Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgv4y99n7rt

Interesting. Looks like Boelter reached his limit and blew.

Who's next? Has this war of ideology finally crossed into open violence? The Libbies have gotten fairly violent. 

Should Karen Bass be arrested?

How about Newsome?

America now sits at the precipice of internal chaos. Should Republicans engage in the same sort of "peaceful protest" as the Libbies? How would such a clash pan out?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
35 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgv4y99n7rt

Interesting. Looks like Boelter reached his limit and blew.

Who's next? Has this war of ideology finally crossed into open violence? The Libbies have gotten fairly violent. 

Should Karen Bass be arrested?

How about Newsome?

America now sits at the precipice of internal chaos. Should Republicans engage in the same sort of "peaceful protest" as the Libbies? How would such a clash pan out?

Boelter couldn't tolerate dissent within the democrat cult, so he'll have to be locked away for life. 

We just need to continue arresting the bad actors: rioters thrown into the slammers, illegal aliens thrown out of the country. 

Stay the course, Mr. President. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Trump supporter murders Democrat lawmakers and their spouses but it's the "libbies" fault. Such is the f*cked up world of MAGAT's

The murder is Boelter's fault, numbnuts. He pulled the trigger, not the "libbies". 

What we know so far is that he is a registered Republican but he ran around with with democrats, and apparently he was pissed off about Hortman's vote against some illegal immigration package that favors illegal aliens. In other words, the guy is a f*cking lunatic. 

https://nypost.com/2025/06/14/us-news/accused-minnesota-assassin-vance-boelter-is-tied-to-middle-east-and-africa-runs-security-company/

Posted
5 minutes ago, Deluge said:

The murder is Boelter's fault, numbnuts. He pulled the trigger, not the "libbies". 

What we know so far is that he is a registered Republican but he ran around with with democrats, and apparently he was pissed off about Hortman's vote against some illegal immigration package that favors illegal aliens. In other words, the guy is a f*cking lunatic. 

https://nypost.com/2025/06/14/us-news/accused-minnesota-assassin-vance-boelter-is-tied-to-middle-east-and-africa-runs-security-company/

Quote

Who's next? Has this war of ideology finally crossed into open violence? The Libbies have gotten fairly violent. 

Quote

America now sits at the precipice of internal chaos. Should Republicans engage in the same sort of "peaceful protest" as the Libbies? How would such a clash pan out?

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Aristides said:

 

The libbies have gotten violent, and I disagree with that second quote. I'd much rather throw illegal immigration rioters in jail for sedition as well as treason, and any other applicable crime; throw the entire book at them. 

Posted
13 minutes ago, Deluge said:

What we know so far is that he is a registered Republican

I don't think we know that... 

We have someone claiming to be his roommate who said he voted for Trump. That is it. 

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, User said:

I don't think we know that... 

We have someone claiming to be his roommate who said he voted for Trump. That is it. 

Which would make sense given the mindset of democrats. True Republicans aren't abortion loving a$$holes that start riots and tell people to kill themselves. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cvgv4y99n7rt

Interesting. Looks like Boelter reached his limit and blew.

Who's next? Has this war of ideology finally crossed into open violence? The Libbies have gotten fairly violent.

"reached his limit," "finally" ? LMAO

Trump is the leader in the descent to violent CHAOS.

Numerous times he ENCOURAGED violence at his rallies including a (gratuitous) promise to pay legal fees for his goons who carry out his violent demands.

Then of course he TOLD his MAGA GOONS to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to "stop the steal." All LIES.

MAGA GOONS like David DePape FAMOUSLY use violence to carry out Trump's commands.

Then you encourage political violence HERE. Not surprised you can't see what YOU'VE BECOME.

 

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Should Karen Bass be arrested?

How about Newsome?

Just for grins, what are the charges you IMAGINE ? LMAO

State officials have NO OBLIGATION to enforce Federal law. Duh

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

America now sits at the precipice of internal chaos. Should Republicans engage in the same sort of "peaceful protest" as the Libbies? How would such a clash pan out?

They already do, lDIOT. Only the MAGA GOONS have publicly beat up cops.

