Jump to content

LIBERAL SOFT ON CRIME STRIKES AGAIN: Man Attacks And Almost Kills Woman After Being Released Earlier In The Day For Another Violence Assault


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

If there wasn't a rule you could prove it.

 

I did. I asked you to show me where you heard about this rule and you started posting pages of rambling nonsense to avoid facing the embarrassment from being exposed as a bad liar. 😂

Posted
25 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

I did.

No, must be another one of your fever dreams. If you back off on smoking all that crack you'd probably spend less time looking silly :) 

well...  a LITTLE less time. Maybe, 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted

Wouldn’t it be sweet if you could actually cite the pretend rule you referred to rather than being reduced to desperately trying to save face by asking me to instead cite a rule that doesn’t exist?
Next time, don’t lie and you won’t have to feel so embarrassed. 😂 

Posted
1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Wouldn’t it be sweet if you could actually cite the pretend rule you referred to rather than being reduced to desperately trying to save face by asking me to instead cite a rule that doesn’t exist?
Next time, don’t lie and you won’t have to feel so embarrassed. 😂 

Yawn! Chrissy drank herself retarded again and is posting on the internet

You got caught making shit up and as usual  you're trying to blame people for your own failings.  

Sad to say, even if you DO learn not to lie next time, you'll still probably look pretty stupid :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
53 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Yawn! Chrissy drank herself retarded again and is posting on the internet

You got caught making shit up and as usual  you're trying to blame people for your own failings.  

Sad to say, even if you DO learn not to lie next time, you'll still probably look pretty stupid :) 

Imagine the vindication you would have felt if you could only prove you aren’t a liar by citing how you know what you claim to know. It would be as sweet as the vindication Polievre could have felt if he just got the security clearance in the last week of the campaign, just to prove he could to wary potential voters.

Sadly, neither of you were capable of doing do. 😂 

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Imagine the vindication you would have felt if you could only prove you aren’t a liar by citing how you know what you claim to know. It would be as sweet as the vindication Polievre could have felt if he just got the security clearance in the last week of the campaign, just to prove he could to wary potential voters.

Sadly, neither of you were capable of doing do. 😂 

 

I already know I'm right so I feel vindicated already. Everybody else is quite aware of it as well which is why nobody's jumping to your defense. The only person here who would find it remotely interesting would be you, and you would just freak out and deny it ever happened

And let's get real, you're just here for the comic relief for the rest of us. It's not like you're a real person or anything. So it's a lot more fun to point and laugh at your ignorance. It certainly not worth educating you :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
13 hours ago, CdnFox said:

I already know I'm right so I feel vindicated already. Everybody else is quite aware of it as well which is why nobody's jumping to your defense. The only person here who would find it remotely interesting would be you, and you would just freak out and deny it ever happened

And let's get real, you're just here for the comic relief for the rest of us. It's not like you're a real person or anything. So it's a lot more fun to point and laugh at your ignorance. It certainly not worth educating you :) 

Polievre might have won if he was willing to get security clearance. Now you're reduced to making up excuses for him out of thin air. Polievre 2029! 😂 

Posted
50 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said:

Polievre might have won if he was willing to get security clearance. Now you're reduced to making up excuses for him out of thin air. Polievre 2029! 😂 

Nobody who's saying cared about that. Everybody understands the issue. If anything that blew up in Carney's face in the worst way during the debates and conservative support went up after the debates.

Only completely delusional die hard lefty types believe it's an issue. Even Thomas Mulcair, former leader of the NDP and opposition, said it was a 'made up thing' by trudeau to push back against PP 

Security clearance debate was a ‘made up thing’ by Trudeau to push back against Poilievre: Mulcair – CTVNews

No sane rational individual thinks twice about it. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...