Aristides Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 (edited) 1 hour ago, Deluge said: You've been watching too much CNN and MSNBC. Those a$$holes are only in it for the DEI. Are you as well? You really are that stupid. Just for the record, I don't watch any US cable news and I don't follow it online. Edited February 22 by Aristides 1 Quote
Deluge Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 23 minutes ago, Aristides said: You really are that stupid. Just for the record, I don't watch any US cable news and I don't follow it online. Answer the question, numbnuts. lol Are you in it for the DEI? Quote
Aristides Posted February 22 Report Posted February 22 4 minutes ago, Deluge said: Answer the question, numbnuts. lol Are you in it for the DEI? What kind of stupid question is that? It's about a department that is there to protect you from the likes of Musk. No wonder he is getting rid of it. He is also decimating the department that looks after vehicle safety. By the time he is finished you will have no protection at all from predatory billionaires. Cable news has sure rotted your brain. Maybe you should take a break from it as well. 1 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 22 hours ago, Radiorum said: Again, for you, it's not about how ordinary people will be affected, but "getting the other side.' And? Frankly it's not true when you say that but let's say it was for a moment. Your side made this confrontational. Your side spent half a year calling everyone who didn't see things your way Nazis and deplorables. You made this all about hurting the other side rather than talking about the people in fact kamala's entire campaign ignored the people and focused on getting the other side. This is just another step in this education we've been talking to you about whereby you reap what you sow. All your side talks about is how everyone else other than your side whether they be trump supporters or even just liberal leaning people who happen to not like the current woke democrats are evil bad people and you're going to get them. If they've decided to get you instead out of a sense of self-defense and self-preservation, then once again that's your doing. Maybe you better think about that during the next 4 years. In the meantime no one's listening to your whining 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Deluge Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 (edited) 1 hour ago, Aristides said: What kind of stupid question is that? It's about a department that is there to protect you from the likes of Musk. No wonder he is getting rid of it. He is also decimating the department that looks after vehicle safety. By the time he is finished you will have no protection at all from predatory billionaires. Cable news has sure rotted your brain. Maybe you should take a break from it as well. No, that is not right, you ldiot. Musk is exposing fraud, waste and abuse, and that's it. The democrats have one purpose, and one purpose ONLY, and that is to f*ck American citizens and that's it. Now, calm down, take your TDS pills, and answer the f*cking question: are you in it just for the DEI? Edited February 23 by Deluge 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 1 hour ago, Aristides said: What kind of stupid question is that? It's about a department that is there to protect you from the likes of Musk. No wonder he is getting rid of it. Musk provides thousands of jobs, has made many people millionaires, and has increased the flow of wealth while at the same time promoting environmentally friendly products and spreading access to the internet along with education and access to information that goes with it. What exactly did you think people needed protection from? 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Deluge Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 (edited) 5 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Musk provides thousands of jobs, has made many people millionaires, and has increased the flow of wealth while at the same time promoting environmentally friendly products and spreading access to the internet along with education and access to information that goes with it. What exactly did you think people needed protection from? And now he's offering his extensive skills and experience to streamline our government. There is nothing but upside, and all these retards can do is fight it every step of the way. It's funny as hell when you think about it. Edited February 23 by Deluge 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 5 hours ago, Deluge said: And now he's offering his extensive skills and experience to streamline our government. There is nothing but upside, and all these retards can do is fight it every step of the way. It's funny as hell when you think about it. Well, the chance to fight it was during the election. And they had tons of chance, like I said trump announced that this was his specific plan in detail naming musk directly back in September. Now the democrats had a choice. They could come out with a strong fiscal policy and lay it out in front of the voters and explain why they felt that that was dangerous and offer an alternate solution on how to achieve similar results in a better fashion or make the case that it was unnecessary to do so, and had a discussion and a debate