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Aristides said:

 

You fckin right I blame Libbies. They have pushed the line of civility, lawfare and violence way past the acceptable norm. They taunt and then deny. They lie and hide.

 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

"reached his limit," "finally" ? LMAO

Trump is the leader in the descent to violent CHAOS.

Numerous times he ENCOURAGED violence at his rallies including a (gratuitous) promise to pay legal fees for his goons who carry out his violent demands.

Then of course he TOLD his MAGA GOONS to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to "stop the steal." All LIES.

MAGA GOONS like David DePape FAMOUSLY use violence to carry out Trump's commands.

Then you encourage political violence HERE. Not surprised you can't see what YOU'VE BECOME.

 

Just for grins, what are the charges you IMAGINE ? LMAO

State officials have NO OBLIGATION to enforce Federal law. Duh

They already do, lDIOT. Only the MAGA GOONS have publicly beat up cops.

 

He said go to the Capital PEACEFULLY.

But of course...you can't post without lying.

Looks like you're wrong...again.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump is the leader in the descent to violent CHAOS.

No, Tim Walz is the leader in the descent to violent CHAOS!

LOL, your commentary is so dumb. 

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Numerous times he ENCOURAGED violence at his rallies including a (gratuitous) promise to pay legal fees for his goons who carry out his violent demands.

You are still living in 2015/2016. Get over it man. This was a stupid argument then, just as it is now. 

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Then of course he TOLD his MAGA GOONS to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to "stop the steal." All LIES.

He told them to march there peacefully. 

"Fight" is a figure of speech that everyone uses, including Democrats all the time. 

11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

MAGA GOONS like David DePape FAMOUSLY use violence to carry out Trump's commands.

Trump never commanded anyone to go attack the Pelosi family. 

 

  • Like 1

 

 

Posted (edited)

There are nut jobs on both sides. I don't care which side this guy is on. Killing politicians is wrong and deeply anti American. 

That said, here is how Trump reacts:

He calls it horrific and vows to prosecute.

Here is how the left handles it:

Poll: 28% of Democrats say U.S. better off if Trump were assassinated

Mississippi congressman's staffer says 'don’t miss next time’ after Trump assassination attempt

 

Edited by gatomontes99

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

He said go to the Capital PEACEFULLY.

No he said "fight" MANY MORE TIMES.

Unfortunate that YOU"RE FOOLED by his DOUBLE TALK.

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

But of course...you can't post without lying.

Looks like you're wrong...again.

Nope, you are clearly wrong because Trump's PARDONS PROVED his GOONS did EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED. Duh

Posted
3 hours ago, Deluge said:

The libbies have gotten violent, and I disagree with that second quote. I'd much rather throw illegal immigration rioters in jail for sedition as well as treason, and any other applicable crime; throw the entire book at them. 

Who have they murdered in cold blood? 

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, robosmith said:

No he said "fight" MANY MORE TIMES.

Unfortunate that YOU"RE FOOLED by his DOUBLE TALK.

Nope, you are clearly wrong because Trump's PARDONS PROVED his GOONS did EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED. Duh

Wrong on both accounts.

The word "fight" is used by Dumbocrats too Dweebls.

The pardons do not prove anything more than the reason given by the POTUS himself.

But well done. Ya got a 2-fer.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

"reached his limit," "finally" ? LMAO

Trump is the leader in the descent to violent CHAOS.

Numerous times he ENCOURAGED violence at his rallies including a (gratuitous) promise to pay legal fees for his goons who carry out his violent demands.

Then of course he TOLD his MAGA GOONS to go to the Capitol and "fight like hell" to "stop the steal." All LIES.

MAGA GOONS like David DePape FAMOUSLY use violence to carry out Trump's commands.

Then you encourage political violence HERE. Not surprised you can't see what YOU'VE BECOME.

 

Just for grins, what are the charges you IMAGINE ? LMAO

State officials have NO OBLIGATION to enforce Federal law. Duh

They already do, lDIOT. Only the MAGA GOONS have publicly beat up cops.

 

So...your blatant lies not withstanding...

