Study Confirms 'Abrupt Changes' in Antarctica – And The World Will Feel Them

[Aristides]

14 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Snuck premise much?

Really, why? Because you don’t want to consider it?

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Fixed it for ya robostooge.

YOU ARE LYING as USUAL trashcan

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Buddy, our country is spinning down into the toilet right now and you want to make elections all about an imaginary decrease in sea ice in the poles. 😂

Your DEI bullshit is funny, as is your woke drivel, but that bit of retardation is just a joke compared to the damage done by your lies about covid and global warming. 

^Complete BULLSHIT with NO EVIDENCE for your OPINIONS. Duh

[Legato]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

https://www.mediamatters.org/climate-deniers/spreading-climate-misinformation-fast-becoming-shortcut-popularity-across-right

For starters , he isn't a climate scientist, he is a geologist. Unfortunately the right is making a scientific issue part of their culture war agains things like DEI and wokeism which have nothing to do with science. But that is what the new right does.

Woosh>>>>>>>>

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

I never said it already happened, I did say, we won’t know until after it happens.

You want to make it about wokeism and DEI and pretend they are the same thing. They are nothing in comparison.

You won't know about an islamic terrorist attack on your street until after it happens either, and it's gonna happen on someone's street, because that's what they do. 

Wokeism and DEI are two turds from the same sick cow. 

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

A one or two year increase in one place isn’t a trend but it’s a soother ring you can suck on  for awhile.

And the trend isn't what you think it is, or why, so there's that. 

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Really, why? Because you don’t want to consider it?

Snuck premise: you're asking a question about your bogus fact, hoping that I will give an answer that acknowledges your bogus fact as an accepted truth. 

So stow it. 

[Aristides]

59 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Snuck premise: you're asking a question about your bogus fact, hoping that I will give an answer that acknowledges your bogus fact as an accepted truth. 

So stow it. 

Why would I expect anything more from someone like you. Silly me. I never said anything was a fact other than 70% of the world’s population is in the northern hemisphere which is warming 50% faster (those are facts) and asked whether they might be related. I don’t know but at least I will consider the question. What did I get? Your usual bullshit that doesn’t address the question. How could I have expected anything different.

Edited August 28, 2025 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

37 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Why would I expect anything more from someone like you. Silly me. I never said anything was a fact other than 70% of the world’s population is in the northern hemisphere which is warming 50% faster (those are facts) and asked whether they might be related. What did I get? Your usual bullshit that doesn’t address the question. How could I have expected anything different.

Do you understand that every source that you have quoted for the past ten years has just been a bunch of liars?

Fauci already knew that he had funded GoF research on the covid virus before you ever heard of him. His string of lies to you started on day 1, and you know that now. 

Now you know that, back while you were calling us all conspiracy theorists, you were just Fauci's stooge.

And you went along with mostly peaceful protests, Russian collusion, Justin the Great, Carney the Magnificent, the covid jabs for kids and young adults, Biden's mental clarity, Jussie's street-lynching, the hijab hoax, etc, etc, etc.

What makes you think that your sources are right this one time? What are the chances? 

[Aristides]

Back to Covid again. Some things never change. Never ceases to amaze me how easily distracted Magats are. Global warming, troops in the streets, checks and balances to executive power being compromised, etc, etc, just wave DEI, and Wokeism and a bunch of stuff that really matters very little in the grand scheme of things in front of them and they will ignore it all. It’s like waving a shiny object in front of a dog while you steal its dinner.

Edited August 28, 2025 by Aristides

[robosmith]

[Deluge]

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

And I'm sure you cultists will be parroting the same shit 100 years from now, just like I'm sure you did 100 years earlier. lol

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Deluge said:

And I'm sure you cultists will be parroting the same shit 100 years from now, just like I'm sure you did 100 years earlier. lol

I'm sure you're just posting DRIVEL as USUAL. You MAGA CULT have nothing but BULLSHIT.

[Deluge]

37 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'm sure you're just posting DRIVEL as USUAL. You MAGA CULT have nothing but BULLSHIT.

There's no such thing as Man-made climate change. You cultists give yourselves way too much credit.

[robosmith]

19 minutes ago, Deluge said:

There's no such thing as Man-made climate change. You cultists give yourselves way too much credit.

You don't even understand the SOURCE nor the EVIDENCE of man-made climate change. AKA AGW.

Check out the peer reviewed journal article JUST POSTED.

[Deluge]

9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You don't even understand the SOURCE nor the EVIDENCE of man-made climate change. AKA AGW.

Check out the peer reviewed journal article JUST POSTED.

The "SOURCE" and the "EVIDENCE" don't translate.

Nobody believes you ldiots.  

[robosmith]

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The "SOURCE" and the "EVIDENCE" don't translate.

Source means the physical causation. Evidence is the DATA which proves the source. 

See I knew you don't UNDERSTAND anything, but continually post your BULLSHIT anyway. LMAO

23 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Nobody believes you ldiots.  

IF you could understand the climate scientists and the EVIDENCE you would KNOW there is NO NEED for BELIEF. Duh

[Aristides]

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

1. Source means the physical causation.

2. Evidence is the DATA which proves the source. 

3. See I knew you don't UNDERSTAND anything, but continually post your BULLSHIT anyway. LMAO

4. IF you could understand the climate scientists and the EVIDENCE you would KNOW there is NO NEED for BELIEF. Duh

1. You have no source, dumbass, because you can't PROVE the source. 

2. You have no evidence. You have SPECULATION and that's it. 

3. You don't know shit, poindexter. All you know is the bullshit global marxists feed into your indoctrinated brain. 

4. There is no man-made climate change. There's just man-made climate scare. It's why nobody believes you ldiots. 

Edited August 31, 2025 by Deluge