Jump to content

De Vinci Code


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved. But even if Jesus was married (which is still a possibility in my mind), then I don't think it makes any difference. It doesn't change the doctrine. It doesn't change his teachings. The only thing that it would change is that priests should be allowed to marry--As far as I understand they are not allowed to within the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus never advocated a life of celibacy--he taught that men should not have lustful thoughts, but never said they must remain celibate. In fact, his disciples even taught that men [clergy, I assume] should marry if it would be easier for them to control their passions.

So, to me it is neither good nor bad. But we don't know for sure whether or not it is true.

A system that robs Peter to pay Paul will always have Paul's support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always have found it odd to think that someone like Jesus, who by all accounts was a normal member of jewish society until his later years would have not married.

"To hear many religious people talk, one would think God created the torso, head, legs and arms but the devil slapped on the genitals.” -Don Schrader

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always have found it odd to think that someone like Jesus, who by all accounts was a normal member of jewish society until his later years would have not married.

Point is that he wans't normal. And, was not a normal member of society but rather one who had a 'new' approach to many things that had been ingrained into society and - mankind. For example, travelling around into tribal areas in an age where only organized armies and guarded merchants would go is a rather suicical method of being a hippie so, he must have had something to offer and placate the suspicious people he met, not to mention the clergy whom he would have posed a threat to.

The visions of right and wrong were new, as were how and who to worship. Certainly he would have made many enemies prior to becomming famous yet, came out unscathed until his end. I find it likely he would have had many mistresses but to have a wife, that's baggage and he travelled light, like an idea twinking at the back of your head. You know it's right, but, just so hard to put into words or actions.

We're Paratroopers Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded - CPT Richard Winters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green
the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved

Right - and all those who make a fuss about it only add to the book's popularity and Brown's bank account.

Read it for what it is worth - a passably decent story but with characters as flat as pancakes. A better title would have been "Inspector Clouseau meets Indiana Jones" :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved

Right - and all those who make a fuss about it only add to the book's popularity and Brown's bank account.

Read it for what it is worth - a passably decent story but with characters as flat as pancakes. A better title would have been "Inspector Clouseau meets Indiana Jones" :)

Mr. Brown cashes in on the popular non fiction theories that are going around today, read Mr. Harper's the"The Pagan Christ".

Its just fiction, a few floating theories and he made a story out of it, can't people get that through their heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved

Right - and all those who make a fuss about it only add to the book's popularity and Brown's bank account.

Read it for what it is worth - a passably decent story but with characters as flat as pancakes. A better title would have been "Inspector Clouseau meets Indiana Jones" :)

LOL, he must be laughing all the way to the bank these days. I found it a good read, but never once took it to be anything but fiction. I wonder if he really anticipated all the fuss.

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved. But even if Jesus was married (which is still a possibility in my mind), then I don't think it makes any difference. It doesn't change the doctrine. It doesn't change his teachings. The only thing that it would change is that priests should be allowed to marry--As far as I understand they are not allowed to within the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus never advocated a life of celibacy--he taught that men should not have lustful thoughts, but never said they must remain celibate. In fact, his disciples even taught that men [clergy, I assume] should marry if it would be easier for them to control their passions.

So, to me it is neither good nor bad. But we don't know for sure whether or not it is true.

The da vinci code the book itself is fictional, but facts in their could possibly be true, such as the knights of templar, Priory of Sion and the Mary the Holy Grail itself. It has neither been proven or disproven, just some codes and hints off of da vinci's art work. The reason it is bad for Jesus to be married is because their is not supposed to be a human bloodline of Jesus Christ because Jesus was not of earth or human and humans sin which would mean his off sping would sin. Plus it also says in the bible Jesus does not sin and had no mention a marrage of any kind so it would have been a sin for Jesus to lie and cover up the marrage and if it did not say in the bible he was married than wouldnt that settle it?

That is if you believe what the bible has to say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved. But even if Jesus was married (which is still a possibility in my mind), then I don't think it makes any difference. It doesn't change the doctrine. It doesn't change his teachings. The only thing that it would change is that priests should be allowed to marry--As far as I understand they are not allowed to within the Roman Catholic Church. Jesus never advocated a life of celibacy--he taught that men should not have lustful thoughts, but never said they must remain celibate. In fact, his disciples even taught that men [clergy, I assume] should marry if it would be easier for them to control their passions.

So, to me it is neither good nor bad. But we don't know for sure whether or not it is true.

