Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/video/authorities-look-into-potential-election-fraud-in-hamtramck/

Yeah Democrats caught literally stuffing the ballot box. One of which only won by 1%.

Why didn't you quote the very short article?

Because it doesn't say there was election fraud. Duh

Quote

Authorities look into potential election fraud in Hamtramck

Two Hamtramck City Council members have been arraigned on charges related to alleged fraud in the 2023 election. And now authorities are investigating potential fraud in the Aug. 5 primary election.

SOP for you to LIE about charges as if they're convictions. 🤮

Posted
5 hours ago, robosmith said:

Why didn't you quote the very short article?

Because it doesn't say there was election fraud. Duh

SOP for you to LIE about charges as if they're convictions. 🤮

Setting yourself up to be wrong again I see.

Good...good...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Why didn't you quote the very short article?

Because it doesn't say there was election fraud. Duh

SOP for you to LIE about charges as if they're convictions. 🤮

Do you not see how desperate it looks to hang your hat on conditional language used to avoid lawsuits as proof that the poster lied? 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Setting yourself up to be wrong again I see.

Good...good...

No matter what happens in the future, it won't change the FACT that the article doesn't say there was election fraud, dropout IGNORAMUS.

Posted
13 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No matter what happens in the future, it won't change the FACT that the article doesn't say there was election fraud, dropout IGNORAMUS.

As always...your point is weak.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

As USUAL you got BUPKIS. Nothing's going to change my being right about the lame evidence cited. Duh

Bupkis? The guy is literally in a car, stuffing ballots, on tape. Thats's not bupkis. What is he going to use? The Shaggy defense?

 

They saw me in the car.

Wasn't me

They saw me stuffing ballots

Wasn't me. 

They got me on video

Wasn't me. 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
On 8/17/2025 at 5:03 PM, Fluffypants said:

https://www.cbsnews.com/detroit/video/authorities-look-into-potential-election-fraud-in-hamtramck/

Yeah Democrats caught literally stuffing the ballot box. One of which only won by 1%.

The thing is almost every reasonable person out there including those on the side of the left have always agreed that there is some election fraud. There has been in every election. Their argument was that it wasn't a sufficient amount to make a difference.

What I have mentioned here dozens of times is how would you know? If there was no picture of this guy stuffing ballots how would you know?

The voting systems in the states are so screwed up and so different in different locations and so random that nobody could possibly have any faith in the idea that there's no fraud. The fact that they didn't catch anyone means nothing. It becomes immediately obvious that it would be very easy to conduct such fraud and go undetected

It's just no way to run a democracy. There should be one set of rules for everybody and they should be reasonable but focused on not just the reality of denying fraud but also the appearance of it so that people can have faith in their systems

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
On 8/17/2025 at 10:06 PM, robosmith said:

Why didn't you quote the very short article?

Because it doesn't say there was election fraud. Duh

It says there was alleged fraud, but we all know that a court conviction is right around the corner. 

Keep your eyes on that one, will ya, roborig? I want to see how it turns out. ;) 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Deluge said:

It says there was alleged fraud, but we all know that a court conviction is right around the corner. 

Keep your eyes on that one, will ya, roborig? I want to see how it turns out. ;) 

You can have someone dead to rights but Robo will claim "alleged" makes it not true unless there is an R next to their name, it could be the biggest political hack making the accusation with 0 proof or anything and its totally true in his mind.

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

You can have someone dead yo rights but Robo will claim "alleged" makes it not true unless there is an R next to their name, it could be the biggest political hack making the accusation with 0 proof or anything and its totally true.

democrats claim exemption on everything. 

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Deluge said:

democrats claim exemption on everything. 

Yep. Democrats do that.  Whatever it is, it never applies to democrats.  It's called pulling the D-card. That's why you look at so many of their claims and think " Man, that's  d-carded. 

Edited by CdnFox
  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yep. Democrats do that.  Whatever it is, it never applies to democrats.  It's called pulling the D-card. That's why you look at so many of their claims and think " Man, that's  d-carded. 

Alot of democrat women have the D-card but pretend its not one.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Dems "It was the most secure election ever!" 

Us "But you kicked us out and ballots magically appeared."

Dems "It was the most secure election ever!"

Us "But then Chinese sent thousands of fake licenses to Chinese nationals with the expressed intent that they would vote for Biden."

Dems "It was the most secure election ever!"

Us "But mail in ballots are rampant with fraud and error and you mandated the election be mostly mail-in in violation of state and federal election laws."

Dems "It was the most secure election ever!"

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,021
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...