Chrissy1979 Posted Thursday at 09:29 PM Report Posted Thursday at 09:29 PM 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: If there wasn't a rule you could prove it. I did. I asked you to show me where you heard about this rule and you started posting pages of rambling nonsense to avoid facing the embarrassment from being exposed as a bad liar. 😂 Quote
CdnFox Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM Author Report Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM 25 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: I did. No, must be another one of your fever dreams. If you back off on smoking all that crack you'd probably spend less time looking silly well... a LITTLE less time. Maybe, Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Chrissy1979 Posted Thursday at 10:24 PM Report Posted Thursday at 10:24 PM Wouldn’t it be sweet if you could actually cite the pretend rule you referred to rather than being reduced to desperately trying to save face by asking me to instead cite a rule that doesn’t exist? Next time, don’t lie and you won’t have to feel so embarrassed. 😂 Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 12:14 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 12:14 AM 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: Wouldn’t it be sweet if you could actually cite the pretend rule you referred to rather than being reduced to desperately trying to save face by asking me to instead cite a rule that doesn’t exist? Next time, don’t lie and you won’t have to feel so embarrassed. 😂 Yawn! Chrissy drank herself retarded again and is posting on the internet You got caught making shit up and as usual you're trying to blame people for your own failings. Sad to say, even if you DO learn not to lie next time, you'll still probably look pretty stupid Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Chrissy1979 Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:12 AM 53 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Yawn! Chrissy drank herself retarded again and is posting on the internet You got caught making shit up and as usual you're trying to blame people for your own failings. Sad to say, even if you DO learn not to lie next time, you'll still probably look pretty stupid Imagine the vindication you would have felt if you could only prove you aren’t a liar by citing how you know what you claim to know. It would be as sweet as the vindication Polievre could have felt if he just got the security clearance in the last week of the campaign, just to prove he could to wary potential voters. Sadly, neither of you were capable of doing do. 😂 Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 01:44 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 01:44 AM 30 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Imagine the vindication you would have felt if you could only prove you aren’t a liar by citing how you know what you claim to know. It would be as sweet as the vindication Polievre could have felt if he just got the security clearance in the last week of the campaign, just to prove he could to wary potential voters. Sadly, neither of you were capable of doing do. 😂 I already know I'm right so I feel vindicated already. Everybody else is quite aware of it as well which is why nobody's jumping to your defense. The only person here who would find it remotely interesting would be you, and you would just freak out and deny it ever happened And let's get real, you're just here for the comic relief for the rest of us. It's not like you're a real person or anything. So it's a lot more fun to point and laugh at your ignorance. It certainly not worth educating you Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Chrissy1979 Posted yesterday at 03:04 PM Report Posted yesterday at 03:04 PM 13 hours ago, CdnFox said: I already know I'm right so I feel vindicated already. Everybody else is quite aware of it as well which is why nobody's jumping to your defense. The only person here who would find it remotely interesting would be you, and you would just freak out and deny it ever happened And let's get real, you're just here for the comic relief for the rest of us. It's not like you're a real person or anything. So it's a lot more fun to point and laugh at your ignorance. It certainly not worth educating you Polievre might have won if he was willing to get security clearance. Now you're reduced to making up excuses for him out of thin air. Polievre 2029! 😂 Quote
CdnFox Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM Author Report Posted yesterday at 03:57 PM 50 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Polievre might have won if he was willing to get security clearance. Now you're reduced to making up excuses for him out of thin air. Polievre 2029! 😂 Nobody who's saying cared about that. Everybody understands the issue. If anything that blew up in Carney's face in the worst way during the debates and conservative support went up after the debates. Only completely delusional die hard lefty types believe it's an issue. Even Thomas Mulcair, former leader of the NDP and opposition, said it was a 'made up thing' by trudeau to push back against PP Security clearance debate was a ‘made up thing’ by Trudeau to push back against Poilievre: Mulcair – CTVNews No sane rational individual thinks twice about it. Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.