I'd charge them with refusal to cooperate with a federal agency...for starters.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Who have they murdered in cold blood? 

It's about violence in general, comrade, not just murder. 

Of course, if you want to get into murder, we can discuss all the abortions you cultists commit on a yearly basis. 

But let's dive into the shit show that is your political belief system shall we? We'll start below:

"Leftwing violence has increased 250% since the final days of the Obama administration.[1]

In the immediate aftermath of the election of Donald Trump, CNN broadcast a non-spontaneous set-up piece with "Lilly," who said

We can’t just do rallies, we have to fight back. There will be casualties on both sides. There will be because people have to die to make a change in this world.[2]"

https://www.conservapedia.com/Left-wing_violence_in_the_Trump_era

Now, you and I both know that leftoids like you secretly wish all white conservative males were dead, but that's never going to happen so we'll have to study your attraction to violence the old fashioned way:

"Trump supporters have been the victims of numerous targeted attacks, brutal violence, and hate crimes,[3][4][5][6] including at left-wing college campuses.[7] A tech company corporate CEO threatened to murder Donald Trump.[8] The brutal and disturbing anti-Trump hate crimes (or hate crimes closely related to Trump's election) continued to occur up to the 2018 Midterm elections,[9] and by March 2019, 334 reported hate crimes had been committed against Trump supporters.[10] Democrat leaders, Obama and the Clinton machine refused to condemn the hate and violence. Ads for paid protesters appeared on Craigslist. Many of these protests were likely organized and coordinated, as many protestors were bused in by Coach buses. Despite the large number of left-wing and anti-Trump acts of violence, leftists faked alleged "hate crimes" by Trump supporters in order to villanize them[11] – but a 2019 study by Nathan P. Kalmoe of Louisiana State University and Lilliana Mason of the University of Maryland found that Democrats are more likely to support political violence than Republicans.[12] The left-wing hatred for President Trump and his supporters posed a threat to civil liberties.[13]

Liberal media bias and fake news, which demonized conservatives and Republicans, are often said to have fanned the flames of the increase in left-wing violence against conservatives.[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Mainstream media outlets even promoted the notion that violent left-wingers use their violence against conservatives to bring about "peace."[21][22] Many Democrats failed to condemn the violence,[23] and top Democrat leaders encouraged the violence and hate.[24] Much of the violence was directed against Trump supporters.[25] The Pew Research Center found in 2017 that 47% thought that their friendships would be in danger if that friend voted for Trump, while only 13% of Republicans thought the same thing about a friend who supported Clinton,[26][27] something confirmed by Harvard Law Professor Adrian Vermeule.[28]

According to a June 2017 Rasmussen Reports survey, 76% of Americans feared political violence.[29]

Unsurprisingly, the left-wing violence and support of violence continued after 2017, with leftists making death threats to numerous Republican members of Congress,[30] and with Occupy Wall Street activists calling for murdering ICE agents.[31] Several acts of violence were directed at pro-life individuals.[32] Many entertainers made jokes about harming President Trump.[33] Despite all this, the Left falsely claimed that "right-wing violence" was rising.[34][35] In the first two years of the Trump presidency, Breitbart News tabulated 639 violent incidents against Trump supporters – nearly one per day. Some of that violence was directed specifically against pro-life individuals.[36]"

Posted
6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

So...your blatant lies not withstanding...

I'd charge them with refusal to cooperate with a federal agency...for starters.

Too bad that's NOT ILLEGAL, IGNORAMUS. 

Maybe you should search for a LEGAL cite before making a fool of yourself. LMAO

Posted
21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Wrong on both accounts.

The word "fight" is used by Dumbocrats too Dweebls.

^IRRELEVANT, to this issue.

Trump was talking to a mob wearing body armor that he SUMMONED to "stop the steal." Duh

21 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

The pardons do not prove anything more than the reason given by the POTUS himself.

But well done. Ya got a 2-fer.

They prove his MOB did what HE WANTED. You're fool if you believe Trump rewards people who displease him.

Posted (edited)

Section 1373 of the federal civil statute unlawfully interferes with state and local authority. It is illegal to inhibit a federal agency.

 

14 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^IRRELEVANT, to this issue.

