Slavery- a new old economic model?

[Gaétan]

Just now, gatomontes99 said:

Well, it is programmed with a thought process and it is trained with data that is presented to it. AI is still a computer. Garbage in, garbage out. 

What ever crap it was trained with is what it is going to out out. It cannot recognize flawed data. It does not differentiate from honesty and lies. Just because you found some AI that repeats the lies you want to believe, does not mean the lies are true. 

That's what the government agency told you to spread — disinformation. AI isn't programmed, it uses information recognized as true, as known by science. You're a paid liar, and I doubt you're even being paid right now with the shutdown — you're just having fun lying for the sake of it

[gatomontes99]

3 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

That's what the government agency told you to spread — disinformation. AI isn't programmed,

I don't know who told you that, but it simply is not true. AI requires mountains of code just to create the speech patterns and logic behavior. Once all the aspects of the AI platform are coded (aka programmed) the AI platform is fed data in a process that is called training. While you think AI is some eutopian data oasis, the reality is that AI is only as accurate as the coding and data. Having  lind faith in it is dangerous. 

[gatomontes99]

7 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

You're a paid liar, and I doubt you're even being paid right now with the shutdown — you're just having fun lying for the sake of it

Dude, there is a chance I make more every month than you do in a year. Almost 95% chance I make more in 3 months than you do in a year and 99% chance I paid more in taxes than you make in a year. Yes, I am getting paid. No, I don't work for the government. 

[Gaétan]

14 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I don't know who told you that, but it simply is not true. AI requires mountains of code just to create the speech patterns and logic behavior. Once all the aspects of the AI platform are coded (aka programmed) the AI platform is fed data in a process that is called training. While you think AI is some eutopian data oasis, the reality is that AI is only as accurate as the coding and data. Having  lind faith in it is dangerous. 

A letter in computing is represented by binary code — 0 and 1 — but that’s not the foundation of AI’s knowledge. AI doesn’t derive its insights from binary itself, but from science. You're just spreading disinformation on this forum — you're a former soldier hired by a U.S. government-linked agency.

Edited November 9, 2025 by Gaétan

[gatomontes99]

17 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

A letter in computing is represented by binary code — 0 and 1 — but that’s not the foundation of AI’s knowledge. AI doesn’t derive its insights from binary itself,

Yes, AI still uses binary coding. 

18 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

but from science. 

You say "science" like it is some unimpeachable source. Science is a constantly evolving continuum of understanding. As new data is gathered, the understanding changes. You use the word as if it is static and perfect. It is anything but static and perfect. Further, you use the word as if the mere presence of the word ends debate. But the true application of the scientific method requires disbelief in what is known in order to expand on what is true. Your use of the word, here, indicates you have zero interest in discovering new data that would expand your knowledge and change your punderstanding. Therefore, your use of the word science is both hypocritical and wrong. 

AI is not science. It is opinions wrapped in the costume of a reliable, unbiased source. 

[Gaétan]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Yes, AI still uses binary coding. 

You say "science" like it is some unimpeachable source. Science is a constantly evolving continuum of understanding. As new data is gathered, the understanding changes. You use the word as if it is static and perfect. It is anything but static and perfect. Further, you use the word as if the mere presence of the word ends debate. But the true application of the scientific method requires disbelief in what is known in order to expand on what is true. Your use of the word, here, indicates you have zero interest in discovering new data that would expand your knowledge and change your punderstanding. Therefore, your use of the word science is both hypocritical and wrong. 

AI is not science. It is opinions wrapped in the costume of a reliable, unbiased source. 

It's not necessary to read what you say because you're paid to spread disinformation

[User]

24 minutes ago, Gaétan said:

It's not necessary to read what you say because you're paid to spread disinformation

Coconuts!

[gatomontes99]

7 hours ago, User said:

Coconuts!

 Cuckoo for coconuts! 

7 hours ago, Gaétan said:

It's not necessary to read what you say because you're paid to spread disinformation

Typical low IQ response. 

[robosmith]

10 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

 Cuckoo for coconuts! 

Typical low IQ response. 

But you're not even denying it's true. Just like Blondi never denied that Trump was photographed with half naked girls at Epstein's house. 

[gatomontes99]

22 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

No, I don't work for the government. 

So I said that and dumbaśś still said this:

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

But you're not even denying it's true. Just like Blondi never denied that Trump was photographed with half naked girls at Epstein's house. 

Smh

[robosmith]

25 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

So I said that and dumbaśś still said this:

Smh

That's what happens when you're ON IGNORE. Stop LYING and I'll read your posts more.

