Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Anything's possible but you have to remember that not everybody hears the voices talking out of things around them the way you do

This is pretty funny considering your issue is always reading something different than what people are actually saying.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
2 minutes ago, eyeball said:

This is pretty funny considering your issue is always reading something different than what people are actually saying.

That's not my issue at all. But it certainly something you claim whenever you feel stupid about the clear meaning of what you've said.

"I SUPPORT TERRORISTS!!!"

 I don't think you should support terrorists. 

"HOW IN THE WORLD DID YOU GET THAT I SUPPORT TERRORISTS FROM WHAT I SAID!?!?!? DERP!!!!"

If you are so chronically misunderstood as you claim maybe the problem is is that you don't think before you speak. Try that and see if it helps

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

"I SUPPORT TERRORISTS!!!"

Yes you've made that quite clear when you laud the creation of Israel.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, eyeball said:

This is pretty funny considering your issue is always reading something different than what people are actually saying.

But what you're actually saying doesn't square with what you're actually saying. You say you support rule of law, but yet you fight for illegal aliens. Nothing you ldiots say is what you actually want. And if it is, it's not the truth. 

Edited by Deluge
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yes you've made that quite clear when you laud the creation of Israel.

I have never actually "lauded' the creation of Israel than the slightest. I've never actually commented on it one way or another.

The closest I've ever come is to say that for better or worse it happened and now we have to deal with the situation that we find ourselves in today and not worry about a situation that happened 100 years ago that we can't change

You're the one who literally said that Hamas had a human right to attack and Slaughter the Israeli civilians.

And when I call you on that kind of thing and say you're supporting terrorism you insist that just because you support the terrorist attack on Israel doesn't mean you support terrorist attacks. But it's literally the definition

One example of many. You always say something and then when someone points out how terrible or stupid it is you turn around and pretend that you never said the thing that you very clearly said

  • Like 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Yes you've made that quite clear when you laud the creation of Israel.

Ah yes... this is where you play some dishonest game that it is OK for you to support terrorism today because you lie about how Israel was formed. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Deluge said:

You say you support rule of law, but yet you fight for illegal aliens.

I fight for Earthlings rights.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
59 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You're the one who literally said that Hamas had a human right to attack and Slaughter the Israeli civilians.

No I didn't, in fact I've said many times they should be charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity like anyone else who commits atrocities against civilians.

Don't forget you can't read English. Have you sought testing or treatment for that? You should.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

Ah yes... this is where you play some dishonest game that it is OK for you to support terrorism today because you lie about how Israel was formed.

What lie?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
9 minutes ago, eyeball said:

No I didn't,

You absolutely did. And repeated it when I challenged you on it. You said they were merely exercising their basic human right to resist. Your literal words.

Every now and then you'd like to throw in something that makes it look like you don't approve but then you immediately go right back to approving.

Like I said when you get called on your bullshit you like to pretend you never ever said anything like that in the past, but the reality is you did. That was only meant to be one example. there are many, you do it all the time. 

If you learn to say what you mean to begin with and not change your story every 5 minutes you won't have these problems

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You fight in comic books.

Colin Powell is laughing his ass off.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
Just now, eyeball said:

Colin Powell is laughing his ass off.

On the other hand, Stan Lee would like to talk to you outside

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You said they were merely exercising their basic human right to resist.

Every Earthling has the right to resist their oppression, dispossession and subjugation.

You disagree?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

On the other hand, Stan Lee would like to talk to you outside

Stan Lee is dead too, probably laughing alongside Powell. Heck even this guy gets it.

image.jpeg.3f9bcbe93d828319510a67ef175a48bb.jpeg

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Every Earthling has the right to resist their oppression, dispossession and subjugation.

You disagree?

Of course I disagree. The problem is people can define those things however they like.

You literally said it justifies the slaughter of innocent civilians in Israel when we talked about this last time. In your mind slaughtering innocent civilians was resistance. And in your mind choosing violence instead of choosing to build a home for themselves well somehow oppressive.

Because the terms have no meaning in any practical sense And there's no limit place on the so-called resistance the phrase is absolutely useless and only somebody attempting to justify their acceptance of terrorism Behavior would even suggest it. 

Let me be even more clear. The Palestinians had absolutely no right to attack Israel on October 7th and kill those people and burn the bodies of children and mutilate women and rape them.

As you have made it clear you feel differently. Just don't complain later when I point out you feel differently

1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Stan Lee is dead too, probably laughing alongside Powell. Heck even this guy gets it.

image.jpeg.3f9bcbe93d828319510a67ef175a48bb.jpeg

I'm fairly certain you talk to dead people in your head all the time so it shouldn't concern you overmuch :) 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
12 minutes ago, User said:

Did you say something?

Yes, what did you miss?

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You literally said it justifies the slaughter of innocent civilians in Israel when we talked about this last time.

Cite.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 minute ago, eyeball said:

Yes, what did you miss?

Cite.

It'll have to wait till the search engine is back online.

And at the end of the day everybody heard you saying it. It's way too late to deny. And even here again you're propping it up as a legitimate thing and a reason to justify the attacks.

No, people don't automatically have a right to "Resist" whatever they imagine to be "repression". They may choose to do that but no, it's not a right. If it was allowed to be a right it would be so misused it wouldn't be funny

They do have a right to self-defense. Which does justify Israel's response. Whether that's still the case or not some people would question but the reality is is that Hamas is not surrendered and it's still a threat and still shooting rockets. So it still seems pretty valid

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
3 minutes ago, User said:

Then why are you asking me what the lie was?

Because it was logical to.

I repeat, what lie?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And at the end of the day everybody heard you saying it. It's way too late to deny. And even here again you're propping it up as a legitimate thing and a reason to justify the attacks.

No, most reasonable people realize that Hamas and Palestine are not the same thing. It's just you, your cronies, Netanyahu and Trump who need to conflate the two to make their points.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
4 minutes ago, User said:

Again, are you unaware of what you said? 

I'm not aware of what you heard. I guess you'll have to wait for your microwave to come back online so you can let me know.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...