Pills don’t heal, they harm.

[Gaétan]

| Province             | 💊 Médicaments ($/hab.) | 🧬 Cancer | 🩺 Maladies chroniques |
|----------------------|-------------------------|-----------|------------------------|
| **Québec**           | **1 100**              | 🔴 Plus élevé | 🔴 >45 %             |
| Ontario              | 950                     | ⚪ Moyenne  | ⚪ ~40 %              |
| Colombie-Britannique | 870                     | 🟢 Inférieur | 🟢 ~38 %             |
| Alberta              | 850                     | ⚪ Moyenne  | ⚪ ~37 %              |
| Manitoba             | 820                     | 🟢 Faible   | 🟢 ~35 %             |
| Nouveau-Brunswick    | 790                     | 🟢 Faible   | 🟢 ~34 %             |

 

Quebec: the epicenter of the medication vicious circle

• It consumes the most drugs.

• It records the highest cancer cases.

• It shows the highest rate of chronic diseases.

👉 This is no coincidence. It’s a system that perpetuates illness through overmedication, side effects, and therapeutic dependency.

Quebec, champion of drugs… and of disease? In Quebec, we consume more medication than any other province. Over $1,100 per capita in prescriptions, with universal public coverage. But at what cost?

Quebec is also the province where cancer deaths are highest. Where chronic diseases are exploding. And where polypharmacy has become the norm among seniors.

This is not random. It’s a vicious circle: ➡️ Chronic diseases → massive prescriptions ➡️ Medications → side effects → new diseases ➡️ New diseases → even more medication

Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies rake in billions.

Health is not found at the bottom of a pill bottle. It begins with prevention, transparency, and the courage to break the cycle.

[WestCanMan]

But let me guess: you hate RFK Jr...

You're so twisted you make DNA look like a laser beam. 

[Legato]

8 hours ago, Gaétan said:

|Health is not found at the bottom of a pill bottle. It begins with prevention, transparency, and the courage to break the cycle.

Where do you get your Viagra from.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

But let me guess: you hate RFK Jr...

You're so twisted you make DNA look like a laser beam. 

Yeah, my days of not taking him seriously are  certainly coming to a middle

[herbie]

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Where do you get your Viagra from.

Didn't you hear all that talk of watermelon curing ED a few years ago? I think that's why you can buy watermelon in February in every supermarket in Northern Canada now!

But some people would rather chew birch bark than Aspirin and running Perrier through a filter means it's not 'natural' anymore.

[Gaétan]

These figures show that doctors should be accused of murder.

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Gaétan said:

These figures show that doctors should be accused of murder.

These figures show that you should seek competent mental health treatment

[Gaétan]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

These figures show that you should seek competent mental health treatment

Doctors have been indoctrinated and alienated by a medical sect to poison the population in order to enrich pharmaceutical companies. Doctors are, in fact, people who have been driven mad and who believe they are doing good. The figures I published online prove that the more medication you give, the more patients you have, by the simple logic that these drugs cause side effects which in turn create other diseases, for which more drugs are prescribed, and so on until the patient dies.

Justice must be done for patients who trusted their doctors, took inappropriate medications, and ultimately died, such as from cancer. There are alternative methods to heal people, but their corrupt system trains them only to enrich the pharmaceutical industry. If you have training as a phytotherapist, naturopath, practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine, or nutritionist—methods that can actually cure the sick—and you recommend plants or healthy nutrition to your client, the medical college can prosecute you for illegal practice of medicine and have you condemned by a judge to a heavy fine.

Perhaps some people don’t believe me, but the medical training program is a horrible, corrupt system whose goal is to deteriorate the health of the population. What I say is proven by science. You can tell this to a doctor, but he will not want to hear it, because he must first be deprogrammed by a psychologist or other experts.

[WestCanMan]

20 hours ago, herbie said:

Didn't you hear all that talk of watermelon curing ED a few years ago?

No. It's probably just something you stumbled on while you were looking for a cure for your husband, herbie. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Gaétan said:

Doctors have been indoctrinated and alienated by a medical sect to poison the population in order to enrich pharmaceutical companies. Doctors are, in fact, people who have been driven mad and who believe they are doing good.

Buddy, I don't know if you're new to this game or what, but you gotta stop going from zero to sixty in 2 seconds every time you learn about a new crusade.

A- it's an established fact that big pharma exerts an immense amount of pressure on Drs, from the top down

B- you seem oblivious to how that works

Brief overview:

1. Big Pharma lobbies the gov't as hard as anyone. They have immense wealth, measured in the trillions, and they spread it around to grease the wheels whenever they want, and it's at a level that is sickening. Senators and congressmen are treated like royalty by big pharma, and it shows
2. Big Pharma has their toadies all over the FDA, NiH, on all the medical licensing boards, etc. Every new law that comes in and every new treatment of a disease that is approved favours big pharma, protects big pharma, renders big pharma and Drs safe from prosecution if they use big pharma meds to treat diseases, etc. Treatments that don't result in big pharma profits are basically forbidden, and drs who give their patients that type of advice expose themselves to lawsuits, with no backing from their licensing boards
3. as an example of #2, the Prep Act (Trump) made it almost impossible to sue covid pseudovax manufactures and Drs who told their patients to take the pseudovax. I forget the exact wording, but affected parties had to prove that the defendents were intentionally (maliciously might have been the word) trying to cause harm, not even negligently. So, if stats showed that people were suffering grievous injuries from the jabs, Drs could just keep prescribing it anyways, and then just say "I didn't know that was the case" if they got sued, and that was enough. Ignorance alone rendered them immune from prosecution. On the other hand, Drs who thought that the vax wasn't necessarily safe, and told their clients to take Vit D, Zinc, Ivermectin, etc, were excoriated by the MSM, threatened with having their medical licenses revoked, couldn't get articles published in medical jornals if their treatments were showing success, and they were basically told that if their treatment fails to work on anyone, they were wide open to prosecution. There was no intent of malice required for them to be successfully sued, they were deemed to be giving bad advice by their own licensing boards, so suing them would come with the backing of their own medical licensing boards. They would basically be betrayed. 

All that in mind, #1, 2 and 3 there are no big deal compared to #4. This will blow you away:

• If your realtor, Lawyer or some other fiduciary who is in a professional relationship with you, accepts any form of gift from a person who is "the opposite party" in a real estate transaction, lawsuit, etc, and they get caught, they are no longer allowed to work in their profession. It is just over. So if you're buying a house from someone, or suing them, and then you find out that your realtor/lawyer accepted a gift from the homeowner/defendant, they lose their license. Done. Because why should they be accepting a gift from the other person? It makes it seem like they were working for the other party, correct? Well, a Dr can prescribe medication for you, which is patented by a drug manufacturer (so that is the only company that you can get it from), and then receive "perks" from the company that makes that medication for selling it to you, and they don't have to tell you. Did you really need medication at all? Was there a better form of treatment available for you, but the Dr didn't recommend it because he doesn't receive any benefits from prescribing it? Is the medication basically useless? Are there some side-effects of that medication that basically outweigh the benefits? It doesn't matter. None of it matters. Once the Big-Pharma-controlled FDA approves or even recommends that form of treatment, lawsuits are 100% impossible. Oh, and there's more. People who sit on the board of the FDA ( and senators and congressmen alike) can invest in medications that are up for FDA approval, and it's not considered "insider trading", or any type of confict of interest. 

So yeah, you're on the right track, but you're at the very steep end of the learning curve. You think it's a sewer, but it's more like the Mariana Trench filed with p---, shit and greed.      

Edited November 20, 2025 by WestCanMan