about why they felt their plan was better and why Americans would be stronger under a democrat-led fiscal vision. Instead they giggled, and when they stopped giggling they switched to calling all Republicans Hitler and Nazis and that was basically the sum total of their entire campaign platform. Oh, and screw god. That was it. Sorry, but elections matter. They had their voice. They had their chance. They had scads of money far more than trump. They had every opportunity to put forward an alternate vision and chose not to specifically. Maybe someone could make a solid argument that there are severe problems with this. Maybe someone could point out a downside that's just not worth it. I've mentioned one or two concerns with it myself. But the time to make that argument was during the election and they absolutely failed to do so. Now they have to live with the result and it's undemocratic and ignorant of them to pretend otherwise. It's like ordering the steak and screaming at the waiter that they didn't bring you the lobster Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
robosmith Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/20/2025 at 11:39 AM, Nationalist said: Giggle... It's not just Libbie shopping sprees DOGE is exposing. Many Republicans voted for this garbage as well and a few might get bloody noses from it. But the tax payer will have a handle on what the government has been spending their money on. That you oppose that puts you in opposition to the tax payers. The average taxpayer has NO IDEA of the value of government functions, including YOU, despite your DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR. ALL you KNOW about is your limited understanding of YOUR SELF INTEREST and you're not willing to pay for ANYTHING ELSE. Quote
robosmith Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/21/2025 at 6:38 PM, Nationalist said: No. Have you considered testosterone pills? Have you considered psychiatric treatment for your INSANITY? On 2/21/2025 at 6:56 PM, Nationalist said: Hopefully instill some ability for rational thought instead of emotional thought. Like you know the difference.... LMAO 1 Quote
robosmith Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 On 2/21/2025 at 7:39 PM, Nationalist said: Hey its worth a try... Tell me...how are all those lawsuits to stop DOGE coming along? They are legally stopped in their tracks on many fronts, but it doesn't matter to criminals like you that in many cases they're breaking the law by continuing their incompetent rampaging. But who could expect a Canadian A-HOLE like you to have any respect for US LAW? 1 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 1 hour ago, robosmith said: They are legally stopped in their tracks on many fronts, but it doesn't matter to criminals like you that in many cases they're breaking the law by continuing their incompetent rampaging. But who could expect a Canadian A-HOLE like you to have any respect for US LAW? Would you say you're a bit of a competition rifle Robo? Because you're certainly easily triggered 1 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Nationalist Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 2 hours ago, robosmith said: The average taxpayer has NO IDEA of the value of government functions, including YOU, despite your DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR. ALL you KNOW about is your limited understanding of YOUR SELF INTEREST and you're not willing to pay for ANYTHING ELSE. Typical Libbie. 'The taxpayer has no idea what their government is doing and not qualified to know.' Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 7 hours ago, robosmith said: The average taxpayer has NO IDEA of the value of government functions, including YOU, despite your DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR. ALL you KNOW about is your limited understanding of YOUR SELF INTEREST and you're not willing to pay for ANYTHING ELSE. robomarx wants the US financing all DEI initiatives. It's yet another reason his piece of shit choice for President lost in November. Quote
Deluge Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: Well, the chance to fight it was during the election. And they had tons of chance, like I said trump announced that this was his specific plan in detail naming musk directly back in September. Now the democrats had a choice. They could come out with a strong fiscal policy and lay it out in front of the voters and explain why they felt that that was dangerous and offer an alternate solution on how to achieve similar results in a better fashion or make the case that it was unnecessary to do so, and had a discussion and a debate about why they felt their plan was better and why Americans would be stronger under a democrat-led fiscal vision. Instead they giggled, and when they stopped giggling they switched to calling all Republicans Hitler and Nazis and that was basically the sum total of their entire campaign platform. Oh, and screw god. That was it. Sorry, but elections matter. They had their voice. They had their chance. They had scads of money far more than trump. They had every opportunity to put forward an alternate vision and chose not to specifically. Maybe someone could make a solid argument that there are severe problems with this. Maybe someone could point out a downside that's