gatomontes99 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 Just now, impartialobserver said: randomness.. Relatively small group of contributors and why they make a thread on Day X... not sure you can pinpoint an exact reason. No. They just use AGW as a political weapon. If they truly believed their b.s. theyd have done something by now. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
impartialobserver Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: No. They just use AGW as a political weapon. If they truly believed their b.s. theyd have done something by now. One person does not correct climate change. Before you blast away.. I am not AGW alarmist. So whether you believe in this or not.. you surely can realize that one person on their own does not change this. Quote
User Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: One person does not correct climate change. Before you blast away.. I am not AGW alarmist. So whether you believe in this or not.. you surely can realize that one person on their own does not change this. No, certainly not... one person doesn't stop an asteroid from hitting the Earth... but if they really believed one was going to, they would certainly change their own lifestyle to reflect that. And if all the people on the left really believe the climate alarmism they preached, maybe Leonardo DiCaprio wouldn't by flying around on his private jet, to get picked up in his suburban, to be taken over to his yacht after his latest trip to decry how we are destroying the planet. Their actions would no longer be their individual ones, but they could work together... I mean, if they really believed it. Quote
impartialobserver Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 5 minutes ago, User said: No, certainly not... one person doesn't stop an asteroid from hitting the Earth... but if they really believed one was going to, they would certainly change their own lifestyle to reflect that. And if all the people on the left really believe the climate alarmism they preached, maybe Leonardo DiCaprio wouldn't by flying around on his private jet, to get picked up in his suburban, to be taken over to his yacht after his latest trip to decry how we are destroying the planet. Their actions would no longer be their individual ones, but they could work together... I mean, if they really believed it. The other poster is doubting that liberals on this site are random. They chose to create this thread now because Trump is in office but yet chose not to create threads like this when Biden was in office. My view is that it is fairly random. Why it comes up now and not 6 months ago when Biden was in office... not like there was not other topics to debate. Yes, they could not drive as much, fly as much, and so on. Lots of folks could change their ways. And even then... not sure that they would get what they want in the short term. In my view.. its a lot of Chicken Litte.. the sky is falling, the sky is falling. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, impartialobserver said: The other poster is doubting that liberals on this site are random. They chose to create this thread now because Trump is in office but yet chose not to create threads like this when Biden was in office. My view is that it is fairly random. Why it comes up now and not 6 months ago when Biden was in office... not like there was not other topics to debate. Yes, they could not drive as much, fly as much, and so on. Lots of folks could change their ways. And even then... not sure that they would get what they want in the short term. In my view.. its a lot of Chicken Litte.. the sky is falling, the sky is falling. Oh they did choose to post about AGW because Trump is in office. Look at them. They are scrambling. They are overwhelmed. They are going back to their old arguments, arguments they think are winners, because they are too overwhelmed to address the topics of the day. Further, those topics are losers for them. So they are going back to the sky is falling argument to distract from what Trump is doing. Was it specifically planned? Nah. Probably not. They do it as a reflex. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
impartialobserver Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 1 minute ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh they did choose to post about AGW because Trump is in office. Look at them. They are scrambling. They are overwhelmed. They are going back to their old arguments, arguments they think are winners, because they are too overwhelmed to address the topics of the day. Further, those topics are losers for them. So they are going back to the sky is falling argument to distract from what Trump is doing. Was it specifically planned? Nah. Probably not. They do it as a reflex. Was it specifically planned? Nah this is what I am talking about. Ok, so we are in agreement. I once led a nonprofit and this idea that folks work in concert and plan their actions is from my experience not realistic. Had 60 people under my watch and I would have loved for them to work perfectly in concert but no.. did not happen. Quote
robosmith Posted February 10 Author Report Posted February 10 6 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: The other poster is doubting that liberals on this site are random. They chose to create this thread now because Trump is in office but yet chose not to create threads like this when Biden was in office. My view is that it is fairly random. Why it comes up now and not 6 months ago when Biden was in office... not like there was not other topics to debate. Yes, they could not drive as much, fly as much, and so on. Lots of folks could change their ways. And even then... not sure that they would get what they want in the short term. In my view.. its a lot of Chicken Litte.. the sky is falling, the sky is falling. Every instance of record setting weather is further evidence that "the sky IS falling." And the fact that the last 10 years were the hottest 10 years in recorded history is even stronger evidence of climate change. Quote
robosmith Posted February 10 Author Report Posted February 10 7 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Oh they did choose to post about AGW because Trump is in office. Look at them. They are scrambling. They are overwhelmed. They are going back to their old arguments, arguments they think are winners, because they are too overwhelmed to address the topics of the day. Further, those topics are losers for them. So they are going back to the sky is falling argument to distract from what Trump is doing. Was it specifically planned? Nah. Probably not. They do it as a reflex. The temperature record set in January was NOT KNOWN before Trump took office. Duh And kids today are very worried about climate change because unlike you they know it's happening will AFFECT THEM DRAMATICALLY. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: The temperature record set in January was NOT KNOWN before Trump took office. Duh And kids today are very worried about climate change because unlike you they know it's happening will AFFECT THEM DRAMATICALLY. What? Who the fùck said anything about planning January to be hot? Are you intentionally being daft or is that your natural level of daftness. If you had to look up daft, it's the later. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Deluge Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 On 2/6/2025 at 5:27 PM, robosmith said: Hottest January on record shocks scientists Data adds to fears that climate change is accelerating, as La Niña phenomenon fails to cool global temperatures Drill, baby drill is Trump's ONLY "plan." 🤮 Short term "thinking" never makes good plans. 7 years, woketard. Will the world survive climate slaughter? Quote
User Posted February 10 Report Posted February 10 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Every instance of record setting weather is further evidence that "the sky IS falling." No, its not. That is like saying every time a meteor hits the Earth, that is evidence that the big one is about to destroy us all! 2 hours ago, robosmith said: And the fact that the last 10 years were the hottest 10 years in recorded history is even stronger evidence of climate change. This is the dumb dishonest game in action. Yes, climate changes. It has been changing since before humans even existed on the planet according to science. No one is arguing that there is no climate change. But you dishonestly use that term to mean OMG we are all going to die = climate change. 2 hours ago, robosmith said: And kids today are very worried about climate change because unlike you they know it's happening will AFFECT THEM DRAMATICALLY. They are worried because people like you are lying to them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.