The da vinci code the book itself is fictional, but facts in their could possibly be true, such as the knights of templar, Priory of Sion and the Mary the Holy Grail itself. It has neither been proven or disproven, just some codes and hints off of da vinci's art work. The reason it is bad for Jesus to be married is because their is not supposed to be a human bloodline of Jesus Christ because Jesus was not of earth or human and humans sin which would mean his off sping would sin. Plus it also says in the bible Jesus does not sin and had no mention a marrage of any kind so it would have been a sin for Jesus to lie and cover up the marrage and if it did not say in the bible he was married than wouldnt that settle it?

That is if you believe what the bible has to say.

Your points are well taken but it still not explain why there is so much fuss about the book. It does not purport to be a work of theology; it's a novel. A work of fiction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The da vinci code the book itself is fictional, but facts in their could possibly be true, such as the knights of templar, Priory of Sion and the Mary the Holy Grail itself. It has neither been proven or disproven, just some codes and hints off of da vinci's art work. The reason it is bad for Jesus to be married is because their is not supposed to be a human bloodline of Jesus Christ because Jesus was not of earth or human and humans sin which would mean his off sping would sin. Plus it also says in the bible Jesus does not sin and had no mention a marrage of any kind so it would have been a sin for Jesus to lie and cover up the marrage and if it did not say in the bible he was married than wouldnt that settle it?

That is if you believe what the bible has to say.

Your points are well taken but it still not explain why there is so much fuss about the book. It does not purport to be a work of theology; it's a novel. A work of fiction.

Your right, the book itslef is fiction, such as the murder of Sophies grand father and the deaths of the four members of the keepers of the Grail documents by Opes Dei. But the not saying these things are true but the Priory of Sion could have possibly exist and their have been documents found that the Holy Grail could possibly be married to Jesus, but that is all a theory as these documents could have been made by a prankster in the modern day to throw of conspiricy theorists like us.

I have read up all about the Priory on wikopedia it has some interesting stuff on it like the supposed leader of the cult in the 1950's.

I do have a question fo ryou though, they mention about documents hidden in the temple of Solemon were is that fact or fiction written by Brown?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green
I do have a question fo ryou though, they mention about documents hidden in the temple of Solemon were is that fact or fiction written by Brown?

I have no idea and I couldn't care less. I read the book as entertainment. As Somerset Maugham once said, "Only a fool reads a novel for edification". If I wanted to learn about the Temple of Solomon I would go to a legitimate historical source, not a second-rate novel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green
To me, Da Vinci's Code on Jesus/Magdalene is just like The Omen's take on the anti-Christ. This movie is nothing more than another thriller meant for entertainment.

It will have to be if it intends to have broad appeal. If you have watched the ads you see a lot more Indiana Jones than St Augustine. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and all those who make a fuss about it only add to the book's popularity and Brown's bank account.

The Vatican's been quiet about it.. ...not wanting to add to the publicity, I guess.

However, one alleged priest so far called for a boycott. Now why would he do that...didn't he see from previous experience(s) that this only rouses curiousity even more?

Could this lone alleged priest be in the payroll of the hollywood blitzing and hyping machine?

I'll bet that all this "fussing" is pure part of the grand scheme to sell the movie. All purposefully created and spinned to create a "controversy" that actually doesn't exist.

I bet majority of Christians didn't even give a hoot to disect it....until now, when it had become a good conversational piece. Of course, the copyright lawsuit greased the wheels even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green

Taling of money making schemes. I heard a radio report that the RC Church in France, short on euros, was renting churches out to the Anglicans. When I was a kid that was as likely to happen as the pope dressing in drag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vatican's been quiet about it.. ...not wanting to add to the publicity, I guess.

However, one alleged priest so far called for a boycott. Now why would he do that...didn't he see from previous experience(s) that this only rouses curiousity even more?

Could this lone alleged priest be in the payroll of the hollywood blitzing and hyping machine?

I'll bet that all this "fussing" is pure part of the grand scheme to sell the movie. All purposefully created and spinned to create a "controversy" that actually doesn't exist.

I bet majority of Christians didn't even give a hoot to disect it....until now, when it had become a good conversational piece. Of course, the copyright lawsuit greased the wheels even more.

The Vatican's hardly been "quiet" about it. They set up a website specifically to counter the claims made by this work of fiction, and now one of their Cardinals is saying they should sue the producers of the movie. As Shakespeare (and Mary Tyler Moore) said: "Methinks thou dost protest too much."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green

The Vatican's been quiet about it.. ...not wanting to add to the publicity, I guess.