just not worth it. I've mentioned one or two concerns with it myself. But the time to make that argument was during the election and they absolutely failed to do so. Now they have to live with the result and it's undemocratic and ignorant of them to pretend otherwise. It's like ordering the steak and screaming at the waiter that they didn't bring you the lobster You'd think they'd pull their heads out of their asses after the election and try to come together as a nation, but that's just not the case. What's baffling is that most Harris voters are not the scumbag bureaucrats and elected officlals directly benefitting from all that pork. What's their motivation? Are they really just brainwashed? What do you think, woke dog, herpes and the rest of you cultists? Are you brainwashed? Have you been indoctrinated? Quote
CdnFox Posted February 23 Report Posted February 23 4 hours ago, Deluge said: You'd think they'd pull their heads out of their asses after the election and try to come together as a nation, but that's just not the case. That's right, and historically it is the case. That is how it is supposed to work. During elections we all pick sides that we feel best represents the interests of the country, we have it out and consider the positions of all of the parties involved and consider the quality of the people representing those parties, the parties present their platforms and voters make it final decision as to what they feel is best. Once that is over then everybody is supposed to look at each other and say a decision has been made, thank god we live in a democracy, we have to respect the results and move forward united. And that is traditionally what has happened. (ok not in ireland but everywhere else). But these days It feels like the democrat voters are less like voters and more like fans for a British rugby league. If their team loses they want to burn the stadium down and get into fist fights with anyone who is on the other side. Democracy ends badly unless all of the parties involved are teaching their people that it's critical to respect the results. Polling show that every election the losing side in the US has left and less faith that the elections are free and fair. That cannot end well Quote What's baffling is that most Harris voters are not the scumbag bureaucrats and elected officlals directly benefitting from all that pork. What's their motivation? Are they really just brainwashed? What do you think, woke dog, herpes and the rest of you cultists? Are you brainwashed? Have you been indoctrinated? Actually there was some fascinating research done with regards to polling and targeting specific groups in regards to this. What they found out was that a significant portion of the democrat vote comes from what most people would consider Elites, High income earners or academics. It turns out these people are isolated from the average democrat and are 100% completely wrong about what they believe average democrats care about and live in their own little ideological bubble where they convince themselves that some of the topics the democrats pursue are the most important topics to average people when they are absolutely not. So what we are largely seeing Is that those who are still staunch democrats are often (not always but with some regularity) Those who are able to exist within an echo chamber bubble that is disassociated with the real needs and concerns of people by and large Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Radiorum Posted February 24 Author Report Posted February 24 On 2/22/2025 at 7:33 PM, CdnFox said: Frankly it's not true when you say that but let's say it was for a moment. Your side made this confrontational. Your side spent half a year calling everyone who didn't see things your way Nazis and deplorables. You made this all about hurting the other side rather than talking about the people in fact kamala's entire campaign ignored the people and focused on getting the other side. This is just another step in this education we've been talking to you about whereby you reap what you sow. All your side talks about is how everyone else other than your side whether they be trump supporters or even just liberal leaning people who happen to not like the current woke democrats are evil bad people and you're going to get them. If they've decided to get you instead out of a sense of self-defense and self-preservation, then once again that's your doing. This seems an explanation for why and how Trump was able to exploit those who felt left behind. It does not excuse him, it damns him. He operates best with enemies, and he bequeathed that to his base. On 2/22/2025 at 7:34 PM, Deluge said: Musk is exposing fraud, waste and abuse, and that's it. What fraud, waste and abuse necessitated shutting done the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 3 hours ago, Radiorum said: This seems an explanation for why and how Trump was able to exploit those who felt left behind. It does not excuse him, it damns him. He operates best with enemies, and he bequeathed that to his base. No problem with this is you conflate appealing with exploitation. If a woman is beaten by her mate day in and day out and finally gets away from them and another person says why don't you come be with me, I won't hurt you like that and I just want to be with you, then that's not exploitation. That's just a decent person offering to be decent to somebody and to them it seems like a great idea because they haven't had decency up to that point. You're literally talking about abusing people horribly and disenfranchising them and then cleaning that someone who says they won't do that is exploitive. That's just nuts. Quote What fraud, waste and abuse necessitated shutting done the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Don't you think you should have asked that before condemning it? Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Deluge Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 5 hours ago, Radiorum said: This seems an explanation for why and how Trump was able to exploit those who felt left behind. It does not excuse him, it damns him. He operates best with enemies, and he bequeathed that to his base. What fraud, waste and abuse necessitated shutting done the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? It's democrat artillery against banks. From Ted Cruz: "The CFPB is an unelected, unaccountable bureaucratic agency that has imposed burdensome and harmful regulations on American businesses, banks, and credit unions," Cruz said in a statement. "It is an unchecked Obama-era executive arm, and the Federal Reserve should not be transferring funds to it. Enacting this legislation would save American taxpayers billions of dollars, and I call on the Senate to expeditiously take it up and pass it." Of course that shit's got to go. Quote
Radiorum Posted February 25 Author Report Posted February 25 13 hours ago, CdnFox said: problem with this is you conflate appealing with exploitation. If a woman is beaten by her mate day in and day out and finally gets away from them and another person says why don't you come be with me, I won't hurt you like that and I just want to be with you, then that's not exploitation. That's just a decent person offering to be decent to somebody and to them it seems like a great idea because they haven't had decency up to that point. This analogy to what Trump is doing is not only fiction, it is ridiculous fiction 11 hours ago, Deluge said: From Ted Cruz: Lol, oh well, if Ted Cruz, who has completely sold his soul to Trump, said it, it must be true! /s Quote
Deluge Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 1 minute ago, Radiorum said: Lol, oh well, if Ted Cruz, who has completely sold his soul to Trump, said it, it must be true! /s Think of it this way: Ted Cruz is more reliable than every leftoid you know, including yourself. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 On 2/22/2025 at 7:33 PM, CdnFox said: And? Frankly it's not true when you say that but let's say it was for a moment. Your side made this confrontational. Your side spent half a year calling everyone who didn't see things your way Nazis and deplorables. You made this all about hurting the other side rather than talking about the people in fact kamala's entire campaign ignored the people and focused on getting the other side. This is just another step in this education we've been talking to you about whereby you reap what you sow. All your side talks about is how everyone else other than your side whether they be trump supporters or even just liberal leaning people who happen to not like the current woke democrats are evil bad people and you're going to get them. If they've decided to get you instead out of a sense of self-defense and self-preservation, then once again that's your doing. Maybe you better think about that during the next 4 years. In the meantime no one's listening to your whining Mostly correct. Except...I am listening to their whining...and relishing every second of it. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Aristides Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 Quote And that is traditionally what has happened. (ok not in ireland but everywhere else). But these days It feels like the democrat voters are less like voters and more like fans for a British rugby league. If their team loses they want to burn the stadium down and get into fist fights with anyone who is on the other side. You mean like Jan 6, 2020. Getting rid of financial oversight only benefits certain people and it isn't the average Joe. Quote
Deluge Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 1 hour ago, Aristides said: You mean like Jan 6, 2020. Getting rid of financial oversight only benefits certain people and it isn't the average Joe. What happened on January 20, 2020? Joe Biden isn't average, he is 100% pure grade dog shit. I hope he gets thrown in the slammer before he croaks in-between hair sniffs. Quote
CdnFox Posted February 25 Report Posted February 25 (edited) 6 hours ago, Aristides said: You mean like Jan 6, 2020. Yes just like jan 6th. but instead of it being a tiny handful of out of control protesters it's the entire democrat base. Quote Getting rid of financial oversight only benefits certain people and it isn't the average Joe. Cutting spending does benefit the average Joe, so you would have to demonstrate that somehow the average Joe was benefiting enough by this financial oversight that the benefits to them greatly outweighed the costs. And I don't believe anyone has made that case at all Edited February 25 by CdnFox Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.