Trump was talking to a mob wearing body armor that he SUMMONED to "stop the steal." Duh

They prove his MOB did what HE WANTED. You're fool if you believe Trump rewards people who displease him.

Body armor like that worn by your peaceful protestors?

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Section 1373 of the federal civil statute unlawfully interferes with state and local authority. It is illegal to inhibit a federal agency.

LMAO. "inhibit" means interfering, NOT lack of cooperation, dummy.

22 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Body armor like that worn by your peaceful protestors?

Nope. LA county protestors DID NOT assemble to invade buildings nor "stop the steal," like the MAGA GOONS  Duh

Nor did ANY government official tell them to, like Trump did....

You probably don't know that there was a REASON the march to the Capitol WAS NOT APPLIED FOR NOR ON the PERMIT for Jan 6th.

Posted
11 minutes ago, robosmith said:

LMAO. "inhibit" means interfering, NOT lack of cooperation, dummy.

Nope. LA county protestors DID NOT assemble to invade buildings nor "stop the steal," like the MAGA GOONS  Duh

Nor did ANY government official tell them to, like Trump did....

You probably don't know that there was a REASON the march to the Capitol WAS NOT APPLIED FOR NOR ON the PERMIT for Jan 6th.

Inhibit...interfere...not cooperating...all the same. That's 1.

Trump did not tell them to riot. That's 2.

Care to go for the strikeout?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
 
 
fought ˈfȯt 
; fighting

 

 

intransitive verb

1

a: to contend in battle or physical combat especially to strive to overcome a person by blows or weapons. The soldiers fought bravely.

 
b: to engage in boxing. He will fight for the heavyweight title next month.
 
 
2: to put forth a determined effort. They were fighting to stay awake.
 
transitive verb
1a(1): to contend against in or as if in battle or physical combat fought the invaders of his homeland was fighting a forest fire
 
(2): to box against in the ring fought several strong contenders
 
b(1): to attempt to prevent the success or effectiveness of the company fought the takeover attempt
 
(2): to oppose the passage or development of
fight a bill in Congress
 
 
2a: wage, carry on fight a battle
 
b: to take part in (a boxing match or similar contest)
 
3: to struggle to endure or surmount fight a cold is fighting cancer
 
 
4a: to gain by struggle fights his way through
 
b: to resolve by struggle fought out their differences in court
 
 
5
a
: to manage (a ship) in a battle or storm
b
: to cause to struggle or contend
c
: to manage in an unnecessarily rough or awkward manner
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Look at how many definitions of fight don't mean physical confrontation. So why does @robosmith refuse to use any of the other proper definitions? Because, if he used the definition that fits the context of the speech, he'd have nothing. 
Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
56 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:
 
 
fought ˈfȯt 
; fighting

 

 

intransitive verb

1

a: to contend in battle or physical combat especially to strive to overcome a person by blows or weapons. The soldiers fought bravely.

 
b: to engage in boxing. He will fight for the heavyweight title next month.
 
 
2: to put forth a determined effort. They were fighting to stay awake.
 
transitive verb
1a(1): to contend against in or as if in battle or physical combat fought the invaders of his homeland was fighting a forest fire
 
(2): to box against in the ring fought several strong contenders
 
b(1): to attempt to prevent the success or effectiveness of the company fought the takeover attempt
 
(2): to oppose the passage or development of
fight a bill in Congress
 
 
2a: wage, carry on fight a battle
 
b: to take part in (a boxing match or similar contest)
 
3: to struggle to endure or surmount fight a cold is fighting cancer
 
 
4a: to gain by struggle fights his way through
 
b: to resolve by struggle fought out their differences in court
 
 
5
a
: to manage (a ship) in a battle or storm
b
: to cause to struggle or contend
c
: to manage in an unnecessarily rough or awkward manner
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Look at how many definitions of fight don't mean physical confrontation. So why does @robosmith refuse to use any of the other proper definitions? Because, if he used the definition that fits the context of the speech, he'd have nothing. 

Because he's a zucchini lovin' little suck?

Just a guess...

  • Haha 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,022
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Smith29
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...