total failure. A complete and total lack of success. Get it?

I posted the Health Canada stats here, I put links to their stats in this thread, and you have no posts or links that counter any of it. Not a single one. You actually have NOTHING but ad hominem attacks and appeal to authority arguments.

And guess what, the people at the peak of the "authorities" that you're citing in your lonely "secret lab tests" narrative were caught LYING TO US about vax safety and efficacy, and you know that. R Woleknski (head of CDC) and A Fauci (head of NiH) are both on video saying in no uncertain terms that "if you get the jab you don't have to worry about getting sick and you don't need to worry about giving covid to granny". NEWSFLASH: Pfizer and Moderna both said that they never made those claims - Fauci and Wolenski either made that up, or Pfixer and Moderna lied to them and then left them holding the bag, but please tell me that you're at least intelligent enough to understand that the jabs didn't stop the spread or prevent sickness... 

[Goddess]

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

"Pfizer's lab tests say they actually worked!!!!"

He likely doesn't even know that there were deaths and permanent disabilities in the trials.  Or that almost half the participants dropped out after the first jab, so they weren't counted as part of the trials.

Or that 1,223 people died within 24 hours of injection in the immediate rollout of the jabs.  BTW, "within 24 hours" in VAERS means it could have been 10 mins after injection or 10 hours.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Goddess said:

The FDA recently put out a memo saying the covid shots killed at least 10 kids.  We all know that's under-reporting.

It's not just the fact that they're under-reporting this that matters, it's that they intentionally withheld the truth while they knew that it was costing children's lives. 

These guys were checking off the "death by covid" boxes like they were popping Pez - even the slightest bit of evidence that someone may have had covid within 2 weeks of their death was enough to certify a death as "by covid" - but dying within hours of the jab was always disregarded as "coincidental, pending further review", which basically meant "after the second coming of Christ".

Remember the protection of the Prep Act, which stated that "malicious intent" was the minimum standard that had to be proven in order for a lawsuit to be successful? 

Well, imo, a class action lawsuit stating that "the intentional withholding of information about the health risks posed to children by the vaccines and the exaggeration of the necessity of vaxing children against covid, amount to the intentional killing of children."

That's malice. Intentionally killing someone is malice.

If they wanna argue that they killed the children for profit instead of maliciously, that's gonna leave a mark. 

But, at the time they finally started vaxxing children (Nov 2021 in Canada), the stats were already out there showing that 1) kids didn't need a vax, and 2) the vaccines were not slowing the spread. 

Malice. Done. Big Pharma faces an out of court settlement or they go out there and litigate the inexplicable truths under oath, with court-documented evidence and expert testimony, in front of the world. 

[WestCanMan]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

He likely doesn't even know that...

Well, CBC sure as hell didn't tell him, because they wouldn't touch that story with a ten-foot pole.

Rosemary Barton could get the jab, die 2 minutes later, be revived and live for only 5 minutes while hooked up to life-support, and in that 5 minutes she would take the time to lie about the safety and efficacy of the jabs, or she'd ignore the topic of covid and vaccines altogether and talk about how the poor leadership of the conservative opposition was and how much it was harming the country. 

[User]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Here's what we actually got from our forced-vax campaign in Canada:

1. We set a huge record for covid deaths in 2022

No crap, there was a big spike at that time... now tell us how many of those deaths were unvaccinated vs vaccinated and the proportions. 

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

almost 90% of the covid deaths in Canada in 2022 were from the m-vaxed whether you want to admit it or not

This is a lie. You have zero evidence for this. 

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

we set a massive record for hospitalization time and ICU time in 2022

No crap, there was a big spike at that time... now tell us how many of those were unvaccinated vs vaccinated and the proportions. As well as severe cases in the ICU. 

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

the jabs killed people

Yes, so did cars. A lot more from cars. Vastly more from cars. People drowned in swimming pools too. What is your point?

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

the jabs injured people so badly that they suffered for years before they opted for death

How many? What is your source?

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

the jabs permanently injured the hearts of young people who didn't need the jabs but were forced to take them

How many? How badly? What is your source?

[User]

9 hours ago, Goddess said:

Or that 1,223 people died within 24 hours of injection in the immediate rollout of the jabs.  BTW, "within 24 hours" in VAERS means it could have been 10 mins after injection or 10 hours.

OK... and? You either do not understand VAERS reporting or are purposely being dishonest about it here.