[gatomontes99]

2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

That's what happens when you're ON IGNORE. Stop LYING and I'll read your posts more.

So you lied. Did you not just accuse me of lying? 

[User]

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

But you're not even denying it's true. Just like Blondi never denied that Trump was photographed with half naked girls at Epstein's house. 

There is no evidence to suggest that such pictures exist. 

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

That's what happens when you're ON IGNORE. Stop LYING and I'll read your posts more.

You put people on ignore because you are a coward. 

[Gaétan]

19 hours ago, User said:

There is no evidence to suggest that such pictures exist. 

You put people on ignore because you are a coward. 

We know the U.S. government spends millions to pay people like you to spread disinformation and sugarcoat the truth

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that his company was pressured by the U.S. government to censor certain pandemic-related content. Furthermore, Facebook employs former CIA and FBI agents to oversee moderation, raising serious questions about the true independence of online information

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, Gaétan said:

We know the U.S. government spends millions to pay people like you to spread disinformation and sugarcoat the truth

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg admitted that his company was pressured by the U.S. government to censor certain pandemic-related content. Furthermore, Facebook employs former CIA and FBI agents to oversee moderation, raising serious questions about the true independence of online information

You are a lunatic. User and I are not sitting right next ro each other in a government bunker in Nebraska, spreading disinformation while fine tuning our nukes and eating expired MREs. Are we @User ***Hey, @User wake up over there and tell this guy you are not sitting next to me in a missile silo, eating MREs and spreading disinformation for crying out loud.****

[User]

46 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

You are a lunatic. User and I are not sitting right next ro each other in a government bunker in Nebraska, spreading disinformation while fine tuning our nukes and eating expired MREs. Are we @User ***Hey, @User wake up over there and tell this guy you are not sitting next to me in a missile silo, eating MREs and spreading disinformation for crying out loud.****

But seriously, we're going out for drinks after our shift here on this forum is over?

 

1 hour ago, Gaétan said:

We know the U.S. government spends millions to pay people like you to spread disinformation and sugarcoat the truth

Millions? LOL, the budget is way bigger than that. Coconuts!

[CdnFox]

54 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

 User and I are not sitting right next ro each other in a government bunker in Nebraska, spreading disinformation while fine tuning our nukes and eating expired MREs. Are we @User ***Hey, @User wake up over there and tell this guy you are not sitting next to me in a missile silo, eating MREs and spreading disinformation for crying out loud.****

awww....  well there's my mental image of you two shattered. 

[gatomontes99]

17 minutes ago, User said:

But seriously, we're going out for drinks after our shift here on this forum is over?

If they ever let us open the hatch. Yeah. 

[robosmith]

On 11/9/2025 at 8:22 PM, User said:

There is no evidence to suggest that such pictures exist. 

YOU ARE LYING. Michael Wolf outright STATED the PICTURES were shown to him by Epstein, as Senator Whitehouse STATED in the CONGRESSIONAL HEARING.

Sorry you didn't understand that. LMAO

On 11/9/2025 at 8:22 PM, User said:

You put people on ignore because you are a coward. 

No I put you on IGNORE because your posts are so STUPID, and WORTHLESS as I told you in the PM.

[User]

37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

On 11/9/2025 at 8:22 PM, User said:

 

No I put you on IGNORE because your posts are so STUPID, and WORTHLESS as I told you in the PM.

The coward emerges from hiding long enough to confirm he is a still a coward. 

[Radiorum]

On 11/4/2025 at 8:40 PM, Deluge said:

The OP is an excellent idea. The more I think about it, the more I want something like it put in place. 

 

Are you willing to be a slave?

[Deluge]

1 minute ago, Radiorum said:

Are you willing to be a slave?

F*ck no, and you're a wet diaper for even asking that question. 

This is for all the aliens that break into the country illegally. It should also be for a$$hole facilitators like you. 

So, the REAL question is, are YOU willing to be a slave? 

[Radiorum]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

This is for all the aliens that break into the country illegally.

 

So, you think you are a better person - more human - than them?

[Deluge]

4 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

So, you think you are a better person - more human - than them?

Yes, because I am a law abiding citizen.

YOU, on the other hand, are a traitor, which is why you stand with the illegal aliens. 

[Radiorum]

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Yes, because I am a law abiding citizen.

So it is your hypothesis that anyone who breaks the law forfeits their humanity?

 

3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

are a traitor

Where did you learn that word? From Trump? Learn to think for yourself.

 

4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

which is why you stand with the illegal aliens. 

I do not support illegal entry into the country. But I recognize a human when I see one.