However, one alleged priest so far called for a boycott. Now why would he do that...didn't he see from previous experience(s) that this only rouses curiousity even more?

Could this lone alleged priest be in the payroll of the hollywood blitzing and hyping machine?

I'll bet that all this "fussing" is pure part of the grand scheme to sell the movie. All purposefully created and spinned to create a "controversy" that actually doesn't exist.

I bet majority of Christians didn't even give a hoot to disect it....until now, when it had become a good conversational piece. Of course, the copyright lawsuit greased the wheels even more.

The Vatican's hardly been "quiet" about it. They set up a website specifically to counter the claims made by this work of fiction, and now one of their Cardinals is saying they should sue the producers of the movie. As Shakespeare (and Mary Tyler Moore) said: "Methinks thou dost protest too much."

Sue a work of fiction? :lol:

On what grounds? That Jesus never actually got married? Does that mean whenever anything of an historical nature is published those with contrary views can sue?

When I was a kid the Roman Catholic Church was an organization which - even if you didn't agree with it - at least was held in respect. Now it is just a parody of itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Vatican's been quiet about it.. ...not wanting to add to the publicity, I guess.

However, one alleged priest so far called for a boycott. Now why would he do that...didn't he see from previous experience(s) that this only rouses curiousity even more?

Could this lone alleged priest be in the payroll of the hollywood blitzing and hyping machine?

I'll bet that all this "fussing" is pure part of the grand scheme to sell the movie. All purposefully created and spinned to create a "controversy" that actually doesn't exist.

I bet majority of Christians didn't even give a hoot to disect it....until now, when it had become a good conversational piece. Of course, the copyright lawsuit greased the wheels even more.

The Vatican's hardly been "quiet" about it. They set up a website specifically to counter the claims made by this work of fiction, and now one of their Cardinals is saying they should sue the producers of the movie. As Shakespeare (and Mary Tyler Moore) said: "Methinks thou dost protest too much."

I was relying on a news report from CTV newsnet stating that the Vatican isn't saying anything. Guess they're wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was a kid that was as likely to happen as the pope dressing in drag.

The Pope presides over a nation that is almost 100% men, has bodyguards who dress in pantaloons (i.e., the Renaissance version of capri pants), he dresses in a frock and insists that no one wears the same hat he wears, makes people kneel and kiss his ring, has more jewelry and art at his disposal than all the royals in the world combined, and lives in a mansion that would make Versace jealous. That already sounds pretty queeny to me. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was a kid that was as likely to happen as the pope dressing in drag.

The Pope presides over a nation that is almost 100% men, has bodyguards who dress in pantaloons (i.e., the Renaissance version of capri pants), he dresses in a frock and insists that no one wears the same hat he wears, makes people kneel and kiss his ring, has more jewelry and art at his disposal than all the royals in the world combined, and lives in a mansion that would make Versace jealous. That already sounds pretty queeny to me. :lol:

Sounds like some one is jelous :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved.

How does one "disprove fiction"? Sounds like an oxymoron.

*sigh* Let me rephrase that then.

"The DaVinci code has been disproved. It is a work of fiction."

(How's that?)

A system that robs Peter to pay Paul will always have Paul's support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Warwick Green

the DaVinci code is fiction. It has been disproved.

How does one "disprove fiction"? Sounds like an oxymoron.

*sigh* Let me rephrase that then.

"The DaVinci code has been disproved. It is a work of fiction."

(How's that?)

Everybody has known that it's a work of fiction since the day it was first published. What's surprises me is the hysteria coming from people who don't seem to know that and who keep acting as if it was intended to be a legitimate piece of religious history. To attempt to "disprove" fiction seems to be purposeless since it was never intended to be be fact in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody has known that it's a work of fiction since the day it was first published. What's surprises me is the hysteria coming from people who don't seem to know that and who keep acting as if it was intended to be a legitimate piece of religious history. To attempt to "disprove" fiction seems to be purposeless since it was never intended to be be fact in the first place.

Point taken. I was speaking from my own experience (and in reference to the original poster), where I have known people who have taken the DaVinci code to be this big new discovery. Of course, it is not. That's all I was saying. For those of you who already knew the book was fiction, congratulations. Some people think that Dan Brown is claiming that these things are true.

A system that robs Peter to pay Paul will always have Paul's support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,815
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    UKTelcoLTD
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • phoenyx75 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Chrissy1979 went up a rank
      Experienced
    • Randyjohnson71 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Fluffypants earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Mathieub earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...